Maybe this iz wut we need?
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 17:52
VIEWED: 19328
PAGE 6 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Its getting there!
I admire your focus - nice one!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I added a bunch uv piks. They were suppos to be a sequential assembly demo, but got reversed and jumbled up after I uploaded them.
Haf to start working on the helmet agen. I took a week off to replase my porch roof kuz it wuz about to cave in. The racoonz hav been going up there and pooping for 25 yirz.
https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
My electronics guru iz too bizzy working on a Covid-19 detector and I havent herd from him in weeks, so I had to think up a way to run 8 UVC LEDz myself.
The solution iz going to work!
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
From the For Democrats Only thred:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Republicans largely ignore moral stain of child poverty
Imagine you have some neighbors in a mansion down the road who pamper one child with a credit card, the best private school and a Tesla.
The parents treat most of their other kids decently but not lavishly — and then you discover that the family consigns one child to an unheated, vermin-infested room in the basement, denying her dental care and often leaving her without food...
But that’s us. That household, writ large, is America and our moral stain of child poverty.
You can't eliminate poverty by "giving" people money. All that does is create dependency on aid. You can only create wealth by having a robust economy in which everyone who can work has a meaningful job at living wages...
In a few decadez there wont be any jobz, so we shoud be tranzitioning to sum other way uv getting money to peepl now.
But thats not the worst problem. It seemz that giving them money or making them work for it, or doing niether, they will still plop out babyz without regard to their financial situation. So in thoze same few decadez there will still be way too many peepl for the ecosystem to support.
I woc Steve Wilcos. The main subject uv the show iz bad parents. Even wen its a cheating show, they usually hav too many kidz. A typical mom haz 5 and her cheating babydaddy haz kidz with 5 other wimin. And thoze are the 'funny' showz.
More than haf are about abuzed children.
Wut happenz wen there are so many peepl that its impossible for any guvrment to keep a lid on this sort uv crap? There are plenty uv useless guvrments now where child abuse must be rampant. And with the GoPs and their idiotic 'small guvrment' ideaz doing nothing but lokking themselvez in power, they are likely to sekseed in defunding all the DCFS eventually.
The human rase iz working on transforming the planet into Hell.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Why not? Who is making the decisions to eliminate jobs?
SECOND: Originally posted by second:
Republicans largely ignore moral stain of child poverty
Imagine you have some neighbors in a mansion down the road who pamper one child with a credit card, the best private school and a Tesla.
The parents treat most of their other kids decently but not lavishly — and then you discover that the family consigns one child to an unheated, vermin-infested room in the basement, denying her dental care and often leaving her without food...
But that’s us. That household, writ large, is America and our moral stain of child poverty.
SIGNY: You can't eliminate poverty by "giving" people money. All that does is create dependency on aid. You can only create wealth by having a robust economy in which everyone who can work has a meaningful job at living wages...
JO: In a few decadez there wont be any jobz,
You?
Me?
Quote:But that will NEVER happen. The same people who are making the decisions to eliminate jobs now ... BTW, so they can keep more of that $$ for themselves ... aren't going to be in any greater "giving away" mood later. Why should they be?
JO:... so we shoud be tranzitioning to sum other way uv getting money to peepl now.
You seem not to have yet grasped the conundrum that is capitalism. The best explanation I can give is FREM'S: Imagine ten people sitting at a card game, and with every round one person gets to take a portion of the money. Sooner or later, the other players will have nothing left to play with.
Give it some thought.
Quote:Most of those shows are a crock. They pay people to go on them to play a part. I loaned somebody money once, and was never paid back. So I went to court and got a judgment against this person. Well, wouldn't you know but one of those "Judge Judy"-type shows offered me $7000 to go on and play my part of the grump white female.
JO: But thats not the worst problem. It seemz that giving them money or making them work for it, or doing niether, they will still plop out babyz without regard to their financial situation. So in thoze same few decadez there will still be way too many peepl for the ecosystem to support.
I woc Steve Wilcos. The main subject uv the show iz bad parents. Even wen its a cheating show, they usually hav too many kidz. A typical mom haz 5 and her cheating babydaddy haz kidz with 5 other wimin. And thoze are the 'funny' showz.
More than haf are about abuzed children.
Quote:I agree that there are not "going to be" too many people, there already are too many for the environment to accomodate. We've exceeded the carbon cycle, the nitrogen cycle, the water cycle, and the soil cycle, are driving an extinction event by sheer habitat loss, among others, and are waaaaay beyond any notion of "sustainability".
JO... Wut happenz wen there are so many peepl that its impossible for any guvrment to keep a lid on this sort uv crap? There are plenty uv useless guvrments now where child abuse must be rampant. And with the GoPs and their idiotic 'small guvrment' ideaz doing nothing but lokking themselvez in power, they are likely to sekseed in defunding all the DCFS eventually.
The human rase iz working on transforming the planet into Hell.
But I don't blame "people" for being "stupid". The last thing corporations and (most) governments want is people who are self-directed, self-disciplined, thoughtful, and rational. THIS APPLIES TO BOTH DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENTS.
You can't get self-directed and self-disciplined people to buy shit they don't need with money they don't have; or to get so hyped up on their own victimization that they refuse to better their own lives; or to idolize stupidity, geed and laziness. Self-directed, self-disciplined people don't expect life to be fun all of the time. They recognize that REAL real life is full of pain, uncertainty, fear, har
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Jo, I didn't even know where to BEGIN to address your post, so I'm glad Signy gave you some feedback.
Anyway, if I was going to have a convo with you about it, I guess the first place I would start is to ask you how many people you know IRL who are just like the people on TV. Family? Former co-workers? Neighbors? Is that how they run their lives? Is that how they behave in public?
And do you really believe 'reality' TV?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree with most uv wut you rote, Sig.
Capitalizm needz to be on a very short leesh. Peepl need to be able to think for themselvz. We need to looz at least 3/4 uv the population and stay at that level.
I disagree about the authentisity uv the show. I no there are Screen Actorz Gild rulez about pay, wich acounts for sum uv the motivation for theze low lifes to air their dirty laundry on national TV, but that duznt preclude their storyz from being true.
A big motiv to go on Wilcos iz to get free lie detector tests. Occasionaly the gests hav alredy paid around 500$ to a local lie detector gy but usually get a different rezult from Dan Ribacoff. https://www.danribacoff.com/
Its a serious show. They hav expozed murdererz, pedofilez, abuzerz, rezulting in many prizon sentensez. Theyv also exonerated many accuzed peepl.
I hav known many splooj munkeyz, 1kiki, and I dont hav a very wide serkl uv frenz.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What's a 'splooj munkey'?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Only because you asked...
"Splooj" means jizz.
A Splooj Munkey is Ted excitedly watching and posting Trump Impeachment Porn every day, 20 days after his guy won* while at the same time not posting a single thing about Biden*, either good or bad.
Used in a sentence:
"CNN is PornHub for TDS suffering splooj munkeys."
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh, I'm trying to figure out how 'Splooj Munkey' fits into shows about baby-daddies. It seems like a 'Splooj Munkey' wouldn't have all that many babies because of being a 'Splooj Munkey', which is a generally solitary activity.
Maybe JO can explain his answer because it seems like he's saying he doesn't know anybody who's anything other than a 'Splooj Munkey' and he doesn't know many people anyway ... which means he doesn't know people like the ones he sees on TV.
Is that what he's trying to say?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME