Liz Cheney ends 75 years of modern political dynasties

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Monday, August 22, 2022 00:46
VIEWED: 829
PAGE 1 of 1

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, August 21, 2022 3:20 AM

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/liz-cheney-
ends-75-years-of-modern-political-dynasties

I remember a day where the Democrats on this board would be celebrating with me about this.

I'd like to think that wherever they are out there and whatever they're doing in life all these years later that they still are celebrating with me in spirit.

SECOND

Sunday, August 21, 2022 4:41 PM

Liz Cheney was an enthusiastic participant in the radical political style that helped bring about Trumpism and her own downfall.

Cheney has been feted as a hero by prominent liberals and Never Trump Republicans alike for her refusal to cave in to 2020 election denialism. In reality, Cheney is far from a hero. Yes, her work as vice chair of the House Jan. 6 committee has been honorable, and it is a sign of basic decency that she refused to equivocate on the 2020 election in order to cling to her seat. But what’s being overlooked is that she was part of the very problem that she decries.

Cheney was a proud Trump ally until he attempted an insurrection, which in and of itself should temper calls to lionize her. She was an enthusiastic participant in the radical political style that helped bring about Trump’s authoritarian break from liberal democracy. If she helped start the fire and only tried putting it out after the whole house was aflame, then her current path isn’t courageous dissent as much as it is belatedly making amends for complicity in our crisis.

Cheney trafficked in Trumpian-style politics well before the Republican establishment felt obligated to. The best example of this was her sly defense of birtherism, the racist conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. whose eventual foremost proponent was Trump. In a 2009 “Larry King Live” segment about birtherism, Cheney refused to condemn the conspiracy theory, and instead implied that it made sense because of the way Obama conducted himself.

“One of the reasons I think you see people so concerned about this issue is people are uncomfortable with having for the first time ever, I think, a president who seems so reluctant to defend the nation overseas,” Cheney said in a discussion about Obama’s citizenship.

To support her point about Obama’s alleged reluctance to defend America she cited the fact that Obama opted to ignore a polemical speech about U.S. imperialism by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the Summit of the Americas, where he was otherwise surprisingly well received by left-wing leaders of Latin American countries. Apparently the fact that Obama chose the strategy of ignoring critique from a small country was a sign that Obama was “afraid to stand up for what we believe in.” This was a silly deduction about Obama’s position on defending America. But more important, it had no bearing on whether Obama was a citizen or if his birth certificate was real.

Cheney was quietly suggesting that the birthers seemed to be on to something real, because Obama purportedly gave off a uniquely un-American air. Right there on the segment, Democratic strategist James Carville called her out on her strategy, saying, “She refuses to say this issue of birtherism is ludicrous, because she actually wants to encourage these people to believe this.” After an uproar, Cheney said in a statement to reporters that she did not question Obama’s citizenship. But still, she chose to use a high-profile platform to stoke racist paranoia about it and to profit from the innuendo.

Birtherism would eventually become Trump’s signature and most high-profile strategy for trying to undermine Obama, and arguably marks his advent onto the national political scene.

Birtherism was a preview of Trumpism. It was a disinformation campaign; its insistence that Obama was not who he said he was despite evidence to the contrary was fueled by racism and nativism; it was not about policy but about identity; and it wasn’t an argument as much as it was a tool for delegitimizing not only the opposition but state institutions altogether (it’s not hard to see the line from not trusting birth certificates to not trusting ballots). Cheney did not see this as something to nip in the bud but to channel for political gain.
Cheney did not have a direct hand in organizing Trump's insurrection, but she was complicit in many of the norms that allowed Trump to feel entitled to attempt it.

And while Cheney has been branded as a more restrained, independent Republican b

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, August 21, 2022 6:28 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/liz-cheney-s-jan-6-awakeni
ng-does-not-absolve-her-n1298097

This article was written with extreme Trump Derangement Syndrome and mostly made up of lies from that bent, but at least there are some among you extreme Leftist retards that don't view people like Liz Cheney, John Bolton, John McCain, George fuckin' W. Bush and Cheney's father as the "Good Guys" because they don't like Trump.

Kudos to the author for at least being able to admit that.

P.S. Birthirism was born by Hillary Clinton... another political dynasty we're lucking to not be dealing with anymore.

I won't say with 100% confidence she was right, but Obama does come from a time in history where I could easily create and forge his birth certificate with my rudimentary skills in a free program called Paint.net. That document they uploaded to whitehouse.gov proves nothing.

In any event, Obama was a terrible president. Almost as bad as Biden*.

--------------------------------------------------

Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus

SECOND

Sunday, August 21, 2022 6:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

P.S. Birthirism was born by Hillary Clinton... another political dynasty we're lucking to not be dealing with anymore.

Trump lied: Donald Trump
stated on September 16, 2016 in a speech:
"Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy."
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/sep/16/donald-trump/fact-ch
ecking-donald-trumps-claim-hillary-clinton-/ (The "-/" in this url is important, but fff.net does NOT get it right when you click the link. Copy and paste it, instead.)

No, Clinton didn't start the birther thing. This guy did.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/birther-movement-founder-trump-
clinton-228304

P.S. 6ixStringJack, you are not truthful. You are not right.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, August 22, 2022 12:46 AM

Yes. Hillary Clinton started the birther movement.

There are 4 lights.

--------------------------------------------------

Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus