A thread for Democrats Only
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 15:36
VIEWED: 755368
PAGE 541 of 725
Quote:Does this rethinking include specific goals your government would have? Name a few specific goals, 1kiki. (By the way, Balancing Trade is not really a goal. Neither is making the dollar convertible into gold at a fixed rate. Or any of your other crank ideas that come from misunderstanding economics.) I'll name a few of my own: Medicare for All, A Living Wage, Stop Climate Change, Deflating the price of houses. That last one really makes many people angry because most of their net worth is in real estate, which means they love a shortage of cheap housing. I'll name a political party that opposes all goals: Republican.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I think people need to rethink their assumptions about the US and its various levels of government, and what they should and should not be focused on.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I've already posted my priorities at least a dozen times. I had 2.
I think it would be really interesting if people were able to choose broad categories for how their tax dollars get spent when they filled out their 1040's. I wonder how much would go to the military. Or to fossil fuel company subsidies.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
SECOND:
How America Fractured Into Four Parts
People in the United States no longer agree on the nation’s purpose, values, history, or meaning. Is reconciliation possible?
Nations, like individuals, tell stories in order to understand what they are, where they come from, and what they want to be. National narratives, like personal ones, are prone to sentimentality, grievance, pride, shame, self-blindness. There is never just one—they compete and constantly change. The most durable narratives are not the ones that stand up best to fact-checking. They’re the ones that address our deepest needs and desires. Americans know by now that democracy depends on a baseline of shared reality—when facts become fungible, we’re lost. But just as no one can live a happy and productive life in nonstop self-criticism, nations require more than facts—they need stories that convey a moral identity. The long gaze in the mirror has to end in self-respect or it will swallow us up.
Since then, the two parties have just about traded places. By the turn of the millennium, the Democrats were becoming the home of affluent professionals, while the Republicans were starting to sound like populist insurgents. We have to understand this exchange in order to grasp how we got to where we are.
The 1970s ended postwar, bipartisan, middle-class America, and with it the two relatively stable narratives of getting ahead and the fair shake. In their place, four rival narratives have emerged, four accounts of America’s moral identity. They have roots in history, but they are shaped by new ways of thinking and living. They reflect schisms on both sides of the divide that has made us two countries, extending and deepening the lines of fracture. Over the past four decades, the four narratives have taken turns exercising influence. They overlap, morph into one another, attract and repel one another. None can be understood apart from the others, because all four emerge from the same whole.
...
More about fractured American Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 at https://web.archive.org/web/20210609154909if_/https://www.theatlantic.
com/magazine/archive/2021/07/george-packer-four-americas/619012/
Impatient readers jump to the end of the essay: All four narratives are also driven by a competition for status that generates fierce anxiety and resentment. They all anoint winners and losers. In Free America, the winners are the makers, and the losers are the takers who want to drag the rest down in perpetual dependency on a smothering government. In Smart America, the winners are the credentialed meritocrats, and the losers are the poorly educated who want to resist inevitable progress. In Real America, the winners are the hardworking folk of the white Christian heartland, and the losers are treacherous elites and contaminating others who want to destroy the country. In Just America, the winners are the marginalized groups, and the losers are the dominant groups that want to go on dominating.
. . . we remain trapped in two countries. Each one is split by two narratives—Smart and Just on one side, Free and Real on the other. Neither separation nor conquest is a tenable future. The tensions within each country will persist even as the cold civil war between them rages on.
This essay is adapted from George Packer’s new book, Last Best Hope: America in Crisis and Renewal https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374603663
GOALS
Quote:
SIGNYM:
People work for reward. Our old narratives are breaking down because we are actually living in the realm of a FIFTH narrative, one which the elites have been steadily imposing on us for decades, and that is WORK DOESN'T PAY. BECOME A CONSUMER/USELESS EATER. GO INTO DEBT. WHINGE ABOUT "OTHERS" HAVING MORE PRIVILEGE.
But here's the thing: Three (and a half) of the four narratives actually overlap. You can create a unifying narrative out of them if you want something for America, BUT IT DEPENDS WHAT YOU WANT.
Do you wantNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:If this was 1860, I could easily judge people based on only one facet of their jewel-like character -- slavery. Nowadays I know much more about people's character. I get to examine their personality, pick up that jewel, turn it every which-way and see all the cut facets and flaws deep inside the diamond. Too bad for your superiority, but I know hundreds of Trumptards and many of their biographical secrets. You guys are insane, right down there with Confederates for people burdened with flawed personalities and crazy beliefs. It is no surprise how flawed people found the most flawed man, Trump, to back.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
YOU'RE the crank.
Let go of your sick vendetta, SECOND.
You've got a bug in your head and it's eating your brain. Let it out: You'll feel better.
Narcissism, disagreeableness, grandiosity—a psychologist investigates how Trump’s extraordinary personality might shape his possible presidency.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210612211342if_/https://www.theatlantic.
com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/
Books on Trump
https://www.google.com/search?q=books+on+how+crazy+trump+is
America was troubled by the kind of people who supported slavery. America is troubled by the kind of people who support Trump.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:How? Because you hire PIs to dig into people's private lives? If that's the case, then you KNOW I'm neither a Russian troll nor a Republician, and yet you kept pushing those lies (otherwise known as libel) over and over again.
SIGNYM:
YOU'RE the crank.
Let go of your sick vendetta, SECOND.
You've got a bug in your head and it's eating your brain. Let it out: You'll feel better.
SECONDRATE: If this was 1860, I could easily judge people based on only one facet of their jewel-like character -- slavery. Nowadays I know much more about people's character.
Quote:How? Are you their psychiatrist?
SECOND: I get to examine their personality...
Quote:Yep, you hire PIs to snoop into people's private lives. Did anyone tell you you're a twisted fuck with a megalomaniac personality?
SECOND ... pick up that jewel, turn it every which-way and see all the cut facets and flaws deep inside the diamond. Too bad for your superiority, but I know hundreds of Trumptards and many of their biographical secrets.
Quote:If you've dug into my life, you know for a fact that I'm not Republican. (And yet, you keep lying about it.) Nor am I an uncritical supporter of Trump.
SECOND: You guys
You may not have figured this out yet, but criticizing YOUR incessant, irrational, fake-news screeds against Trump is NOT supporting Trump, it is defending reality-based thinking. Of which you seem incapable.
Quote:Wow. Says the insane man with the bug-eaten brain who spends all of his time obsessing about Republicans because of a mistake that he made 50 years ago!
SECOND ... are insane, right down there with Confederates for people burdened with flawed personalities and crazy beliefs. It is no surprise how flawed people found the most flawed man, Trump, to back.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
SECONDRATE: If this was 1860, I could easily judge people based on only one facet of their jewel-like character -- slavery. Nowadays I know much more about people's character.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM: How? Because you hire PIs to dig into people's private lives? If that's the case, then you KNOW I'm neither a Russian troll nor a Republican, and yet you kept pushing those lies (otherwise known as libel) over and over again.
Quote:
SECOND ... pick up that jewel, turn it every which-way and see all the cut facets and flaws deep inside the diamond. Too bad for your superiority, but I know hundreds of Trumptards and many of their biographical secrets.
Quote:He's a sociopath. The only thing he has against republicans isn't the futility of the Vietnam War. Or the many hundreds of thousands dead. Or the needless suffering inflicted on people who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Or even that it ruined the US budget.
Originally posted by SIGNYM: Yep, you hire PIs to snoop into people's private lives. Did anyone tell you you're a twisted fuck with a megalomaniac personality?
It's that THEY PLAYED HIM. For a fool.
BTW, remember how he was jonesing to find out who was that 'good man' who died? I guarantee it wasn't to pay his respects! Probably more like in order to dig out any little dirty secrets to tarnish that good man ... and prove to himself that since he - SHITHEAD - isn't a good man, there can be no good men, ever, who might be ... yanno ... better than he is.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Republican Party has turned fascist – it is now the most dangerous threat in the world
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
The only thing he has against republicans . . .
The G7 meeting focused attention on many challenges facing the world, but it did not address the most dangerous threat of them all, which is the transformation of the Republican Party in the US into a fascist movement.
When Donald Trump was in the White House there was much debate about whether or not he could be called a fascist in the full sense of the word, and not merely as a political insult. His presidency showed many of the characteristics of a fascist dictatorship, except the crucial one of automatic re-election.
But Trump or Trump-like leaders may not have to face this democratic impediment in future. It was only this year that the final building blocks have been put in place by Republicans as they replicate the structure of fascist movements in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s.
Two strategies, though never entirely absent from Republican behaviour in the past, have become far more central to their approach. One is a greater willingness to use or tolerate violence against their opponents, something that became notorious during the invasion of the Capitol by pro-Trump rioters on 6 January.
The other change among Republicans is much less commented on, but is more sinister and significant. This is the systematic Republican takeover of the electoral machinery that oversees elections and makes sure that they are fair. Minor officials in charge of them have suddenly become vital to the future of American democracy. Remember that it was only the refusal of these functionaries to cave in to Trump’s threats and blandishments that stopped him stealing the presidential election last November.
Many of them will be unable to perform the same duty in future elections. The Republican Party across the country is replacing or intimidating them so they are giving up their jobs or are being forced from their posts. In Pennsylvania, a state which played a crucial role in Trump’s defeat, a third of county election officials have changed as have numerous others in swing states like Michigan and Wisconsin. Their places are frequently being taken by conspiracy theory zealots who will have the power to nullify election results that are not to their liking. A survey by the Brennan Center for Justice shows that one in three local election officials say that they are being subjected to harassment and other pressures.
Speeding up this exodus are Republican state legislatures that have passed laws mandating heavy fines – $10,000 in Iowa, $25,000 in Florida – for election supervisors who make minor technical mistakes. Republican officials who refused to say that Trump won the election are being removed by their party. The Republicans should be able to do in 2022 and 2024 what they failed to do in 2020, which is to nullify election results at will so the true outcome of a poll can be ignored. Put simply, the will of the people will no longer count for anything.
Authoritarian regimes across the world have found that it is much easier and more certain to announce the election result they would like than to go to all the trouble of suppressing votes and gerrymandering constituencies. Once control of the electoral machinery is obtained then democracy poses no threat to those in power. Fascist leaders may use democratic processes to obtain office, but once there, their instinct is to pull up the ladder and let nobody else climb up it.
Nullification of elections is only the latest step in the Republican Party’s strange voyage towards becoming a genuine fascist party. Other steps have a much longer history, notably the moment half a century ago when President Nixon adopted his “Southern Strategy” whereby the Republicans capitalised on the Civil Rights acts to make a political takeover of the American South. The old slave states became the strongholds of the Republican Party which had once freed the slaves and defeated
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, you're up to your normal abnormal of posting random shit out of context in order to not address it? Troll much?
As for the first sentence (which is as far as I bothered to read): Republicans are really the most dangerous thing in the world? Can you really post that with a straight face as you swallow your guffaws over that ridiculousness? Or are you genuinely hyperventilating like the author, with your knickers in a bunch, over nothing at all?
There are LOTS of things far more dangerous in the world: Supervolcanoes, a large coronal mass ejection aimed at the earth, an EMP aimed at the earth, an asteroid aimed at the earth ...
And the 2 most dangerous things in the world related to human cause are nuclear holocaust and global warming, both of which are international, multi-decade, multi-party problems.
SLOPPY - why do you never start any threads of your own but instead spend 100% of your time crapping up everyone else's? Is it because you really have NOTHING you want to discuss and are only here to troll?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I've already posted my priorities at least a dozen times. I had 2.
I think it would be really interesting if people were able to choose broad categories for how their tax dollars get spent when they filled out their 1040's. I wonder how much would go to the military. Or to fossil fuel company subsidies.
I like that idea.
Assuming that they'd ever adhere to it, voting on policy would probably be better than voting on individuals.
--------------------------------------------------
Give me liberty or just come shoot me in my house. I'm so over this ridiculous reality.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME