Real World Event Discussions

Bush at 29%

POSTED BY: DallasFirefly
UPDATED: Thursday, May 18, 2006 17:22
VIEWED: 6180
PAGE 4 of 6

Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Haze:
Here is the link.



Q But it's your response to Iraq that's considered --

THE PRESIDENT: Let me finish. Let me finish, please. Please. You ask the questions and I'll answer them, if you don't mind.

But i do mind... and i know i'll be glad when he is finished....

Thanks for the link Haze....

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:13 AM

I guess it's possible for Bush to fall a little further, but he probably won't since he's busy shoring up his base. He won't rise much either, but I think his goal is to get back to about 40% so he won't drag his party to far down in the mid terms.

To Dayve, Kinky Friedman is interesting, but he can't beat Perry. He can only siphon enough votes away from Chris Bell to reelect Perry. With Ms Strayhorn (a Republican running for Governor as an independent, for those outside of Texas) in the race there is a chance that Bell can defeat Perry, but not if Democrats vote for Kinky in large numbers. Independents always hurt the major party candidate they are closest to idea logically. Ralph Nader in the 2000 Presidential race is the best example of that.


I wanna be Mr. Baccarin!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:20 AM

Personally, I think that anyone who goes calling themselves Kinky DESERVES high office!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:50 AM

When you said you needed Kinky I thought you meant... uh... kinky...

DARN! And I was all ready to volunteer!

---------------------------------
Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:54 AM

hmmm interesting thought. I must let it compute. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:10 AM

Quote:

Personally, I think that anyone who goes calling themselves Kinky DESERVES high office
Uhm, we got that already. "according to a high White Horse souse ..."


Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:33 AM

On a more serious note - I'm proud to be one of the few who thought Bush was a loser on 9/10, 9/11 and 9/12.

Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:56 AM

That would be me. I remember thinking what a chicken he was for flying around on Air Force One far longer than he needed to. Seeing his deer caught in the headlights look in the Florida classroom after his aide informed him of the attack was priceless. That's Bush in a nutshell, dumb and gutless.

I wanna be Mr. Baccarin!

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
On a more serious note - I'm proud to be one of the few who thought Bush was a loser on 9/10, 9/11 and 9/12.


Same here. I actually disliked him more than I usually do during that time for two reasons:
i) I knew people would rally behind him and his popularity would shoot up, which was an undeserved blessing for him;
ii) I guess I can understand why people would support their leader in such a time, but somehow, deep down, I just knew his administration would misuse that trust and goodwill - and it did.



Other people can occasionally be useful, especially as minions. I want lots of minions.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Haze:
He consented to an interview with RTE over here in 2004 and wouldn’t you know it the interview asked him ACTUAL questions about ACTUAL things with ACTUAL follow-ups. The barely contained anger on his face during was as funny as it was frightening. I’ll see if I can find a link to a transcript so I can post it here. Afterwards the US posted a complaint to both the RTE and the Irish embassy. All that for simply being asked the kind of questions an Irish politician would be faced with on a day to day basis. As I say both funny and deeply worrying.

I've seen similar things with the British media (mainly BBC interviews, I like some of the Parkinson ones). US politions just don't seem to be able to handle being asked questions that haven't been pre-approved and pre-answered by a crack team of spin doctors.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
And as you know, these are open forums, you're able to come and listen to what I have to say.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME