Why does everybody at Fox News call Palin by her first name?
POSTED BY: MalBadInLatin
UPDATED: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 07:09
VIEWED: 2991
PAGE 1 of 4
I'm curious...Fox News never refers to liberal politicians by thier first name, or the rest of the conservatives too? They don't say "Barak" has gone to Europe. In all fairness they do call Hillary by her first name but only because there is room for confusion because of her husband. I though Fox was fair and balanced?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Because if they called her Quitter, their diabolical plot would fail.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ignoring PN's idiocy..."because she's their buddy, and making her sound more familiar puts her in the same class, as in 'she's on our side'." Just guessing.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Ignoring PN's idiocy..."because she's their buddy, and making her sound more familiar puts her in the same class, as in 'she's on our side'." Just guessing.
That's my guess too. How gullible do you have to be to fall for it too. Righties are really disadvantaged because they only have one source for cable tv news.
Fox News, the place to go for news if news is not what you really want
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't watch FOX news, therefore I do not know about such things.

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=28764731
Traveler
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Maybe they don't want to confuse people into thinking that Michael Palin will be running for president in 2012.
More likely though they are just hot for her and hope that being less formal increases their chances of hooking up with her.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Are they still working Obama's middle name into their every story about him, just to make sure all of us know that he's a "secret Muslim" and an Iraqi despot? ;)
Mike
Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just a peep from redneckistan here:
Sarah because she's a girl, but this isn't sexism. It's just a level of familiarity contrasted with the number of people with a given name.
You can watch this in gossip media all the time. They'll choose to lose the last name and just go with "Nicole." Occasionally, they'll mean Nicole Ritchie or someone, and then it's all confusing, because we have assumptions about who they mean. Generally they can't do this with "Jenny" or "Mike."
Here, everyone had a name, and ussually not their real name. It's like Geezer's story about Bear, everyone has names like that, because when you get right down to it, everyone is Bob or John or Janet or Valerie.
But when you limit the pool, like "Women running for president" you're safe with "Sarah" or "Hillary" with no risk of confusion. You could not, however, go with "Joe." You mean Biden, or Lieberman? Al Gore, or Al Sharpton?
I suspect, also, that there are more girls names overall.
As for Obama, people only need one moniker, and Obama is pretty easy to deal with. There are no other Obamas around, except Michelle, and people were always pronouncing Barack "barrack" and they tried "Barry" but it didn't take much, and yes, the Hussein thing is about the secret muslim thing.
But take another example. On the Daily Show "Aasif" is the only Aasif, and Mandvi is more difficult. If the show were hosted in Mumbai, where Aasif is really from, then there might be a few Aasifs about, I don't know. Probably more Mandvis. But still, when it comes to John Oliver, he's John Oliver, not "John" because that would be confusing.
It's just common sense. Say you were referring to a past president, and wanted to catch it in one. Which would work best:
George
Bush
W
See?
Now "Clinton" works, but after Hillary, he is getting relegated to "Bill" except as "President Clinton." If she becomes president, he'll retroactively become just "President Bill."
I'm only anticipating one President Sarah, so I don't see a problem with it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I'm only anticipating one President Sarah, so I don't see a problem with it.
The fact that you're anticipating even one, and don't see a problem with it, concerns me. I'm not sure whether I should be rolling on the floor laughing, or hiding under the bed cowering. Or maybe both at the same time. ;)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ditto Mike, only I wouldn't hide under the bed. Move to Canada, maybe.
And I don't agree with your theory, either; I go with what the majority of us said about Faux News wanting to align themselves with Sarahcudda.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME