Ann Coulter, right wing goddess
POSTED BY: NewOldBrownCoat
UPDATED: Thursday, October 5, 2023 23:43
VIEWED: 28042
PAGE 14 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by JKiddo:
if you think that FFF.net folks wouldn't sink to that level, what about "Shiny"Ed, whose posts are replete with such gems as ...
pompous & hypocrite
pretty-boy
retarded
pretty-boy
pretty-boy
vile bloodsucking tort-lawyer
pimps
juman beans (an insult to juman beans everywhere...)
Silky Pony (Auraptor) and...
hey if it takes maniacal & demented religious sub-humans from Islam to shake up Hollywood degenerates
which was immediately followed by YOUR post...
In a later update, Tehran has moved to sever all diplomatic relations with Sparta in response to their attack on peace-loving Persian invaders 2,487 years ago.
Where's the outrage, man? Where's the disappointment about sinking so low?
Oh yeah, that's right.. it was all meant in fun.
So was mine.
Thanks Jkiddo! It's about gorram time I received some props here, instead of the usual ruttin' bashing I get. Look......I tells it like I sees it....no links (sorry Chrisisall), no patties, no wikipedophilia...just moi ! By the way...the terms you quoted ( a clever combination by you of 2 or 3 different posts ) are just my second stringers....surely you've seen my best work somewhere else here....no? I know when I've done well by all the vitriolic & hateful responses I get from the Rennaissance Fair/tree-hugging crowd...ya know...idiot, troll, moron, neo-con etc etc etc .....yaaaaawwwnnn!....How boring and predictable....although I am seeing more & more 'coats with a sense of humor about political things & world events....and really, that's me in a nutshell...just poking fun at all the absurdities in the world, and all the f'ing bullshit we are supposed to suck down every day....not me...I'm a college graduate with a good job & a great family!.....Like I really give a rats's patoot about smarmy politics or Iraq or Iran or Venezuela, or Hollywood, or anything!///I don't...I take care of me & mine, and that don't include anyone else 'less I conjure it does.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
But is the point to focus in on only one aspect of the problem? The one aspect that allows us to not discuss the more pressing issue concerning one political party's institutional support and encouragement of hate speech and what it says about a subset of it's members that this tactic works?
Not a bit. Focusing on Ms. Coulter's support and encouragement of hate speech should be the point of the thread. There has been some of that going on. But using hate speech against Ms. Coulter in complaining about her hate speech seems to show a double standard, which is what I originally pointed out.
Quote:
Ann Coulter is paid by conservatives to preach hate and intolerance. Her message reaches millions.
Yep. We get this.
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Slick,
So I checked out it out. The VERY FIRST mention of Coulter being a trans-X (-sexual, -gender, -vestite or whatnot) was PirateNews Tuesday, March 06, 2007 - 19:20.
The NEXT post on the topic was from you Slick, March 08, 2007 - 02:27 asking why 'multiple posters' call her a trans-X; and again Monday, March 12, 2007 - 14:23 asking about the trans-X 'schtick'. In fact, the only person who keeps doing that schtick would be you.
Anyone who takes the time to actually read my first post will note you're pretty selective in taking things out of context to avoid the issue. Typical.
So back to the question you're trying to avoid with this little smokescreen.
"Is it prejudicial (to the person, or the minority, or both) to compare a person you don't like to a discriminated-against minority? You already said this applies to certain minorities, what about others equally oppressed?"
Still not expecting a straight answer.
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Slick,
Nope, not taking it out of context. You are the only one using the trans-X schtick. Not to criticize Coulter but to portray her a martyr. No one else here is doing trans-X. Just you.
Why is that?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Can you not tell when people are making an ironic point? Do you really think that people here (except PN... and perhaps you) give a friggin' rat's behind about Ann's hands, her adam's apple, or her sexuality?
But using hate speech against Ms. Coulter in complaining about her hate speech seems to show a double standard, which is what I originally pointed out.
You seem like a normally intelligent juman bean. Just terribly one-sided.
heh heh heh
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Slick,
Nope, not taking it out of context. You are the only one using the trans-X schtick. Not to criticize Coulter but to portray her a martyr. No one else here is doing trans-X. Just you.
Why is that?
Right again. No straight answer.
Let's try again, shall we?
"Is it prejudicial (to the person, or the minority, or both) to compare a person you don't like to a discriminated-against minority? You already said this applies to certain minorities, what about others equally oppressed?"
A simple Yes or No would be fine.
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So Geezer, when will I get a straight answer out of you?
And now the comedy stylings of...
John Edwards is a bunch of sticks? Well, he always did seem a little stiff...-Geezer
Its the one up his ass that...damn. Too easy.-Hero
Dishes out but can't take it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Slick,
Quote:Your first post? Would that be this one?
Anyone who takes the time to actually read my first post will note you're pretty selective in taking things out of context to avoid the issue. Typical.
Quote:
John Edwards is a bunch of sticks? Well, he always did seem a little stiff...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wow! This thread has seen a lot of mileage since I've been here last and, big suprise, it hasn't really resolved anything.
There was something that I believe Soupcatcher mentioned about Ann representing the Conservatives (and making them look real bad) that made me think about my arguement to Science types in here and their Richard Dawkins.
This gave me an idea. Celebrity Deathmatch between Ann and Richard! At the very least let's set up a boxing match between them like the time Danny Bonaduce beat the shit out of Donny Osmond. I'd imagine that Ann would have the advantage here though, what with the reach advantage those hands give her and the fact that your stereotypical Scientist is a big pussy. The added bonus here for the spectators is that we finally get to see Survival of the Fittest in action.
That or we should set them up on a blind date. I think the both of them need to just get laid and then maybe they'll shut up. aaaahhhhhhhh.... talk about the pot calling the kettle black..... sigh 
"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Your first post? Would that be this one?Quote:
John Edwards is a bunch of sticks? Well, he always did seem a little stiff...
Oh, sorry. second post, then.
So, how about it? Is insulting someone by comparing them to an unfairly oppressed minority prejudice? Y or N? Or don't you know?
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME