Question: Now that expensive militaristic fascism is going out, will these boards still retain their vitriol?
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Friday, September 19, 2025 19:30
VIEWED: 17791
PAGE 13 of 25
And yes, didn't Clinton sign the DOMA ?
But...but...but Clinton ? Yes, as a matter of fact. And you KNOW it was Clinton, which is why you posted that in the first place, so that when I pointed out the obvious, that it WAS Clinton, you could say " Ah HA! " , and have yourself a good laugh
What ever.
It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
already answered that, dork.
It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
No, you answered YOUR questions - not mine. Mine still stands --- unanswered.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anyway -
As we all can see, Rap can't admit to the simple FACT that marriage is a BASIC right as ruled by the US Supreme Court.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Baby steps Rapo, baby steps. Leaving out the definition of marriage, did the Supreme Court call marriage a BASIC RIGHT?
Is that a FACT? (Even if it's a limited, incomplete Rapo-style fact.)
Yes or no?
---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well, I have things to do.
I suspect Rap is going to let this die just like all the other threads where he's wrong, oddly enough, yet again ...
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Guess what you guys...my email was on Bill O'Reilly tonight. Bill was offended and called me "sir".
My original email was: Bill, twice Mayor Newsome humiliated you by dissacknowleging your complaints about San Francisco. This made you so mad you had to attack the city. Your complaints are harming innocent people who work in tourism with your lies.
He edited it....Bill, Mayor Newsome humiliated you so much that you had to attack. You are harming innocent people with your lies.
My moment of fame was tainted by minor paliagerism.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by MalBadInLatin:
You need to distinguish what the difference between correct and incorrect feels like in your head.
Good luck with teachin him that, since several years of harsh realities have failed to.
-F
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Well, I have things to do.
I suspect Rap is going to let this die just like all the other threads where he's wrong, oddly enough, yet again ...
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
I'm not wrong, and I've already answered your gorram question. You think that acting like a 5 yr old and repeating it over and over, even after I've answered, will some how gain you some sort of leverage ?
Very strange, on your part. However, I'm going to let this die, as I've already won, long ago.
It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
'Rap, the reason the questions keep being asked over and over is because you won't CLEARLY answer them. You pasted up YOUR definition of "marriage", including some stuff that clearly isn't in the DOMA, and when questioned on it, you started moderating your position, backpedaling, and calling people names for questioning you on a position that you're obviously not even clear on yourself.
You say that "marriage" is between 1 man and 1 woman, but that civil unions between others would be fine by you. Why is it so important to you that they not be called "marriages"? Why do you care? What's it to you?
You say that it's been this way for 10,000+ years, and that marriage is what sets us apart from animals. Do you have anything to actually back that up? I know of several animal species that mate for life and commit to monogamous relationships. Can you be sure they aren't in a "marriage"?
Here's an excerpt from an informative blog on same-sex marriage (Dominick Evans' blog):
Quote:
Getting Past the Arguments for Same Sex Marriage
October 21, 2008
I had a lively debate on Twitter about same sex marriage the other night. I can refute every argument against Same Sex Marriage with facts. It’s time America got past the silly nonsense of denying an entire group of Americans the right to marry.
I call it a right because there are over 1400 benefits (state and federal) that are afforded by the government to a married couple. While some couples make their wedding a church/religious affair, marriage is first and foremost a government granted right. If it wasn’t you wouldn’t need a state certified marriage license. The church would simply write down your marriage if only ordained by the church.
The Declaration of Independence promised all Americans the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These are three inalienable rights afforded to all Americans. Marriage is another of those inalienable rights. It is unconstitutional for any government (state, local, federal or otherwise) to deny anyone the right to marry, who is over the age of consent and unrelated. So, why are so many people against Same Sex Marriage?
1. Fear - People fear the unknown. They don’t understand same-sex relationships, so they’re quick to dismiss them as legit or logical. A same-sex relationship is actually quite similar to a heterosexual relationship. Same-sex couples eat meals together, spend time together, share bills and buy household necessities together, raise children together, buy/build/design a home together, participate in hobbies together, etc. It’s really not very different than any other relationship save for the intimacy involved and even then, it’s fairly similar.
I’ve found that educating others, especially those opposed to same-sex marriage, who don’t know a single gay person, has changed many views. Speaking from experience, being GLBT is not a choice. It’s who the person is, and nothing has ever been proven to change GLBT individuals, not even “reparative” therapies or “get rid of the gay” camps. Not even the church can make a GLBT person non-GLBT. They just make the person a liar.
2. The Bible says it’s bad. Which Bible have you been reading? I’ve read many a Bible and most of the English translations make a mockery of the original Bible. The original Bible was written in Ancient Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew. Before quoting the actual Bible, I recommend people learn Ancient Greek (Open Texture has an excellent program, which uses authentic Bible text - free of English-translated dogma). You can find various places online to learn Hebrew, and I’m sure Aramaic as well.
Then you can go to websites like Codex Sinaiticus to translate the various Ancient Bibles out there yourself.
I can tell you for a fact, there was no mention of homosexuality in the original Bible. There wasn’t even a word for homosexuality until the 1800s. What the Bible did refer to was, the “pagan” temple slaves/prostitutes. These men were condemned. They participated in orgies that celebrated the Gods and yes that included homosexual orNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME