GWB Approval Rating 4/24/06
POSTED BY: STDOUBT
UPDATED: Monday, April 7, 2025 04:26
VIEWED: 6755
PAGE 1 of 10
Approve
32%
Disapprove
60%
Clueless
8%
Source: CNN
ref URL: http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
P.S. Why doesn't someone move that AIDS /Racial
thread to troll coutry FFS?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Still gald he's President. Can't imagine the horror of Kerry or Gore in the W.H.
Also glad the only polls that count are the ones on Election day.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:These are the only Americans that MATTER! The only ones with the VISION!
Originally posted by STDOUBT:
Approve
32%
The kind that helped us choose VHS over BETA!!!!!!
Chrisisall!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:Quote:These are the only Americans that MATTER! The only ones with the VISION!
Originally posted by STDOUBT:
Approve
32%
The kind that helped us choose VHS over BETA!!!!!!
Chrisisall!
Too bad. Bush isn't running again. And I suspect many of those who 'disapprove' are ALSO conservatives who are less than thrilled w/ W's weak stance on Illegal immigration, excessive Federal spending, and of course, the price of gasoline, which has absolutely nothing to do w/ his policy, but it's what everyone has to deal with , regardless. And before anyone whines about the war in Iraq, there's a host of other forces which impact the oil market - increased economies in China, India, Hurricane damage to oil platforms / refineries in the Gulf of Mexio, social unrest in Nigeria, and the whacko Iranian President making new threats every other day about nuclear holocaust and vaporizing Israel.
People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I knew it.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Too bad. Bush isn't running again.
You were one of the first to buy VHS.
ChrisisallNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
With a great deal of consistency, I hear from the Bush apologists, who even themselves can't prop him up on his own merits or accomplishments, "at least he isn't Kerry or Gore, because they would just be fucking horrible."
For starters, what isn't fucking horrible about this President's track record?
Secondly, could somebody please elaborate on what exactly Kerry or Gore would have done that would have been so terrible?
Would they have scorned our nation's laws as much as this Presidency has? Would they have ignored and even endangered our national security at the level that this presidency and this buttkissing Congress has? I can go on and on and give specific after specific, but rather than to do that, I'll leave my argument open to attack, so that somebody might actually respond to it, rather than flitting away to post the same old, consistently refuted, propaganda on another thread.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Righteous9:
With a great deal of consistency, I hear from the Bush apologists, who even themselves can't prop him up on his own merits or accomplishments, "at least he isn't Kerry or Gore, because they would just be fucking horrible."
For starters, what isn't fucking horrible about this President's track record?
Secondly, could somebody please elaborate on what exactly Kerry or Gore would have done that would have been so terrible?
Would they have scorned our nation's laws as much as this Presidency has? Would they have ignored and even endangered our national security at the level that this presidency and this buttkissing Congress has? I can go on and on and give specific after specific, but rather than to do that, I'll leave my argument open to attack, so that somebody might actually respond to it, rather than flitting away to post the same old, consistently refuted, propaganda on another thread.
No, they wouldn't have. We would still be involved with Iraq, but I feel like a number of other things wouldn't have happened/would have actually been dealt with when they did occur.
Though honestly, I was more about Edwards than Kerry in that duo.
What this country really needs is a strong 3rd/4th party to really shake things up.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall: The kind that helped us choose VHS over BETA!!!!!!
I've only ever known VHS!! I didn't even get a chance to choose!!!
THOSE BASTARDS!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I imagine that they might have kissed the a** of the status quo, and found nicer, more intelligent ways to state why we must be in Iraq.
Originally posted by Righteous9:
Secondly, could somebody please elaborate on what exactly Kerry or Gore would have done that would have been so terrible?
On the other hand, I don't see them letting Katrina go down the same way...
Trying to be fair Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Beta was superior, but (like Nader) had poor backing, and lost.
Originally posted by Sassalicious:
I've only ever known VHS!! I didn't even get a chance to choose!!!
THOSE BASTARDS!
I feel for you.
Alpha Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME