Ward Churchill B*tch Slapped by CU Committee for Plaigarism
POSTED BY: BarnStormer
UPDATED: Saturday, May 20, 2006 02:21
VIEWED: 2617
PAGE 2 of 2
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
PLEASE READ MY POSTQuote:Because THAT'S WHAT BUSH PROMISED, bimbo.
In the first quote above you agreed with someone who stated that "Rove should be suspended until his specific role has been determined". That may as well be in the dictionary under "guilty until proven innocent".
Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.
Again Rue, Bush did not promise to can ROVE because there is NO EVIDENCE that ROVE had ANYTHING to do with it.
What part of this do you not understand????????
You agreed with the person who said that ROVE should be canned WITH NO EVIDENCE OF HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE OUTING OF PLAME.
This is a case of "Do as I say, not as I do"
And please, stop with the name calling (bimbo) stuff. It makes you seem very sophmoric.
Am I a Lion?... No, I think I'ma tellin' the truth.
BarnStormer
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sophomoric is better than 'can't read'. Perhaps you need a picture book.
Read Bush's original quote and McClellan's revisitation. Go and do a web search. Rove was known to be 'involved' at that time. That is historical fact. It wasn't proven in court, but that was not the standard Bush originally set for taking action. (4 months later the admin changed its original wording to 'violated the law' b/c of calls for Bush to keep promise #1. 19 months later they further changed it to 'committed a crime' b/c of calls for Bush to keep promise #2.)
What I called for is standard administrative procedure when someone is accused of a serious crime - in Rove's case treason - which is suspension from work until cleared. I didn't call for immediate dismissal as some did.
Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Sophomoric is better than 'can't read'. Perhaps you need a picture book.
Read Bush's original quote and McClellan's revisitation. Go and do a web search. Rove was known to be 'involved' at that time. That is historical fact. It wasn't proven in court, but that was not the standard Bush originally set for taking action. (4 months later the admin changed its original wording to 'violated the law' b/c of calls for Bush to keep promise #1. 19 months later they further changed it to 'committed a crime' b/c of calls for Bush to keep promise #2.)
What I called for is standard administrative procedure when someone is accused of a serious crime - in Rove's case treason - which is suspension from work until cleared. I didn't call for immediate dismissal as some did.
Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.
Rue
So you must be reading between the lines then huh?
What I see printed in your post does not support your arguement.
What constitutes being "involved" in your book? Would working in the federal government qualify?
If Rove was "involved" in some real way, I would have thought he would have been indicted by Fitzgerald by now, would'nt you?
Heck, they did'nt waste much time getting old Scooter boy indicted. Not for the Plame business, but because he did'nt properly remember the timing of what happened months in the past.
Do you even realize, that you're doing exactly what you have so unjustly accused me of doing?
Accusations are not self fullfilling truths, Rue.
If real evidence suggests it could be true, the federal prosecutor indicts you and you step down from your post.
No indictment, no apparent proof.
Should I draw you a picture???????
Am I a Lion?... No, I think I'ma tellin' the truth.
BarnStormer
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, to get back to all those things you wrote about Churchill that weren't true (that's libel, not slander) - what do you have to say for yourself?
Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The fucker isn't even a real Native American. He's a bigger fraud than YoSaffBridge. He deserves the suck side of SERENITY's vtol engines.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME