Real World Event Discussions

I thought the Left was for FAIRNESS. Guess not.

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Sunday, November 30, 2025 19:35
VIEWED: 3822
PAGE 4 of 6

Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:29 PM

Quote:

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 12:28 AM

:)

So just remember, not necessarily a bad thing to be the straw man.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

When the children stop changing the subject title, maybe they'll be ready for a grown up discussion.
As if YOU are???

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!

I guess you think that gives you good enough cover to slip out of the thread?

Here's an idea: Why don't you salvage your reputation a bit, and actually address the countering facts and questions on the topic of the thread? Have a real conversation, in which people respond on point with thoughtful, verifiable replies. Might be worth a try.



Why not just answer the question, and stop trying to change the subject or hurl mindless, petty insults ?

Too much to ask ?

For a change, I'd appreciate it if ANYONE would reply to the original point, instead of blindly blurting out " yeah, but ...!!! ".








Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

When the children stop changing the subject title, maybe they'll be ready for a grown up discussion.
As if YOU are???

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!

I guess you think that gives you good enough cover to slip out of the thread?

Here's an idea: Why don't you salvage your reputation a bit, and actually address the countering facts and questions on the topic of the thread? Have a real conversation, in which people respond on point with thoughtful, verifiable replies. Might be worth a try.



Why not just answer the question, and stop trying to change the subject or hurl mindless, petty insults ?

Too much to ask ?

For a change, I'd appreciate it if ANYONE would reply to the original point, instead of blindly blurting out " yeah, but ...!!! ".






Hell, if by "ANYONE" you include yourself, I'd love it if you'd answer the question, too.

Quote:

Why should one immigrant be more special than another ?

If you're from Africa, India or Poland, you're treated 1 way as an immigrant. But if you're from Mexico or further south, you're treated COMPLETELY different.



That DOES include Cuba, doesn't it?

Why SHOULD one immigrant be more special than another?

You posed the question. Why won't you answer it?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
So you're saying you fully support not allowing Cubans into the country any more, correct?

I mean, if we're going by "fairness"...



Prime example of a straw man argument.




Why not just answer the question, and stop trying to change the subject or hurl mindless, petty insults ?

Too much to ask ?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:12 PM

Okay, Rappy, here's your answer: I think ALL immigrants should be treated alike.

Now, will you answer the question about Cubans?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

That DOES include Cuba, doesn't it?

Why SHOULD one immigrant be more special than another?

You posed the question. Why won't you answer it?




You're intentionally interjecting Cuba to avoid my question. Cuba is a separate issue, and has been, for 50 years. I'll not bother w/ your straw man.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Okay, Rappy, here's your answer: I think ALL immigrants should be treated alike.

Now, will you answer the question about Cubans?



Cuba's situation is complicated by the embargo. You're essentially saying you want the embargo dropped, correct ?






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:36 PM

Quote:

You're essentially saying you want the embargo dropped, correct ?
No, I want you to ANSWER THE QUESTION instead of changing the subject.

That was YOUR mantra, wasn't it? I showed you mine, now you show me yours.

Goose sauce = gander sauce.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, April 30, 2010 1:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

You're essentially saying you want the embargo dropped, correct ?
No, I want you to ANSWER THE QUESTION instead of changing the subject.

That was YOUR mantra, wasn't it? I showed you mine, now you show me yours.

Goose sauce = gander sauce.



Now you're being obstinate. You know damn well that nothing per immigration can be done w/ regards to Cuba w/ out the embargo status being changed.

I'll not play this game.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME