Another Putin Disaster
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 26, 2026 22:07
VIEWED: 114667
PAGE 55 of 160
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:The problem you have Polish Russian Collaborator Signym is that what you post is Putties propaganda.
From LITHUANIA??
Lithuanians HATE Russia with a passion, which is why I selected that particular source for a LEGAL analysis. You would know that, if you weren't a complete ignoranus [sic]
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
tick tock
At this point I think it's pretty safe to just assume that Ted doesn't know what a clock is.
--------------------------------------------------
And he who is not sufficiently courageous to defend his soul — don’t let him be proud of his ‘progressive’ views, and don’t let him boast that he is an academician or a people’s artist, a distinguished figure or a general. Let him say to himself: I am a part of the herd and a coward. It’s all the same to me as long as I’m fed and kept warm.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:The problem you have Polish Russian Collaborator Signym is that what you post is Putties propaganda.
From LITHUANIA??
Lithuanians HATE Russia with a passion, which is why I selected that particular sour
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
Russian Trolls Are Hammering Away at NATO’s Presence in Lithuania
A broad disinformation campaign of fake news and other tricks aims to turn the Baltic nation’s public against the alliance.
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/12/russian-trolls-are-hamme
ring-away-natos-presence-lithuania/161654/
Yep, that's where you got it comrade. And yep, Lithuanians sure do hate you Russian commie bastards. What you've posted only points to you, being, a Polish Russian Collaborator dipshit.
You need to find a new hobby comrade, because posting here sure don't suit your low IQ.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yes, but what I posted wasn't from a Russian (troll or otherwise), it was from a Lithuanian. I've heard/read the same general thought ... two sets of naval laws, peacetime and wartime, from and American lawyer and a British lawyer. And the wartime laws were used to justify America and Britain setting aside certain sensitive coastal areas for defensive purposes. Are THEY "Russian trolls" too? Is everyone who says something that you disagree with a "Russian troll"?
THUGR: The problem you have Polish Russian Collaborator Signym is that what you post is Putties propaganda.
SIGNYM: From LITHUANIA??
Lithuanians HATE Russia with a passion, which is why I selected that particular source
THUGR: Russian Trolls Are Hammering Away at NATO’s Presence in Lithuania
A broad disinformation campaign of fake news and other tricks aims to turn the Baltic nation’s public against the alliance.
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/12/russian-trolls-are-hamme
ring-away-natos-presence-lithuania/161654/
Believe it or not, "occupying states" are recognized by international law, with certain authorities and responsiblities:
http://lawofwar.org/occupation.htm
International Red Cross
https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/misc/634kfc.htm
Kerch Strait Incident
https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-kerch-strait-incident-law-of-the-sea-or-l
aw-of-naval-warfare/
You've got Russia on the brain, you low-information troll.
You need a new hobby, troll. One that doesn't involve sticking your head up your ass.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Yes
THUGR: The problem you have Polish Russian Collaborator Signym is that what you post is Putties propaganda.
SIGNYM: From LITHUANIA??
Lithuanians HATE Russia with a passion, which is why I selected that particular source
THUGR: Russian Trolls Are Hammering Away at NATO’s Presence in Lithuania
A broad disinformation campaign of fake news and other tricks aims to turn the Baltic nation’s public against the alliance.
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/12/russian-trolls-are-hamme
ring-away-natos-presence-lithuania/161654/
You've got Russia on the brain, you low-information troll.
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
First of all bullshit as to your source not being Russian influenced. Secondly, you comrade, represent a full of shit low quality country.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I posted additional links from international and national sources on laws of the sea during wartime and occupation. YOU justed post more name-calling.
Are you prepared to discredit the International Red Cross?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I posted additional links from international and national sources on laws of the sea during wartime and occupation. YOU justed post more name-calling.
Are you prepared to discredit the International Red Cross?
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
Your links and posts comrade are designed to deceive. They are usually a mismatch of shit that mostly when read doesn't match your posted claims. So, I don't read them anymore and haven't for a very long time. I respond to the claims you make only, and they comrade are fabricated, and on a middle school level. They are , always, easily disproven.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If they're so easy to disprove, disprove them.
Just so you know: name-calling doesn't count. See if you can come up with something BESIDES name-calling or cartoons. Some sort of legal analysis from a credible source.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BTW I found this of historic interest, providing context for the current laws of naval warfare and occupation. Here is one example
Quote:
America’s World War II contest with Japan put an end to America’s traditional view of freedom of the seas. As historian Joel Ira Holwitt writes, the order to conduct unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan, targeting “all Japanese shipping, from fishing trawlers to freighters to tankers,” issued on 7 December 1941, was “a major and dramatic change to the American attitude toward freedom of the seas.”2 In World War II, the U.S. Navy exercised the type of unrestricted submarine warfare the United States had condemned in Germany in World War I.
Today, U.S. naval officers will find instruction on the rights of belligerents and the rights of neutrals in The Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP 1-14M/MCWP 5-12.1/COMDTPUB P5800.7A, Edition July 2007 [Washington, D.C.: 2007]), which is an update of the Law of Naval Warfare, promulgated by the Navy Department in 1955. The 1955 volume in the U.S. Naval War College’s International Law Studies series, The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea, by Robert W. Tucker, is a commentary on the Law of Naval Warfare. Tucker’s main concern in writing the 1955 Naval War College volume was to explore the relationship between modern belligerent practices and the traditional law of naval warfare. He concludes that the modern practice of sinking enemy merchantmen without warning is in accord with the principles behind the traditional law. The standard international law texts, Grotius, Vattel, and others, were written during an era in which merchant vessels did not pose a serious threat to warships, and therefore the accepted practice was to require a belligerent warship, before firing on an enemy merchantman, to identify itself and give the enemy merchant ship a chance to surrender.
https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/browse-by-topic/wars
-conflicts-and-operations/world-war-i/history/laws-of-naval-warfare.html
Not directly related but still interesting.
This is directly relevant, and probably THE definitive document on USA's legal interpretation of Maritime occupation.
Occupation of Maritime Territory - Naval War College
https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu
Unfortunately it's a pdf and my phone won't let me copy the URL directly. But if you read the pdf, you'll find that the article from Lithuania quotes this Naval War College document extensively. This document also cites USA occupation of Iraqi maritime territory as proof that occupation is lawful.
I suppose you're going to tell me that they're Russian trolls too?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This gets you to the abstract and a downloadable document.
https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/ils/vol95/iss1/11/
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME