Who Is Running In 2020?

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 01:47
VIEWED: 46005
PAGE 7 of 8

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE

1KIKI

Monday, March 2, 2020 6:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard Nate Silver says Bernie sweeps Super Tuesday except for Klobuchar in MN.

Quote:
South Carolina has an open primary system where members of any party can participate in the Democratic primary and some are urging conservatives to take part in the vote.

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
And therein lies the mystery of Biden's 'surge'. Thanks to SECOND for posting something relevant and factual.

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Since very few democratic primaries are closed, https://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2020-presidential-primary-s
chedule-calendar/ Biden may have more 'surges' in other states.

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Has DNC announced Hilliary as winner yet?

HA HA! Too (ouch) funny!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, March 2, 2020 7:27 AM

Nah... Biden is their guy. There's no way they're going to let Bernie get the nomination, even though Antifa will be rioting in the streets and burning trashcans when he loses.

Warren is out.

I think it's hilarious that there's a better chance that nobody wins.

How many people are going to "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" when the Super Delegates make their non-Biden pick?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

I don't want to go back and edit an old post after other people have posted...

But I meant their "non-Bernie" pick.

Too many B's on the B-Team.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 1:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US presidential race
I guess all those multi-billionaires now see a non-Buttigieg pathway to a Sanders defeat, and decided to stop throwing good money after bad. Oh well. Easy come - easy go.

I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.

Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 2:54 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
]Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
So, who do you think has a chance? Is it still Hilliary? Or NOTA?

I've heard of the Heart Attack Race. Which of the Dems is most likely to have a Cardiac Arrest or Stroke first? Whether or not Hiliary is the Veep.

Also, are any of these likely to be the first elected woman Veep?
For each of the remaining candidates, who is the most likely woman in America that they might choose as their running mate?
Oh, you know, there's a lot of time between now and then. All I have to go on is current data. But Buttigieg and Klobuchar seem destined to not make it. I have a personal sense of why Klobuchar is still running (she believes in her accomplishments too much to quit). I believe 'Mayor Pete' is still running as a spoiler. But neither is going to go anywhere towards the WH.

But there could be a brokered convention coming up with over 500 superdelegates involved, and if that happens afaik all hell breaks loose on the 'democratic' side.

That's as far as I'll suppose.

OK.

A slightly different question. I don't need a prediction, I'm just not aware of who's who of the Lefties.

Who would you say might be in the top ten of prominent females who might be considered as running mate, not including any who have been running for President?

SIGNYM

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 3:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I think it's a good article written on it that doesn't take one extreme side or the other.

It absolutely does exist and it absolutely is a problem. But it's pretty much probably not a huge Jewish conspiracy, the likes of some old PirateNews thread title.

The last paragraph was great:

Quote:
Cultural Marxism was no conspiracy, but it is also no mere right-wing “phantasmagoria.” It was and remains a coherent intellectual program, a constellation of dangerous ideas. Aspects of these ideas, to their credit, brought the West’s dirty laundry into the limelight and inaugurated a period of necessary housecleaning that was, indeed, overdue. But their obsessive focus on our societal dirt—real and perceived “injustice,” “oppression,” “privilege,” “marginalization” and the like—quickly became a pathological compulsion. We started to see dirt everywhere. We cleansed and continue to cleanse ourselves tirelessly but are never satisfied, always eager to uncover more dirty deeds and historical sins and stage more ritualized purges. We end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater. And all our hard-won collective attainments and achievements, all that is great and good and glorious in our midst, gets swept up, spat on and discarded with the rest of the trash.

Just to bump this for later.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

SIGNYM

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 3:17 AM

Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US presidential race

KIKI: I guess all those multi-billionaires now see a non-Buttigieg pathway to a Sanders defeat, and decided to stop throwing good money after bad. Oh well. Easy come - easy go.

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.

I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KIKI's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party. I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough votes away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are catching fire. I guess this is where the "brokered convention" and shoehorning in an establishment candidate (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

But then, a more cynical interpretation is that Bernie is getting just as far as the press and the M$M is letting him, that he really doesn't represent a threat to the establishment parties because they know he'll fold like a cheap suit at the convention and endorse whoever the DNC says to.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 3:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US presidential race

KIKI: I guess all those multi-billionaires now see a non-Buttigieg pathway to a Sanders defeat, and decided to stop throwing good money after bad. Oh well. Easy come - easy go.

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KIKI's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party.

Hahahahahaha. I suspect you are right. But to see it written that plainly, while some are advocating "democracy" in primary voting, is just hilarious. Taking away options and leaving only those who many find despicable may force more to vote for Bernie, not less. Fewer options seems the mantra of anti-democracy DNC.
I wonder if Tulsi had held out until many of these clowns had dropped out, she might have been the fall-back option for many who were not voting for Bernie. My biggest fear is that Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money - she would at least mop the floor with him during debates.
This is just too funny. You peeps who are writing the script for the DNC are getting better. Comical, if not believable.

Quote:

I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough votes away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are catching fire. I guess this is where the "brokered convention" and shoehorning in an establishment candidate (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

Is "shoehorn" the new code word for cankles? Has Hilliary been announced as the candidate yet? Which hotel in Milwaukee did DNC reserve for Hilliary?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 5:19 AM

Klobuchar dropped out?

Leaving MN for Bernie to win.

1KIKI

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 8:31 AM

Not only dropped out but "Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar endorse Joe Biden for president".

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2020/03/02/Pete-Buttigieg-Amy-Klobucha
r-endorse-Joe-Biden-for-president/1281583174652/

1KIKI

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 1:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and that he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal identity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

Yeah, that always puzzled me about him. I've posted more than once there was no 'there' there - he was a synthetic assemblage of memorized talking points.

But I think I may have figured out at least a little that there was a connection between the CIA and all the multi-billionaire deep pockets that funded him.

So, let me back up a bit. There are roughly 310 declared democratic candidates for president. https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_registered_2020_presidential_candidate
s So how does a not very successful mayor from a small city get the backing of so many multi-billionaires? Does he cold-call them with a winning smile and outstretched hand like a Fuller brush salesman? In that case anyone could do that - even JO. (HIYA JO! !

!) Et voilà!!! Manna from heaven! ... Nah, I don't think so ... So, while I don't have the details of how the CIA connected Buttigieg with those donor$$$, I can't imagine it happened any other way except by design.

Quote:
I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win against Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough votes away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are catching fire. I guess this is where the "brokered convention" and shoehorning in an establishment candidate (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

Well ... almost no democratic primaries are closed - in other words, anyone from any party can vote. As SECOND pointed out, it's entirely possible that Biden's surge was due to republicans. I can imagine him surging in other states as well, for the very same reason. Once that mechanism becomes obvious, why split the anti-Sanders vote with all those extraneous choices?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 6:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Well ... almost no democratic primaries are closed - in other words, anyone from any party can vote. As SECOND pointed out, it's entirely possible that Biden's surge was due to republicans. I can imagine him surging in other states as well, for the very same reason. Once that mechanism becomes obvious, why split the anti-Sanders vote with all those extraneous choices?

I don't think that's exactly what it means...

I think it's a state by state basis how "Open" is handled.

https://www.openprimaries.org/states_indiana

Quote:
Affiliation with a party is not required to vote in primaries. However, voters can only choose the primary ballot of the party who recieved a majority of their votes in the previous general election, and voter records are kept as public information.

I'm not a party line voter, but seeing as how there's no way I'm going to remember everybody I voted for, I'm actually not sure how they would handle me if I went to vote in the Primary (I've never voted in one before).

It's quite possible that even if I wanted to vote GOP in the primary they wouldn't allow me to based on my 2016 choices.

I'm also on the fence with the knowledge that "voter records are kept as public information". On one hand, that is supposed to be private information. On the other hand, between that and requiring a Driver's License/State ID, you never hear about voter fraud in Indiana.

Also, OpenPrimaries.org needs an editor. They spell about as good as T does.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US presidential race

KIKI: I guess all those multi-billionaires now see a non-Buttigieg pathway to a Sanders defeat, and decided to stop throwing good money after bad. Oh well. Easy come - easy go.

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KIKI's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party. I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough votes away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are catching fire. I guess this is where the "brokered convention" and shoehorning in an establishment candidate (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

But then, a more cynical interpretation is that Bernie is getting just as far as the press and the M$M is letting him, that he really doesn't represent a threat to the establishment parties because they know he'll fold like a cheap suit at the convention and endorse whoever the DNC says to.

The stupid sh*t you post... just...wow. "I heard you get emails from Russia telling you to say..."

SIGNYM

Tuesday, March 3, 2020 11:01 PM

It seems as if the "anybody but Bernie" is Biden. Jimminy crimminy. I can't imagine Biden winning in a fair fight against Bernie in the primaries, OR against Trump in the general. It looks like the DNC is shooting itself in the head, again.

Still, if they coalesce the "anybody but Bernie" vote they still might get a brokered convention, and put someone else in who is little more credible than Biden. I can't imagine who, tho. Who would the DNC pick who is acceptable to transnational interests and the deep state, and who has a prayer of winning the general election. Hillary? Er ... A previous candudate? A governor? A Senator or high-ranking Representative?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 12:39 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US presidential race

KIKI: I guess all those multi-billionaires now see a non-Buttigieg pathway to a Sanders defeat, and decided to stop throwing good money after bad. Oh well. Easy come - easy go.

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KIKI's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party. I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough votes away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are catching fire. I guess this is where the "brokered convention" and shoehorning in an establishment candidate (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

But then, a more cynical interpretation is that Bernie is getting just as far as the press and the M$M is letting him, that he really doesn't represent a threat to the establishment parties because they know he'll fold like a cheap suit at the convention and endorse whoever the DNC says to.

The stupid sh*t you post... just...wow. "I heard you get emails from Russia telling you to say..."

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 6:55 AM

Obama cleared the path to shoehorn in Michelle.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 6:55 AM

Obama cleared the path to shoehorn in Moochelle Obama at the convention.

Klobuchar had a campaign quip about never losing an election in MN. If her internal polling showed she was about to lose MN primary to Bernie, she may have quit in order to reserve her quip for the future.

So if Creepy Joe comes thru on his "Super Thursday" then his election can usher in new relevance for the term "puppetmasters"

SIGNYM

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:29 AM

So far Bernie has 58 pledged delegates, Biden has 54, Mayor Pete has 25, Warren has eight and Klobuchar has seven. Texas is still too close to call.

I'm not sure if the candidates can do this, but both Mayor Pete and Klobuchar have said that Biden should be supported, so maybe they can release their candidates to Biden?

Wouldn't it be funny if, in their effort to concoct a brokered convention the DNC actually winds up with Biden getting an unexpected majority? What then?? They'll have to run a geriatric candidate who can't keep the days of the week straight.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 12:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Wouldn't it be funny if, in their effort to concoct a brokered convention the DNC actually winds up with Biden getting an unexpected majority? What then?? They'll have to run a geriatric candidate who can't keep the days of the week straight

Maybe COVID-19 will take him out on the campaign trail.

I've been wondering about that. How will anybody conduct a campaign if it becomes epidemic?

SIGNYM

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 4:32 PM

Quote:
SIGNYM:
Wouldn't it be funny if, in their effort to concoct a brokered convention the DNC actually winds up with Biden getting an unexpected majority? What then?? They'll have to run a geriatric candidate who can't keep the days of the week straight

KIKI: Maybe COVID-19 will take him out on the campaign trail.
I've been wondering about that. How will anybody conduct a campaign if it becomes epidemic?

That's a good question! Not only should people be reluctant to attend townhall meetings or mass rallies, how will the candidates themselves survive the flesh-pressing, baby-kissing meet-and-greets of the campiagn trail?

HILLARY has already set herself up with a (supposedly) fireside-chat-styled podcast. Hmm... an indication of the future? Something wicked this way comes?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:22 PM

Who do you think Warren is going to endorse?

Pretty much everybody knows she's a liar and a whore and she LOVES money, but if she were to stay in the race by the end of the day today I think even her most ardent supporters are going to finally get the hint.

I can't say that I'm getting tired of being right all the time.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 9:03 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US go-cart race

KIKI: I love Vladimir Putin sooooo much!

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KKK's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party. I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough fish away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are hatching eggs. I guess this is where the "snooker convention" and shoewhoring in an establishment candy date (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

But then, a more cynical interpretation is that Bernie is getting just as far as the press and the M&Ms is letting him, that he really doesn't represent a threat to the establishment parties because they know he'll fold like a cheap suit at the convention and endorse whoever the DNC says to.

Kiki and Siggy's post are the most enlightening eva..."

KIKI - you're such a goof ball. Quoting someone's post for posterity as proof of an alleged slander - is foolish. You're not taking into account the obvious: you or anyone could be changing the quoted language to say whatever they want it to. You repeat the same trivial rubbish over and over expecting it to mean more each time. I'm guessing data entry was your forte.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 9:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:
Pete Buttigieg is dropping out of the US go-cart race

KIKI: I love Vladimir Putin sooooo much!

JSF:I head reports that he dropped out after Obama called him and told him to get out.
Apparently, now the youngest male running for President is Trump.
I always thought that Mayo Pete was running just because someone told him to, and tha he dropped out because someone told him to, and that he was just a tool of the CIA/deep state. His campaign seemed to have no underpinning motivation (either personal or political). It was as if someone said ... well, he's Midwestern, male, and white so we can wrap up the "deplorables" identity vote, but he's gay so we get the liberal indentity vote, and if we feed him talking points and funnel funding thru Wall Street he might go far enuf.

The analysis that I heard, which is somewhat similar to KKK's, is that the DNC is on a "stopBernie" drive, that they see the candidates as "Bernie" and "everybody else", and that if they don't stop dividing the "everybody else" vote Bernie may get a majority of delegates which will force the DNC to come out with the superdelegates which will create another mess in the party. I understand their dilemma - Bernie will not win againt Trump (unless the M$M can craft yet another hoax against Trump). What I can't quite figure out is WHO they think can take enough fish away from Bernie? None of the rest of the candidates are hatching eggs. I guess this is where the "snooker convention" and shoewhoring in an establishment candy date (someone who isn't even running right now) might come in.

But then, a more cynical interpretation is that Bernie is getting just as far as the press and the M&Ms is letting him, that he really doesn't represent a threat to the establishment parties because they know he'll fold like a cheap suit at the convention and endorse whoever the DNC says to.

Kiki and Siggy's post are the most enlightening eva..."

KIKI - you're such a goof ball. Quoting someone's post for posterity as proof of an alleged slander - is foolish. You're not taking into account the obvious: you or anyone could be changing the quoted language to say whatever they want it to. You repeat the same trivial rubbish over and over expecting it to mean more each time. I'm guessing data entry was your forte.

Yup. Once in a blue moon the Captain and I agree on something. Not only can you change what's in the quote, but whoever you're quoting could just change the post after the fact and lie about it.

Both Second and T have changed posts after I've quoted them, and then they claimed that what I quoted is not what they've said.

It's the pitfalls of having a dated website. Anywhere else I post these days have timestamps for the original posts and the edits, or at least mark that the post was edited and shows the last time/date of the final edit to the post.

If I wanted to spend a few days here, I could go back through every single post I've ever made on this site, edit the posts, and just reply with nothing and everything I've ever written would be gone.

I suggest in the future, if you want to maintain "proof" that somebody said something, archive it at the wayback machine or just Google for other archive sites. I've never tried that on FFF.NET before, but I think it should suit your purposes just fine.

But given the nature and age of this site, I don't think anything you've ever quoted anybody saying here using the site's quote feature would be admissible.

DISCLAIMER: Not that I'm supporting any legal action by anyone here against anyone here. I'm 100% against anybody doing that.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SIGNYM

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 9:30 PM

AS USUAL, CC has nothing ON TOPIC to contribute.

It's hard to believe you ever worked anywhere doing anything, CC, especially where you might have to cotribute ideas, because you lack focus and you have no ideas.

So, any thoughts on the Democratic primaries themselves? Aside from being butt-hurt that your midwestern gay-boy acted like a droid, dropped out, and then threw his support to Biden like the good little esablishment creation that he is ?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

SIGNYM

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Who do you think Warren is going to endorse?

Pretty much everybody knows she's a liar and a whore and she LOVES money, but if she were to stay in the race by the end of the day today I think even her most ardent supporters are going to finally get the hint.

I can't say that I'm getting tired of being right all the time.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Now that it's turned into a two-person race (instead of the GOP free-for-all that got Trump elected) my guess is that it would have to be Biden. I can't imagine Warren supporting Bernie; she WAS a Republican in the past, and all of her identitarian politics was just virtue-signalling. And I can't imagine her being so spiteful as to ruin her career and endorse Bernie.

So far, the only candidate who's been steadfast in her stance is Tulsi. Too bad the M$M and the DNC (and Hillary) buried her.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:53 PM

I think you're probably right. If anything, Biden's surge is at least giving the illusion that the identity politics and far left Socialism isn't the larger part of the Democratic Party... at least not yet.

An opportunist all the way, Chief Speaking Bull will do what is best for her, just as she has always done.

I know that Trump is a happy camper. The only one left he was worried about at all was Booty Judge.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:07 PM

Quote:
KIKI - you're such a goof ball. Quoting someone's post for posterity as proof of an alleged slander - is foolish. You're not taking into account the obvious: you or anyone could be changing the quoted language to say whatever they want it to. You repeat the same trivial rubbish over and over expecting it to mean more each time. I'm guessing data entry was your forte.

Sworn testimony counts, hon.

I can swear it's intact and that I didn't change a single thing. All I'm doing by quoting you is keeping an accurate record for my own use.

But THANKS for resetting the clock! I've been really busy, so I'm glad you've been keeping it alive for me.

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:11 PM

I'd be curious if there were turnout figures. If turnout was exceptionally high, or even greater than the number of registered democratic voters, then Biden's wins could be attributed in part to republicans.

But Biden. Jeeze.

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:26 PM

2020 Democratic primary is a Biden-Sanders race after Bloomberg drops out

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, March 5, 2020 1:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I'd be curious if there were turnout figures. If turnout was exceptionally high, or even greater than the number of registered democratic voters, then Biden's wins could be attributed in part to republicans.

But Biden. Jeeze.

I don't know what they usually are, but the numbers on here.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Thursday, March 5, 2020 2:12 AM

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_vot
e_count.html.

Raw numbers here but not democratic turnout. At some point I may possibly dig out registered democrat numbers in each state and calculate % democratic turnout, but probably not.

1KIKI

Thursday, March 5, 2020 3:05 AM

total votes for each candidate
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_vot
e_count.html.

states that record registered voter numbers by party
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/c
ommentary_by_rhodes_cook/registering_by_party_where_the_democrats_and_republicans_are_ahead

states with open primaries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_primaries_in_the_United_States

On Super Tuesday, states with open primaries that also record registered voters by party had these democratic turnouts in the democratic primary:
AR 299% registered democratic turnout
CO 74%
MA 91%
NC 49%
OK 39%.

By comparison, on Super Tuesday, states with closed primaries that also record registered voters by party had these democratic turnouts in the democratic primary:
CA 35% registered democratic turnout
ME 61%
UT 109%.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 5, 2020 3:24 AM

I burst LOL when I heard an observation.

Creepy Joe won overwhelmingly in some states where he has not visited in 2020.

In states where he actually appeared and spoke, those voters who actually witnessed him unedited did not vote for him.

Unrelated: last night all networks were on the election, no shows were broadcast.

I have not paid attention, does anybody know how delegates are allotted? What is the formula for determining how many delegates each state gets? I saw some states where Joe got 1/3 the votes, so he was awarded 1/6 of the delegates - that must be where superdelegates come in.

Nice to see that Doomberg got some delegates, and Tulsi got at least 1.

1KIKI

Thursday, March 5, 2020 3:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I burst LOL when I heard an observation.

Creepy Joe won overwhelmingly in some states where he has not visited in 2020.

In states where he actually appeared and spoke, those voters who actually witnessed him unedited did not vote for him.

Don't know if it's true, but I can imagine it is. THAT'S FUNNY!!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 5, 2020 5:29 AM

I copied this from a Dow thread because I thought it should fit here also.

Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Dow closes nearly 1,200 points higher as Biden Super Tuesday victories boost health care stocks

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 5, 2020 5:30 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I burst LOL when I heard an observation.

Creepy Joe won overwhelmingly in some states where he has not visited in 2020.

In states where he actually appeared and spoke, those voters who actually witnessed him unedited did not vote for him.
Don't know if it's true, but I can imagine it is. THAT'S FUNNY!!

He won by big margins in AR, MN, and others, while never visiting them.

SIGNYM

Thursday, March 5, 2020 12:40 PM

Well, of course ...

Quote:
DNC Scrambles To Change Debate Threshold After Gabbard Qualifies

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/dnc-scrambles-to-change-debate-threshold-after-gabbard-qualifies-cbe94e48ab91

So in addition to blanking her out of the media (going so far as to label Warren "the last female left in the race") and being called a Russian asset, Tulsi is edited from the debates.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

1KIKI

Thursday, March 5, 2020 11:50 PM

Warren, Once a Front-Runner, Drops Out of Presidential Race

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, March 6, 2020 12:09 AM

A day later than I expected.

"Declines to make endorsement for now", I see...

An opportunist to the wretched core, this should come as a surprise to NO ONE.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, March 6, 2020 2:46 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Well, of course ...

Quote:
DNC Scrambles To Change Debate Threshold After Gabbard Qualifies

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/dnc-scrambles-to-change-debate-threshold-after-gabbard-qualifies-cbe94e48ab91

So in addition to blanking her out of the media (going so far as to label Warren "the last female left in the race") and being called a Russian asset, Tulsi is edited from the debates.

Thanks for the update. The Fake News that I get never mentions her, yet they do yak on about Bernie.

Now that Fauxcahontas is out, is Tulsi the only woman remaining in the field?
I gotta admit, if there is a debate with Tulsi and Trump, I might actually watch a debate. With popcorn, too.

Has Tulsi been in all of the debates so far? I have not heard of her smacking around the doofus group, and I thought kiki had not mentioned her in regards to debates, so I had thought that she was squeezed out.

She might take it easy on Bernie, but I might watch to see her taken down Creepy Joe.

Did she qualify because she got a delegate?

1KIKI

Friday, March 6, 2020 3:37 AM

Gabbard was in the first 2 debates, she didn't qualify for the 3rd, but did make the 4th and 5th, out of 10 so far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_debat
es#Sixth_debate_(December_19,_2019)

Supposedly the criteria for making the next debate was getting (a) delegate(s), which she did, but there's rumor the DNC is changing the criteria to be able to exclude her.

1KIKI

Friday, March 6, 2020 3:42 AM

I predict the general election is going to be a Trump/ Biden one. Biden can't win it. But if Trump seriously dings himself with, as Signy calls it, a "heck of a job Brownie!" reputation over SARS-COV-2, he might lose it.

SIGNYM

Friday, March 6, 2020 4:16 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A day later than I expected.
"Declines to make endorsement for now", I see...
An opportunist to the wretched core, this should come as a surprise to NO ONE.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Negotiations for her endorsement are continuing even as we post ...

Maybe she wants someone to pick up the debt she incurred running her race? Or maybe she wants a Cabinet post? Or both?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, March 6, 2020 5:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A day later than I expected.
"Declines to make endorsement for now", I see...
An opportunist to the wretched core, this should come as a surprise to NO ONE.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Negotiations for her endorsement are continuing even as we post ...

Maybe she wants someone to pick up the debt she incurred running her race? Or maybe she wants a Cabinet post? Or both?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!

What debt?

She rolled over $10,000,000+ Big Donor money from her Senate races and called it "grassroots" fundraising.

She's still sitting on over $2.2 Million.

https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/P00009621/?cycle=2020&election_
full=false

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, March 6, 2020 5:59 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Gabbard was in the first 2 debates, she didn't qualify for the 3rd, but did make the 4th and 5th, out of 10 so far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_debat
es#Sixth_debate_(December_19,_2019)

Supposedly the criteria for making the next debate was getting (a) delegate(s), which she did, but there's rumor the DNC is changing the criteria to be able to exclude her.

How did she do in 4th and 5th? Did she work on Bernie, or save him for later?

1KIKI

Saturday, March 7, 2020 11:34 PM

Who Is Running In 2020?

Maybe SARS-COV-2. Maybe it affects campaign traveling and flesh-pressing and large gatherings. Maybe it kills one or both candidates. Maybe it halts the actual election.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, March 8, 2020 12:12 AM

Nah.

But just to be safe, Bernie shouldn't let the weirdos he courts up on stage to take his mic this time around.

I'm pretty sure that Biden has Deep State agents that would never let them get close.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, March 9, 2020 2:43 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Gabbard was in the first 2 debates, she didn't qualify for the 3rd, but did make the 4th and 5th, out of 10 so far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_debat
es#Sixth_debate_(December_19,_2019)

Supposedly the criteria for making the next debate was getting (a) delegate(s), which she did, but there's rumor the DNC is changing the criteria to be able to exclude her.
How did she do in 4th and 5th? Did she work on Bernie, or save him for later?

So, is Tulsi out of the next debate? Is Hilliary in? Maybe that is what Hilliary is waiting for, for Tulsi to be removed so she doesn't torpedo Hilliary?

I was thinking that if B/B debate Trump, he could refer to them as "pops" or "old man" equally.

Is Tulsi the only woman remaining in the race?

Remember when NYT endorsed Amy and Fauxcahontas?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, March 9, 2020 12:05 PM

There's no way they're letting Tulsi in any of the debates. She'd destroy Biden or Bernie.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, March 11, 2020 5:40 AM

Is Hilliary getting more delegates today? Has DNC announced she has won the nomination yet?

Are the womenfolk getting out the vote for Tulsi? Tulsi and Hilliary are the last 2 women in the race, right?

So, if there is an operation chaos, it should be voting for Bernie now, right?

1KIKI

Wednesday, March 11, 2020 11:59 PM

As I see it, the Biden/ Sanders matchup is instructive to the 2015-2016 democratic nomination process. That Sanders did so well compared to Hillary is more of an indication of Hillary's weakness than Sanders' strength.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 17, 2020 6:27 AM

I finally made a decision. I haven't been deeply following everything, been busy with things. Took a little bit for some things to settle in my mind.

But now I finally realized that I am going to vote for Tulsi Gabbbard on 7 April, in the Democrat Primary (if I am allowed). I don't think I've ever voted in a Dem Primary before.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, March 17, 2020 6:37 AM

There has been talk of what could bring down Trump to the point of losing the election. Much has been jabbered about a Stock Market crash, and how that might ensure a Trump defeat.

This was a great concern for me. Although I will not vote for Trump, the threat of a President Biden/Bernie/Hilliary is a horror show of immense proportions.

Some think that this corona-crash of stocks means impending doom for the Trump campaign.

But I think that, as the fall comes around and the electorate looks back on the Wuhan Virus scare, and what ever may result from it, they will view the stock drop as a result of the pandemic. I don't envision that the electorate will view the stock drop as a function of Trump.

It was a worry, because the market really was due for a correction at some point. Without the pandemic, the Bull Market likely would have continued through Election Day (unless polls showed Biden/Bernie/Hilliary in the lead).

But now, the correction has occurred, and it may be bouncing back before the Election. And Trump is likely to be unscathed by this Market event.

For Trump, this could be the best of all scenarios.

Which also makes it the best scenario for America. If Trump can stay alive until Election Day.

1KIKI

Friday, March 27, 2020 4:31 AM

Please great spirits - give Biden and Hillary COVID-19 and make the democratic field a better one!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, March 27, 2020 5:15 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Please great spirits - give Biden and Hillary COVID-19 and make the democratic field a better one!

Wow.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Friday, March 27, 2020 5:44 AM

Not wishing death - just - yanno - them being out of commission for a while. Sidelined, so to speak.

Just fyi.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, March 27, 2020 5:55 AM

I dunno. You seem pretty sure that every old person that's going to get it is going to die. They're pretty old.

I'm pretty sure Biden has been successfully sidelined by the virus just because of the quarantine. It's clear that he's demented, but I don't think he regularly hangs out with anybody who knows how to computer.

#WheresBiden has been trending on Twitter.

You've got to at least hand that to Bernie. Even if he's only a few years younger than my grandma, he's got enough youth support to at least fake it if he's a dummy with the internet.

Hillary had a server in her basement. If she didn't know what she was doing with it, she at least had somebody semi-competent keeping that operational, even if they were unwittingly paying Putin directly for Kaspersky AntiVirus.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Friday, March 27, 2020 6:04 AM

"I dunno. You seem pretty sure that every old person that's going to get it is going to die. They're pretty old." Actually, that's YOU making that assumption! Old people = dead, young people = immune.

As you know, I've been harping about what a shit-show the democratic party is since well before the 2016 election.

As to having demented, or at least brain-damaged, people in the WH, it didn't seem to do Reagan or dubya any harm! The puppet-masters were running the show anyway. Biden will just be more of the same.

I would just like to have a meaningful choice this time around. Otherwise, once again, I'm going to be voting for #notthedemocrat.

1KIKI

Wednesday, April 8, 2020 11:17 PM

Bernie Sanders ends his presidential campaign -LATimes

As Sanders Quits, Trump Tells 'Bernie Bros' To Vote Republican After Another "Crooked Hillary Fiasco" -ZH

1KIKI

Thursday, May 14, 2020 4:05 AM

For sure Trump is sliding in polls over his handling of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic in the US.

Donald Trump Trails Governors By Almost 30 Points in Coronavirus Approval Poll
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-trails-governors-30-points-coron
avirus-approval-poll-1503705
5/13/20 (WaPo/ University of Maryland)

Donald Trump's approval rating dips, currently trails behind Biden: Polls
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/donald-trumps-approval-rating-dip
s-currently-trails-behind-biden-polls/ar-BB140JaT
5/13/20 (Reuters/ Ipsos)

How worried are Americans about infection?
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/coronavirus-polls/
(compiling multiple polls over time)

Trump approval rating slides in new poll as coronavirus grips the nation
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-approval-rating-slides-poll-cor
onavirus
April 16, 2020 (Gallup)

RealClear Politics
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_app
roval-6179.html

BUT ... no matter how he does in the polls, on the betting sites he always does better than Biden.

https://www.oddsshark.com/politics/2020-usa-presidential-odds-futures

https://www.thelines.com/odds/election/

https://www.predictit.org/

https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics

https://www.electionbettingodds.com/

Because ... Biden.

To win, Trump doesn't need to be great, or good, or even merely so-so. He just needs to be better than Biden.

1KIKI

Friday, May 15, 2020 8:49 PM

I believe Trump has made a very shrewd, if heartless, calculation.

First of all, as I've opined before, he's a far better salesman than most people give him credit for. There's no sale so easy as telling people what they want to hear. Trump's sales gift is ferreting that thing out.

Here's the calculation:

While at the moment, people are divided about reopening, ultimately, most people are most concerned about the need to pay their bills. Trump has made it so that bill-paying will be impossible without going back to work RIGHT NOW!, no matter what. With 3/4 of all emergency federal spending going to corporations and financialism, the average Jane or Joe is getting crumbs off the table of what Trump is willing to spend. But they won't see that. So they won't be disgruntled about not getting more.

The second part of the calculation has to do with the personal experience of COVID-19. At this point, unless you're a doctor or nurse, or you live in NYC, your direct experience of COVID-19 is nil. Trump is betting that not many people will lose a beloved nana or granpa (a number of them will die, but not too many will be mourned by the grandkids), or even a beloved mother or father. Those few who will be mourned are in numbers that can be easily and ignorably - even smugly - flushed, like they've done in Sweden.

Et voilà! The re-open RIGHT NOW !! reelection strategy, even if it provably kills people. Even tens of thousands more people.*

* see 'deadly new' thread

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, July 1, 2020 1:11 AM

Believe it of not, the DEms seem to still be pushing for the mental invalid Obiden to be the lead.

During the Lockdown I had conjured Newsom and/or NY Governor Fredo Gump would get shoe-horned in as the candidate who can dress themselves.
If Obiden gets the nom, who knows who will actually run the campaign - but certainly he won't know, even if it really was his wife/sister/daughter ande he actually could recognize one of them.

On the other side, Trump has created trouble. He has been bragging that he was able to spend more money, create more debt, than anybody else has ever been able to. No conservative can support this nonsense.
Polls have been showing the public is fed up with this spending spree, and some of his polling numbers have suffered. Fake News has been trying to convince the Sheeple Lemmings that this drop in figures is a result of his Fake Impeachment, or something about response to Wuhan Coronavirus, or anything other than his rampant spending spree.

The Tea Party was about rampant excessive spending. Hard to get a clear picture of what might happen this fall, but the obfuscation via the Fake News is obliterating the view at this point.

The Libertarians have put up Jo Jorgensoen. And she says she has no hope of winning. She apparently claims she supports confiscating our freedoms, but does not support helping the businesses which are failing as a result of the GOVERNMENT MANDATED LOCKDOWN.

1KIKI

Wednesday, July 1, 2020 3:17 AM

LATimes article: "Hillary Clinton talks Trump, protests and that time Chelsea brought her and Bill together". Hillary, you're like a cancer that keeps coming back. Just go away, and STAY away, already. Every time you put yourself in the news, you remind people what a horror you are and cast a cloud over the democratic party. And it's already bad enough with Biden running.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, July 1, 2020 7:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Libertarians have put up Jo Jorgensoen. And she says she has no hope of winning. She apparently claims she supports confiscating our freedoms, but does not support helping the businesses which are failing as a result of the GOVERNMENT MANDATED LOCKDOWN.

Oh. It looks like you did answer my question about Jo. But not in the thread about Libertarians that's in General Discussions.

That's pretty much my exact take on her.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:29 AM

I wish Murray from Kentucky was running for Prez. He actually called for a roll call vote on the spending bill, and was vilified for it, trying to get congress on the record for who voted for eternal debt.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:37 AM

Those numbers mean nothing at this point man. If we're going to blame anybody for starting the eternal debt train, that lands on the GWB administration. Been a runaway train ever since then.

Unless he comes out against the shutdown itself, there's no reason I'd vote for him. The spending bill had to happen after the government fucked 25% of the population.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, July 7, 2020 2:59 AM

I don't understand the plan Libtards have for debates.

Are they just praying that there will be no debates?

Will they refuse to participate in live debates in person?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, July 7, 2020 6:25 AM

There is zero chance any Democrats want Trump to be able to debate Biden.

It would be a greater comedy than any movie director has been able to put to film in the last 20 years.

I'm sure they're trying to use both COVID and the riots to not only cancel the debates, but to mandate mail in voting so they can cheat their way to victory.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 9, 2020 2:39 AM

Well, if Kanye and Obiden get a Live Debate together, even Kanye will mop the floor with Obiden.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, July 17, 2020 2:24 AM

Kanye West dropped out. Wonder if there were any fluctuation in the polls.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, July 17, 2020 7:39 AM

Did he really even drop out though?

Despite all the talk, I don't ever remember hearing that he had ever filed any papers to actually be in the race.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, July 21, 2020 3:37 AM

6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.

SECOND

Tuesday, July 21, 2020 4:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Believe it of not, the DEms seem to still be pushing for the mental invalid Obiden to be the lead.

During the Lockdown I had conjured Newsom and/or NY Governor Fredo Gump would get shoe-horned in as the candidate who can dress themselves.
If Obiden gets the nom, who knows who will actually run the campaign - but certainly he won't know, even if it really was his wife/sister/daughter ande he actually could recognize one of them.

On the other side, Trump has created trouble. He has been bragging that he was able to spend more money, create more debt, than anybody else has ever been able to. No conservative can support this nonsense.
Polls have been showing the public is fed up with this spending spree, and some of his polling numbers have suffered. Fake News has been trying to convince the Sheeple Lemmings that this drop in figures is a result of his Fake Impeachment, or something about response to Wuhan Coronavirus, or anything other than his rampant spending spree.

The Tea Party was about rampant excessive spending. Hard to get a clear picture of what might happen this fall, but the obfuscation via the Fake News is obliterating the view at this point.

The Libertarians have put up Jo Jorgensoen. And she says she has no hope of winning. She apparently claims she supports confiscating our freedoms, but does not support helping the businesses which are failing as a result of the GOVERNMENT MANDATED LOCKDOWN.

The doctor behind a cognitive test Trump took says ‘it’s supposed to be easy’

www.marketwatch.com/story/the-doctor-behind-a-cognitive-test-trump-too
k-says-its-supposed-to-be-easy-for-people-with-no-cognitive-impairment-2020-07-20

I'm a psychologist. I've administered this test (the MOCA) hundreds, if not thousands of times. Let me tell you, bragging about acing this test is the equivalent of bragging that you tied your own shoes this morning.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, July 21, 2020 8:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.

5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SECOND

Tuesday, July 21, 2020 8:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.

5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Why is President Trump so proud of passing a test only those with dementia fail?

The president told Chris Wallace that the mental competence test he recently took was “very hard,” specifically the last five questions.

Just to be clear, the president “passed” the test, a fact he’s boasted about on numerous occasions. “I aced it,” he proudly told Fox’s Sean Hannity earlier this month. The problem is that none of the questions on the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test are supposed to be hard if you aren’t suffering from dementia of some kind. Crowing that you “aced” the MoCA is a bit like bragging that you passed a sobriety test while sober. Nixon would be so proud of Trump.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:18 AM

Nobody cares, buddy.

And I guarantee you that nobody is going to remember this 3 months from now anyhow.

But if you need to know, since you clearly didn't get the joke, he's trolling your demented nominee and all of the idiots who are going to vote for your demented nominee.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.
5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Ka-CHING.

I don't know if that was the real answer, or if you just thought that up as reply - but that is the very best answer.

NOW that all makes sense.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 23, 2020 1:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.
5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Why is President Trump so proud of passing a test only those with dementia fail?

The president told Chris Wallace that the mental competence test he recently took was “very hard,” specifically the last five questions.

Just to be clear, the president “passed” the test, a fact he’s boasted about on numerous occasions. “I aced it,” he proudly told Fox’s Sean Hannity earlier this month. The problem is that none of the questions on the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test are supposed to be hard if you aren’t suffering from dementia of some kind. Crowing that you “aced” the MoCA is a bit like bragging that you passed a sobriety test while sober. Nixon would be so proud of Trump.

Obiden would be so proud if he only knew what planet he was on. Are the networks carrying water for him?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, July 23, 2020 6:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.
5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Ka-CHING.

I don't know if that was the real answer, or if you just thought that up as reply - but that is the very best answer.

NOW that all makes sense.

Everybody here want to say that I'm a dummy but, yanno...

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, July 25, 2020 10:56 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
6ix, I keep seeing you refer to the Election of 1972. Why this one, and not 1984? I don't see the relevance.
5 pt electoral difference. No biggie.

Because it pisses Second off more when I reference Nixon.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Why is President Trump so proud of passing a test only those with dementia fail?

The president told Chris Wallace that the mental competence test he recently took was “very hard,” specifically the last five questions.

Just to be clear, the president “passed” the test, a fact he’s boasted about on numerous occasions. “I aced it,” he proudly told Fox’s Sean Hannity earlier this month. The problem is that none of the questions on the standard Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test are supposed to be hard if you aren’t suffering from dementia of some kind. Crowing that you “aced” the MoCA is a bit like bragging that you passed a sobriety test while sober. Nixon would be so proud of Trump.
Obiden would be so proud if he only knew what planet he was on. Are the networks carrying water for him?

What is the first part of that test?
It must need some instructions, I don't get it.

THG

Saturday, July 25, 2020 11:57 PM

Again, I don’t see any critical thinking skills here. The major point regarding Trump and his supposed IQ memory test is. Trump is telling America that remembering Person woman man camera TV is very difficult and the doctors were amazed he could do it.

What, and he’s running the country. Why do you think the press keeps playing it? They can’t come out and say he’s a moron because they are being delicate. People who take this test may have Alzheimer’s disease. And that is very sad.

However, it’s gold and shows Trump to be cognitively deficient. Final point is that because he is cognitively deficient he doesn’t get it. Now, I have to ask why none of you except second gets it?

T

Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, July 26, 2020 12:40 AM

Wow. Two of the retards "get it".

I feel deep shame that I'm not on your level.

Do try not to get stepped on down there. Mental midget.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, August 4, 2020 2:07 AM

I don't know if the ads are regional. Saw a new ad, for Obiden. Has a bimbo from Greenfield, WI yakking about her mom who died from Wuhan Coronavirus on April 29.
Greenfield is a suburb of Milwaukee, the Socialist capital of America - for about 7 decades. WI is stuck with a Libtard Gov after stealing the election, and Milwaukee has been Democrat/Socialist control forever. It has been the worst offender of Coronavirus case explosion and deaths, which Dems use as pretexyt to shut down the entire State, all 72 counties.

Not sure if the ad is shown outside the region.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:24 PM

Anybody heard Obiden's virtual town hall?

He explains that Latinos are diversified and can think for themselves, unlike African-Americans.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, August 7, 2020 1:14 AM

I heard Obiden has been told his choices for VP are Kamala Harris and Susan Rice.
But some are still pushing for Moochelle Bama. Or their plan is for Rice to ascend to President and then select Moochelle as Veep, after which Rice will be suicided so that Moochelle can select Hilliary.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, August 7, 2020 8:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Anybody heard Obiden's virtual town hall?

He explains that Latinos are diversified and can think for themselves, unlike African-Americans.

Yeah. That one was pretty cringe.

He actually said something along the lines of "Unlike the black community, except for a few rare instances, there is a lot of diversity of thought within the Latino community."

Maybe the "few rare instances" were people like these?

It's going to be funny when Biden discovers on November 4th how many more free thinking blacks there are in this country than he assumes there are.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Friday, August 7, 2020 9:52 AM

Now this is an interesting compilation of polls.

And it'll all be fine until they have to take Biden's muzzle off.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president/trumpbidenfav
orability.html

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, August 7, 2020 9:59 PM

MSM is reporting that only about 100 folks will show up for the DNC in Milwaukee in a couple weeks. Not including Obiden, Kamala.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 5:17 AM

I learned that early ballots will be delivered by 4 September.

Obiden is refusing to debate prior to 29 September.

That might just be the best strategy for how to get Obiden to win.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 2:59 AM

I found myself thinking back to when Tulsi Gabbard was running. Not only was she greatly entertaining, but she made so much sense on so many topics, in contrast to what we now must muddle thought. The Infection Election. Creepy Uncle Joe. BLMball games on TV. AntiFag looters and rioters run amok.

Ahhh, the good olde days were only a half year ago.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I learned that early ballots will be delivered by 4 September.

Obiden is refusing to debate prior to 29 September.

That might just be the best strategy for how to get Obiden to win.

That's why Trump wanted two more debates scheduled earlier. Of course Biden wasn't on board.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, September 2, 2020 11:46 PM

Obiden is scheduled to make a public appearance!!! On planet Earth!! He might even bring his scripters so that he could speak.

Trump came to Appleton/Oshkosh last month, and Gev Skeletor Evers (pronounced EVE-erz) admonished that he must wear a mask. A few days ago Trump came to Kenpsha, WI - and Evers pleaded do not come, told Trump not to come.

Now with news that Obiden is planning to come to Kenosha, not a peep from the Libtard Gov.

shockers

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, September 5, 2020 12:09 AM

I've seen a TV ad about how Obiden will provide enough PPE if he is elected.

The gall of this assclown. After Obiden/Bama pilfered and depleted the supply of FEMA masks and then refused to allow replentishment of the stockpile, so that there were none when Covid came along.

The entire problem with the lack of masks was all the fault of his administration with Barack Hussein.

What a complete ass.

JAYNEZTOWN

Saturday, September 5, 2020 12:39 AM

A Greenie, Sedinam Kinamo Christin Moyowasifza Curry

Henry Hewes, Democrat Right to Life? https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11332693/ , Sam Sloan he likes Chess? married three times and has nine children. His second wife, Honzagool, was a native of Chitral, Pakistan

John McAfee? The computer virus guy, was doing a lot of drugs going around a bunch of islands in a boat and posting crazy rants on twitter and facebook

Zoltan Istvan Gyurko reads a lot of comcibook, scifi stuff, he believes people should become transhumanist, the human become one with a machine like some kind of cyborg movie. Istvan announced his candidacy for the Republican Party's nomination in the 2020 United States presidential election, hoping to win the GOP nomination against President Donald Trump.
http://www.transhumanistparty.org/

Kanye West joke or serious

Bernie Sanders failed again

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:28 AM

Sounds like Obiden won't be showing up for any debater, he will hide behind his teleprompter.

Other Dems are refusing to show up in person to any debates, and a pretextual foundation for creepy Joe to do the same. Like Jay Inslee

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:00 AM

Trump was just nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Unlike Obama, he actually did something to earn it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, September 10, 2020 5:19 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump was just nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Unlike Obama, he actually did something to earn it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

This is the 2nd year in a row, nominated by the same person in Yurp.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, September 10, 2020 11:45 PM

I heard report that more GOP Primaries have been won by women, minorities, Veterans, than ever.

Does this spell the demise of Dems as a Nationwide Party?

The last time a Party was wiped out was Federalists, who mostly became Whigs and then Republicans.

If Dems are kaput, then GOP can divide a little, so there could be several Right choices on ballots.

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Friday, September 11, 2020 12:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump was just nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Unlike Obama, he actually did something to earn it.

Suk Putin's d*ck?

SECOND

Friday, September 11, 2020 1:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump was just nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Unlike Obama, he actually did something to earn it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Has Mr Trump been nominated before?

Yes.

And for the second time, he has Mr Tybring-Gjedde to thank. Who is he? He is a complete fucking wacko if there ever was one: He has been described by media commentators and scholars as far-right, anti-immigrant and Islamophobic. In 2019 Tybring-Gjedde said his party should position itself as national conservative. In 2020 he spearheaded an attempt within his party to declare Norway a "patriotic beacon", arguing that "liberalism is a dead ideology"; summarising the core content of this policy, he said that his party should call for "a complete ban on non-western immigration", a referendum on immigration and adopt the view that "climate change is not man-made". He has also advocated limited government intervention, reduced public spending, and tax reduction. Tybring-Gjedde has stoked controversy on numerous occasions. His pro-Russian views have been criticised by Norwegian conservatives. He has been described as "one of Norway's most controversial anti-immigration politicians"; political scientist Sindre Bangstad has described him as one of the "main traffickers in extreme right-wing rhetorical tropes about Islam and Muslims" in Norway. Tybring-Gjedde was a civil servant in the Ministry of Defence before he entered politics.

More about how crazy the man is who nominated Trump, twice!, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Tybring-Gjedde

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, September 11, 2020 7:02 AM

That's fine. Let the TDS sufferers pretend that we're not under the only administration in the last 40+ years that hasn't started any new wars, has been brokering peace among foreign entities thought to be impossible to ever accomplish and has been very loud about shouting down the warmongering machine that has infected both sides of the aisle for decades.

You people are fucking idiots and are great examples why we should strip people with double digit IQs from the right to even voice an opinion on anything.

But it was great seeing Barry get that Peace Prize right before he started all of those wars though.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE