Real World Event Discussions

Victoria's Secret Switching To Lesbian Lingerie

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Sunday, May 24, 2026 23:10
VIEWED: 7608
PAGE 5 of 5

Sunday, January 8, 2023 9:28 PM

UPDATE FROM CAPTAIN OBVIOUS:

Victoria’s Secret CEO Amy Hauk resigns after just eight months.



THE REASON: “Amy Hauk will be stepping down as CEO of Victoria’s Secret and PINK in order to spend more time with her family in Florida,” the company said in a statement.

TRANSLATION: You're fired!


Former Executive Vice President of Merchandising for L Brands and Bed Bath & Bodyworks and Human Thumb became CEO of VS on April 21st of 2022. VS Stock was $45.86 at the time, which was actually higher than its IPO of $42.14, but steeply down from the speculative bubble that was created when it announced fat and tranny models would be replacing the gorgeous Angel lineup. By August 14th of 2021, VS stocked peaked at $74.77.

Around this time, MarkeWatch.com had this to say:

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/victorias-secret-soars-in-its-first-
days-as-a-standalone-company-with-shares-up-33-11628100891


Quote:

Ahead of the separation, Victoria’s Secret announced a new board, mostly populated by women, a new women-focused approach that highlights empowerment and diversity, and a brand ambassador panel, VS Collective, that includes U.S. soccer player Megan Rapinoe; actor, producer and author Priyanka Chopra Jonas; and Paloma Elsesser, a model and body-positive advocate.

...

MKM calls Victoria’s Secret a “compelling value” that has assets including a strong executive team and an omnichannel structure that works to its benefit. Analysts rate the company’s shares buy with an $88 price target.

Analysts are equally upbeat about Bath & Body Works.

“Now having spun off Victoria’s Secret, Bath & Body Works is a standalone company with industry-leading margins and market share, a robust growth trajectory, category tailwinds and a flexible supply chain,” Wells Fargo wrote in a separate Bath & Body Works note.



Incidentally, here's what's happening with Bed Bath & Bodyworks in 2023:

REUTERS: Bed Bath & Beyond preparing to file bankruptcy within weeks

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/bed-bath-beyond-raise
s-going-concern-doubt-shares-fall-17-2023-01-05
/

....

Back to VS...

The SEC filing regarding her "stepping down" was released on January 3rd. Shares were $32.99 on that date. There was a slight uptick of value on the following day, but it has been see-sawing its way downward, with a slight uptick today leaving it at $32.44 currently.



I agree with MarketWatch. The brand IS worth $88 per share. But only if you get rid of the fat and tranny models and go back to what always worked for the brand.

It wasn't sexy models that were killing the brand's value. It was the greedy, pedophile 80 year old CEO skimming as much from the top as he could before he retired, as well as the RIDICULOUS salaries that were being paid to the "executives" of the brand before the woke failure that followed, including the incompetent choices in leadership between the public offering and now.




Here's some comments on the news of Hauk's departure:

Good riddance! The merchandise was NEVER more cheaply made or unattractive under her brief helm. It has been declining for years. The company would do fine if they brought back pretty things of good quality. They have not seemed to follow that once winning formula for the last ten years.

------

VS began its descent when it added a cross-dresser to its Angel line-up, and it’s not coming back. Neither are it’s former customers of which I was one.

------

When I’m shopping for clothes I often read the reviews to determine my size for a product. But on the VS website I can’t because I don’t want to read comments from men wearing women’s underwear including graphic comments about “tucking” and the feel of the fabric. Gross. I haven’t purchased anything from VS in years.

------

Maybe the CEO of Victoria's Secret should be someone who can actually pull off wearing their products and look goo

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 19, 2023 9:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK (June 19th, 2021):

And the bottom line is, if VS is going to make the changes that they're talking about making, they're no longer in the lingerie business. They're making comfortable clothing and undergarments, some of which might be moderately sexy, for the overweight population.

Like I said before. That's they're prerogative. But they're not going to change any minds by doing it. They're just going to leave a void behind that somebody else is going to come around to fill. And if the new direction VS takes from here ends up losing them more money while losing their existing clientele, the new CEO will ultimately be fired.

--------------------------------------------------

Give me liberty or just come shoot me in my house. I'm so over this ridiculous reality.





I'm going to need a bigger bag...





Victoria's Secret halts woke branding, going back to roots as sales dip

https://calgaryherald.com/life/fashion-beauty/victorias-secret-halts-w
oke-branding-going-back-to-roots-as-sales-dip


Quote:

Victoria’s Secret is bringing sexy back.

The U.S. lingerie chain said that it will focus on expanding its swim, sport and apparel offerings after a drop in sales the last two years following its woke, feminist makeover.

The company launched a rebranding effort two years ago to promote inclusivity. It featured lesbian soccer star Megan Rapinoe, transgender model Valentina Sampaio and other spokesmodels.

Reviews were favourable at the time, but it did not translate to increased sales.
Victoria’s Secret is projecting revenue of $6.2 billion this year, down 5% from 2022 and well below the $7.5 billion from 2020.

At a presentation to investors in New York last week, the company said it was shifting gears to increase sales.

“Sexiness can be inclusive,” said Greg Unis, brand president of Victoria’s Secret and Pink, according to CNN editorial partner Business of Fashion. “Sexiness can celebrate the diverse experiences of our customers and that’s what we’re focused on.”

The financial drain the body-positive marketing was causing has forced the fashion chain to bring its runway shows back, in which it will blend sexiness with more inclusive initiatives.

Hailey Bieber and Emily Ratajkowski have been featured in more recent campaigns along with plus-size models Paloma Elsesser and Ali Tate-Cutler.

“Despite everyone’s best endeavours, it’s not been enough to carry the day,” said chief executive Martin Waters.




Victoria’s Secret Bet On Megan Rapinoe, Woke Marketing Push Miserably Backfires

https://www.outkick.com/victorias-secret-bet-on-megan-rapinoe-woke-mar
keting-push-miserably-backfires
/

Quote:

Another company that put Megan Rapinoe at the center of its marketing is failing … miserably.

It’s been a bad year for marketing executives who chose to go woke in their messaging, and you can add Victoria’s Secret to that list.

By the sounds of it, the women’s lingerie company took such a revenue hit from its “inclusive” new direction that they’re strongly pivoting away from it.





What's not mentioned in these articles?

After Fat Woke Idiot Diversity Hire Amy Hauk was fired from her CEO position in January of this year, the brand did not back off of woke shit.

That $45.86 per share when she took over and the $32.99 per share when they finally shit-canned her ass?

They'd LOVE if they still had that going for them.

Nope.

$17.91 per share right now.

And that's up from $14.30 per share on October 5th, with over $2.50 of the increase coming in just the last week.

The fall of VS stock prices up until last week looks like a Joe Biden* popularity graph.




Victoria's Secret, just like ALL CORPORATIONS, don't give a single shit about the useless and/or the fat and/or the sexless and/or the menta

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 7, 2024 10:13 PM

Heard News report that VS stock lost 25%.

Shockers.

Is it because Libtard wymmin soccer beat Canada on a submerged field?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, March 7, 2024 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Heard News report that VS stock lost 25%.

Shockers.

Is it because Libtard wymmin soccer beat Canada on a submerged field?



Just checked...

Down 37.47% in the last 5 days, actually.

6 months of gains wiped out in 5 days.



--------------------------------------------------

Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, May 24, 2026 11:10 PM

so that poor poor me woe is me Jew Wexner with all those Israel connections and Epstein island links

did he find SJW 'Diversity' was that before or after these Epstein stories started leaking to news papers?

The Dark Empire of Les Wexner

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME