Weather Channel Founder to Sue Al Gore

POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 11:30
VIEWED: 1024
PAGE 1 of 1

PIRATENEWS

Tuesday, March 4, 2008 5:04 PM

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080303175301.aspx

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, March 4, 2008 6:22 PM

Good. 1st legitimate post PN has made here on FFF.net - EVER!

Congrats.

It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

AVENGINGWATCHER

Wednesday, March 5, 2008 2:48 AM

A conservative site posting info that bashes Gore? No way who would have thought! I agree though, lets put all the evidence out in the open and let it stand on its own. I think that is a fair way to judge.

When there are no heroes where will we turn?

CANTTAKESKY

Wednesday, March 5, 2008 4:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Good. 1st legitimate post PN has made here on FFF.net - EVER!

Well, actually the heading was misleading.

Coleman simply advocates suing Gore. He isn't actually suing him or about to sue him.

Bad science can be bought in court as well. Look at tobacco. The tobacco evidence was all indirect, and now it is like the gospel truth.

Not that I like tobacco--I don't. I am convinced it is evil. But I can't prove it beyond reasonable (let alone scientific) doubt, and neither can anyone else.

So court would be a big gamble. Whatever decision is reached sticks. And they don't always make the right decision.

I think science should be left in the hands of the scientists. Let them argue it till the cows come home. But no one should lose her job or suffer legal consequences for thinking for herself.

--------------------------
Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.
-- Richard Feynman

JAYNEZTOWN

Wednesday, March 5, 2008 11:30 AM

sounds like the onset of senile dementia, maybe he can also sue that cloud of smog hovering over L.A