Election Day Oddities
POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 03:39
VIEWED: 11221
PAGE 1 of 2
EDIT: Although this page started out as a kind of laugh when I'd see weird things on the NYT map, it turned into more of a semi-real time play by play as things were going on outside of when I would step away from the action when there was a lull...
Feel free to post any that you find on the maps if you're checking them.
6:56 CST:
Yup. That above image just about sums up 2020.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
7:00 CST:
And this follow up pic is evidence that there isn't a NYT conspiracy here, but that the fine people who work at NYT just don't know how numbers work.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
07:08 CST:
You'll notice that there are "needles" on Florida, Georgia and North Carolina.
According to the Times on their "needles" page, which doesn't seem to be working for me at the moment, this is what those needles means:
Funny. Biden has a 66% chance of winning North Carolina with 1% of the votes counted and Trump getting most of them, huh?
Hope you're not basing those off the polls, such as the ones which had Biden winning Florida (because, as you can see from the picture above, NYT is now giving Trump a greater than 95% chance of winning Florida).
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/fl/florida_tru
mp_vs_biden-6841.html
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ouch....
You REALLY better hope that's not why.
Unlike the RCP aggregate that had Biden up by 0.9pts today, the North Carolina aggregate has Trump up by 0.2.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nc/north_carol
ina_trump_vs_biden-6744.html
Looks like NYT is just making shit up again.
Probably not smart when they're going to be called on it so quickly and so many people are watching.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
07:26:
C'mon man.
"No votes reported"? Can't we at least pretend like this whole vote counting thing means anything?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
7:37 CST: (UPDATE to 7:08 CST above)
"Oh... We meant TRUMP has a 66% chance of winning North Carolina. Sorry."
P.S. Georgia also went from 78% Trump to 82% Trump in the last half hour.
UPDATE: What was the aggregate for Georgia?
Seems Biden's chances in Georgia fell off a cliff in the last three days.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BATTLEGROUND UPDATE:
7:45 CST:
Trumps chances in...
Florida >95%
Georgia 83%
N Carolina 72%
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
7:53 CST:
Trump wins Indiana.
No shit. (Not an Oddity)
Sorry bout that, Nilbog.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
7:58 CST:
RCP calling it a virtual coin flip now, with a slight edge of 50.1% to Trump vs. 48.6% to Biden.
CORRECTION: There was nothing on the page stating exactly what those numbers mean. After looking at the total current vote count for the country at large on NYT, it clicked that this was not a prediction, but a percentage of current counted votes without actually showing the number of votes counted.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
8:08 CST
Just wanted to take a snapshot of the popular vote, before New York and California bastardize it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BATTLEGROUND UPDATE:
9:06 CST
Trumps chances in...
Florida >95%
Georgia 83%
N Carolina 95%
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
9:12 CST
Despite 30% of NY being reported as well as 29% of Illinois being reported, Trump's popular vote lead has ballooned to nearly 2 million votes.
We know what's coming when California gets their turn, but I wanted to take another snapshot. I didn't expect the lead to actually widen once NY started counting.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
9:22 CST:
With 35% of NY counted and 34% of Illinois counted, Trump cracks a 2 Million vote lead.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BATTLEGROUND UPDATE:
9:30 CST
Trumps chances in...
Florida >95%
Georgia 81%
N Carolina >95%
REMINDER: At 7:08PM CST, the NYT gave Biden a 66% chance of winning North Carolina when only 1% of the vote had been counted and those that were counted at the time HEAVILY favored Trump.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
9:56 CST
Trump is now up by over 3.3 Million votes with 53% of NY counted and 57% of Illinois counted.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"EXPECTED" RESULTS BY STATE:
10:02 CST
No surprises in the "easily won" states on either side, although you might notice that Trump has a commanding lead in nearly all of them while the same can't honestly be said for Biden as of now.
More interesting is the "narrow win" states, where Trump doesn't seem to be having any problems outside of Montana, but only 19% of the votes have been tabulated there and are primarily in big cities so far.
Biden, however, looks like he may have a problem hanging on to a few of those in his column.
The so called "toss up" states seem to lean heavily in Trump's favor as well. Trump really shouldn't have any problems with Iowa where he's currently down by 10pts. Those are largely from urban centers which are anywhere from 59% to 95% counted as of 10:09 CST.
HILARIOUS SIDE NOTE: Biden is up 86pts in Washington D.C. If that doesn't tell you who the Establishment candidate is, I don't know what will.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
10:14 CST:
With 58% reporting in both NY and Illinois, Trump has extended his popular vote lead to over 3.5 Million votes.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
10:23 CST
The Popular vote party had to end for Trump at some time...
With 63% of NY reporting and 59% of IL reporting, 9% of California has now reported, mainly from urban/suburban areas, and Trumps Popular vote lead has quickly dwindled to 2.7 Million. L.A. County, Sandiego County and Santa Clara county haven't even begun counting yet either.
Will the rest of America vote against the coasts? He had a pretty strong start. Lots of ballots to still be counted, and in general the mail in ballots which favor Democrats are among the first to be counted.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
10:28 CST:
Jeez... Things move pretty quickly in California, huh?
Well... we knew this was going to happen.
Up from just 9% counted to 45% counted in a matter of minutes with well over half of the previous 3 mentioned counties now accounted for and Trump is now losing the Popular Vote.
Say hello to the three counties who would run the country if we did away with the Electoral College.
Let's get those urban/suburban California areas out of the way quick and see if Trump can catch up.
NOTE: 68% of NY and 60% of IL are counted now as well.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nevada be like "Fuck you, buddy. I count my votes whenever I feel like counting my votes".
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
TEXAS:
10:39 CST
As expected, Trump seems to be running away with Texas. 86% of the total voted counted with 80% to 91% counted in the 4 Democratic strongholds in the state.
TEXAS RCP AGGREGATE:
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
WISCONSIN:
10:44 CST
With only 36% of Milwaukee County counted (and expected to go late into the night), Trump's going to have to pull ahead quite a bit more if he's going to overcome that. Just shy of 100,000 votes isn't going to cut it.
The one thing he has going in his favor is that it's actually Madison County that is going HUGE in Biden's favor instead of Milwaukee (76% to 59%, respectively) and Madison is already 80% accounted for and less densely populated.
WISCONSIN'S RCP AGGREGATE:
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"EXPECTED" RESULTS BY STATE UPDATE:
11:00 CST:
Not much to speak about in the Easily won categories, since they seem to be going as expected. Although Rhode Island is looking particularly skechy compared to expectations. Although I have serious doubts it would flip tonight, that might be a state that you'll have to watch out for flipping red in the future. Not a lot of counties in the state to speak of and no signs that any of the counting is really very lopsided. It should end up being pretty close (unless mail in ballots haven't been counted yet and it just seems closer than it really is).
In the Narrowly won category, Trump flipped Montana like I expected him to. Unless Cascade County is a HUGE Democrat stronghold I don't expect that to flip the other way.
Biden is still looking far weaker in the Narrowly category overall.
My prediction now on the "Toss Up" states is that Trump takes all of them.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
GEORGIA UPDATE:
Quote:
Stephanie Saul, in Atlanta 5m ago
Atlanta won’t finish its count tonight. Election workers in Fulton County, who were counting absentee ballots, went home for the night. A water line break delayed the count.
Uh huh.
A water line break. Right.
So can we expect the waterline break to be the reason that NYT changed their 82% Trump probability win in Georgia 10 minutes ago magically to a 63% Biden chance then?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
POPULAR VOTE UPDATE:
11:15 CST:
With 78% of NY counted, 65% of IL, and 60% of CA, Trump is still falling behind on the Popular vote front, but hot as much as one might have expected.
Currently down 1.2 Million.
The entire West Coast has been beating Trump up, but Washington is 87% counted and Oregon is 86%.
Just recently won Ohio too, in case you missed it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
11:21 CST:
Trump just won Montana, as predicted.
Doesn't appear that it will be "narrowly" either.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
11:25 CST:
Still absolutely no explanation whatsoever for the magical 155% chance swing to Biden in Georgia except for the waterline breaking.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
11:30 CST
SENATE SIDE NOTE:
Both the Dems and the GOP have flipped a Senate seat.
Current results are Dems: 43 / GOP: 46
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
MINNESOTA:
11:35 CST:
Minnesota might be tight. Right now it's not looking very good for Trump. Vote counts in all the Democratic strongholds are 81% to 91% done, so it all depends on voter turnout in the rest of the state.
MINNESOTA RCP AGGREGATE:
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
11:39 CST:
Trump declared winner in Florida.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
TEXAS:
11:44 CST
Expect them to call Trump for Texas any time now. Democrat strongholds are nearly exhausted and 91% of the state is done with Trump up nearly half a million votes.
Electoral count will be Biden 213 to Trump 212 if it's the next state called.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
MINNESOTA:
12:03AM CST:
Called for Biden.
Despite the fact that even Politico has already called Texas, the NYT still hasn't.
GEORGIA UPDATE: Explaining away the 155% magical flip.
Quote:
Nate Cohn, in New York 20m ago
Why did the Needle turn blue in Georgia? We got enough vote out of the Atlanta area to realize it was going to be really good for Biden. And there's a ton of vote left there.
Quote:
Nate Cohn, in New York 13m ago
Another reason the Needle has Biden edging ahead in Georgia: For a while, it was taking cues from trends in N.C. and Florida. Now we've seen enough vote in the Atlanta area.
Neither of these statements are true.
Look at the county by county map, how much remain blue vs. red, the amount of votes per and you'll see that Biden is far from a 66% chance in GA. Coin flip at best now.
Unless something changes, disregard the change in the NYT needle.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
TEXAS:
12:20 AM CST:
Trump declared winner of Texas by NYT (20 minutes after Politico called it).
RHODE ISLAND:
12:23 AM CST:
Disregard what I said about it being close.
They counted the in-person ballots first, then the mail in ballots in that state. While it looked to be fairly close an hour ago, Biden's up by 20 pts there now.
I did mention this in the earlier post though...
Quote:
It should end up being pretty close (unless mail in ballots haven't been counted yet and it just seems closer than it really is).
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I would have advised HEAVILY against Biden coming out 45 minutes ago and declaring himself the winner of Pennsylvania, unless they've got a few truckload of mail in ballots on standby.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
WISCONSIN:
12:39 AM CST:
I'm calling Wisconsin for Trump now.
There are no notations at all on NYT saying that mail in votes will be counted later, and outside of Milwaukee reporting late, results are supposed to be known by 3AM to 6AM this morning.
That being said, if Biden holds 60% in Milwaukee County, it will be enough to overtake Trump, but outside of Portage County which is at 81% and is a close race with low population, every blue county is at 98% which essentially means they're done.
There are plenty of Red counties with more votes to count, including Brown County (Green Bay) which alone would put Trump back over the top if the percentages hold.
It will be really close, and they may demand a recount. But at least for the first count I'm calling it for Trump.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SENATE UPDATE:
12:53 AM CST:
Still only one seat flippped for both sides.
Dems: 44 / GOP: 47
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
1:21 CST
Well... I'm done for the night. It's obvious that we're not going to have an answer anytime soon. Hopefully we're not arguing for weeks about it and we know in a day or two who won.
It's almost impossible to tell what will happen because of the mail in crap, but I'm going to go ahead now and concede Georgia to Biden unless some sort of miracle happens overnight.
Here's my prediction... or at this point possibly just wishful thinking. (barring any court battles)
Current results are 225 Biden to 213 Trump.
TRUMP PICKS UP:
Alaska - 3 (Sure thing)
Wisconsin - 10 (90% sure)
North Carolina - 15 (85% chance Trump according to NYT)
Pennsylvania - 20 (90% sure)
Michigan - 16 (Giving only 60/40 to Trump because of mail in shenanigans)
Maine - 1 of 4 (Inconsequential, and just basing it off of 2016)
BIDEN PICKS UP:
Georgia - 16 (NYT has 63% chance Biden, and after doing the math I can't disagree.. maybe higher)
Nevada - 6 (Just giving this one to Biden because the mail in ballot system in this state is just despicable).
Arizona - 11 (It will be close, but math with remaining votes by color of county just looks better for Biden)
Maine - 3 of 4 (Biden already has 1, Maine is inconsequential at this point)
260 Biden / 278 Trump
My prediction is that Michigan will actually be the great decider here.
Time will tell...
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
P.S. Dems just flipped another Senate seat, so they're up one from where they stared.
Currently Dems: 45 / GOP: 47
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The biggest oddity ... and one that defies statistica, defies all explanation, and demands invesigation... is that overnight Michigan found 138,000+ votes to add to the Biden column and not a single vote went to Trump???
So while everyone was asleep and after everyone went home, Democrats in Michigan magically found a trove of 138,339 votes, and all 138,339 of those "votes" magically went to Biden? That doesn't look suspicious at all. https://t.co/6w1MFoVhfg
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 4, 2020
Now THAT'S hinky. Someone should demand a recount, and an examination of those ballots and ballot chain of custody. And if the ballots have already been bundled with statewide ballots, then recount the whole state and examine each ballot for proper validation. And STILL investigate how ballots were handled and counted. Because, really, something stinks like fraud.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The word magically is the dead giveaway. You actually got that not from Sean Davis, who was retweeting Trump, but from Trump. He is not a believable source:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So while everyone was asleep and after everyone went home, Democrats in Michigan magically found a trove of 138,339 votes, and all 138,339 of those "votes" magically went to Biden? That doesn't look suspicious at all. https://t.co/6w1MFoVhfg
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 4, 2020
Now THAT'S hinky.
9:04 AM · Nov 4, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1324004491612618752
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nothing was found "magically." Those votes were cast, and are only now being counted.
They will be overwhelmingly Democratic.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:There's a diference between being "overwhelimgly" Democrat and being 100% Democrat. I haven't calculated the odds, but for illustrative purposes to count 138,000+ votes and have them ALL be Democrat would be like flipping a coin and having it come up "tails" 138,000+ times in a row.
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Nothing was found "magically." Those votes were cast, and are only now being counted.
They will be overwhelmingly Democratic.
If THAT happened, I would take a serious look a the coin, the coin flipper, or the counter.
Really. 138,000+ votes "Democrat" and not a single one Republican? Even in a heavily democrat district, there will be 10% something else. Sounds like the ballots were pre-sorted or ballot-harvested or fraudulently generated or fraudulently counted.
This is just like the 2004 election of GWB, where six battlegrounds swung in his favor, disagreeing heavily with exit polls. Because this only happened (1) in battleground states (2) in precincts with electronic voting (3) and all swung in one direction (4) fr beyond the known error rate of exit polling, fraud is the most likely explanation.
Which is why I have been harping on picture identification at the polls (absentee ballots should be requested by the voter, NOT sent out en masse), HAND MARKED ballots, HAND COUNTED in public.
Democrats didn't move to clean up the election process then, they just figured out new and better ways of cheating.
We REALLY need a more cheat-proof system of voting!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I wonder which County mysteriously supplied those ballots. Does that county now have more votes listed than Eligible Voters?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The biggest oddity ... and one that defies statistica, defies all explanation, and demands invesigation... is that overnight Michigan found 138,000+ votes to add to the Biden column and not a single vote went to Trump???
So while everyone was asleep and after everyone went home, Democrats in Michigan magically found a trove of 138,339 votes, and all 138,339 of those "votes" magically went to Biden? That doesn't look suspicious at all. https://t.co/6w1MFoVhfg
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 4, 2020
Now THAT'S hinky. Someone should demand a recount, and an examination of those ballots and ballot chain of custody. And if the ballots have already been bundled with statewide ballots, then recount the whole state and examine each ballot for proper validation. And STILL investigate how ballots were handled and counted. Because, really, something stinks like fraud.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Last night I noticed that once the odds shifted to favoring TRump, all of a sudden the counting stopped in some states.
MI, RI, MT, CT all of a sudden froze at less than 55% of votes counted.
RI spend about 3 hours frozen with under 50% vote counted, and Obiden had about 48% with less than 1% lead over Trump. I never saw an update with more than 50% counted last night.
VA was called early for Obiden, and then for a couple hours Trump was above 50% and getting up to 54% of the vote. In one update it flipped to 50% for Obiden.
VA, RI, MI, and WI might be deserving recounts.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'm wondering how long before you give up noticing obvious Election Fraud? Seems clear, but how long will you hold out with common sense?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:There's a diference between being "overwhelimgly" Democrat and being 100% Democrat. I haven't calculated the odds, but for illustrative purposes to count 138,000+ votes and have them ALL be Democrat would be like flipping a coin and having it come up "tails" 138,000+ times in a row.
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Nothing was found "magically." Those votes were cast, and are only now being counted.
They will be overwhelmingly Democratic.
If THAT happened, I would take a serious look a the coin, the coin flipper, or the counter.
Really. 138,000+ votes "Democrat" and not a single one Republican? Even in a heavily democrat district, there will be 10% something else. Sounds like the ballots were pre-sorted or ballot-harvested or fraudulently generated or fraudulently counted.
This is just like the 2004 election of GWB, where six battlegrounds swung in his favor, disagreeing heavily with exit polls. Because this only happened (1) in battleground states (2) in precincts with electronic voting (3) and all swung in one direction (4) fr beyond the known error rate of exit polling, fraud is the most likely explanation.
Which is why I have been harping on picture identification at the polls (absentee ballots should be requested by the voter, NOT sent out en masse), HAND MARKED ballots, HAND COUNTED in public.
Democrats didn't move to clean up the election process then, they just figured out new and better ways of cheating.
We REALLY need a more cheat-proof system of voting!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nope. It's all legit, and, since you're a Russian troll, you're lying at full tilt.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Last night I noticed that once the odds shifted to favoring TRump, all of a sudden the counting stopped in some states.
MI, RI, MT, CT all of a sudden froze at less than 55% of votes counted.
RI spend about 3 hours frozen with under 50% vote counted, and Obiden had about 48% with less than 1% lead over Trump. I never saw an update with more than 50% counted last night.
VA was called early for Obiden, and then for a couple hours Trump was above 50% and getting up to 54% of the vote. In one update it flipped to %0% for Obiden.
VA, RI, MI, and WI might be deserving recounts.
If you lived in the US, you might have a better idea of how elections work here. But, of course, the only president you've ever voted for is Putin.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I'm wondering how long before you give up noticing obvious Election Fraud? Seems clear, but how long will you hold out with common sense?
There is no election fraud. Yet. You're spewing shit out of your drunk Russian ass.
Trump will try every trick in his little rat book, but I don't think he has a chance. Biden won, fair and square. You can STFU now.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
Biden has AZ sewn up. This is the only election fraud going on so far: Trump's bogus bullshit.NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Votes for 2016 Presidential race were 2.4 million in AZ. Currently only showing 1.17 votes tallied in this race for AZ.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
If AZ is Trump's, then Trump could lose WI and PA and still have 270.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Maricopa in 2016 had over 1.5 million votes for President, with Trump getting 45,000 more than Hilliary. The current claimed lead in AZ is Obiden with 93,000. Reports are 650,000 otes remaining, and 84% have been reported.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Votes for 2016 Presidential race were 2.4 million in AZ. Currently showing 2.7 votes tallied in this race for AZ.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
If AZ is Trump's, then Trump could lose WI and PA and still have 270.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Heard news that NV was planning to not count any votes today, but have released a statement that they might bother themselves to count some more today.
https://wnyt.com/politics/nevada-suspends-ballot-counting-decision-202
0-/5915251/
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/nevada/articles/2020-11-03/nev
ada-high-court-asked-to-stop-vegas-area-mail-ballot-count
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/politics-news-pmn/michigan-still
-counting-votes-angry-poll-watchers-barred-in-detroit-trump-sues-2
Emotions were running high on Wednesday afternoon in downtown Detroit, where city election officials blocked about 30 people, mostly Republicans, from entering the vote-counting hall at TCF Center due to capacity restrictions to fight the spread of COVID-19.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You can't have a bunch of armed randos trying to disrupt the vote count.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/politics-news-pmn/michigan-still
-counting-votes-angry-poll-watchers-barred-in-detroit-trump-sues-2
Emotions were running high on Wednesday afternoon in downtown Detroit, where city election officials blocked about 30 people, mostly Republicans, from entering the vote-counting hall at TCF Center due to capacity restrictions to fight the spread of COVID-19.
That's fascism.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are supposed to be observers from BOTH PARTIES (technically, ALL parties) to watch the vote-counting. Reportedly, Republican observers are being blocked, and the windows also blocked so nobody can peek in and see what's going on.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Another lie.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
There are supposed to be observers from BOTH PARTIES (technically, ALL parties) to watch the vote-counting. Reportedly, Republican observers are being blocked, and the windows also blocked so nobody can peek in and see what's going on.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Which part? The part that says counting must be observed by BOTH (technically, ALL) parties?
Or the one that says that reportedly GOP observers are being kept out by Democrats?
Quote:
See tense situation at Detroit ballot-counting center
CNN's Miguel Marquez reports from a convention center in Detroit where some observers and challengers to the vote-counting process have been removed from a room where absentee ballots are being counted.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/11/04/michigan-detroit-ballot
-counting-center-tensions-flare-marquez-elexnight-vpx.cnn
In M$M reporting about this, with all of the blah-blah-blah about approval process and credentialing of challengers the one thing the reports DON'T mention is that there are, in fact, Republican challengers already inside observing the vote. Just being able to say THAT would, I think, calm things down considerably, so why doesn't the M$M report that?
Detroit local news says there are Republican challengers already inside, but that hasn't made it to national news. Republican challengers say they are overwhelmed since their numbers do not equal the number of Democrat and Democrat-leaning challengers.
https://michiganchronicle.com/2020/11/04/republican-vote-challengers-p
rotest-erupt-over-tallying-process-at-tcf-center-in-detroit/
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Because trumptards don't know or care how elections work. They just want to win, and if they don't, they cry.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
REAVERBOT: Because trumptards don't know or care how elections work. They just want to win, and if they don't, they cry.
Oh like this?
Got your ass handed to you, AGAIN, didn't you?
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's a consideration, since Nancy lost a chunk of votes in the House and the Senate doesn't look like it's going to flip. That would indicate increased/ maintained republican votes for Congress but decreased republican votes for president, which makes no sense.
I'd look at states where the margins in terms of total numbers votes are small. Otherwise we're talking about modifying/ manufacturing hundreds of thousands of votes, and that's too massive for me to want to consider.
It's not the votes that counts, it's who counts the votes.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yu seem to be aware that Trump won the Election, and Dems are trying hard to steal it.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:There's a diference between being "overwhelimgly" Democrat and being 100% Democrat. I haven't calculated the odds, but for illustrative purposes to count 138,000+ votes and have them ALL be Democrat would be like flipping a coin and having it come up "tails" 138,000+ times in a row.
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Nothing was found "magically." Those votes were cast, and are only now being counted.
They will be overwhelmingly Democratic.
If THAT happened, I would take a serious look a the coin, the coin flipper, or the counter.
Really. 138,000+ votes "Democrat" and not a single one Republican? Even in a heavily democrat district, there will be 10% something else. Sounds like the ballots were pre-sorted or ballot-harvested or fraudulently generated or fraudulently counted.
This is just like the 2004 election of GWB, where six battlegrounds swung in his favor, disagreeing heavily with exit polls. Because this only happened (1) in battleground states (2) in precincts with electronic voting (3) and all swung in one direction (4) fr beyond the known error rate of exit polling, fraud is the most likely explanation.
Which is why I have been harping on picture identification at the polls (absentee ballots should be requested by the voter, NOT sent out en masse), HAND MARKED ballots, HAND COUNTED in public.
Democrats didn't move to clean up the election process then, they just figured out new and better ways of cheating.
We REALLY need a more cheat-proof system of voting!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
Are you surprised?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Yu seem to be aware that Trump won the Election, and Dems are trying hard to steal it.
Are you surprised?
And in spite of the facts, you will say that for the rest of your Russian troll career.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This was all blamed on "clerical error". The votes were NOT for Biden.
REAVERFAN:
Nothing was found "magically." Those votes were cast, and are only now being counted.
They will be overwhelmingly Democratic.
SIGNYM: There's a diference between being "overwhelimgly" Democrat and being 100% Democrat. I haven't calculated the odds, but for illustrative purposes to count 138,000+ votes and have them ALL be Democrat would be like flipping a coin and having it come up "tails" 138,000+ times in a row.
If THAT happened, I would take a serious look a the coin, the coin flipper, or the counter.
Really. 138,000+ votes "Democrat" and not a single one Republican? Even in a heavily democrat district, there will be 10% something else. Sounds like the ballots were pre-sorted or ballot-harvested or fraudulently generated or fraudulently counted.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
I guess I'm not the only one to think of using Senate votes as an "internal standard" for the Presidential vote. (All you analytical chemists out there will know what Im talking about.)
Quote:I will present the article data in tabular form for easier reading
Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."
Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.
Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.
SWING STATES
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
Donald Trump (R) 2,637,163 (+7,121)
John James (R Senate) 2,630,042
GEORGIA
Biden 2,414,651 (+95,801)
D Senator 2,318,850
Trump 2,432,799 (+818)
R Senator 2,433,617
MONTANA
Biden 243,278 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:270,735
Trump 340,635 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 330,317
NONSWING STATES
WYOMING
Biden (+725)
*****
It would be interesting to see a full analysis on that.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
OMG.
That looks bad.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Once again, you got your ass handed to you.
Originally posted by SignyM:Quote:
REAVERBOT: Because trumptards don't know or care how elections work. They just want to win, and if they don't, they cry.
Oh like this?
Got your ass handed to you, AGAIN, didn't you?
You tears are delicious!
Who are we kidding? You aren't even in America.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You cannot possibly be surprised that that is the residue of Election Fraud.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
OMG.
That looks bad.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:You cannot possibly be surprised that that is the residue of Election Fraud.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
OMG.
That looks bad.
There was no fraud. You have no proof of fraud. All you have are reichwing lies manufactured in your native Russia.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Current update:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
I guess I'm not the only one to think of using Senate votes as an "internal standard" for the Presidential vote. (All you analytical chemists out there will know what Im talking about.)
Quote:I will present the article data in tabular form for easier reading
Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."
Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.
Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.
SWING STATES
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
Donald Trump (R) 2,637,163 (+7,121)
John James (R Senate) 2,630,042
GEORGIA
Biden 2,414,651 (+95,801)
D Senator 2,318,850
Trump 2,432,799 (+818)
R Senator 2,433,617
MONTANA
Biden 243,278 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:270,735
Trump 340,635 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 330,317
NONSWING STATESCurrent update:
WYOMING
Biden (+725)
*****
It would be interesting to see a full analysis on that.
MONTANA
Biden 243.719
Dem Sen:271,209 (+27,490)
Dem CD 261,168 (+17,449)
Trump 341,767
GOP Sen 331,414 (-10,353)
GOP CD 337,381 (-4,386)
POTUS total: 600,680
Senator total: 602,623
MT-1 CD total: 598,549
https://ca.yahoo.com/topics/us-election?cache=clear
I notice the House race has 100% ciounted, but the Senate and President only have 99% counted.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yes, but what about BIDEN?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Current update:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
I guess I'm not the only one to think of using Senate votes as an "internal standard" for the Presidential vote. (All you analytical chemists out there will know what Im talking about.)
Quote:I will present the article data in tabular form for easier reading
Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."
Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.
Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.
SWING STATES
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
Donald Trump (R) 2,637,163 (+7,121)
John James (R Senate) 2,630,042
GEORGIA
Biden 2,414,651 (+95,801)
D Senator 2,318,850
Trump 2,432,799 (+818)
R Senator 2,433,617
MONTANA
Biden 243,278 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:270,735
Trump 340,635 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 330,317
NONSWING STATESCurrent update:
MONTANA
Biden 243.719 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:271,209
Dem CD 261,168
Trump 341,767 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 331,414
GOP CD 337,381
WYOMING
Biden (+725)
*****
It would be interesting to see a full analysis on that.
MONTANA
Biden 243.719 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:271,209
Dem CD 261,168
Trump 341,767 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 331,414
GOP CD 337,381 (-4,386)
POTUS total:
https://ca.yahoo.com/topics/us-election?cache=clear
It is expected that the vote for Senator will closely track vote for President.
When votes diverge is when investigation is useful.
Also, just like in 2004, it isn't necessary to swing the entire USA, just key states. Looking at the USA overall will probably swamp the relevant numbers. You need a state-by-state comparison.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Software 'Glitch' In Michigan Erroneously Gave 1000s Of Votes To Biden; Up To 47 Counties Compromised
Software used to tabulate votes cast in 47 Michigan counties erroneously gave 6,000 votes to Joe Biden in Anterim County, according to state GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox.
"In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said 'tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the vote.' Since then, we have now discovered the 47 counties used the same software in the same capacity," she said, adding "Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that used the software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies."
Of note, Trump won Antrim County in 2016 with 62% of the vote vs. 33% for Hillary Clinton.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Software 'Glitch' In Michigan Erroneously Gave 1000s Of Votes To Biden; Up To 47 Counties Compromised
Software used to tabulate votes cast in 47 Michigan counties erroneously gave 6,000 votes to Joe Biden in Anterim County, according to state GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox.
"In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said 'tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the vote.' Since then, we have now discovered the 47 counties used the same software in the same capacity," she said, adding "Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that used the software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies."
Of note, Trump won Antrim County in 2016 with 62% of the vote vs. 33% for Hillary Clinton.
PICTURE ID AT THE POLLS
HAND-MARKED VOTES
HAND-COUNTED IN PUBLIC.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
WaPo had some exit polls by state, and, well, it's WaPo, but they were the only ones I could get to.
Other places that might have them are https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls
-president.html This link claims AP and Edison Research ran exit polls. https://www.the-sun.com/news/1732552/exit-polls-2020-what-how-work-us-
election/ "Edison Research conducted this exit poll for the National Election Pool(ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC). The National Election Pool (NEP) members (ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC) prepared the questionnaire." https://s.abcnews.com/assets/dtci/elections/NEPExitPollMethodologyStat
ement.pdf But of the various members of the NEP I could only find ABC which didn't break the results down by state. https://abcnews.go.com/Elections/exit-polls-2020-us-presidential-elect
ion-results-analysis This link claimed Reuters/IPSOS did exit polls but didn't provide numbers by state. https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/EXIT-POLL/xegvblddavq/index.
html This site also didn't break down exit polls by state. https://morningconsult.com/exit-polling-live-updates/ Statista also doesn't seem to have exit polls by sate. https://www.statista.com/search/?q=2020+presidential+election+exit+pol
ls&Search=&qKat=search
In any case, one of the big tipoffs in Bush's election were the big discrepancies between exit polls and vote counts, so I calculated the percentages in the exit polls v the reported percentages, and posted them here: http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=51008&p=17
WaPo also had Senate vote exit polls, but I didn't calculate those.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
I guess I'm not the only one to think of using Senate votes as an "internal standard" for the Presidential vote. (All you analytical chemists out there will know what Im talking about.)
Quote:I will present the article data in tabular form for easier reading
Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."
Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.
Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.
SWING STATES
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
Donald Trump (R) 2,637,163 (+7,121)
John James (R Senate) 2,630,042
GEORGIA
Biden 2,414,651NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
I hate to rain on your conspiracy parade with some basic maths but, well, no I don't.
69,003 is less than 2.5% of all Biden voters in this state... So 2.5% of voters split their tickets. And?
Quote:
HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket
Yeah, about 97.5%, apparently...
-------------------------------------------------------
"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."
Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Syrian regime collusion with ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't eat food or drink water anymore.
I draw all my nourishment from trumptard tears. They are so sweet and yummy!
Trump lost.
Get over it, snowflake!
Fuck your feelings.
Your tears are delicious.
https://twitter.com/copingmaga
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmMwT75XUAETSTu?format=jpg&name=large
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Wisconsin Clerks May Have Unlawfully Altered Thousands of Absentee Ballots
By Dan O'Donnell
Nov 7, 2020
County and municipal clerks and poll workers across Wisconsin may have unlawfully altered witness statements on thousands of mail-in ballots across the state, "The Dan O'Donnell Show" has learned.
Wisconsin Statute 6.86 provides that an absentee ballot must be signed by a witness, who is also required to list his or her address. If a witness address is not listed, then the ballot is considered invalid and must be returned to the voter to have the witness correct.
Instead, multiple sources tell "The Dan O'Donnell Show," municipal clerks and vote counters across the state simply filled out witness signatures themselves. Acting on false and unlawful advice from the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), these clerks may have inadvertently invalidated thousands of absentee votes.
"The statute is very, very clear," said retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who worked as a poll watcher in Milwaukee on Election Day. "If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it's not valid. That ballot is not valid."
The WEC sent uniform instructions to voters with their mail-in ballots that informed them that "your witness must sign and provide their full address (street number, street name, city) in the Certification of Witness section" and warned that "if any of the required information above is missing, your ballot will not be counted."
However, on October 19th, the WEC sent instructions to clerks that they can simply fill in the witness address themselves so that the ballot would not be invalidated.
"Please note that the clerk should attempt to resolve any missing witness address information prior to Election Day if possible, and this can be done through reliable information (personal knowledge, voter registration information, through a phone call with the voter or witness)," WEC wrote. "The witness does not need to appear to add a missing address."
"In defiance of and direct contradiction to the statute, the Wisconsin Elections Commission gave guidance--that is, cover--to all 72 county clerks and turned the statute on his head," Gableman said. "They said, 'Gee, we know the law says an absentee ballot without the witness address is not valid, but county clerk, you have a duty to go ahead and look up on your own the witness' address if there's no address on the absentee ballot."
Anticipating a legal challenge to this seemingly highly unlawful advice, the WEC instructed clerks to write in these witness addresses in red pen so that they would be easy to find during a recount or audit of the vote.
The Republican Party of Wisconsin estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed, thus invalidating the ballots on which they appeared. The statutory remedy for this is to subtract a commensurate number of votes for the candidates for whom those ballots were cast, meaning that vote totals may substantially change.
President Trump's campaign is investigating the scale to which clerks and election workers were altering ballots as well as several other incidents that it has termed "irregularities." President Trump has also publicly called for a recount of Wisconsin's vote.
Former Vice President Joe
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/
2020-11-07-wisconsin-clerks-may-have-unlawfully-altered-thousands-of-absentee-ballots/Biden won the state by roughly 20,000 votes, a margin of less than one percent.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Dan O'Donnell.
Hey, Russian troll. I have a thread that debunks all your bullshit.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Signy: before it disappears here's a link to exit polls NOT from WaPo.
https://edition.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/national-re
sults The nice thing about THIS exit poll is that it looks like it includes all 50 states and Senate votes as well.
Edison Research did the CNN exit poll for CNN, but also ABC, CBS, and NBC in a 'National Election Pool' (link is to info about the National Election Pool http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=63976&p=2 )
Since - like WaPo - the NEP exit poll doesn't deal in totals but breaks everything down by 'demographics', you'll have to calculate totals from the male/ female demographics (like I did with the WaPo poll http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=51008&p=17 )
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data
A most interesting thread popped up on Twitter Sunday from a data scientist who wishes to remain anonymous, regarding mail-in ballot data which strongly suggests fraud occurred in the wee hours of election night, when several swing states inexplicably stopped reporting vote counts while President Trump maintained a healthy lead over Joe Biden.
Using time series data 'scraped' from the New York Times website, the data - comparing several states (swing and non-swing) - clearly illustrates what fraud does and does not look like, and how several anomalies in swing states left 'fingerprints of fraud' as Biden pulled ahead of President Trump.
Presented below via @APhilosophae:
The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.
— CulturalHusbandry (@APhilosophae) November 9, 2020
Continued...
This is based on their proprietary "Edison" data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press. The CSV is available here. And the script to generate it is here. I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.
What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.
One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots.
As we can see on this log-log plot, for many of the counting progress updates, we see an almost constant ratio of #Biden to #Trump. It's such a regular pattern that we can actually fit a linear regression model to it with near-perfect accuracy, barring some outliers. How could this be possible? Is this a telltale sign of fraud? Surprisingly, as it will be shown, the answer is no! This is actually expected behavior. Also, we can use this weird pattern in the ballot counting to spot fraud!
Here is the same pattern for Florida. We see this linear pattern again.
And again (Texas)
And again (South Dakota)
And again all over the country. What appears to be happening is that points on the straight line are actually mail in votes. The reason they're so homogeneous across with respect to the ratio of #Biden vs #Trump votes is that they get randomly shuffled in the mail like a deck of cards. Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time and across different reporting updates.
Lets dig a little deeper into this:
Here is a plot of the same Florida voting data, but this time it's the ratio of #Biden to #Trump ballots, versus time. What we see is that the initial ballot reportings are very noisy and "random".
The initial reporting represents in-person voting. These vote reports have such large variation bc in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments. We can see this same patternNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And they STILL have not explained how Joe Biden got so mny more votes than the corresponding Democrat Senator.
Anyway, this is like 2000 and 2004 replayed.
In 2000 there was the "hanging chad" controvery in Florida. After Katherine Harris (R) State Scy did everything she could possibly do to scrub the voter rolls of Democrats and potential Democrats, the vote was still within the error rate of the vote-counting machines.. Then there was the problem of the "butterfly ballot" and the "hanging chad" (both in districts controlled by Democrats, so they created their own problems.) Should election officials recount just Broward County???? The whole state?? There was so much controversy that the Supreme Court stepped in and selected GWB. (Leading to the famous joke Q: What is the difference between Hitler and GWB? A: Hitler was elected")
Anyway, about a year-ish or so later, a consortium of about a half-dozen newpapers paid the have the ENTIRE STATE recounted. And they tabluated the votes using several different scenarios: All corners detatched, three corners detached, two corners detached, one corner detached, and just a dimple.
As it turned out, Dems and Repubs apparently made the same punchout errors equally, because in the end it DIDN'T MATTER about the "hanging chads", what DID matter was a district that used ELECTRONIC VOTING AND VOTE COUNTING. When those votes were recounted, something in the realm of 20,000 votes swung to Al Gore. He would have taken Florida and won the election.
You would have thought that the DNC and Dem election officials would have taken the hint for Bev Harris (Black Box Voting) but... no. That's about the time I started agitatig for HAND MARKED BALLOTS, HAND COUNTED IN PUBLIC.
Then, in 2004, there were once again strange anaomalous votes, where the votes didn't match the exit polls, not by a litle but by a WHOLE LOT, swinging the vote by 6%-10%. This time they happened
a) well beyond the histoic accuracy and statistical uncertainty of exit polling
b) only in states with electronic voting
c) only in swing states
d) and always in favor of Bush
By the time the six statisticians mulled over the chances that this could have happened by error, the only explanation was that this was a case of FRAUD. So much pressure was put on these academic statisticians that only one put his name to the paper, but the paper still stands.
Then, after Obama urged illegal aliens to vote (Don't worry, nobody's going to check) is when I added
PICTURE ID/PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP AT THE POLLS
HAND MARKED BALLLOTS
HAND COUNTED IN PUBLIC.
Our voting system is a mess because we make our voter rolls oh-so-dependent in "which district" you live in. But people move, people-including soldiers- are out of country, students are off at school, and for national and statewide elections it shouldn't matter.
Maybe people should be required to put their ZIP code on their ballot, bring a recent utility bill as verification, and have the ballots sorted that way instead this clunky system of having people registered in two (or more) districts or not taken off the rolls altogether when they move, or die.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:AZ now has Obiden with a 17,000 vote lead with only 150,000 ballots remaining.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Maricopa in 2016 had over 1.5 million votes for President, with Trump getting 45,000 more than Hilliary.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Votes for 2016 Presidential race were 2.4 million in AZ. Currently showing 2.7 votes tallied in this race for AZ.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
If AZ is Trump's, then Trump could lose WI and PA and still have 270.
The current claimed lead in AZ is Obiden with 93,000. Reports are 650,000 votes remaining, and 84% have been reported.
This does confirm the Trump team's prognosis that the next 500,000 votes would give Trump a 76,000 vote gain. (more than 15,000 gain per 100,000 votes)
If trend prevails, and more Fake Votes are not collected/stuffed, then the next 150,000 votes would gain Trump another 22,500 - for a 5,500 vote win in AZ.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
AZ doesn't matter. Biden has this sewn up.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I am sorry. My post was incomplete. I have completed it now.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Yes, but what about BIDEN?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Current update:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
One interesting thing to look at would be the #of votes for GOP Senators v #votes for Trump. Because if there are a lot more votes for GOP Senators than for Trump, either GOP voters left the "President" box unmarked or split their ticket, (unlikely, most people vote straight ticket) or the Trump vote tally was monkeyed with.
And just for comparison, do the same for #votes for DEM Senators compared to the #votes for Biden. Because if the #votes for Biden vastly exceeds the #votes for DEM Senators, then either DEM voters refused to vote down-ballot (HIGHLY unlikely, most people vote straight ticket and if they're going to hold their nose and vote for a corrupt politico like Joe they'll for sure vote downballot) or the Biden vote tally was monkeyed with.
I guess I'm not the only one to think of using Senate votes as an "internal standard" for the Presidential vote. (All you analytical chemists out there will know what Im talking about.)
Quote:I will present the article data in tabular form for easier reading
Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."
Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.
Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.
SWING STATES
MICHIGAN
Joe Biden (D) votes 2,787,544 (+69,003)
Gary Peters (D Senate) votes 2,718,541
Donald Trump (R) 2,637,163 (+7,121)
John James (R Senate) 2,630,042
GEORGIA
Biden 2,414,651 (+95,801)
D Senator 2,318,850
Trump 2,432,799 (+818)
R Senator 2,433,617
MONTANA
Biden 243,278 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:270,735
Trump 340,635 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 330,317
NONSWING STATESCurrent update:
MONTANA
Biden 243.719 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:271,209
Dem CD 261,168
Trump 341,767 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 331,414
GOP CD 337,381
WYOMING
Biden (+725)
*****
It would be interesting to see a full analysis on that.
MONTANA
Biden 243.719 (+27,457)
Dem Sen:271,209
Dem CD 261,168
Trump 341,767 (+10,318)
GOP Sen 331,414
GOP CD 337,381 (-4,386)
POTUS total:
https://ca.yahoo.com/topics/us-election?cache=clear
It is expected that the vote for Senator will closely track vote for President.
When votes diverge is when investigation is useful.
Also, just like in 2004, it isn't necessary to swing the entire USA, just key states. Looking at the USA overall will probably swamp the relevant numbers. You need a state-by-state comparison.
Please reiterate any problems or discrepancies you find now.
I think that the plus/minus designations for GA, MT are incorrect.
I had intended to show the further data of the Montana Congressional District, which is also a statewide vote. The same number of ballots. I also posted the race t
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:AZ now shows a lead of less than 15,000 for Obiden, with 3.332 million total votes. Still 2% of the vote remaining to be counted.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:AZ now has Obiden with a 17,000 vote lead with only 150,000 ballots remaining.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Maricopa in 2016 had over 1.5 million votes for President, with Trump getting 45,000 more than Hilliary.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Votes for 2016 Presidential race were 2.4 million in AZ. Currently showing 2.7 votes tallied in this race for AZ.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports from AZ officials are that results from Maricopa County have not been turned in yet, and the percent of votes tallied is actually 85%, not 99%.
Also, Trump campaign has filed suit for ongoing shenanigans in MI and PA. In MI for lack of access, and in PA for lack of transparency.
If AZ is Trump's, then Trump could lose WI and PA and still have 270.
The current claimed lead in AZ is Obiden with 93,000. Reports are 650,000 votes remaining, and 84% have been reported.
This does confirm the Trump team's prognosis that the next 500,000 votes would give Trump a 76,000 vote gain. (more than 15,000 gain per 100,000 votes)
If trend prevails, and more Fake Votes are not collected/stuffed, then the next 150,000 votes would gain Trump another 22,500 - for a 5,500 vote win in AZ.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One thing seems certain, this does has not happened before in America, has it? Does anybody know if such a controversy has occurred before?
Where the election stands now:
Obiden seems to have 229 uncontested Electoral Votes. Some Libtards claim that he also has PA, WI, AZ, NV, MI.
Trump seems to have 214 uncontested Electoral Votes so far. AK would make it 217.
AK (3 EV) is still counting ballots. Seems likely that GOP will win President, House, Senate races.
AZ (11EV) seems to be tallying the honest votes, showing Trump as winner. They keep stopping the counting, likely so they can go hunt down some more Dem ballots to stuff in the boxes. If a recount occurs here, McSally might end up winning in the Senate Race.
PA (20EV) Corrupt officials defied clear orders from Supreme Court Justice Alito. It would seem SCOTUS will be weighing in on this. Maybe these corrupt "results" will be invalidated - or at least only in the jurisdictions where they defied, circumvented, bypassed the Law (which is only Liberal jurisdictions). Correcting the illegal vote may move PA-7 and PA-17 back to GOP, like they were before mysterious ballot dumps for Dems only.
WI (10EV) has already had a Trump team request for recount. Recount must wait until Canvass is completed, and WEC is dragging feet. Trump had the lead with the honest vote on Election Day.
MI (16EV) has had some legal challenges, but their laws supporting Election Fraud seem resilient to honesty. Trump had the lead with honest votes on Election Day.
GA (16EV) is still stopping their vote counting regularly after Trump had the handy lead on Election Day, hunting down more and more Fake Votes for Obiden.
NC (15EV) is still counting, but it seems the Libtards won't be able to scrounge up enough Fake Votes to deny Trump.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:WI is canvassing, with 5 Counties completed. All 72 Counties have deadline of 17 November.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
One thing seems certain, this does has not happened before in America, has it? Does anybody know if such a controversy has occurred before?
Where the election stands now:
Obiden seems to have 229 uncontested Electoral Votes. Some Libtards claim that he also has PA, WI, AZ, NV, MI.
Trump seems to have 214 uncontested Electoral Votes so far. AK would make it 217.
AK (3 EV) is still counting ballots. Seems likely that GOP will win President, House, Senate races.
AZ (11EV) seems to be tallying the honest votes, showing Trump as winner. They keep stopping the counting, likely so they can go hunt down some more Dem ballots to stuff in the boxes. If a recount occurs here, McSally might end up winning in the Senate Race.
PA (20EV) Corrupt officials defied clear orders from Supreme Court Justice Alito. It would seem SCOTUS will be weighing in on this. Maybe these corrupt "results" will be invalidated - or at least only in the jurisdictions where they defied, circumvented, bypassed the Law (which is only Liberal jurisdictions). Correcting the illegal vote may move PA-7 and PA-17 back to GOP, like they were before mysterious ballot dumps for Dems only.
WI (10EV) has already had a Trump team request for recount. Recount must wait until Canvass is completed, and WEC is dragging feet. Trump had the lead with the honest vote on Election Day.
MI (16EV) has had some legal challenges, but their laws supporting Election Fraud seem resilient to honesty. Trump had the lead with honest votes on Election Day.
GA (16EV) is still stopping their vote counting regularly after Trump had the handy lead on Election Day, hunting down more and more Fake Votes for Obiden.
NC (15EV) is still counting, but it seems the Libtards won't be able to scrounge up enough Fake Votes to deny Trump.
GA is recounting, deadline is 20 Nov.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
WI is canvassing, with 5 Counties completed. All 72 Counties have deadline of 17 November.
GA is recounting, deadline is 20 Nov.
So, is the plan to miss the deadlines? Not real, Russian troll. Why do you continue to peddle your fake bullshit?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Each day, I am amazed that the biggest story in American history of our lifetimes, an active coup-in-progress, has disappeared from the Fake News headlines, replaced by the most meaningless drivel imaginable.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:MI State Legislators are looking into the Election Fraud.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:WI is canvassing, with 5 Counties completed. All 72 Counties have deadline of 17 November.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
One thing seems certain, this does has not happened before in America, has it? Does anybody know if such a controversy has occurred before?
Where the election stands now:
Obiden seems to have 229 uncontested Electoral Votes. Some Libtards claim that he also has PA, WI, AZ, NV, MI.
Trump seems to have 214 uncontested Electoral Votes so far. AK would make it 217.
AK (3 EV) is still counting ballots. Seems likely that GOP will win President, House, Senate races.
AZ (11EV) seems to be tallying the honest votes, showing Trump as winner. They keep stopping the counting, likely so they can go hunt down some more Dem ballots to stuff in the boxes. If a recount occurs here, McSally might end up winning in the Senate Race.
PA (20EV) Corrupt officials defied clear orders from Supreme Court Justice Alito. It would seem SCOTUS will be weighing in on this. Maybe these corrupt "results" will be invalidated - or at least only in the jurisdictions where they defied, circumvented, bypassed the Law (which is only Liberal jurisdictions). Correcting the illegal vote may move PA-7 and PA-17 back to GOP, like they were before mysterious ballot dumps for Dems only.
WI (10EV) has already had a Trump team request for recount. Recount must wait until Canvass is completed, and WEC is dragging feet. Trump had the lead with the honest vote on Election Day.
MI (16EV) has had some legal challenges, but their laws supporting Election Fraud seem resilient to honesty. Trump had the lead with honest votes on Election Day.
GA (16EV) is still stopping their vote counting regularly after Trump had the handy lead on Election Day, hunting down more and more Fake Votes for Obiden.
NC (15EV) is still counting, but it seems the Libtards won't be able to scrounge up enough Fake Votes to deny Trump.
GA is recounting, deadline is 20 Nov.
Same in WI.
AK has finished their counting.
NV claims a 36,000 vote lead for Obiden, with 5% of the vote still not counted. I suppose those are the Trump votes - waiting to count those until after they find out if they need to add more Biden Ballot Box Drops.
NV-04 has a 15,000 vote lead for Dem with only 80% of the vote counted. Total of 315,456 votes. There were 265K in 2016.
The "hand recount" in GA is described this way: The ballots are looked at and placed into stacks, for Biden, Trump, this Senator, the other, etc. Then the voting machine only counts the number of ballots running through, not doing any scanning.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This Dominion software was not ony used in 47 Counties in MI, but also in 28 other States as well.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Software 'Glitch' In Michigan Erroneously Gave 1000s Of Votes To Biden; Up To 47 Counties Compromised
Software used to tabulate votes cast in 47 Michigan counties erroneously gave 6,000 votes to Joe Biden in Anterim County, according to state GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox.
"In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a 6,000 vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said 'tabulating software glitched and caused a miscalculation of the vote.' Since then, we have now discovered the 47 counties used the same software in the same capacity," she said, adding "Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that used the software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies."
Of note, Trump won Antrim County in 2016 with 62% of the vote vs. 33% for Hillary Clinton.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/20/benson-aske
d-investigate-detroit-perfect-storm-voting-problems/5616629002/
Jocelyn Benson is the Soros-puppet Secretary of State from the 2018 election. Previously it was a post held by competent people.
Quote:
Recorded ballot counts in 72% of Detroit's absentee voting precincts didn't match the number of ballots cast, spurring officials in Michigan's largest county to ask the state to investigate
In this Presidential Election, Detroit poll workers refused to count while honest poll observers were present, only when Dem poll watchers were standing guard against honest observers. Dem poll watchers outnumbered honest poll observers 3:1, and liberal activists were recruited as "independent" poll watchers. If honest poll observers adjusted their masks, they were removed immediately and the whole room cheered the removal of any honest poll watcher.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This is a very informative story:
https://www.headlineoftheday.com/2020/11/12/mit-scientists-data-analys
is-of-election-fraud-in-mi-shows-69000-votes-were-transferred-from-trump-to-biden/
Quote:
Federal election statues dictate that all election records must be held for 22 months. However, Dr. Ayyadurai discovered that many states do not retain the ballot images produced by the machines. The default settings of the machines automatically store the ballot images, so this means election officials are manually disabling the image storage feature.
Because ballot images are not being retained in states like MA and MI, the election results cannot be meaningfully audited, leaving ambiguity as to the actual election outcome. The only way to audit the results of an election without ballot images would be to manually count the ballots, which is very difficult to do.
Dr. Ayyadurai learned that in 2001, a weighted race feature was added to Global Election Systems (GEMS 1.18.1) voting systems. This feature allows elections to be skewed to one candidate or another based on the settings of the software. This is not a hack, but a built-in FEATURE of the software. Why this feature exists in US ballot tabulation machines has never been explained.
Not only does the software allow for the weighting of election outcomes, but the way votes are stored and counted is also problematic. The systems store the votes as fractional decimals instead of whole numbers. This means the machines can be set to tabulate half a vote, which makes no sense at all, yet that’s how they were designed.
After voting “glitches” were reported in Michigan, Dr. Ayyadurai’s team decided to analyze the top four counties in MI for irregularities. They looked at data from Oakland, Macomb, Kent and Wayne counties. What they found was absolutely shocking. Data analytics show, at a minimum, 69,000 votes were TRANSFERRED from Trump to Biden in these four counties, in a pattern that is consistent with algorithmic weighting of a race.
And other excellent stories from this informative site:
https://www.headlineoftheday.com/2020/11/12/data-deep-dive-on-dominion
-voting-systems-offers-incontrovertible-proof-of-election-hack/
https://www.headlineoftheday.com/2020/11/13/arizona-republican-party-f
iles-lawsuit-to-enforce-hand-count-by-precinct/
https://www.headlineoftheday.com/2020/11/13/dominion-systems-can-tweak
-results/
https://www.headlineoftheday.com/2020/11/13/watch-how-unsecure-dominio
n-voting-machines-are-combine-this-with-how-aggressively-democrats-were-to-keep-poll-watchers-away-in-pennsylvania-video/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
The Georgia Recount May Be As Corrupt As The Election Itself
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Authored by Andrea Widburg via AmericanThinker.com,
On Friday morning, Georgia began to recount the votes it received on November 3. However, within a short time, reports came in that the recount process was being conducted with as little respect for transparency as the original vote count. Without that transparency, this recount is a waste of taxpayer time and money.
Before getting to the problem with the recount itself, we need to be sure we're all on the same page about what's happening in Georgia, so some background is necessary. In my post about the two different types of election fraud, I explained that the first type of fraud goes to ballot legitimacy.
That is, was the piece of paper that got fed into the counting machine from a duly registered voter? If not, that vote cannot be counted.
We know from the affidavits flooding in from across the country that the Democrats used the Wuhan virus to justify mailing out millions of ballots to anyone on the voter registers, whether that person had since died, moved on, or lost interest in voting. Because voter rolls are chock-full of such voters, mass mailings meant that thousand, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of ballots were floating around in mail-in states, free for anyone to grab and submit.
Democrats made this fraud possible because they have steadily chipped away at other election legitimacy gatekeepers, such as identification checks and signature matches. In Democrat-run states, voting became as easy and as vulnerable to fraud as going to a shopping mall, filling out names on slips of paper, and sticking them in a big bucket for a promotional "drawing" for a bike or car. Or, even better, mailing hundreds of completed slips of paper to your buddy at the car dealer for him to put in the bucket. That's how Democrat states ran their elections in 2020.
So here's what's important to know about Georgia's recount: the recount will do nothing to correct this first type of fraud. The process of vetting voters was wholly corrupt, and there is no way to disentangle the illegitimate from the legitimate ballots during the recount.
The second type of fraud involves counting. Data-crunchers have produced powerful evidence that electronic voting machines in contested states were set to switch votes from Trump to Biden. Valentine has an accessible rundown of that type of fraud here. What's good about computer fraud is that, while it can be hidden on a small scale, on a large scale, it leaves unmistakable clues. (You can read more about these clues here and here.) There's strong evidence that the same pro-Biden code that showed up in Michigan also affected votes in Georgia.
In theory, while it won't winnow out illegitimate ballots, a hand recount will at least prevent a repeat of the computer counting fraud. However, that works only if the humans doing the counting don't cheat.
The best way to prevent humans from is to watch them. Indeed, those of you old enough to remember the Florida recount in 2000 will also remember that the media wandered freely through the counting rooms, getting close-ups of people carefully examining each ballot for those infamous hanging chads. Everyone understood that the point was to get it right.
What happens, though, when the people in charge of the recount, in place of transparency, once again refuse to allow representatives of the parties to audit their work? What happens is this:
In a brief video that I can't embed but that you can view here, Dick Morris explains that there is more going on than just barring RepublicansNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Las Vegas Columnist Ran A Test And County Officials Accepted Fake Signatures On 8 Different Ballots
Authored by Victor Joecks via The Las Vegas Review Journal
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
PICTURE ID AT THE POLLS
HAND MARKED BALLOTS
HAND COUNTED IN PUBLIC
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I found it on Infowars.
Originally posted by SignyM:Quote:
Las Vegas Columnist Ran A Test And County Officials Accepted Fake Signatures On 8 Different Ballots
Authored by Victor Joecks via The Las Vegas Review Journal
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox Business, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.”
Powell claimed that elections software switched “millions of votes” from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Powell is notably the counsel to former national security advisor Michael Flynn, engineering a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges.
Powell said a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to “rig elections.”
“He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.” She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” Powell said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell said.
Powell also referred to a 2019 investigation by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
trump and bidenFormer federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox Business, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.”
Powell claimed that elections software switched “millions of votes” from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Powell is notably the counsel to former national security advisor Michael Flynn, engineering a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges.
Powell said a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to “rig elections.”
“He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.” She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela evNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I found it on Infowars.
Of course you did, despite ALL the information given you!
You couldn't find you own ass if you used both hands.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/victor-joecks/vi
ctor-joecks-clark-county-election-officials-accepted-my-signature-on-8-ballot-envelopes-2182390/
RF is an idiot. It's that simple.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox Business, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.”
Powell claimed that elections software switched “millions of votes” from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Powell is notably the counsel to former national security advisor Michael Flynn, engineering a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges.
Powell said a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to “rig elections.”
“He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.” She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” Powell said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell said.
Powell also referred to a 2019 investigation by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago. “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
trump and bidenFormer federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that the president’s legal team is receiving a deluge of evidence concerning voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said on Fox Business, adding that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation. “I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up.”
Powell claimed that elections software switched “millions of votes” from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Powell is notably the counsel to former national security advisor Michael Flynn, engineering a stunning comeback with the Department of Justice moving to drop charges.
Powell said a whistleblower has come forward alleging that the voting software was designed to “rig elections.”
“He saw it happen in other countries,” she said, apparently referring to election hardware and software by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose.” She declined to elaborate when prompted by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from theNOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME