Ann Coulter, right wing goddess
POSTED BY: NewOldBrownCoat
UPDATED: Thursday, October 5, 2023 23:43
VIEWED: 28042
PAGE 8 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Rue "OR FOR USING FAGGOT AS A DERAGATORY TERM"
BDN "There is nothing wrong with being gay"
Rue See below
Rue "catch a nig ... I mean TIGER by the toe ..."
BDN "or were your intentions more nefarious"
Rue You recognized nigger as slander, but discounted faggot. Why did you do that?
Rue,
If you used the quote function perhaps you would not misrepresent other posters positions.
You posted the following,
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
OR FOR USING FAGGOT AS A DERAGATORY TERM like there is something wrong with being gay?
Faggot does have another meaning where nigger does not. I was agreeing that using faggot in it's deragatory form is wrong and there is nothing wrong with being gay. I hope this helps clarify my position.
Posting to stir stuff up.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
I think you were refering to this forum and not people in positions of power with that quote. Please correct me if I am wrong.
See the addendum that you quoted from.
Quote:
But one should aspire to rise above the petty personal attacks and stick to the politics.
Sure. Nice sentiment. And, guess what, I'll completely put down the snark when people stop making tons of money calling for the death of millions of Americans.
Quote:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_c
ontent_id=1003548043
Would you consider any of the people named in this article as being in positions of prominence?
Okay, so you're using an example of the campaign staff of two Democratic politicians going back and forth at each other as a counter to prominent conservative/Republicans smearing millions of people? Just wanted to make sure that's the equivalence that you're trying to set-up here.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Geezer:
Let's see...
For Ann Coulter to suggest that John Edwards shares attributes commonly (if erroneously) attributed to homosexuals is slander, a lie, a fraud, and should not be accepted by anyone.
For multiple posters to suggest that Ann Coulter bathes in virgins' blood, enjoys taking it up the a** while listening to liberal viewpoints, is a transvestite, has had a sex change, etc., is just good fun.
Do I detect a slight case of double standard here?
Not expecting a reasonable answer Geezer.
I can see what you're saying but I think there are some significant differences that you're leaving out. There's a lot of sentiment in this thread that I don't consider proud-worthy (I'm not quite sure how to describe this but it's basically the opposite of, "You just made your parents proud."). It's not the high point of discussion on RWED, that's for sure. But enough concern trolling from me. I think there is a wide swath of comments that are getting lumped together indiscriminantly. However, not one of the people who posted in this thread will be hired to speak at a large gathering because of the comments they made here.
Ann Coulter is hired to speak and write books precisely because she expresses the sentiments she does. Who hires her to write books? Who hires her to come and talk? On what end of the political spectrum lies her target audience?
Ann Coulter has the explicit support of the Republican Party. Her comments have the explicit support of the Republican Party. By this point in time, when you hire her to come and talk, you know exactly what you're getting. The crowd reaction to her faggot comment was quite positive. They got exactly what they wanted and expected.
She has explicitly advocated violence against those who do not share her views. If you look at her vector it ends in lynch mobs.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:
John Edwards, gay or not, sees dead people, talks to dead people, and unlike most Democrats, cannot get them to vote for him.
Priceless.....
"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by FMF:
When someone gets paid big bucks to stand up in front of the Democrtic Party machine and officially say these things, you'll have a point. Until then, you're just off-message, as ususal.
Jesse Jackson happens to say derogatory remarks every time he opens his mouth. I find him to be one of the most offensive and dispicable humans alive and a complete waste of flesh and all of the food he's consumed his entire life which could have been going to poor innercity youths he was supposed to be speaking for as he laughed all the way to the bank. He happened to make boatloads of money off of being a race-baiting hatemonger himself, but most of his message I'm sure he would have whored out for free, if given the chance.
At least I think he was Demoncrat.... I could be wrong here though. I was only a kid when his opinion mattered to anybody from either side.
I know I'm supposed to be staying out of RWED, but it's very hard for me. I'm bored at work and I like reading the posts in here even if I don't want to be in the middle of all the crap anymore. I've tried not to post much, but I do see an overwhelming Liberal bias in here, as usual, and I just think that the playing field needs to be leveled a bit. Does anybody in here from either side of the Repuglicrat spectrum really believe that "their party" is really any better for the overall good and future of mankind?
"Anyway you look at it you lose" - Paul Simon/Art Garfunkel
"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I've tried not to post much, but I do see an overwhelming Liberal bias in here, as usual, and I just think that the playing field needs to be leveled a bit.
Point me in the direction of something Democrat-related that's equally as disturbing as the one I posted and I'll put that one up, too. And, I think the liberal bias comes from the fact that it's really hard to be as conservative, much less more, than Coulter. (Who the hell wants to be on this woman's side? Seriously?)
It almost even sounds like a good idea to say she could have been initially propped up by the Democrats so they could point to Republicans and say, "Look at this." And, if that wwas the case, it backfired the day someone took her seriously.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SoupCatcher:Quote:
Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_c
ontent_id=1003548043
Would you consider any of the people named in this article as being in positions of prominence?
Okay, so you're using an example of the campaign staff of two Democratic politicians going back and forth at each other as a counter to prominent conservative/Republicans smearing millions of people? Just wanted to make sure that's the equivalence that you're trying to set-up here.
The article was linked in response to your following quote.
Quote:
Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
The second claim was that there are no equivalent prominent people on the left who attack their opponents the way that many prominent people on the right do. Notice that there is nothing in this claim about everyone on the right or the left, only people in positions of prominence/influence.
IMHO, Hilary Clinton and Barak Obama are responsible for the actions of their respective staffs. I would consider both of them to presently be in positions of prominence.
David Geffen raised a boat load of money for Obama at his 'Giant Hollywood Fundraiser' and his most recent attack against the Clintons made every national entertainment show. I would consider him to be in a position of prominence.
South Carolina State Senator Robert Ford is certainley in a position of prominence in South Carolina.
James Carville is a nationally known pundit who regularly appears on television and movies. I would consider him in a position of prominence.
Posting to stir stuff up.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
6-string,
Jesse Jackson calls himself a democrat. But he isn't invited to get up in front of the party faithful to spew hate. (And PLEASE find me some quotes from him that are as inflamatory as Coulter's AND made in a similar situation.) Ann Coulter is an official mouthpiece of the repubicans. That's the difference. (I just put repubicans in there to balance the name-calling on the other side.)
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nobody,
You still aren't finding equivalent examples either in the attacks or the context. Did anyone call Obama a nigger in an official party function? Has anyone called Clinton a Kike-lover under those circumstances?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
All you brainless, one-word or phrase bashers of Ann & Republicans & Conservatives....ponder this a spell....I and the vast majority of normal traditional American, hard-working family folk think ALL you liberals are faggots....in addition to generally being godless, vile libertines & traitors...but I go off topic & apologize.
Now, do we all think you're all gay????? Probably not...but in the eyes & hearts & souls & time-tested belief-systems of clear-thinking people who are NOT ashamed & embarrassed by the history of their country, etc etc....you're all a sad lot of malcontents, losers, freaks, naive idiots,& faggots...ooooops I said it again...whoops...off to another PC liberal idiot rehab clinic.
Wow...how does somebody get that mad?...Anyhow, let's review.
Democrats/Liberals are: Brainless, faggots, godless, vile, traitors, malcontents, losers, freaks, naive idiots.
Reublican/Conservatives are: Normal, hard working, family folk, clear thinking.
I go to church, and from what I remember, Jesus teaches tolerance.
"You can believe your eyes...or you can believe me." -Groucho Marx
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME