Trunp loses again in Court
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 04:15
VIEWED: 52231
PAGE 51 of 100
Quote:
Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM
THG
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.
T
Fed up RIGHTWING judges hand Trump major DEFEATS
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM
THG
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.
For every post you make in here of Trump losing a case initiated by an Obama/Clinton/Biden* appointee and never bother updating, there are 10 more that have been appealed in a higher court.
Go ahead and investigate that yourself. There has hardly been a single case of lawfare that you've thrown at Trump that stuck after it left the stacked ultra-left court.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
T
Trump ORDERED to CLEAN UP HIS MESS by Federal Judge
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The only loser here, as per usual, is you Ted.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM
THG
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.
For every post you make in here of Trump losing a case initiated by an Obama/Clinton/Biden* appointee and never bother updating, there are 10 more that have been appealed in a higher court.
Yes dummy, that's how it works...
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
'Both reasonable and proportionate': Trump ordered to pay $800,000 in legal fees over failed Steele dossier lawsuit
A British judge sitting in London on Thursday ordered President Donald Trump to pay some $800,000 to a private intelligence company owned by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele over a data protection lawsuit which was dismissed by a different judge last year.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/both-reasonable-and-proportion
ate-trump-ordered-to-pay-800-000-in-legal-fees-over-failed-steele-dossier-lawsuit/ar-AA1Cjok4?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=0f36254067b54106dbb032e8a8d17180&ei=104
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM
THG
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
For every post here of Trump getting creamed in court, there are nine more that I don't post.
For every post you make in here of Trump losing a case initiated by an Obama/Clinton/Biden* appointee and never bother updating, there are 10 more that have been appealed in a higher court.
Yes dummy, that's how it works...
T
Yes dummy, and Trump has won almost all of them.
That's why this thread is stupid. You are stupid.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
'Both reasonable and proportionate': Trump ordered to pay $800,000 in legal fees over failed Steele dossier lawsuit
A British judge sitting in London on Thursday ordered President Donald Trump to pay some $800,000 to a private intelligence company owned by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele over a data protection lawsuit which was dismissed by a different judge last year.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/both-reasonable-and-proportion
ate-trump-ordered-to-pay-800-000-in-legal-fees-over-failed-steele-dossier-lawsuit/ar-AA1Cjok4?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=0f36254067b54106dbb032e8a8d17180&ei=104
T
Trump won't be paying a dime of this.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
March 27:
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Appeals court refuses to halt an order for the rehiring of thousands of fired federal workers
WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court in California has refused to halt a judge’s order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of federal workers who were let go in mass firings.
A split 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel turned back an emergency motion late Wednesday to pause the order from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by labor unions and nonprofits as Republican President Donald Trump moves to dramatically downsize the federal workforce. Alsup is one of two judges who found legal problems with the way the firings of probationary workers were carried out.
Two of the three judges on the panel ruled against the request for an emergency stay. The dissenting judge said the government had a strong argument against reinstating the workers.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-refuses-to-halt-an-ord
er-for-the-rehiring-of-thousands-of-fired-federal-workers/ar-AA1BLTPh?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=95d016bd9b324cc88256c043441ad072&ei=24
Trump suffers another loss.
T
Supreme Court halts order to rehire federal workers removed by Trump
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/3373770/supreme-
court-halts-order-rehire-federal-workers/
Quote:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s sweeping order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal employees, marking an early legal win for the president’s plan to slash government bureaucracy.
In a brief, unsigned order, the high court sided with the administration and froze a March 13 injunction from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who ordered six agencies to reinstate 16,000 recently hired probationary employees pending litigation over the legality of their mass terminations.
OOPS.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
March 27:
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Appeals court refuses to halt an order for the rehiring of thousands of fired federal workers
WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court in California has refused to halt a judge’s order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of federal workers who were let go in mass firings.
A split 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel turned back an emergency motion late Wednesday to pause the order from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by labor unions and nonprofits as Republican President Donald Trump moves to dramatically downsize the federal workforce. Alsup is one of two judges who found legal problems with the way the firings of probationary workers were carried out.
Two of the three judges on the panel ruled against the request for an emergency stay. The dissenting judge said the government had a strong argument against reinstating the workers.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-refuses-to-halt-an-ord
er-for-the-rehiring-of-thousands-of-fired-federal-workers/ar-AA1BLTPh?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=95d016bd9b324cc88256c043441ad072&ei=24
Trump suffers another loss.
T
Supreme Court halts order to rehire federal workers removed by Trump
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/3373770/supreme-
court-halts-order-rehire-federal-workers/
Quote:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a federal judge’s sweeping order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of fired federal employees, marking an early legal win for the president’s plan to slash government bureaucracy.
In a brief, unsigned order, the high court sided with the administration and froze a March 13 injunction from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who ordered six agencies to reinstate 16,000 recently hired probationary employees pending litigation over the legality of their mass terminations.
OOPS.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME