Maybe this iz wut we need?
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 17:52
VIEWED: 19328
PAGE 13 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:WHY should our President be "feared by all autocrats?
Worth ansering, even tho it shoud be obvious.
Bad gize want to be able to do anything they want. Having a hier power abuv them iz hard to tolerate. Bad gize hoo hav rizen to the near ultimate pozition uv autocrat are naturally the worst, most ruthless and evil.
Its thanks to America and the international alliansez it created that theze toxic turdz hav sum fear uv retribution if they start trying to take over nayboring countriez or commit larj scale atrosityz on their own sitizenz.
Sum fear. Not alot. Thanks to endless examplz uv inaction by us and our alliez after atrositiez came to lite, the limits to wut they can get away with are very hi.
Quote:
Are you assuming that it is on OUR INTEREST ... that it benefits YOU AND ME in some real way ... for that USA to be "world cop" and to threaten or destroy every "autocratic" rule across the world?
Yes. Agen, it shoud be obvious.
If my free time holdz up for a few more weeks, I want to add an international polisy paje to the website. Part uv it will cover this subject.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
JO, you seem incapable of discussing FACTS. And I will not be reading anything else on your website either. I've really had enough of your arm-waving declarations with no FACTS to back them up.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Sorry Nilly. Democrats are trying to shred the Constitution and install censorship at every level in the 2020s.
Not every level, just the dregs levels you live on
Find a brain and some work ethic and maybe someone will care what you think one day.
6ix REALLY believes it's ok to wish pandemic deaths on the world but that HE is special and should be exempt from it
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol
The Nilbot appears to be programmed to believe that actual humans care about its synthetic opinions.
How cute.
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey. 
Collection of links to Second's, Nilbog's and Marcos' death threats: https://cutt.ly/tkCvEX6
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
When I was a newbie here in SoCal and was in the first year or 2 of my job (so many decades ago the exact time escapes me) I was sent to an AWMA - Air and Waste Management Association - conference.
And kind of by happenstance, but not really, I ended up seated at the same as table as - and right next to - a guy. What I didn't notice was that people were really avoiding that table, and in particular those chairs. And in a weird secret game of musical chairs, I ended up next to him. He was apparently well-known in those circles, but I was a completely naive participant, which is how I got the last seat in that spot.
Anyway, from my perspective the conference started great. But as it wore on, the guy next to me would mutter occasional inaudible comments to himself. Gradually those comments got longer, and louder, and more frequent. And then he started looking at me and directing them to me.
By the time the presentations were about 3/4 through, he was talking to me ... and telling me he had an invention where IC (internal combustion) engines could run on water. Now that sounded really unlikely to me, but I was interested. Like the claimed cold-fusion later on, it would be revolutionary. So during the break I took time to chat with him, and eventually asked him to give me a rough idea of how it worked. Sadly, that was the death-knell of anything he was willing to say, because, as he claimed, the government and oil industry were after him and would kill him if he revealed the secret. Or something. It was kind for hard to figure out what that point was. It seemed to me he was safest spreading the word far and wide with his name attached to it as well as the names of his 'enemies'.
But I got interested in the mental phenomenon - white male of above average intelligence gets delusionally paranoid around middle age. And it turns out it's very common.
Of all the paranoid types, there are 2 that are the most prevalent.
There's the paranoid schizophrenic, with hallucinations and disorganized thinking and all the accoutrements of schizophrenia, with paranoid delusions. And like other schizophrenics, the paranoid schizophrenic's unmistakably schizophrenia-associated symptoms start early, generally in their late teens to mid 20's (ie, seeing things, hearing voices, disorganized thinking, delusions of being targeted).
And then there are the people who start out reasonably OK. They're not seeing things or hearing voices. But apparently they start out with a feeling that they are awesomely specially important ... and their paranoia grows from that. They're convinced that not only are their grandiose ideas real, but because they have 'the secret', they're in fact SO important that 'people' are either out to get them, or that they're leading undisclosed groups of followers. In any case, the basis for their pathology is simply the feeling that they're more special and with better ideas than everyone else on the entire planet.
John Nash (A Beautiful Mind), btw, was both a genius and schizophrenic, who spent years dragging his family across Europe in midnight traverses across borders (that they crossed sans visas and passports just because Nash was such a pita), who explained he thought he was god's left baby-toe "walking across the face of the earth".
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, to be completely hard-nosed about this: SO WHAT?
SIGNYM:WHY should our President be "feared by all autocrats?
JO: Worth ansering, even tho it shoud be obvious.
Bad gize want to be able to do anything they want. Having a hier power abuv them iz hard to tolerate. Bad gize hoo hav rizen to the near ultimate pozition uv autocrat are naturally the worst, most ruthless and evil.
Its thanks to America and the international alliansez it created that theze toxic turdz hav sum fear uv retribution if they start trying to take over nayboring countriez or commit larj scale atrosityz on their own sitizenz.
What makes you think that we have the responsibility, moral authority, or even the military strength to go around trying to "fix" the world and make it conform to our expectations? I can actually understand trying to grab someone's oil, or tin, or whatever, and I can DEFINITELY see defending our borders, but it seems to me that we do THE MOST HARM (Nicaragua, Brazil, Cuba, El Salvador, Lebanon etc or, more recently Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria) when we've deluded ourselves into believing that were on some sort of humanitarian bombing mission.
And think about Rwanda, or Eritrea, or Mali, or Yemen, or South Africa or any number of blighted nations suffering under corrupt leadership and economic distress .... what are you going to do about THOSE? Why do you think we should, or even can, solve their problems when we haven't even fixed Baltimore or Detroit or Camden?
Quote:I think the BEST way to improve the world... if you believe that you have a mission from on high to do so... is first of all, not commit atrocities that are as bad or worse than the ones you're supposedly trying to fix. Then you need to find out why these atrocities occurred and solve the problem. You seem to think that is all because of one "bad guy", but quite often you'll find a lot of threads tangled together ... also often involving the support of western elites... when you try to unknot the problems.
Sum fear. Not alot. Thanks to endless examplz uv inaction by us and our alliez after atrositiez came to lite, the limits to wut they can get away with are very hi.
IMHO if you cna figure out WHY we haven't yet fixed Baltimore, Detroit, or Camden or any of the other three hundred cities that are dysfunctional across the USA, then you'll prolly have the answer to what's gone wrong elsewhere. And our military is unlikely to fix any of that, either here or there.
Quote:Well, not to me.
Are you assuming that it is on OUR INTEREST ... that it benefits YOU AND ME in some real way ... for that USA to be "world cop" and to threaten or destroy every "autocratic" rule across the world?
JO: Yes. Agen, it shoud be obvious.
Name three nations since 1960 that turned out more prosperous, freer, more developed, after we "intervened", and explain how that "helped us".
I can't even think of one.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh, I take it back ... I can think of one. Out of the couple of dozen (or more) "interventions" that the USA undertook since 1960, including "boots on the ground" military "interventions", bombing campaigns, CIA/State Department destabilization campaigns/color revolutions, junta installations, "secret drone strike wars", arming jihadists, and sanctions, I can think of ONE nation that came out better. Let's see if you can think of it, while I go and get a better count and list of ALL of our "intervnetions" since 1960.I had actually counted them up and posted a brief description of each, but that was since 1900, and IIRC there were almost 100.
when I undertook that project, I learned a lot. It made me, and thereaders, heartsick to know how much harm we had done, and some people begged me to stop posting, but I was dermined to finish the list.
That post was lost in fff.net disk crash, but maybe I should do it again.
Yanno, mix some reality into people's ideals.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
WISHY: 6ix REALLY believes it's ok to wish pandemic deaths on the world but that HE is special and should be exempt from it
Well, I see I miised THIS little gem from our local sociopath/narcissist!
1) In this thread, in any case, killing people off via a pandemic seems to be JO's hooby-horse, and
2) This, from the person who wouldn't mind genociding the entire world "down to the last hundred" to meet it's vision of a "better world".
At least a viral pandemic is somewhat passive. WISHY, OTOH, would actively kill billions of people!
Sheesh. And it still has no idea how illogical that is.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
WISHY: 6ix REALLY believes it's ok to wish pandemic deaths on the world but that HE is special and should be exempt from it
Well, I see I miised THIS little gem from our local sociopath/narcissist!
1) In this thread, in any case, killing people off via a pandemic seems to be JO's hooby-horse, and
2) This, from the person who wouldn't mind genociding the entire world "down to the last hundred" to meet it's vision of a "better world".
At least a viral pandemic is somewhat passive. WISHY, OTOH, would actively kill billions of people!
Sheesh. And it still has no idea how illogical that is.
That's actually the Nilbot's new signature. It is obsessed with me.
I think I made myself pretty clear about the pragmatic nature behind my idea that the only way for the human race to continue to exist for any meaningful amount of time is through population control.
I think I was also clear that this could be done over the next generation or two through several means that don't require anybody already alive to actually die for that cause. Not only that, but properly incentivized it could be done willingly.
I made no mention of anything based off of race. And I certainly didn't ever say that these people or those people should die while I am spared from that fate.
The Nilbot is completely delusional. It needs to make up it's own reality as it goes otherwise reality would constantly come into conflict with its hypocritical programming.
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
Collection of links to Second's, Nilbog's and Marcos' death threats: https://cutt.ly/tkCvEX6
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
At least a viral pandemic is somewhat passive.
Then I hope wishing all your fascist friends a nice "passive" Covid death makes things easier for you
Not gonna address his hypocrisy at all, eh??
Still trying to suck up to the dumbest bottom feeder on the internets??
BTW 6ix, I hope your death is a pragmatic one for the planet and the internet.
As long as it's "pragmatic".
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME