Real World Event Discussions

Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?

POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 16:05
VIEWED: 185382
PAGE 351 of 479

Sunday, October 5, 2025 8:46 PM

NEWSOM: “IN ADDITION TO NEW MAPS, WE PLAN ON CHANGING OUR STATE’S OFFICIAL NAME TO DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE EPSTEIN LIST-FORNIA.”

https://ifunny.co/picture/newsom-in-addition-to-new-maps-we-plan-on-ch
anging-MuvFrj9fC


The implication here is that the convicted felon rapist draft dodger is a pedophile.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, October 5, 2025 9:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
NEWSOM: “IN ADDITION TO NEW MAPS, WE PLAN ON CHANGING OUR STATE’S OFFICIAL NAME TO DONALD TRUMP IS ON THE EPSTEIN LIST-FORNIA.”



The Left can't meme.

--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

The Left can't meme.

Trump is not funny when raping children. The little girls weep:

Case 5:16-cv-00797-DMG-KS Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:3

11. On the third occasion involving the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson was forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump. After this sex act, both minors were forced to orally copulate Defendant Trump by placing their mouths simultaneously on his erect penis until he achieved sexual orgasm. After zipping up his pants, Defendant Trump physically pushed both minors away while angrily berating them for the "poor" quality of their sexual performance.

12. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was tied to a bed by Defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Johnson. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff Johnson loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to "please wear a condom". Defendant Trump responded by violently striking Plaintiff Johnson in the face with his open hand and screaming that "he would do whatever he wanted" as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, the Defendant, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, in tears asked Defendant Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Defendant Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money "to get a fucking abortion".

It’s only 6 pages! See them all in their original form at https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/katie-johnson-civil-case-for-rape
-trump-epsteinpdf/257375882


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 6:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

The Left can't meme.

Trump is not funny when raping children.



Shut the fuck up, creep.

--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 6:11 AM

Hey Google! What was the outcome of court case 5:16-cv-00797-DMG-KS?

Quote:

The civil lawsuit
Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump et al. (Case No. 5:16-cv-00797-DMG-KS), filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, was dismissed on May 2, 2016, just a week after it was filed. The court's dismissal followed the denial of the plaintiff's request to proceed without paying court fees.
Case details and timeline

Parties: Plaintiff "Katie Johnson," a pseudonym for a woman who alleged she was sexually assaulted by Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, and defendants Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Filing: The lawsuit was filed in federal court in California on April 26, 2016, alleging sexual abuse and a conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of her civil rights.

Dismissal: The case was quickly dismissed. On May 2, 2016, Judge Dolly M. Gee denied the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (without paying court fees) and dismissed the case. The court cited that the plaintiff "fails to state a civil rights claim".



Tell me about the judge who dismissed the case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_Gee

Appointed by Barack Obama.

Judge Dolly M. Gee is the Chief United States District Judge for the Central District of California and the first Chinese American woman to serve as an Article III federal judge. A graduate of UCLA Law, she has a background as an advocate for immigrants, minorities, and the working class, often focusing on labor and employment law before joining the federal bench.




Also...

Quote:

While this doesn't invalidate the accuser's claims, reporting from Snopes in 2024 revealed that a publicist with a history of creating fictional salacious stories was heavily involved in promoting the claims during the 2016 campaign. This raises questions about the motives behind the claims' promotion, but it doesn't disprove the underlying allegations themselves.



The Snopes article:

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/

Quote:

The Johnson claims, however, originated due to the aggressive efforts of a publicist using the false name Al Taylor. In 2016, investigative reporters tied the Taylor persona to a former "Jerry Springer Show" producer, Norm Lubow. For this story, Lubow confirmed to Snopes he had acted as Taylor and played a role in filing and promoting the Johnson claims.


Go fuck yourself, Second.


--------------------------------------------------

For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 4:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Shut the fuck up, creep.

You are a supporter of a child rapist. Congratulate yourself on good taste and fine feelings of moral superiority.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 4:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The court cited that the plaintiff "fails to state a civil rights claim".

That is not the same as Trump proving he did not rape a child. Also, it is not the same as insufficient evidence that defendant Donald J Trump raped the child.

The U.S. Supreme Court has protected Trump in the same way, on legal technicalities:

Trump Keeps Winning at the Supreme Court. There Are Two Convincing Theories Why.

By Dahlia Lithwick | Oct 06, 2025 5:45 AM

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/10/trump-winning-supreme-cour
t-theories-john-roberts.html


There is a long-standing theory among Supreme Court watchers that holds that the reason the six conservatives on the John Roberts court keep giving President Donald Trump big wins is because they are attempting not to provoke a fight with him, and thus not invite a so-called constitutional crisis wherein the executive branch and the high court are in an intractable standoff. On this week’s Amicus podcast, Dahlia Lithwick spoke to Ian Millhiser, senior correspondent at Vox, who writes about the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States, and attempted to understand whether this is a logical explanation of the conservatives’ thinking. A portion of their conversation, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, is below.

Dahlia Lithwick: I wanted to ask about what has come to be named the appeasement theory, the idea being that the Roberts court rolls on pretty much everything for Donald Trump, but it’s because they’re saving their powder—giving Donald Trump a string of uninterrupted wins, all in the hopes that they’re not going to draw down whatever capital they have with him. The idea being that when the real constitutional crisis is upon us, they will leap out and save democracy. I hear this a lot from people that are very, very smart. I am curious if, in your view, what the Kavanaugh–Barrett–chief justice trifecta is really saying, is OK, we’re going to wait until things get really bad and then we’re going to stop the juggernaut. I’m very curious how that’s going to work or if they genuinely don’t think there’s a juggernaut here to be stopped now.

Ian Millhiser: I try not to read the minds of the justices in part because I don’t know if it really matters that much whether the Neville Chamberlain theory of the Supreme Court is correct or whether the theory that they’re just 100 percent on board with MAGA is correct. Either way, they’re handing down the same decisions and what matters most is the results. I think what potentially supports the Neville Chamberlain theory is that they haven’t been handing down too many decisions saying: “Yes, the Constitution says that Trump can do this tyrannical thing that he wants to do.” What they’re doing instead is saying if you file in Court X, [we’ll] say, No, no, no—you had to file in Court Y. If you get an injunction, they’ll say, No, you didn’t meet the rules for what you need to do to get an injunction. If one plaintiff brings a suit, they’ll say, No, someone else had to be the plaintiff. They’re finding all these procedural ways to hand Trump victories and maybe that’s because they don’t want to damage the substantive law. And maybe they will turn around eventually when someone finally finds the perfect plaintiff and files in the perfect court [so] that Amy Coney Barrett has to admit, Yes, you are allowed to bring this magical person to this magical court and actually get a magical injunction from it.

Maybe they will then rule in August of Trump’s last year in office that he did something illegal, but who cares? The crisis is now. And if they are letting Trump win because they think they can appease him and find procedural reasons to kick the can down the road for as long as possible, or if they are instead doing it because they think that Stephen Miller is the most awesome person who has ever lived and they wake up every morning asking themselves, What would Stephen Miller do?, we’re still getting the ex

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 4:50 PM

State Terror, American Style

Forget about “soft autocracy”

By Paul Krugman | Oct 6, 2025 at 5:34 AM

https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/state-terror-american-style

Over the weekend I talked to a couple of people, people who generally try to keep abreast of the news, about the Chicago apartment raid last Tuesday — and discovered that they hadn’t heard about it. And that’s extremely worrying. It suggests that many people don’t realize how fast and aggressively the Trump administration is moving to end rule of law and convert America into a full-fledged autocracy.

So while I’d like to devote today’s post to economics — you have no idea how happy I felt while writing yesterday’s primer about agglomeration and productivity — I couldn’t in good conscience avoid writing about the terrible things happening in Chicago and elsewhere, and what they may portend.

About that raid: It was reported in mainstream media, but didn’t get the screaming banner headlines it deserved. Here’s what happened, according to Reuters:

U.S. Border Patrol agents deployed to Chicago led a late-night raid on an apartment building this week, rappelling from helicopters onto rooftops and breaking down doors in an operation authorities said targeted gang members but which swept up U.S. citizens and families.

As part of the raid, some U.S. citizens were temporarily detained and children pulled from their beds, according to interviews with residents and news reports. Building hallways were still littered with debris two days later.

Hundreds of agents swarmed the apartment building during the raid on Tuesday, including some rappelling down to the roof from Black Hawk helicopters, according to NewsNation.

One resident, who asked not to be named, reported being made to lie down on the ground by agents during the raid and having his hands zip-tied.

ICE claimed that the building was targeted because it was “known to be frequented by Tren de Aragua (a Venezuelan gang) members and their associates” — that is, although ICE carried out the raid, it was supposedly about crime. And they arrested two suspected gang members, while also rounding up some undocumented immigrants. But they detained everyone in the building, smashed their doors, zip-tied their children, and ransacked their homes.

This was a wildly disproportionate and illegal response, even if the raid had actually had anything to do with crime.

But none of what the Trump administration is doing in Chicago has anything to do with fighting crime. Chicago has more violent crime than, say, New York or Los Angeles, but the post-Covid bump in crime has completely receded. City officials report that this past summer had the fewest homicides in 60 years. If we’d seen this kind of decline in crime after the Trump administration began flooding Chicago with ICE agents, rather than before, they’d be touting these results as complete vindication.

But as I said, this isn’t about crime. It’s about paranoid conspiracy theories and an attempt to dismantle democracy.

Here’s Stephen Miller, Trump’s immigration czar:

Stephen Miller @StephenM
The issue before now is very simple and clear. There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general. The only remedy is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.
1:59 PM • 10/4/25 • 360K Views

Does Miller actually believe this? The truth is that left-wing terrorist attacks and plots are very rare in this country. There have been more this year than in the previous two years, but the number is still tiny, and is normally dwarfed by right-wing terrorism:

https://www.csis.org/analysis/left-wing-terrorism-and-political-violen
c

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 4:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Go fuck yourself, Second.

House of South Carolina Judge Criticized by Trump Administration Set Ablaze

Judge Diane Goodstein had received death threats. At least three members of the judge’s family, including her husband and their son, have been hospitalized with serious injuries.

Oct 6, 2025 4:00 AM CT

https://time.com/7323442/south-carolina-judge-diane-goodstein-house-fi
re-trump-political-violence
/

Funny how Trump threatens judges and then Trumptards try to kill the same people.
Could there be connections between Trump’s mouth and the crimes?

Trump’s Dept. of Justice is definitely NOT investigating such connections because the Supreme Court gave Trump immunity from prosecution.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/19/politics/trump-supreme-court-immunity

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, October 6, 2025 6:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Go fuck yourself, Second.

Trump will have 25,000 paying guests at his birthday party on the White House lawn:

The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fight will be hosted at the White House on June 14, 2026, marking the president’s 80th birthday. Trump announced the date on Sunday.

Around 20,000 to 25,000 will be in attendance on the White House South Lawn.

But the fight is not a universally popular event, with former UFC and WWE star Ronda Rousey last month ruling herself out from participating. During an appearance on The Lapsed Fan podcast, Rousey said she’s “got better s*** to do” when asked about the event.

Alluding to a potential comeback, she said “After Mike Tyson being in the biggest fight of the year, never say never,” but then added “I ain’t fighting at the f****** White House.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mma_ufc/trump-announces-white-house-u
fc-fight-date/ar-AA1NV8pg


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME