I came across this on another board where I am also considered a troll
POSTED BY: kaneman
UPDATED: Monday, June 18, 2007 00:58
VIEWED: 10040
PAGE 4 of 9
And every time I see this "I came across this on another board where I am also considered a troll" I think - ahhhh ... other people with the same fine sense of reality.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
K-man...When is that "offensive" tag coming off you?
Hopefully never.
Quote:
Why did it appear in the first place?
You actually read his posts and don't know this answer?
Quote:
but I don't see any trollish posts from you.
A troll would come on FFF and bash Firefly or Serenity...you don;t do that...you may bash some FF fans, etc...but that 'aint no troll.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns
...
In Internet terminology, a troll is someone who intentionally posts derogatory or otherwise inflammatory messages about sensitive topics in an established online community such as an online discussion forum to bait users into responding
...
Trolls can be existing members of a community that rarely post and often contribute no useful information to the thread, but instead make argumentative posts in an attempt to discredit another person, concentrating almost exclusively on facts irrelevant to the point of the conversation, with the intent of provoking a reaction from others
------------------------------------------
"A revolution without dancing is no revolution at all." - V
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ah, so you agree that employers should be legally required to make it known what dangerous conditions exist, such as asbestos in the air, etc; so that the customers and employees can make healthy decisions?
Originally posted by kaneman:
My position is the gov should have no rules that regulate a private business. If the owner runs a company that is not healthy for his customers and the employees, and they know this,
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Um, it's actually 'her', Seven, but whatever.
Originally posted by SevenPercent:
You actually read his posts and don't know this answer?
Interjecting Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
K-man...When is that "offensive" tag coming off you?
Why did it appear in the first place?
Lot's of people here use the F word, so why are just you ( all I can see ) being Scarlett lettered?
I don't think you're a troll....you may be many things, but I don't see any trollish posts from you.
A troll would come on FFF and bash Firefly or Serenity...you don;t do that...you may bash some FF fans, etc...but that 'aint no troll. I like your posts...they're certainly not mainstream here, but they're always entertaining...and that's really why I'm here. Thanks.
Some people just can't take a joke. Like that sevenpercent retard( what normal human goes and adds a wikipedia link for the definition of troll, that pickle licker is obsessed with me). I have no idea how long I must remained tagged, but like most people would guess....I don't care anyway. I will always march to my own music...If not I would turn into rue...just a sad lonely girl going through life trying to find the dildo that fits and being pissed that they don't come that big....Well, it's true.....
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by leadb:Quote:Ah, so you agree that employers should be legally required to make it known what dangerous conditions exist, such as asbestos in the air, etc; so that the customers and employees can make healthy decisions?
Originally posted by kaneman:
My position is the gov should have no rules that regulate a private business. If the owner runs a company that is not healthy for his customers and the employees, and they know this,
Not necessarily healthy decisions...just informed decisions. I don't think making healthy decisions is mandatory or should be. I mean, I have unprotected sex with one legged, cross eyed, intravenous drug using whores, because I like to. Well, that's not really true....they usually have two legs
.........
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Fair enough, I only referenced 'healthy' since you did, 'informed' is what I meant as well. In general, I wouldn't get that upset if we took that route; I only object to the depths of lying and secrecy corporations will go to to avoid admitting, much less providing up-front information, regarding the health risks in the environment the employers establish. Main advantage is we can go back to strong unions. That's one thing an 'overly protective' gov. has done is reduce the need for unions.
Originally posted by kaneman:Quote:
Originally posted by leadb:Quote:Ah, so you agree that employers should be legally required to make it known what dangerous conditions exist, such as asbestos in the air, etc; so that the customers and employees can make healthy decisions?
Originally posted by kaneman:
My position is the gov should have no rules that regulate a private business. If the owner runs a company that is not healthy for his customers and the employees, and they know this,
Not necessarily healthy decisions...just informed decisions. I don't think making healthy decisions is mandatory or should be.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by leadb:Quote:Fair enough, I only referenced 'healthy' since you did, 'informed' is what I meant as well. In general, I wouldn't get that upset if we took that route; I only object to the depths of lying and secrecy corporations will go to to avoid admitting, much less providing up-front information, regarding the health risks in the environment the employers establish. Main advantage is we can go back to strong unions. That's one thing an 'overly protective' gov. has done is reduce the need for unions.
Originally posted by kaneman:Quote:
Originally posted by leadb:Quote:Ah, so you agree that employers should be legally required to make it known what dangerous conditions exist, such as asbestos in the air, etc; so that the customers and employees can make healthy decisions?
Originally posted by kaneman:
My position is the gov should have no rules that regulate a private business. If the owner runs a company that is not healthy for his customers and the employees, and they know this,
Not necessarily healthy decisions...just informed decisions. I don't think making healthy decisions is mandatory or should be.
I like you....not in a gay way.......
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This may surprise you, but did you know that at one time Anarchists and Unionists were *very staunch* allies and often worked in concert ?
One of the reasons Unions ever made any headway was the Anarchists willingness to use violence and break stupid oppressive laws without a blink in order to bust the chops of the corporations.
Eventually, the unionists cut us out, wanting to be reasonable and play nice and not get portrayed as violent vandals - and ever since, they've had their asses kicked, every effective strike broken by scabs, by federal troops, every useful tactic outlawed wholesale, and those very folk who wanted a smooth, reasonable front went to the same politicians screwing the workers for a handout or two and then assisted in the screwing.
If you doubt that, go look up the haymarket riot, mayday riots, and delve into anarchic history, they even tried to off JP Morgan and demolish wall street at one time.
These days the Union way is to suck up to the CEO and beg for scraps from the corporate table as the board of directors pull a tom jones... it's pathetic and disgusting.
If they ever do manage to reach down and find a pair, they know where to find us.
Violence of some sort is inherent in a truly free market, a restauranteer who's serving potentially dangerous food may not fear a fine too much, but for damn sure he'd fear the locals taking the place down around him in retaliation.
Not to mention that's way more satisfying than a class action in which the only people to recieve a dime of compensation are the lawyers.
-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So JONGSSTRAW,
Was wondering, do you find these quotes "retard ... pickle licker" ... "trying to find the dildo that fits" not offensive ? Or is that true only when they are directed at someone not you ? Just curious how deep your acceptance goes.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME