Real World Event Discussions

Meanwhile, back in Libya

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, January 3, 2026 23:15
VIEWED: 9457
PAGE 7 of 7

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:49 PM

Quote:

….Sig. First of all, you moron, Libyans aren't fighting Qaddafi, who's been dead for several years now, they're fighting each other..


They are still fighting Qaddafi loyalists who want back what they lost. The powers that stood behind Qaddafi. Because there is a power vacuum a power struggle between many is going on. This all started before we assisted anyone yet you still wish to blame us. You forget Qaddafi threatened to destroy an entire city of 80,000 leaving no one alive till we intervened. You always overlook facts that show you to be irrational.

Quote:

….Sig. It would be as if Britain deposed President George Washington, and then the colonies immediately started fighting with each other for control. If that was supposed to be an analogy, you failed epically.


You seem to think we fought the British and then lived happily ever after from coast to coast. You forget the French Indian wars and all the battles with Indians and Spaniards who occupied much of Americans west for many years. Before and after our fight with the Brits. That war started in 1775 and we did not have a constitution till almost the end of 1787. Then there is the Civil War, another power struggle with confusing flags being hung on the tops of buildings. When we defeated the British there were thirteen Colonies all on the east coast. No constitution or bill of rights and many different philosophies on how we should proceed. No Sig, I think pointing to all the troubles we had in establishing our country is a very good analogy of how difficult building a nation is.

What we are witnessing now are the people indigenous to the region continuing the struggle of developing their nations because they had no say for a very long time. Religion and a few ruled them all and in the interim (for good or bad) because of Oil we needed to keep a working relationship with those few. Making all the right decisions can only be accomplished in hindsight, and really not even then.

I wonder if there isn’t a connection in sprit to what is happening in the Ukraine and our own Alamo, with the Ukrainians holding off the Russians while waiting for the Europeans to get there shit together and show up to the fight? Allowing them once and for all to shed the yoke of Russia and join the European colonies? Are they showing the same sprite displayed when Mexico broke from Spain?

Quote:

….Sig. SOME Libyans wanted to get rid of Qaddafi and install a western-style democracy, and some wanted to build a Muslim state under Sharia law, and more than a few fighters were from foreign countries. We should pick our friends more carefully.


Yes it’s messy Sig.

Quote:

…Sig. So, that's our strategy, eh? Destroy nations, and then HOPE that sooner or later... maybe decades later... reason and sanity take over?


Sig, get back to reality, the Libyans started this themselves in the hopes of developing a government better than a dictatorship. This is what shows you to be nuts. You can’t realize that.

They rest of your post is two subjective to respond to. It is about flags flying, who said what and all the insanity taking place within Libya, along with more nonsense as to why this is all our fault.

There is one more thing that needs mentioning. I only see you post in threads that attack America and not in any that may point to something positive we did or are doing. If you love this country as you claim, you would not miss an opportunity to sing its phrases with its accomplishments as well as your disappointments when you perceive it strays from the purpose of good. In any court of law it would be easy to show you as biased against this country and therefore ineligible to sit in judgment.


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:03 PM

SERIOUSLY, THUGR?

I think it's time YOU got back to reality, assuming you were ever there to begin with!

Quote:

Sig. First of all, you moron, Libyans aren't fighting Qaddafi, who's been dead for several years now, they're fighting each other.-sig

They are still fighting Qaddafi loyalists who want back what they lost.

A prosperous, secular nation?
Quote:

The powers that stood behind Qaddafi. Because there is a power vacuum a power struggle between many is going on. This all started before we assisted anyone yet you still wish to blame us.
A power struggle between (for the most part) jihadists on one side and parts of the former Libyan army on the other.

So, who would we like to see win?

Jihadists who're trying to impose Sharia law (a form of religious tyranny) and who've created poverty everywhere they went?

Secularists who're had a prosperous, secular tyranny?

WOW, it's a little tough to decide, isn't it!

Quote:

You forget Qaddafi threatened to destroy an entire city of 80,000 leaving no one alive till we intervened. You always overlook facts that show you to be irrational
Actually, that is something I remember very well, because that heartbreaking missive, about tanks crushing civilians and people being shot en masse was entirely made up, and Human Rights Watch (with close ties to the State Department) had a hand in the fabrication. I'll see if I can find those articles (with pictures of the ACTUAL city the day of the supposed fighting) along with eyewitness accounts, and the reactions of residents who were totally nonplussed at the description of that (non)event.

ANOTHER made-up allegation was that Qaddafi told his soldiers to rape all women, and gave them Viagra to help with the job. That was actually investigated by an international group, and no evidence was found to support the allegations.

Quote:

It would be as if Britain deposed President George Washington, and then the colonies immediately started fighting with each other for control. If that was supposed to be an analogy, you failed epically-Sig

You seem to think we fought the British and then lived happily ever after from coast to coast. You forget the French Indian wars and all the battles with Indians and Spaniards who occupied much of Americans west for many years. Before and after our fight with the Brits. That war started in 1775 and we did not have a constitution till almost the end of 1787. Then there is the Civil War, another power struggle with confusing flags being hung on the tops of buildings. When we defeated the British there were thirteen Colonies all on the east coast. No constitution or bill of rights and many different philosophies on how we should proceed. No Sig, I think pointing to all the troubles we had in establishing our country is a very good analogy of how difficult building a nation is.

First of all, we had many wars of expansion, in which we killed everyone who stood in our way. HARDLY an event that we want in the process of "nation building" ... unless you support genocide.

Do you? Support genocide as part of "nation building?

Quote:

What we are witnessing now are the people indigenous to the region continuing the struggle of developing their nations because they had no say for a very long time. Religion and a few ruled them all and in the interim (for good or bad) because of Oil we needed to keep a working relationship with those few. Making all the right decisions can only be accomplished in hindsight, and really not even then.
It depends on what your goals are. If you're willing to let oil trample over ethics, then- yes, it becomes very cloudy, because then you have to decide how much evil you're willing to support and how much it will bite you later.

However, if you're REALLY about promoting self-determination, development, and freedom, there are so many other ways to go about it other than a bombing campaign.

Quote:

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, July 16, 2017 5:19 PM

Newsweek had an article online, With ISIS on the Brink of Defeat, What happens in Libya?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 3, 2023 7:00 AM

U.N. Libya mission warns of violence after push for new interim government

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/un-libya-mission-warns-violence-a
fter-push-new-interim-govt-2023-07-27
/

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:26 PM

Renewed Violence in Libya Reflects Power of Militias

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/17/world/middleeast/libya-tripoli-viol
ence-clashes.html


Libya: A decade on the frontline - BBC News

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, August 18, 2023 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SERIOUSLY, THUGR?

I think it's time YOU got back to reality, assuming you were ever there to begin with!

Quote:

Sig. First of all, you moron, Libyans aren't fighting Qaddafi, who's been dead for several years now, they're fighting each other.-sig

They are still fighting Qaddafi loyalists who want back what they lost.

A prosperous, secular nation?
Quote:

The powers that stood behind Qaddafi. Because there is a power vacuum a power struggle between many is going on. This all started before we assisted anyone yet you still wish to blame us.
A power struggle between (for the most part) jihadists on one side and parts of the former Libyan army on the other.

So, who would we like to see win?

Jihadists who're trying to impose Sharia law (a form of religious tyranny) and who've created poverty everywhere they went?

Secularists who're had a prosperous, secular tyranny?

WOW, it's a little tough to decide, isn't it!

Quote:

You forget Qaddafi threatened to destroy an entire city of 80,000 leaving no one alive till we intervened. You always overlook facts that show you to be irrational
Actually, that is something I remember very well, because that heartbreaking missive, about tanks crushing civilians and people being shot en masse was entirely made up, and Human Rights Watch (with close ties to the State Department) had a hand in the fabrication. I'll see if I can find those articles (with pictures of the ACTUAL city the day of the supposed fighting) along with eyewitness accounts, and the reactions of residents who were totally nonplussed at the description of that (non)event.

ANOTHER made-up allegation was that Qaddafi told his soldiers to rape all women, and gave them Viagra to help with the job. That was actually investigated by an international group, and no evidence was found to support the allegations.

Quote:

It would be as if Britain deposed President George Washington, and then the colonies immediately started fighting with each other for control. If that was supposed to be an analogy, you failed epically-Sig

You seem to think we fought the British and then lived happily ever after from coast to coast. You forget the French Indian wars and all the battles with Indians and Spaniards who occupied much of Americans west for many years. Before and after our fight with the Brits. That war started in 1775 and we did not have a constitution till almost the end of 1787. Then there is the Civil War, another power struggle with confusing flags being hung on the tops of buildings. When we defeated the British there were thirteen Colonies all on the east coast. No constitution or bill of rights and many different philosophies on how we should proceed. No Sig, I think pointing to all the troubles we had in establishing our country is a very good analogy of how difficult building a nation is.

First of all, we had many wars of expansion, in which we killed everyone who stood in our way. HARDLY an event that we want in the process of "nation building" ... unless you support genocide.

Do you? Support genocide as part of "nation building?

Quote:

What we are witnessing now are the people indigenous to the region continuing the struggle of developing their nations because they had no say for a very long time. Religion and a few ruled them all and in the interim (for good or bad) because of Oil we needed to keep a working relationship with those few. Making all the right decisions can only be accomplished in hindsight, and really not even then.
It depends on what your goals are. If you're willing to let oil trample over ethics, then- yes, it becomes very cloudy, because then you have to decide how much evil you're willing to support and how much it will bite you later.

However, if you're REALLY about promoting self-determination, development, and freedom, there are so many other ways to go about it o

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, August 18, 2023 12:08 AM

So, speaking of Libya... I see that militias are still fighting for control, trapping civilians in their homes and that Libya is still without a functioning government.

Wow, we sure done good, didn't we?

-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger

Loving America is like loving an addicted spouse - SIGNYM


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, March 26, 2025 5:34 PM

Trump's new travel ban may come Friday: See which countries are on the 'red list' so far

https://www.statesman.com/story/news/state/2025/03/21/donald-trump-tra
vel-ban-2025-red-list-countries-affected/82589731007
/

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, January 3, 2026 11:15 PM

KINSELLA: Trump's decision to capture of Maduro the right move, but now what?

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/trumps-capture-maduro-right-
move-now-what

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME