bodies with vaginas

POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Monday, October 11, 2021 08:03
VIEWED: 2503
PAGE 1 of 1

1KIKI

Sunday, October 10, 2021 7:45 AM

I haven't seen the article, but as was told to me, in a madness of political correctness, The Lancet no longer uses the phrase women, but now has a policy to reefer to (women, us, me) as 'people with cervices'.

So I tracked it down.

The turmoil started out with The Lancet publishing an article with cover referring to women as 'bodies with vaginas' (not 'people with cervices').

This appears to be a single article, albeit a cover story, not a policy. And boy, has The Lancet received a metric crap-ton of of criticism and outright hate. So it published one of those infamous non-apologies, which seemed pathetic to me.

In any case, no, it doesn't look like a policy.

The Lancet ripped for calling women 'bodies with vaginas'
https://nypost.com/2021/09/28/the-lancet-ripped-for-calling-women-bodi
es-with-vaginas/

Lancet describes women as 'bodies with vaginas', issues
https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/lancet
-describes-women-as-bodies-with-vaginas-issues-apology-after-heavy-backlash.html

The Lancet Tweet About 'Bodies with Vaginas' Gets Wrecked
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebeccadowns/2021/09/26/the-lancet-tweet
-about-bodies-with-vaginas-gets-wrecked-n2596499

Lancet editor apologises for calling women 'bodies with ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10035415/Lancet-editor-apolog
ises-calling-women-bodies-vaginas-medical-journals-cover.html

'Bodies with vaginas'?! Lancet slammed for 'erasing women ...
https://www.rt.com/news/535784-lancet-cover-quote-bodies-vaginas/

Medical journal says 'bodies with vaginas' instead of ...
https://www.theblaze.com/news/lancet-women-bodies-with-vaginas

Lancet Journal Apologizes After Referring to Women as ...
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/09/lancet-journal-apologizes-after-
referring-to-women-as-bodies-with-vaginas-in-latest-edition/

Lancet accused of sexism after calling women 'bodies with ...
https://vnexplorer.net/lancet-accused-of-sexism-after-calling-women-bo
dies-with-vaginas-ez2021907118.html

Lancet Brands Women 'Bodies with Vaginas' to Be Trans ...
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/09/26/lancet-brands-women-bodies
-with-vaginas-to-be-trans-inclusive/

Fury as leading medical journal describes women as 'bodies ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10029817/Fury-leading-medical
-journal-describes-women-bodies-vaginas.html

Note that The Lancet is a British publication, and a lot of responses came from British media.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 8:42 AM

lol

It's hilarious when they take this political correct bullshit so far that they've gone full circle and become exactly what they hated.

"Bodies with vaginas", huh?

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 8:56 AM

P.S. I see that outside of the two DailyMail articles, you didn't post any Lefty shill sites, and only Righty shill sites.

Couldn't find any Lefty journalists in America who had a problem with the term, huh?

Imagine that.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

1KIKI

Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:50 AM

I just posted the first ones I found. I'm not sure which 'Lefty journalists in America' you want, but I included a Christian link, a feminist link, an alternate news link, and a couple of m$m links below.

Medical journal editor apologizes for cover labeling women as 'bodies with vaginas'
https://www.christianpost.com/news/medical-journal-apologizes-for-bodi
es-with-vaginas-cover.html

What’s Current: Leading medical journal slammed for describing women as ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.feministcurrent.com/2021/09/27/whats-current-leading-medic
al-journal-slammed-for-describing-women-as-bodies-with-vaginas/

People With Vaginas, What's Something You Wish You Learned About Your Body Sooner?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/hannahdobro/what-do-you-wish-you-learned-abou
t-your-body

Lancet top editor apologizes to readers offended by 'humans with vaginas' cover quote
https://news.yahoo.com/lancet-top-editor-apologizes-readers-231100512.
html

Lancet accused of sexism after calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/style/lancet-receives-complaints-a
nd-scientists-quit-over-sexist-cover-calling-women-bodies-with-vaginas/ar-AAONNN0

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 5:28 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:

I just posted the first ones I found. I'm not sure which 'Lefty journalists in America' you want, but I included a Christian link, a feminist link, an alternate news link, and a couple of m$m links below.

I had a long post made, but this stupid bullshit site logged me out again and lost it on me.

I wasn't giving YOU shit about not posting Lefty shill sites and their replies. I'm just laughing because of course US Lefty shill sites aren't going to condemn it.

The feminist site doesn't say anything about it and that's not really an article.

BuzzFeed isn't "alternative". It is an extreme Lefty shill site. I'm not going to wade through the disgusting comments a 2nd time this morning, but I'd pulled a few real gems out of there for you to read. You should take a look for yourself. Lots of people in the comments stating that genitals and gender are two different things and you're a piece of shit if you don't agree with their mental illness.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 6:55 PM

Gavin Newsom right back to work in California, tackling the things that matter most to his constituents.

https://www.axios.com/california-gender-neutral-toy-aisles-large-retai
lers-372e29cc-b530-4a6d-9406-40cf183e6179.html

Nevermind the fleet of cargo ships that have been floating off your fucking coast for weeks and causing the shortage of virtually EVERYTHING in stores across America.

WE NEED GENDER NEUTRAL TOY AISLES IN STORES! REEEEEEEEEEEEE!

The Left has completely lost it.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 7:09 PM

Don't be surprised when you wake up one day and start seeing people burning "witches" at the stake again.

The Left's insanity is only going to go on for so long until the Right's insanity ups the disproportionate response to everything in kind.

Oh... and don't forget all of the Afghan terrorists Biden* is putting all over the country on your dime too. They'd just as soon rape your daughters as they would their own wives. What do you think they're going to do when they meet a woman on the street that starts yelling at them when they don't address them by their proper non-binary gender pronouns?

Yeah... Good luck with that, Zir.

I'd tell you to call the police, but you've already defunded them.

I hope you're right and words are violence. Because words are going to be the only defense you have left.

PRO TIP: Don't bother using the word "No". "No" is not part of the Muslim male's vocabulary.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

SIGNYM

Sunday, October 10, 2021 9:28 PM

I thought that PC-ness had gotten so extreme and received so much push-back thet TPTB would be backing off of it by now, but ... no.

There are a number of laws circulating here and in the EU that will push everyone off a cliff into complete and utter mindfuck-land that will have your head twisted so far you'll feel like you're living in a Kafka novel.

If I get time, I'll track down those proposed laws and institutional policies, with links.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

1KIKI

Sunday, October 10, 2021 9:55 PM

Quote:
Medical journal editor apologizes for cover labeling women as 'bodies with vaginas'
https://www.christianpost.com/news/medical-journal-apologizes-for-bodi
es-with-vaginas-cover.html

Quote:
What’s Current: Leading medical journal slammed for describing women as ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.feministcurrent.com/2021/09/27/whats-current-leading-medic
al-journal-slammed-for-describing-women-as-bodies-with-vaginas/

The article contained a link to the Daily Mail article, which is how it covered the story. And apparently the readers of the article were NOT happy with The Lancet at all.

Quote:
•Actually "human milk" would be precise and not insulting if one were comparing women's milk with that of the females of other mammalian species (I've attended to quite a few pussycats). But that was not the intention of the article, in one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world. Sad.
•A body with vagina? Was the article discussing fleshlights, blow-up sex dolls or female sex robots?
•Apology not accepted
•"What does it mean when a narcissist says "I'm sorry"?"

Quote:
People With Vaginas, What's Something You Wish You Learned About Your Body Sooner?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/hannahdobro/what-do-you-wish-you-learned-abou
t-your-body

I should not have included this one.

Quote:
Lancet top editor apologizes to readers offended by 'humans with vaginas' cover quote
https://news.yahoo.com/lancet-top-editor-apologizes-readers-231100512.
html

Yes, this is an article about the non-apology apology issues by The Lancet's editor-in-chief Horton.

Quote:
Lancet accused of sexism after calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/style/lancet-receives-complaints-a
nd-scientists-quit-over-sexist-cover-calling-women-bodies-with-vaginas/ar-AAONNN0

This link is, too.

1KIKI

Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:02 PM

Signy, you seem to access news I don't. From this example, I found that some things have been exaggerated. So, I know you're very busy, but if you could post a link or 2 about pending legislation I'd appreciate it.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:
Medical journal editor apologizes for cover labeling women as 'bodies with vaginas'
https://www.christianpost.com/news/medical-journal-apologizes-for-bodi
es-with-vaginas-cover.html

Quote:
What’s Current: Leading medical journal slammed for describing women as ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.feministcurrent.com/2021/09/27/whats-current-leading-medic
al-journal-slammed-for-describing-women-as-bodies-with-vaginas/
The article contained a link to the Daily Mail article, which is how it covered the story. And apparently the readers of the article were NOT happy with The Lancet at all.
Quote:
•Actually "human milk" would be precise and not insulting if one were comparing women's milk with that of the females of other mammalian species (I've attended to quite a few pussycats). But that was not the intention of the article, in one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world. Sad.
•A body with vagina? Was the article discussing fleshlights, blow-up sex dolls or female sex robots?
•Apology not accepted
•"What does it mean when a narcissist says "I'm sorry"?"

You must be seeing something different on my PC when looking at the feminist site. I'm not seeing any opinion at all... just a list of 5 things that have happened recently.

My original post said of course the Christian "news" site had opinions on this.

Quote:
Quote:
People With Vaginas, What's Something You Wish You Learned About Your Body Sooner?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/hannahdobro/what-do-you-wish-you-learned-abou
t-your-body
I should not have included this one.

That's a regret that anybody who ever posts anything by Buzzfeed has at some point or another.

I'm glad you did post it though. I assume you waded through the comments. Pretty gross, huh?

Quote:
Quote:
Lancet top editor apologizes to readers offended by 'humans with vaginas' cover quote
https://news.yahoo.com/lancet-top-editor-apologizes-readers-231100512.
html
Yes, this is an article about the non-apology apology issues by The Lancet's editor-in-chief Horton.
Quote:
Lancet accused of sexism after calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/style/lancet-receives-complaints-a
nd-scientists-quit-over-sexist-cover-calling-women-bodies-with-vaginas/ar-AAONNN0
This link is, too.

Yeah. Articles from UK sites. The Left Media is pretty bad in the UK, but not outright fucking bonkers like it is in the US.

I'm not surprised that they're not on board with this way of thinking in 2021... at least not yet.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:18 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I thought that PC-ness had gotten so extreme and received so much push-back thet TPTB would be backing off of it by now, but ... no.

There are a number of laws circulating here and in the EU that will push everyone off a cliff into complete and utter mindfuck-land that will have your head twisted so far you'll feel like you're living in a Kafka novel.

If I get time, I'll track down those proposed laws and institutional policies, with links.

I touched on that in our discussion about "Public Good" in your "Not about Trump" thread.

Check the underlined part...

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SIX: I think "public good" is a valid concept and phrase, even tho it's been used and abused throughout its lifetime. After all, you would probably accept the term "public bad" so clearly its opposite also exists, if only in theory.

All "public bad" means is Government Bad. No Duh. But that's not the equal and opposite to Public Good. Because Public Good is an intentional misnomer.

How many times do I have to explain to you that they're changing the meaning of words by using a 2nd word as a prefix to it?

The opposite of a White Nationalist wouldn't be a Black Nationalist, would it?

Quote:
But let me get to perhaps a more essential question:

provide for the common defense
promote the general welfare
and secure the blessings of liberty for us and our posterity

Even governments that I believe work reasonably well ... NOT OURS ... achieve the top two, but not the third. It seems to me that, over time, most governments become more centralized and authoritarian.

SO is this inevitable? Can it be reversed without revolution, or external force being applied?

What do you think?

It is inevetable. It cannot be reversed without revolution or external sources applied.

The only difference between every other society that has fallen and ours is that ours has figured out a way to push the envelope so slowly that the will of the people will be subverted without any real resistance until there isn't any will left.

At least, that's what I would have said 10 years ago if you asked me. Maybe just 5 years ago, even.

They've seemed to have thrown that tactic right out the window right now, and they're blatantly throwing American citizens under the bus left and right every single day while bending over backwards for anybody and everybody who comes here that wasn't one. They're destroying the meaning of words... Not just on the level of "Public Good" and "White" Nationalism, but by calling Mothers the fucking "Birthing Parent" when speaking in Congressional chambers.

They might not know it yet, but the "Progressives" (another intentional misnomer) might be America's saving grace in the long run. The "external force", if you will. They're trying to force 100 years of so-called "Progress" down everyone's throats overnight. That's 100 years of slow anger that would have just been swallowed down with a beer and Netflix binge every night that is impossible for a lot of people to swallow all at once.

We don't vet Afghani terrorists that we're relocating all over the country. We'll destroy the lives and livelihoods of citizens who will refuse a vaccination while allowing hundreds of thousands of illegal alien invaders into our borders without even testing them. The FBI has zero records collected on BLM/Antifa or any other left-wing activists that have broken laws in the last 2 years. We have State's Attorneys releasing 10's of thousands of criminals without pressing charges because of the color of their skin.

But we're going to send the FBI after mothers and fathers that are vocal with their schools about brainwashing their kids with CRT?

And all of this while the

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

1KIKI

Sunday, October 10, 2021 11:01 PM

As I mentioned previously, The Lancet is a British publication, so it got a lot of reaction in the British press, and also in other Commonwealth countries and former colonies, like Australia and NZ, which I didn't include.

I understand that if tptb had WANTED to make an issue of it, it would be all over the US news as well, British publication or not.

I'd be curious to see if Rachel had anything to say, but not enough to even duck. Oh what the heck ... no, duck doesn't have a first-page result for rachel +maddow +"bodies with vaginas"

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, October 11, 2021 1:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Gavin Newsom right back to work in California, tackling the things that matter most to his constituents.

https://www.axios.com/california-gender-neutral-toy-aisles-large-retai
lers-372e29cc-b530-4a6d-9406-40cf183e6179.html

Nevermind the fleet of cargo ships that have been floating off your fucking coast for weeks and causing the shortage of virtually EVERYTHING in stores across America.

WE NEED GENDER NEUTRAL TOY AISLES IN STORES! REEEEEEEEEEEEE!

The Left has completely lost it.

Maybe this is all the result when pu$$yhats are on backorder due to the shipping backlog.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, October 11, 2021 8:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:

As I mentioned previously, The Lancet is a British publication, so it got a lot of reaction in the British press, and also in other Commonwealth countries and former colonies, like Australia and NZ, which I didn't include.

I understand that if tptb had WANTED to make an issue of it, it would be all over the US news as well, British publication or not.

I'd be curious to see if Rachel had anything to say, but not enough to even duck. Oh what the heck ... no, duck doesn't have a first-page result for rachel +maddow +"bodies with vaginas"

I wouldn't even want to know what the images that would pop up with that were.

Hope you had "safe search" on.

Rule 34, yanno...

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."