The Cowardly Hypocrisy Of RiverLove
POSTED BY: Riverlove
UPDATED: Friday, August 29, 2025 14:58
VIEWED: 9935
PAGE 7 of 13
Quote:Rappy does have other sock puppets...
Originally posted by rue:
But RL, just like Rappy, has decided that by ignoring posts it means they are magically erased from reality and no one else can read them.
And didn't Riverlove disappear for all that lovely time when he was gone?
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
I'll accept your statement that your earlier remark was not a snark, but the way it was worded, and your previous responses to me made that seem difficult to imagine. If it truly was meant in kindness, my apologies and thank you.
I don't hate you; you're the one who went after me, seemingly out of the blue in another thread, with all kinds of lies, slurs and distortions in a lengthy post aimed directly at me, nobody else--if memory serves, it was actually a post which begun a thread, so the thread was aimed directly at me. I replied and pointed out that you were wrong, in detail, and you never responded. You've also called me some doozy of names since then in myriad posts. That kinda tells me how YOU feel about ME, so I remember that when reading your posts. Simple as that.
My response was actually a teasing reply to Sig's post above it. It didn't have anything to do with you, except as the subject of the mocking.
However, you could prove us ALL wrong by answering Mal, Story's and my relevant questions in this thread; they're not hard to find, in fact here, I'll give them to you:
Niki: Please show me factual evidence that the rhetoric by those in authority on the left has ever, anything like, equalled that on the right.
Mal: How about the active encouragement of violent rhetoric by conservative leaders today? How many "gunhair" and "reload" statements were made against Bush by liberal politicians?
Story: Point out violent ACTIONS on the left as extreme as those coming from the right. If libruls are such evil wicked hypocrites, you should have something to show it, right?
In all fairness we should point out that you did cite evidence of a Repub headquarters being vandalized--although given, as I mentioned, that there were effigies of both Bush AND Kerry left behind, it kinda doesn't fit the definition of "left-wing violence".
Nonetheless, you want to get real? Control your nastier impulses, refrain from hurling invectives and slurs, and answer those three questions. Then you both have a position from which to diss others if they don't respond reasonably, and perhaps we could have a meaningful debate--otherwise, you're just being another wind in the trees.
If I could, I would add a fourth question: How do you view the Republican party refusing to join the Democratic party in a call for lowering the tone of hatred?
I'll likely never answer questions like that from twits who will never be satisfied with anything I say. I do not have to answer anything here. If you or anyone else doesn't like that, then move on. Problem is they cannot. They must have the last word. Their obsession is as bad as yours. I greatly enjoy NOT responding to people like that. At least some of you Libs have occasionally discussed things with me, and those are the ones, whether we get along now or not, that I will respond to.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Especially if you're incapable.
Originally posted by Riverlove:
I do not have to answer anything here.
When it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Tell us your not another dish-it-but-can't-take-it types.
Or, we can take your continued silence on the matter to be an admission of your own hypocrisy then?
I already answered your argumentative question by pointing out that you answered it yourself. My answer to your new question would have to be nasty, so I will refrain, except to say that I consider you to be nothing more than a human hemmorroid. Besides, no matter how I answer your stupid posts you'd still give me shit for it. Right? So go fuck off a bit, okay?
Uh, no.... that was a different point you didn't answer, ya halfwit. Do try and keep up.
Not that really I expected an answer. You and I both know you can't provide one, because such acts have not happened on the left.
But you're too much of a pussy to admit you're wrong, so I'll just keep pointing it out for you.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by mal4prez:
When it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...
a duck? well that 'aint gonna work. Better seek out advice from the experts here who came up with death-loving cunt. Man, yer not even in the same ballpark.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:See Mal4? That's how ya do it.
Originally posted by Storymark:
But you're too much of a pussy ...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:
I'll likely never answer questions like that from twits who will never be satisfied with anything I say. I do not have to answer anything here. If you or anyone else doesn't like that, then move on. Problem is they cannot. They must have the last word. Their obsession is as bad as yours. I greatly enjoy NOT responding to people like that. At least some of you Libs have occasionally discussed things with me, and those are the ones, whether we get along now or not, that I will respond to.
You won't answer because you're a coward who CAN'T actually provide an answer.
but nice try at playing to some pity. Good little hypocrite.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
River really MUST be Rappy. I've never met anyone else so cowardly, dishonest and deluded.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:Quote:
Originally posted by mal4prez:
When it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...
a duck? well that 'aint gonna work. Better seek out advice from the experts here who came up with death-loving cunt. Man, yer not even in the same ballpark.
And the question was: How about the active encouragement of violent rhetoric by conservative leaders today? How many "gunhair" and "reload" statements were made against Bush by liberal politicians?
I won't repost the other posters' questions. Wouldn't wanna overwhelm poor little rappylovejewelfan. Feathers might ruffle.
So you got anything but bile and hate in that brain? Come on, prove it. Again: How many "gunhair" and "reload" statements were made against Bush by liberal politicians?
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Call names? That's not real hard. Try being informed. Have you ever tried? Doesn't seem like you have.
Originally posted by Riverlove:Quote:See Mal4? That's how ya do it.
Originally posted by Storymark:
But you're too much of a pussy ...
Again: How many "gunhair" and "reload" statements were made against Bush by liberal politicians?
Go - search the internet. Here:
http://www.google.com
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME