The deep state and Dems have tried to get rid of Trump four times, and failed. What next?
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Thursday, January 4, 2024 18:04
VIEWED: 5370
PAGE 5 of 6
Quote:What are you gonna do if Trump loses? Pull the rest of your teeth out? (I have all my teeth, including the wisdom teeth.) http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=58882&mid=10934
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s acquittal will do immense damage to America’s “soft power,” Washington’s ability to convince other nations to do what the US wants without using military force.
Nope. All it's going to do is damage to Democrat's chances in November, which were already abysmal.
Losers losing lost.
Buh bye, morons.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
34#1093434
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:What are gonna do if Trump loses? Pull the rest of your teeth out? (I have all my teeth, including the wisdom teeth.)
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s acquittal will do immense damage to America’s “soft power,” Washington’s ability to convince other nations to do what the US wants without using military force.
Nope. All it's going to do is damage to Democrat's chances in November, which were already abysmal.
Losers losing lost.
Buh bye, morons.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
What are who gonna do?
You're missing a word in that sentence idiot.
Good for you and your teeth. Wow. You're cool man.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That's funny. "You" is not missing in my copy. Are you sure you're not losing your mind along with your teeth?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:What are you gonna do if Trump loses? Pull the rest of your teeth out? (I have all my teeth, including the wisdom teeth.)
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump’s acquittal will do immense damage to America’s “soft power,” Washington’s ability to convince other nations to do what the US wants without using military force.
Nope. All it's going to do is damage to Democrat's chances in November, which were already abysmal.
Losers losing lost.
Buh bye, morons.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
What are who gonna do?
You're missing a word in that sentence idiot.
Good for you and your teeth. Wow. You're cool man.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=58882&mid=10932
84#1093284
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's because you edited it, retard. And then you lied about it after the fact. You're a liar. We all know you're a liar. You even edited it in my quote too, which only means that you're lying twice about it. Pathetic.
And if you're going to lie about something as trivial as this, nobody is going to believe that you have any money or own a business.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And is this what you're going to do now? Try to make me feel bad about my teeth because I was right again, and you were wrong, again, and Trump is going to be acquitted and you're right back where you started three years ago, completely wasting every single day of your life obsessing over this?
I'm glad my teeth are gone. There was no saving them. I'm fixing everything in my life. You're wasting what's left of yours.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Oh, because we've always followed the "rule of law"? Yeah, tell that to the Afghanis, Syrians, Yugoslavians, Libyans, Iraqis, Iranians, Sudanese, Yemenis, El Salvadorans, Venezuelans, etc.
Originally posted by second:
When US diplomats tell their foreign counterparts to be less corrupt, fix partisan problems, and adhere to the rule of law, those talking points won’t resonate.
Quote:wow, now THAT'S a lie if I ever read one!
Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz said in front of the Senate: ‘I want to be elected. I think I’m a great president. I think I’m the greatest president there ever was. If I’m not elected the national interest will suffer greatly.’ That cannot be impeachable.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yanno, I was wondering why the DNC fucked up the impeachment so badly. I mean, the House had control of the timing and could have waited for favorable court rulings but rushed thru so fast they missed questioning Bolt-on.
And it occurred to me that maybe Nancy isn't as stupid as some people say she is.
do you know how some Congresspeople attach "riders" to bills that they KNOW aren't going to pass? Usually some sort of extreme proposal that sounds good in soundbites but is impossible to implement, or is unfunded or some such? That way they get to claim they proposed something without ever having to deal with the consequences ... yanno, Congressional virtue-signalling! It's as old as the hills.
Well, maybe the Dems MEANT for this impeachment to fail. The Dems never questioned the original "whistleblower" for what seems to me to be nonsensical reasons. They COULD have waited for Bolt-on to testify, but instead sent such a weak case to the Senate that the Senate was perfectly entitled to shoot it down. That way Nancy gets to satisfy the "posse" and then gets to blame Senate Republicans for the results.
Do I believe that politicians would engage is such crafty political calculations?
You betcha!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I guess i'm not the only one to question the charade. This is from someone who appeared before the House and was involved in the process
Quote:MORE AT https://jonathanturley.org/2020/02/03/how-the-house-lost-the-witnesses
When I appeared before the House Judiciary Committee in November, I opposed four proposed articles of impeachment as legally flawed and explained that two would be legitimate if they were proven. The House Judiciary Committee rejected the challenged articles and accepted the two articles on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. That left one fundamental area of disagreement. I warned the panel that it was rushing to a failed impeachment by insisting on a vote by Christmas. This was the shortest impeachment investigation in American history. It was also the narrowest grounds and thinnest record for trial. I have previously noted that witnesses like former national security adviser John Bolton indicated that they were willing to testify if subpoenaed, and that a couple months would have likely secured more testimony and supportive court orders.
Indeed, in the impeachment case of President Nixon, it took only a few months to go all the way to the Supreme Court for the final decision. So absent such a delay, the impeachment of Trump was guaranteed to fail, due to an incomplete and insufficient record. Yet the House insisted this was a “crime in progress” and there was no time to delay a submission to the Senate. It then immediately contradicted its rationale by waiting more than a month to submit articles of impeachment to the Senate. The House simply could not have made it easier on the president and his legal team.
The media ignored the obvious catastrophic blunder by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her leadership. The media instead suggested that it was all some grand and brilliant scheme. They even credited the strategy with Bolton eventually coming forward to say he would testify with a subpoena, even though the same offer was made during the House investigation. The media also ignored the unexplained decision by the House to withdraw a subpoena for top Bolton aide Charles Kupperman, who went to court as a prerequisite for testimony, the same position taken by Bolton. Before the courts could even rule, the House mooted the case by withdrawing the subpoena. That made no sense, and the court dismissed the case after concluding that the House appeared to have no interest in the witness.
No harm would have come from pursuing testimony by Kupperman. Yet lead House manager Adam Schiff offered a facially dubious explanation that Kupperman had said he would litigate the issue. If Kupperman truly wanted to drag out litigation, he could have refused to appear before the House and waited for it to seek to compel his testimony. Instead, he said he just wanted a court order in favor of testifying for his own protection. Moreover, House Democrats continued to seek to compel the testimony of former White House counsel Donald McGahn, despite his continued litigation. It won that case as the House was voting on impeachment.
As these blunders by the House became more and more obvious, all the efforts to excuse them became more and more absurd. One main defense heard in the media was that it did not matter, given the Senate Republican majority. Yet if the House was certain to lose on that record, why end the investigation prematurely with a case that would be so easy to defeat? By waiting only a few months, the record would have been stronger. Instead, House Democrats surrendered control of the record to the opposing party and adopted a ridiculous strategy of demanding concessions to end with this trial that Senate Republicans loathed. That strategy failed miserably.
This is not Monday morning quarterbacking. This very series of events was expressly laid out before the vote, and House Democrats made a decision to choose certain failure over completing their impeachment case.
-along-with-the-impeachment/
-----------
Pity woul
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The calculation was to not waste time on Trump, like the two years and two months spent on Watergate with all the investigations. At the end of Watergate, the GOP Senators would not have voted to remove Nixon. A burglary does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense because Nixon was not present at the break-in to the Watergate building, therefore no crime. Nixon removed himself for the good of the party and the next election. Trump is not so loyal to the Republican Party.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yanno, I was wondering why the DNC fucked up the impeachment so badly. I mean, the House had control of the timing and could have waited for favorable court rulings but rushed thru so fast they missed questioning Bolt-on.
And it occurred to me that maybe Nancy isn't as stupid as some people say she is.
do you know how some Congresspeople attach "riders" to bills that they KNOW aren't going to pass? Usually some sort of extreme proposal that sounds good in soundbites but is impossible to implement, or is unfunded or some such? That way they get to claim they proposed something without ever having to deal with the consequences ... yanno, Congressional virtue-signalling! It's as old as the hills.
Well, maybe the Dems MEANT for this impeachment to fail. The Dems never questioned the original "whistleblower" for what seems to me to be nonsensical reasons. They COULD have waited for Bolt-on to testify, but instead sent such a weak case to the Senate that the Senate was perfectly entitled to shoot it down. That way Nancy gets to satisfy the "posse" and then gets to blame Senate Republicans for the results.
Do I believe that politicians would engage is such crafty political calculations?
You betcha!
www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/complete-watergate-timeline-took-longer-
realize
Impeachment wasn’t popular until right before Nixon resigned
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/it-took-a-long-time-for-republica
ns-to-abandon-nixon/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump is not so loyal to the Republican Party.
Probably should have saw that coming since he was a lifelong Democrat before running.
He's just not a 2020 Democrat. 2020 Democrats are insane.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME