Simon and Kaylee - Meant to last or meant to not?
POSTED BY: TamSibling
UPDATED: Thursday, February 16, 2006 22:14
VIEWED: 8429
PAGE 4 of 4
Meant to last!!!!!!......uh......until Joss writes another movie, and implales one of them on a giant toothpick, or sets one of the on fire, or some other Joss type gruesomeness! 
I'd given some thought to movin' off the edge -- not an ideal location -- thinkin' a place in the middle.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
>while there is no doubt S/K would be going at it like bunnies, why does everyone insist they would be irresponsible and end up having a baby out of wedlock? Or get married right away?
You're the first person I've seen that feels the same way I do about it.
1. The man is a doctor. My guess is he has yearly contraceptive shots and makes certain any woman he's with does the same. 500 years in the future, I'm sure they've advanced enough that 'oopses' are rare.
2. He's on the run. He's trying to protect his sister. Knocking up any woman whether he loves her or not would be a recipe for additional disaster. I think he's more responsible than that.
3. I think he loves very deeply (look at what he gave up for River?) and would love and protect Kaylee enough to die for her.
And he doesn't need to be married to her to accomplish this. Imagine what the Feds would think when they found out he had a wife? Ohh, someone else to catch and torture...
No, wouldn't happen. Simon's too smart to let it.
My opinion though and I know many have ones that differ.
"A government is a body of people usually notably ungoverned."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME