Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?

POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 16:05
VIEWED: 185382
PAGE 355 of 479

I didn't forget. It's bullshit. E. Jean Carroll is a lying slut and won't see a dime of that money.

Trump was fucking supermodels behind his wife on the regular back when Carroll was a 7/10 groupie slut working at a perfume counter.

In reality, Trump told her to go dig in the dumpster to find a man on her level, and she never forgot that.



--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I didn't forget. It's bullshit. E. Jean Carroll is a lying slut and won't see a dime of that money.

---

Too late. Trump has already paid the insurance company Chubb $91.63 million for a bond. Even if the Supreme Court takes Trump's case, he won't get that money returned. Chubb holds Trump's money until the Supreme Court tells Trump to fuck off, you rapist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump#Appea
l_effort_(March_2024%E2%80%93present)

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I didn't forget. It's bullshit. E. Jean Carroll is a lying slut and won't see a dime of that money.

---

Too late. Trump has already paid the insurance company Chubb $91.63 million for a bond. Even if the Supreme Court takes Trump's case, he won't get that money returned. Chubb holds Trump's money until the Supreme Court tells Trump to fuck off, you rapist.

---

Apparently you don't understand how bonds work.

No surprise there, retard.

--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Apparently you don't understand how bonds work.

No surprise there, retard.

---

(Appeal bonds are "fully collateralized," meaning the appellant, Trump, provided cash, property, or a letter of credit equal to the full amount of the bond to secure it. Then Chubb charged Trump 10% more because he is completely unreliable. )

Pam Bondi did the same as what 6ixStringJack is doing.

Photographer Captures Pam Bondi’s Notes—and They’re a Doozy

Attorney General Pam Bondi came to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing armed with nothing more than lame canned attacks.

By Edith Olmsted | October 8, 2025 10:37 a.m. ET

https://newrepublic.com/post/201475/photographer-pam-bondi-senate-hear
ing-notes

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi needed a cheat sheet of attacks to dodge Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s tough questions.

While sitting before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday, Bondi repeatedly refused to answer questions from the Rhode Island Democrat about what happened to the $50,000 cash bribe border czar Tom Homan received from undercover FBI agents in 2024.

Reuters photographer Jonathan Ernst captured an image of the inside of a folder of notes Bondi referred to during questioning by Whitehouse. But her notes had nothing to do with her work as leader of the Department of Justice, or even the embattled border czar. Rather, Bondi had collected screenshots of social media posts, prewritten comebacks, and handwritten notes she hoped could give her a good “gotcha” moment.

The top of the folder showed a July X post from Whitehouse in which he’d called for an investigation into Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. “No government official should be above the law,” he wrote.

Also included in the folder was a bulleted list of comebacks. Apparently, Bondi needed to prepare the remark “You are a total hypocrite” in advance.

She employed another one of her prewritten attacks when asked about Homan’s tax returns. “Senator, I would be more concerned if I were you when you talk about corruption and money, when you pushed for legislation that subsidized your wife’s company!” Bondi sneered.

“The questions here are actually pretty specific,” Whitehouse replied, undeterred. “So, having you respond with completely irrelevant far-right internet talking points is really not very helpful here.”

Below her catalog of clapbacks, Bondi had written a handwritten note “On Epstein” positing whether Whitehouse had ever accepted money from Reid Hoffman, who once invited Epstein to dinner. She used the tidbit to deflect from a question about whether the FBI had seized photos of President Donald Trump with half-naked young women from the safe at Epstein’s estate, as reported by author Michael Wolff.

“Do you know if the FBI found those photographs in their search of Jeffrey Epstein’s safe or premises or otherwise? Have you seen any such thing?” Whitehouse asked.

“You know, Senator Whitehouse, you sit here and make salacious remarks, once again trying to slander President Trump left and right, when you’re the one who was taking money from one of Epstein’s closest confidants, Reid Hoffman,” Bondi replied.

Again, Whitehouse continued unbothered. “The question is, did the FBI find those photographs that have been discussed publicly by a witness who claimed Jeffrey Epstein showed them to him. You don’t know anything about that?” he asked, and Bondi fell silent, having exhausted her scant notes.

It’s disturbing, but not surprising, that Bondi didn’t make actual preparations to answer tough questions from senators. It appears that the attorney general felt no obligation to be accountable to the American people about alleged efforts to cover up for Trump or his underlings, believing them all to be above the law.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Apparently you don't understand how bonds work.

No surprise there, retard.

---

(Appeal bonds are "fully collateralized," meaning the appellant, Trump, provided cash, property, or a letter of credit equal to the full amount of the bond to secure it. Then Chubb charged Trump 10% more because he is completely unreliable. )

---

So fucking what?

Her case is going to get tossed, and she isn't going to get shit.

Trump had to put up collateral for the half a BILLION kangaroo court case that was thrown out too.

You get your bond back, jackhole.

Chubb doesn't just keep that. The government doesn't confiscate it. It doesn't just disappear into the ether.

You are fucking retarded.

--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

So fucking what?

Her case is going to get tossed, and she isn't going to get shit.

Trump had to put up collateral for the half a BILLION kangaroo court case that was thrown out too.

You get your bond back, jackhole.

Chubb doesn't just keep that. The government doesn't confiscate it. It doesn't just disappear into the ether.

You are fucking retarded.

---

Why do Trumptards act the way you do? Once you figure it out, you will know why life has been hard for you Trumptards. Even better, you will know why life has been one conflict after another for Trump, too!

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Something Interesting Is Happening With GOP Public Opinion

Phillips’s Newsletter by Phillips P. OBrien / Oct 9, 2025 at 4:19 AM

Hhttps://phillipspobrien.substack.com/p/something-interesting-is-happening

There has been a noticeable change in the public opinion of Republicans about the war in Ukraine—one that seems to have been catalyzed when Trump rolled out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin during the Alaska Summit in August. In a nutshell, Trump seems to be losing control over Republican opinion on the Russo-Ukraine war, in a way that is very different from his hold over the party when it comes to practically every other issue.

Now, one of the reasons I get frustrated when people talk about Trump being a buffoon, or stupid, etc., is that this leads to the type of drastic underestimation of his political abilities that helps him immensely. Trump is one of the most intuitive operators in US political history—a seminal figure who has the ability to motivate and understand his base in a way that has been shared by very few others (and I hate saying that). Not understanding his political skills, respecting them, and responding to them appropriately, is one of the reasons Democrats have failed repeatedly against him.

Between 2022 and 2025 one of the greatest examples of Trump’s ability to manipulate and understand his base was how he turned a Republican Party that was instinctively sympathetic to Ukraine and hostile to Putin in February 2022, and flipped it almost entirely by the second half of 2024 and early 2025.

In a nutshell, when Putin launched his full scale invasion in February 2022, Republicans and Democrats shared very similar visions of the war and the need to support Ukraine, but within a year the Republicans had become much more sympathetic to Russia and skeptical of aiding Ukraine. This change can be seen in many polls, maybe the best is the Pew Research Centre, which took regular polls using the same methodology and asking the same questions) between 2022 and 2024.

What they found was striking—starting with the basic idea of whether Russia was a threat to the USA. In February 2022 there was no partisan difference whatsoever amongst Americans. However by 2024 Republicans were far less likely to see the Russians as a threat. Basically the Republican worry about Russia being a threat had fallen by 50% (and this was while Russia was regularly attacking Ukrainian civilians, etc).

When it came to US aid for Ukraine, the Partisan change by the Republicans was arguably more stark. In March 2022, once again there was strong bipartisan support for aiding Ukraine. However by April 2024, half of all Republicans believed that the US was providing too much aid to Ukraine. Note that date April 2024—it was after four months during which the Republicans in Congress had already cut off Ukraine from US aid—which caused a real crisis. At the same time, Democratic support for aiding Ukraine had remained very solid.

This deep partisan split with Republicans becoming more Ukraine-skeptical and more Russia-comfortable than Democrats, was seen in many other polls.

When Trump retook the White House, therefore, he had done something really remarkable (and I mean that in a terrible way). He had taken a party that was instinctively pro-Ukraine and anti-Russian and basically scrambled its brains. And believe, me, Republicans in Congress understood this, and tempered their support for Ukraine and criticism of Russia as well.

Now the interesting news. Having scrambled Republican brains, Trump has started to lose control of GOP opinion and Ukraine and Russia, particularly in the last two months. Signs started in March that the Republicans were become a little uncomfortable with Trump’s open love of Putin and hostility towards Ukraine, but in the last two months this transformation has picked up pace rapidly—and amazingly the partisan difference between the parties has gone down a great deal. Here is the Yougov/Economist Poll, which shows the change starkly—notice in particular the steep decline in Republi

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Bailing out Bessent’s Buddies’ Bets on Argentina

Trump bails out hedge funds’ failed bets on Milei while his foreign aid cuts will kill millions of children

By Paul Krugman | Oct 09, 2025

https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/bailing-out-bessents-buddies-bets

RFK Jr. Poses for Weird Photos With Argentina's President as They Plot Alternative to World Health Organization

The Trump administration really hates giving foreign aid that serves any kind of humanitarian purpose. They are clearly unmoved by the fact that that they may be responsible for the preventable deaths of millions of children in impoverished countries.

Children die as USAID aid cuts snap lifeline for the world’s most malnourished
https://apnews.com/article/usaid-funding-cuts-humanitarian-children-tr
ump-4447e210c4b5543b8ebb9a6b9e01aa53

And to be crass, it isn’t even in the strategic interests of the United States to withdraw critically needed aid to impoverished countries. For example, we are abandoning the entire continent of Africa, with billions of people and enormous deposits of critical resources, to China.

But a $20 billion lifeline to the right-wing government of Argentina, which has no strategic value to the US and has a decades-long history of corruption, unstable politics, fiscal mismanagement and financial crises? A country that has defaulted nine times on its sovereign debt, three times since 2001? No problem!

Two weeks ago I wrote about Scott Bessent’s plan to aid Argentina, saying “This is about ideology and Trumpian fealty, not America’s interests.” I have since learned that what I said was true but incomplete, because I was insufficiently cynical. Mea culpa.

First things first: there’s no plausible scenario in which even $20 billion in U.S. loans will save Javier Milei’s failing economic strategy. The core of that strategy, as I noted previously, is what is called “exchange-rate based stabilization” — propping up the peso in an attempt to bring down inflation. But as Maurice Obstfeld, the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, points out in a new analysis, “Latin America is a museum of failed exchange-rate based stabilization efforts.”

I witnessed one of Argentina’s many failed attempts up close. During Argentina’s 2001 financial crisis I attended a meeting at the Casa Rosada, the Argentine equivalent of the White House, with then-president de la Rua. I was there because de la Rua was desperately trying to salvage the Convertibility Plan, the 1990s version of exchange-rate based stabilization. The plan bore a strong family resemblance to Milei’s plan both in concept and in results: Initial euphoria that eventually gave way to disaster. Neither I nor anyone else had a solution: the Convertibility Plan was unsalvageable and Argentina soon defaulted on $132 billion in sovereign debt.

Yet in 2024, despite Argentina having arguably the worst global record for sovereign debt defaults, hedge funds decided that this time was different. Milei played the room well, espousing libertarian econo-derp policies, waving a chain saw to show what he would do to government spending. While ignoring his own domestic politics, Milei deftly courted Donald Trump and Elon Musk. So by December 2024, after Trump won the presidential election, Argentine stocks and bonds had surged in value, as hedge funds and money managers put big bets on Milei.

Well, as every economist who knew the relevant history expected, it all went pear-shaped again. By early September 2025, investors began dumping Argentine assets as it became clear that Milei would suffer significant losses in upcoming congressional elections, thereby putting his entire program in danger. Despite lacking any economic, strategic or even a political rationale, Scott Bessent then announced a $20 billion lifeline to save Milei.

What I failed to point out in my previous post was that the Bessent’s money-drop was not only an attempt to bail out Argentina’s version of Elon Musk, it also bailed out

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME