new deadly human-to-human-transmissible coronavirus emerges out of China
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 22:21
VIEWED: 203741
PAGE 8 of 283
Quote:What was the best guess for Day 0, and what is the current best guess for Day 0?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread wa started on the evening of 20 Jan 2020.
I recall the news had already been out and updated a few times by that time.
From the stories in the OP, it seems the Sunday before was also referenced.
What is the date that they are considering Day One for their charts and graphs, and how do they define Day One? The first Fatality? The first known case in Human?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I just heard on the news that MA just confirmed it's first case. Some 20-something kid, student of U-Mass, fresh in from Wuhan.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard 5 confirmed cases in USA. Will there be a breakout? also a suspected case landing at Logan direct from China.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Just for clarity, these are not the same property, and not owned by the same entity, and also they're quite some distance from each other, geographically.
I am not sure if they are the same property, merely civilian and military sides. (Ontario International Airport / March Air Reserve Base)
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread was started on the evening of 20 Jan 2020.
I recall the news had already been out and updated a few times by that time.
From the stories in the OP, it seems the Sunday before was also referenced.
What is the date that they are considering Day One for their charts and graphs, and how do they define Day One? The first Fatality? The first known case in Human?
Quote:Given the source of the graphic, and the fact that they seem to dig pretty deeply, I'd say that at the time, the best guesstimate for day 0 was the middle of December. And if you look at the name, it's officially tagged as being from 2019: 2019-nCoV (2019 novel coronavirus). But new information indicates the index patient fell ill ~ December 1, 2019.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
What was the best guess for Day 0, and what is the current best guess for Day 0?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why aren't the insertions into the coronavirus in the news?
First of all the article linked below complains that 'mis'information about coronavirus is being scrubbed from social media. Well, as people here should know by now, I'm not on any social media at all because I see no reason to give my privacy away for the dubious benefit of artificially 'connecting' with artificial entities and government propaganda. So when the author complains that social media is scrubbing information it disagrees with in favor of officialdom, narrative, and orthodoxy I do kind of roll my eyes a bit. Who in hell goes to social media for information?
But when the author states that GOOGLE is also being the Ministry of Truth, it's more concerning. So I went to duckduckgo, which is google without the noxious tracking, and typed in 2019-ncov hiv insertions. I got lots of 'conspiracy site' links and one pretty far down the page from bioRxiv. BioRxiv is the preprint server on which the original paper is found. When I clicked on the 'news' subheading, I got zero results. I mean that literally. Google seems to think that there is literally no news about the topic.
So I went to gibiru which is a modified google-type search engine and did another search. I got lots of credible results, the very first one being the bioRxiv link. (btw gibiru doesn't have sub-heads like 'news'. WYSIWYG.)
Getting back to the actual results, as I mentioned, the original paper was found on bioRxiv. And what is bioRxiv? "bioRxiv is an open access preprint repository for the biological sciences co-founded by John Inglis and Richard Sever in November 2013. It is hosted by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. As preprints, papers hosted on bioRxiv are not peer-reviewed, but undergo basic screening and checked against plagiarism." So this isn't some fly-by-night operation. And here's its link https://www.biorxiv.org/
And how did I originally get to the paper on bioRxiv? Well, ZH has a great reputation for posting links to original sources. And in its original story about this, they posted the link. Here is the link it posted https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full.pdf . You can read the paper at your leisure.
So google is scrubbing this from its search engine, and literally results(verb) that there is no news about it.
Even more so, this isn't being covered by the media at all. Searching duckduckgo under individual media names, like abc, nbc, fox, new york times, washington post etc results in zero links.
AND back one more time to the paper, linked above. Is it credible? One person - not a researcher in the field, but a claimed professional with interest - disputes it (for reasons I find unconvincing), writing to what appears to be a prepper blog. But here is the link https://theprepared.com/blog/no-the-2019-ncov-genome-doesnt-actually-s
eem-engineered-from-hiv/
In any case, here is the article that goes into detail about what information is being scrubbed out of social media and google, (and the news), and scrubbed from your view:
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/coronavirus-contains-hiv-insert
ions-stoking-fears-over-artificially-created-bioweapon
Quote:
(short quote as an example) Kang-Xing Jin, Facebook’s head of health, wrote:
Our global network of third-party fact-checkers are continuing their work reviewing content and debunking false claims that are spreading related to the coronavirus. When they rate information as false, we limit its spread on Facebook and Instagram and show people accurate information from these partners. We also send notifications to people who already shared or are trying to share this content to alert them that it’s been fact-checked.
We will also start to remove content with false claims or conspiracy theories that have been flagged by leading global health organizations and local health authorities that could cause harm to people who believe them. We are doing this as an extenNOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I just did a general search (DuvkDuck) for news (last day) on coronavirus and most of the major news networks have not chimed in lately, let alone say anything at all about the insertions.
It's all pretty fluffy stuff about tasteless racist jokes about Coronavirus (I have to admit, one was pretty funny) and such. All of the grim coverage is saved for China.
The lesson that I learned from Fukushima was when they tell you "don't panic" it the time to start worrying. But I think the M$M has learned its lesson since then: "Don't panic" is a signal that some serious shit is happening. Much better to fill the airwaves and websites with happy-news.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Or maybe they realized that most people are tuning out and it isn't generating any ratings for them anymore.
We're hitting a saturation point with Legacy Media bullshit. One day, there is going to be something serious to report but nobody is going to take it seriously.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not in this case. Even alternative media like social media is being scrubbed of any mention of the insertions into the virus. Facebook, youtube, instagram, twitter and so forth are actively being scrubbed. Google is actively suppressing results.
The whole idea that you can zombify people by simply not reporting the news was tried first, in my opinion, when protests were 'kettled'. Out of sight, out of mind. It was done on a large scale during Katrina. Even as the crisis was still unfolding, it was simply not being reported. Fukushima is another example.
Maybe I need to focus less on this and more on "what has disappeared from the news / what's not being reported". Perhaps a few dozen examples of MAJOR news that gets quietly erased will help you understand how thoroughly tptb have your information controlled.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm aware of the practice. It makes it all the more easy when everybody's daily lives are oversatured with a ton of worthless information that they could never process or fully research.
Personally, I don't really care about that stuff anymore. I lost some good years of my youth being paranoid about it. 20 years later and the sun still rises.
I got a good 20 years left maybe. I doubt things are going to become disagreeable to me in that time. I'm certainly not going to waste what I have left worrying about a bunch of shit I have no control over. I'm as prepared for the unexpected as I'll ever be right now. I'll let the kids who have to deal with the future worry about things.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ok.
I'm just pointing out it's not just legacy media. It's pretty much everything.
ETA: Maybe you think I'm trying to harangue you into CARING. I hope it doesn't come across that way!
I'm pointing out - and not necessarily to you - that this is one very clear example of an EXTREMELY important news item that's being deliberately and nearly completely suppressed across the full spectrum of information sources. Jeeze, there was a whole lot more reporting on far flimsier 'news' items like 'golden showers'!
Do you remember that episodic movie you linked about the kids who found themselves in isolated rooms who had to construct from scratch the rules of their environment ... (that ended up with them probably being the only survivors of global nuclear holocaust)?
I feel that we're being moved into that same information space as that society of total-narrative(bullshit)-realityTV-infotainment 100% of the time, in every direction.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME