Real World Event Discussions

Yellowcake Shipped Out

POSTED BY: Geezer
UPDATED: Saturday, March 14, 2026 00:42
VIEWED: 11240
PAGE 3 of 13

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
...eager to replace North Korea as an Axis of Evil.



Is there some kind of waiting list?

Canada's nothing if not desperate for attention...


SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
why have we not invaded them, or at the very least nuked them?


Yeah, it's just a matter of time until they ALL switch to the Euro...

...not that we started with Iraq because of it...
...nor that we're rattling the saber on Iran for the same reason....



Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:12 PM

Would yellowcake be vanilla, or more of a lemony flavor?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Nothing here but a story which completely and utterly justifies Bush's war on Iraq

So...why aren't we slamming North Korea? Or better yet, China?
Your lack of logic still astounds me, AU.

Go have some yellowcake for desert.

Chrisisall



Oh, we are, but they didn't have 17 UN Resolutions specific to WMD and the use of it on their own civilian population and such, " that we are aware of , that is " .

There's no lack of logic here, what so ever. You just seem to think that if we can't catch all the criminals, we can't go after any.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Why haven't we invaded Pakistan? They're a Muslim nation, run by a dictator, known to be harboring terrorists (including Bin Laden himself, according to most sources - or what you'd call a "slam dunk") - why have we not invaded them, or at the very least nuked them?

Because they already HAVE nuclear weapons dumbass! it's no fun if they can shoot back!



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 4:38 PM

iraq must have been planning a big party with all that marzipan cake maybe it was to thank the troops for the liberation of their country

im just going out,i may be some time

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 5:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Nothing here but a story which completely and utterly justifies Bush's war on Iraq

So...why aren't we slamming North Korea? Or better yet, China?
Your lack of logic still astounds me, AU.

Go have some yellowcake for desert.

Chrisisall



Oh, we are, but they didn't have 17 UN Resolutions specific to WMD and the use of it on their own civilian population and such, " that we are aware of , that is " .

There's no lack of logic here, what so ever. You just seem to think that if we can't catch all the criminals, we can't go after any.



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "





If the US is going to start wars to enforce UN resolutions, perhaps this should be the next target

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concer
ning_Israel


seems to be long overdo



Lets party like its 1939

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 5:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Oh, we are, but they didn't have 17 UN Resolutions specific to WMD and the use of it on their own civilian population and such, " that we are aware of , that is " .

So, as soon as we get some good intel that the rest of the world poses a viable and immediate threat to our way of life, it's nukes away, is it?
Too late pal, the Global Economy IS already eroding our way of life. And the biggest viable and immediate threat is Bushieboy.
Quote:



There's no lack of logic here, what so ever.

As you say, so it is...in your own mind anyway.

Why do you hate America, AU? Only an America-hater would cheer on it's destruction as led by your man Bush...

Oh, and BTW, THEM'S THE FACTS. You may not continue to dispute them, or I'll get UN sanctions for you to break so I can ram yellowcake down your douschey throat!!!!

Sorry...lost my usual quiet reserve for a moment there...apologies.



isall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 5:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Why haven't we invaded Pakistan? They're a Muslim nation, run by a dictator, known to be harboring terrorists (including Bin Laden himself, according to most sources - or what you'd call a "slam dunk") - why have we not invaded them, or at the very least nuked them?

Because they already HAVE nuclear weapons dumbass! it's no fun if they can shoot back!



And to our shame, that seems to be the mindset of the US government these days. By invading Iraq for *supposedly* having WMD (because if there's one thing we can absolutely be SURE of, it's that it wasn't about oil, right?), and by NOT invading North Korea when they announced that they had detonated a nuclear device (a nuclear "fizzle"?), we seemed to send a clear message - one that we're reinforcing now with our sabre-rattling stance on Iran. That message is this:

"If you are trying to acquire nuclear weapons, we'll invade your ass. If you already HAVE them, we'll talk."

Now, given that that's the message the rest of the world in hearing, by our words and actions, it's easy to see WHY they'd want to hurry up and get their nukes, and do it on the downlow, so they can announce that they have them before we can invade!

We haven't stopped proliferation, we haven't postponed it or slowed it down. If anything, we've accelerated it by our current stance on the issue.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence[sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

I can't help the sinking feeling that my country is now being run by people who read "1984" not as a cautionary tale, but rather as an instruction manual. - Michael Mock

The Myrmidons were an ancient nation of very brave and skilled warriors as described in Homer's Iliad, and were commanded by Achilles. - Wikipedia

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2008 6:02 PM

The Iranian situation is a perfect example of UN & European ineptitude in dealing with aggressors. All you Bush haters...hey...you can't blame America for this one...right? Well, you probably do anyhow, since that's your entire raison d'etre. It's been over 2 years of IAEA & European oversight and demands. All that has been returned from Iran is a big middle finger pointed straight up back at them. Can't wait to see the first city nuked by Iran...we have a betting pool in the office. If it's your city, or your friend's city, don't come-a-cryin' to Bush & Cheney. They've played this one by the book.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME