General Discussions

Is Science Fiction inherently anti-establishment?

POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Saturday, April 19, 2008 17:10
VIEWED: 5811
PAGE 4 of 6

Thursday, April 17, 2008 8:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Well, the 'Establishment' in the movies embraced the creation of Skynet- isn't that a slam on the computer-dependent culture we have?

Computers are evil Chrisisall

I think its more technophobia built on top of the M.A.D. principle. Skynet is a convenient vehicle for the technophobia, the Government is about the only entity that could really put it in too being. Though a great deal of the Sarah Connor Chronicles is suggestive that an individual created at least the basis for skynet (the turk)...



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 8:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
But is Joss Whedon's portrayal of Inara pro-prostitution?

No, I take it as anti-regulation...

I would say it's pro-prostitution. It's kind of hard to avoid the fact that Inara is a effectively a high-class hooker.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 8:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
That’s probably true. But even in the movie, you really have to look for the dystopic side. It's more of a feeling then a direct issue. If you didn't know anything about Nazism or Nazi propaganda, would you really find something dystopic about the settings? Maybe it falls more into the Armageddon camp, where it's not clear which side of the establishment coin it falls on.

The movie always caught me as more of a parody of fascism, actually. And yes, if you knew nothing about Nazism, I think a certain amount of that would come off.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
If you didn't know anything about Nazism or Nazi propaganda, would you really find something dystopic about the settings?

There was something unsettling about the way when the Sarge got a bullet in his eye, it was more of a fuss about the accident itself, than the death of a good man...or maybe that's just how I saw it. It spoke to me about a culture where we weren't all that much better than bugs ourselves- the 'hive' was more important than the individual.

Dystopic Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
It's kind of hard to avoid the fact that Inara is a effectively a high-class hooker.


Prostitution is like boxing; ya got yer big-money championships, & yer back alley bare-knuckle bouts.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:12 PM

I'm not sure how a show can be considered pro something merely because it portrays it.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
I'm not sure how a show can be considered pro something merely because it portrays it.


If anything, I think Joss intended to portray whores & Companions as people, not just playthings, although Jayne would probably go with the playthings more...

I'm in Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
I'm not sure how a show can be considered pro something merely because it portrays it.


If anything, I think Joss intended to portray whores & Companions as people, not just playthings, although Jayne would probably go with the playthings more...

I think your anti-regulation theme was more on target with the pro-prostitution thing.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:52 PM

Transformers - Totally Establishment !

Independence Day - Certainly !

Armageddon - yup!

The Island - Anti

iRobot - Anti

THX1138 - Anti

Silent Running - Anti

Stargate - Yes

Starship Troopers - Anti

Minority Report - Anti

Total Recall - Anti

The Matrix - who the hell knows?!

Supernatural - Anti

Residnet Evil - Anti

Heroes - Depends where the end up with it.



NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:07 PM

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

If anything, I think Joss intended to portray whores & Companions as people, not just playthings, although Jayne would probably go with the playthings more...



Thing with Firefly is that all the characters have their conflicting counterparts. Inara is the counterpoint to Mal and vice versa. Likewise Jayne and Book. Wash and Zoe etc... I don't read it as being so clear cut as pro or against. It's set up to cloud the issue, to cause the viewer to at least consider both arguments. To sympathize with either character depending on the circumstance. To 'un' generalize and to regard people as individual irrespective of their occupation.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME