Trunp loses again in Court
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 04:15
VIEWED: 52231
PAGE 50 of 100
Given the proclivity of Republican politicians to deride the federal government and the bureaucrats that fill its ranks, it stands to reason Democrats would be more likely to seek out Uncle Sam for employment.
And that is true. But only barely.
In a recent survey conducted by Government Business Council, the research arm of government and the bureaucrats that fill its ranks, it stands to reason Democrats would be more likely to seek out Uncle Sam for employment.
And that is true. But only barely.
In a recent survey conducted by Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive Media Group, 44 percent of respondents identified as Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents, while 40 percent identified as Republicans or Republican-leaning independents. The remaining respondents were undecided or did not identify with either party, though a plurality of them said they were “conservatives.”
https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2015/08/there-are-more-republicans-f
ederal-government-you-might-think/119138/
Jack, you are gullible. Easily persuaded to believe something, anything because you want it to be true. You are incredulous, in that you are incapable of believing anything you don't want to be true.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Given the proclivity of Republican politicians to deride the federal government and the bureaucrats that fill its ranks, it stands to reason Democrats would be more likely to seek out Uncle Sam for employment.
And that is true. But only barely.
In a recent survey conducted by Government Business Council, the research arm of government and the bureaucrats that fill its ranks, it stands to reason Democrats would be more likely to seek out Uncle Sam for employment.
And that is true. But only barely.
In a recent survey conducted by Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive Media Group, 44 percent of respondents identified as Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents, while 40 percent identified as Republicans or Republican-leaning independents. The remaining respondents were undecided or did not identify with either party, though a plurality of them said they were “conservatives.”
https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2015/08/there-are-more-republicans-f
ederal-government-you-might-think/119138/
Jack, you are gullible. Easily persuaded to believe something, anything because you want it to be true. You are incredulous, in that you are incapable of believing anything you don't want to be true.
T
You keep explaining yourself.
Government employees are 90% Democrat voters. I don't give a shit what this government funded government poll that nobody EVER ran before says all of the sudden. That's just the Democrats trying desperately to shift the narrative again, and it will fail just like everything else they do.
Also, I don't know a single person who works for the government, so I really, really don't care.
Keep crying for all those people you'll never meet, and wonder why your party is dead and won't come back.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Jack, you are gullible. Easily persuaded to believe something, anything because you want it to be true. You are incredulous, in that you are incapable of believing anything you don't want to be true.
T
You keep explaining yourself.
Because you're a moron, I have to explain things like I am talking to a child. Now you'll say you meant something else but your, I know you are but what am I, post proves my point. You have the IQ of a child.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Love hearing it...
T
Trump SMACKED DOWN and FORCED to COMPLY by Federal Judge
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judge bars Musk's DOGE team from Social Security records in scathing ruling
A federal judge Thursday issued a temporary restraining order barring Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency team from getting access to personally identifiable information from the Social Security Administration.
Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander accused DOGE of launching a "fishing expedition" at the Social Security agency and failing to provide any reason why it needed to access vast swaths of Americans' personal and private data.
"The defense does not appear to share a privacy concern for the millions of Americans whose SSA records were made available to the DOGE affiliates, without their consent," the judge wrote.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/judge-bars-musk-s-doge-team-fr
om-social-security-records-in-scathing-ruling/ar-AA1BkPUg?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=e841234ff0764761b2c04aaa48fcc87a&ei=26
Anybody who says Trump respects the law can't possibly have an IQ of above 60.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump loses again. Of course he did.
T
Federal Judge SHUTS DOWN Trump RETRIBUTION SCHEME?!?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judge Rules Trump’s Firing Unconstitutional
A federal judge has declared President Donald Trump’s removal of FLRA member Susan Tsui Grundmann unconstitutional, describing the firing as a clear violation of federal law. Judge Sparkle Sooknanan has ordered Grundmann’s reinstatement, citing the lack of due process and Congress’s authority in establishing protections for independent officials.
Sooknanan wrote, “The Government’s arguments paint with a broad brush and threaten to upend fundamental protections in our Constitution.” She added, “But ours is not an autocracy; it is a system of checks and balances.”
The FLRA, created by Congress to oversee labor disputes, grants its members statutory protections against arbitrary dismissal. Members can only be removed for inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance and must receive notice and a hearing before dismissal.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-rules-trump-s-firing-unconstit
utional/ar-AA1BJjtM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=2cb8f33603594755efee80f47e6dbe93&ei=14
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Thank you once again Democrats for not slow-walking any of this through your extreme Leftist judge stooges and getting them done very quickly so they can all be reversed on appeal and those that don't can make their way swiftly to the Supreme Court where they will be the law of the land going forward.
If your party had any leadership right now, this would not be happening because they would know to slow-walk this until the midterms, where historically they would gain back enough seats to at least take the house back.
Or maybe it's possible that your leadership already knows that there's no chance for a Democratic Party comeback in the mid-terms and they're just going to burn everything they can down while their ship sinks once and for all.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Appeals court refuses to halt an order for the rehiring of thousands of fired federal workers
WASHINGTON (AP) — An appeals court in California has refused to halt a judge’s order requiring the Trump administration to rehire thousands of federal workers who were let go in mass firings.
A split 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel turned back an emergency motion late Wednesday to pause the order from U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by labor unions and nonprofits as Republican President Donald Trump moves to dramatically downsize the federal workforce. Alsup is one of two judges who found legal problems with the way the firings of probationary workers were carried out.
Two of the three judges on the panel ruled against the request for an emergency stay. The dissenting judge said the government had a strong argument against reinstating the workers.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-refuses-to-halt-an-ord
er-for-the-rehiring-of-thousands-of-fired-federal-workers/ar-AA1BLTPh?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=95d016bd9b324cc88256c043441ad072&ei=24
Trump suffers another loss.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wow. An appeals court in pure blue territory shot Trump down. Imagine that, huh?
Thank you for doing this so quickly. Now we'll punt it to the Supreme Court and make it the law of the land going forward.
America thanks Liberal Activist Judges for helping speed all of this along in record time.
You are just too stupid.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME