Wifely Duties
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Saturday, January 9, 2010 04:47
VIEWED: 62964
PAGE 4 of 19
Quote:
Originally posted by zzetta13:
The Scenario:
Jeff has been out of work due to a lay-off for a while. It isn’t to bad he and his spouse are still able to keep their head above the bill collectors because she puts in a full day at the office. The thing is…… Jeff, in order to mellow his depression takes some of that money and heads down to the local bar to drink his sorrow away with his friends. His buddies do help make him feel better. Jeff heads home feeling better about himself and meets Mary in the kitchen where she’s taking things out of the frig to prepare the nights dinner. The drunken man sashays up to his pretty wife on course for a romantic evening. So, Mary isn’t in the mood. She’s worked all day, is getting dinner ready and now has to deal with a liquored up mate?
“Wifely Duties?” I personally think she has the right to refuse.
Course it works both ways…but if my honey came home all boozed up ready for ….. I think I’d have to give in. But that’s just me
Z
Is there really some question here that women don't have the right to refuse? I mean, do we even have to play out any scenario to understand that?
Good lord, this thread feels like it was written in about 1967. And some of it by insane people
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
PN
So you've met my friends Rockefeller, Rothschild and Company. Yes, you are correct on their bottom line. No argument here.
It's not too late, but it's getting late... I think that the proper countermove would require a great deal more discretion.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Magonsdaughter,
You missed the tactical tool of inflamatory rhetoric.
The point here is the very real threat to the human race posed by RR&Co. Far from being insane, we are very very informed. I can question PN's tactics, one of which is posting the most inflamatory thing possible to generate traffic, but I can't question his motives or understanding of the situation.
Also, bear in mind, the inflamatory topic tactic is well exploited by the media. Who hear did not read the story of the "Happy Birthday Adolph Hitler" story? The point of that story was to attack WalMart. Methhead Nazis are everywhere, that's not even news. But they used it to get almost everyone to read the story. So, I'll grant that it works.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I can question PN's tactics, one of which is posting the most inflamatory thing possible to generate traffic, but I can't question his motives or understanding of the situation.
Actually, that whole "most inflammatory thing possible" part of his posts is EXACTLY what makes me question his motives and understanding of the situation.
Look, if I say I'm pissed because I ordered a Domino's pizza and it took them 45 minutes to deliver it, that's a legitimate gripe. If I post, however, that I ordered a Domino's pizza from those money-grubbing big-nosed Jews who run the World Pizza Order, and that they genocided 50 million Italians to get it to my door in 30 minutes and then demanded payment in the form of their FedNote scrip and wouldn't take my legal gold, which is the ONLY form of money that's real and legal, I just come across as batshit crazy.
It really is just that simple. Not EVERYBODY is out to get you. Conspiracies happen, but not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy, much less a part of a larger "uber-conspiracy".
Mike
"It is complete now; the hands of time are neatly tied."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Yes, you are correct on their bottom line."
To go back to some earlier posts - the 1950's were all about getting women out of the factories and back into the home. That was to make room for returning GI's in the workplace. Increasing the tax base had nothing to do with it. Women NOT working - which WAS the goal - would decrease the tax base, not increase it.
Despite that, lower class women have always had to work, no matter what kind of low-paying 'female' jobs they were relegated to (domestic/ maid, waitress, retail sales etc). For them, the 1950s through 1970s were about 'help wanted, female' ads for book-keepers, and 'help wanted, male' ads for accountants, 'help wanted, female' ads for waitresses and 'help wanted, male' ads for bartenders. A 'trained' woman could be a secretary, not an executive assistant. An 'educated' woman could be a nurse but not a doctor, or teacher but not a professor, or librarian. Women did not get union apprenticeships, nor did they get admitted to medical school.
For better or worse, the 1960's 'women's liberation' movement was started by white, middle-class women who were unhappy with being trapped in the limited role of wife and mother. It did do some good things - though it took decades, in some cases - it opened up a few real opportunities for women.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not everything is a conspiracy.
But, there are conspiracies.
Its only after the event happens, that we know what really was the truth.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Of COURSE rich people try to run things so as to make themselves even richer.
DUH !
But chasing after non-existant conspiracies when there are real ones to address doesn't help any.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It opened up opportunities at the cost of the lives of the children that these women would abandon for their own wants.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
For better or worse, the 1960's 'women's liberation' movement was started by white, middle-class women who were unhappy with being trapped in the limited role of wife and mother. It did do some good things - though it took decades, in some cases - it opened up a few real opportunities for women.
Women's Lib was started by Jewish CIA agent Gloria Steinham, as a nefarious plot to overthrow USA.
Just like CIA agent Timothy Leary gave CIA LSD to the sheeple.
And CIA agent E Howard Hunt helped blow JFK's head off.
And military killers landed on the "moon", as military killers genocided 2.5-million Vietnamese allies.
Now 17-year-old girls are getting their heads blown off as machinegunners for the US military in combat zones.
No one is more hopelessly enslaved as she who thinks she is free.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"It opened up opportunities at the cost of the lives of the children that these women would abandon for their own wants."
And all these women had those children without a man ?
Why are you saying the women HAS to be the one to give up personal opportunities and look after the kids - and the man doesn't have any responsibility to them at all ?
Wulf, what I get from you posts is that you have a serious problem with feeling entitled. And you are mad at the non-white-male-us-born world - at blacks, at women, at Polacks - b/c you didn't get those things to which you feel entitled.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME