Impeachment Investigation Is Underway, Judiciary Committee Says
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Monday, February 3, 2020 01:19
VIEWED: 84495
PAGE 32 of 111
Shoo comrade troll...
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:There was no "invasion". Russia did not take and hold Donbas territory against an unwilling population; they assisted rebel elements in a proxy war.
Wow, ok. And Trump is still guilty.- CC
You say that will all the certitude you repeated TRUMP!!RUSSIA!!COLLUSION!! over the span of 2+ years. Why should I credit your opinion about anything?- KIKI
Apart from being right about Russia invading Ukraine *cough*
Quote:Yep, they annexed Crimea, after a huge majority voted for it. "Invasion"? Planes, tanks, troops? NOPE!
Crimea *cough*
Quote:WHAT "involvement"? Hillary had more involvement than Trump did.
and about Trump's involvement with Russia pre-2016 you mean?
Quote:It's also not a problem. Was there any quid pro quo? Any pressure? Did Zelenskiy even know about the pending funds from the USA? Sheesh! Trump spoke to another President? Big deal.
Easy, you don't have to listen to me, Kiki. Listen to Trump saying it himself - from the White House released "transcript":
TRUMP: "The other thing, there's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
It's not opinion, it's fact.-CC
Quote:That's not what I said. The context was that the form of "help" from Russia was that it alllegedly stole the DNC/Podesta emails and sent them via internet to Russia. But not a single packet of that (alleged) international communication was ever intercepted by the NSA. Not one, out of hundreds of millions.
SIGGY use to say if there was collusion in 2016 surely we'd have phone conversations...
Aside from that, there was an active real-time counterintelligence surveillance of the Trump campaign. Now, "collusion" requires ONGOING communication. Think about it: Even if the terms of the deal were set many years ago (We'll help get you elected if you remove sanctions from Russia and provide a billion-dollar loan to Venezuela) there would STILL have to be communication as situations change. What happens for example if Trump thought the "help was inadequate? Or if neither of Russia's asks are achievable? Don't they have to get together and reset their arragements from time to time? Wouldn't that leave a trail of phone calls?
Quote:CC, if there was anything MORE in Trump's closet, don't you think this "whistleblower" would have found it out? Why are they stooping to making a big deal about this nothingburger if they had anything substantive to bring to the table?
aren't like this one that was not caught until a whistle blower had the nerve to call it out?
Quote:
Ukraine is an adversary? Biden and son didn't think so. The Podesta Brothers didn't think so. -KIKI
It is if their president gives in to Trump's flagrant over step. This is all about Trump Making Trump Great Again. If he caves (and I wouldn't blame him if he does, The US represents their survival), then he sets himself up for further []u]extortion/kompromat from Russia.
Krompromate FROM RUSSIA? Are you as delusional as JO is? JO's got an excuse ... he's been propagandized into total paranoia and is suffering from PTSD. What's YOUR excuse? Quote:WHICH FOR SOME STRANGE REASON ARE NEVER FOUND, despite CIA spying on the WH. Which is why they had to resort to this nothing-burger.
No doubt Trump gets together with Putin on a regular basis for some fun dictator chat
The problem is, one can never prove a negative. There is a person who reads this board and who posts occasionally (who shall remain nameless) that was just as terrified of Saddm's WMD as JO is of Russia. No amount of investigation ... either before-hand by Blix or afterw
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Make no mistake. The trolls here are not American or believers in the rule of law. This shit happens in Russia and is not tolerated here. More Americans are going to hear of this and want it stopped. In other words; impeachment.
tick tock
T ![]()
Whistleblower's lawyers claim there's a $50K bounty out to ID him or her
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
That's you're stupid?
too perfect! 
No one makes you look as foolish and over stuffed as you do.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yep, they annexed Crimea, after a huge majority voted for it...
I think the only appropriate response to any of your weak-ass, over wrought, endless spam fodder posts from here on out is:
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Speaking of CC being overstuffed ...
Quote:There was no "invasion". Russia did not take and hold Donbas territory against an unwilling population; they assisted rebel elements in a proxy war.
Wow, ok. And Trump is still guilty.- CC
You say that will all the certitude you repeated TRUMP!!RUSSIA!!COLLUSION!! over the span of 2+ years. Why should I credit your opinion about anything?- KIKI
Apart from being right about Russia invading Ukraine *cough*
Quote:Yep, they annexed Crimea, after a huge majority voted for it. "Invasion"? Planes, tanks, troops? NOPE!
Crimea *cough*
Quote:WHAT "involvement"? Hillary had more involvement than Trump did.
and about Trump's involvement with Russia pre-2016 you mean?
Quote:It's also not a problem. Was there any quid pro quo? Any pressure? Did Zelenskiy even know about the pending funds from the USA? Sheesh! Trump spoke to another President? Big deal.
Easy, you don't have to listen to me, Kiki. Listen to Trump saying it himself - from the White House released "transcript":
TRUMP: "The other thing, there's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
It's not opinion, it's fact.-CC
Quote:That's not what I said. The context was that the form of "help" from Russia was that it alllegedly stole the DNC/Podesta emails and sent them via internet to Russia. But not a single packet of that (alleged) international communication was ever intercepted by the NSA. Not one, out of hundreds of millions.
SIGGY use to say if there was collusion in 2016 surely we'd have phone conversations...
Aside from that, there was an active real-time counterintelligence surveillance of the Trump campaign. Now, "collusion" requires ONGOING communication. Think about it: Even if the terms of the deal were set many years ago (We'll help get you elected if you remove sanctions from Russia and provide a billion-dollar loan to Venezuela) there would STILL have to be communication as situations change. What happens for example if Trump thought the "help was inadequate? Or if neither of Russia's asks are achievable? Don't they have to get together and reset their arragements from time to time? Wouldn't that leave a trail of phone calls?
Quote:CC, if there was anything MORE in Trump's closet, don't you think this "whistleblower" would have found it out? Why are they stooping to making a big deal about this nothingburger if they had anything substantive to bring to the table?
aren't like this one that was not caught until a whistle blower had the nerve to call it out?
Quote:
Ukraine is an adversary? Biden and son didn't think so. The Podesta Brothers didn't think so. -KIKI
It is if their president gives in to Trump's flagrant over step. This is all about Trump Making Trump Great Again. If he caves (and I wouldn't blame him if he does, The US represents their survival), then he sets himself up for further []u]extortion/kompromat from Russia.
Krompromate FROM RUSSIA? Are you as delusional as JO is? JO's got an excuse ... he's been propagandized into total paranoia and is suffering from PTSD. What's YOUR excuse? Quote:WHICH FOR SOME STRANGE REASON ARE NEVER FOUND, despite CIA spying on the WH. Which is why they had to resort to this nothing-burger.
No doubt Trump gets together with Putin on a regular basis for some fun dictator chat
The problem is, one can never prove a negative. There is a person who reads this board and who posts occasionally (who shall remain nameless) that was just as terrified of Saddm's WMD as JO is of Russia. No amount of investigation ..
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
burp
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Make no mistake. The trolls here are not American or believers in the rule of law. This shit happens in Russia and is not tolerated here. More Americans are going to hear of this and want it stopped. In other words; impeachment.
I really feel the tide is turning.
Only trouble is... it's still up to Pelosi. The same problem the Senate has in that McConnell can block 100 bills by not bringing them up for a vote - too much power in 1 person's hands. The system needs an over haul. We've been too prescious and sentimental about changes imho. There are some obvious ones that need upgrades.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Even the "whistleblower's" attorneys disagree with the M$M
Quote:
Whistleblower's attorney says '60 Minutes' misinterpreted letter in federal protection report
By RISHIKA DUGYALA
09/29/2019 11:14 PM EDT
An attorney for the whistleblower in the Trump-Ukraine scandal said Sunday that CBS’ “60 Minutes” had “completely misinterpreted” a document from his legal group, after the news outlet tweeted that the whistleblower was now under federal protection.
On Sunday night, CBS wrote on Twitter: “‘60 Minutes’ has obtained a letter that indicates the government whistleblower who set off the impeachment inquiry of President Trump is under federal protection because they fear for their safety.”
Two hours later, following significant reaction to the report, Attorney Mark Zaid responded: “NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes completely misinterpreted contents of our letter, which is now published online.”
NEWS ALERT: 60 Minutes completely misinterpreted contents of our letter, which is now published online at https://t.co/HjmBrEQLEi. Nor have we, as we stated earlier today, reached any agreement with Congress on contact with the whistleblower. Discussions remain ongoing. https://t.co/3XSwmtuRrn
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) September 30, 2019
He added that no agreement has been reached with Congress on contact with the whistleblower, and discussions remain ongoing.
A spokesperson for CBS said in a statement: "60 Minutes stands by its sources and reporting on the whistle-blower. "
The letter — sent Saturday from the Compass Rose Legal Group to the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire — addressed the whistleblower’s personal safety concerns. The attorneys wrote that they “appreciate your office’s support thus far to activate appropriate resources to ensure (the whistleblower’s) safety.”
The attorneys added that President Donald Trump had heightened these concerns by stating Thursday that he wanted to know who the whistleblower and their informant is, because “that’s close to a spy.”
Following reports that Trump had asked Ukraine to dig up damaging information on his political rival, former vice president Joe Biden, House Democrats launched an official impeachment inquiry. Trump and his allies stepped up their attacks over the weekend to discredit the whistleblower complaint and impeachment proceedings.
On Sunday, Trump demanded to meet the whistleblower, whose complaint helped bring impeachment closer to his doorstep.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/09/29/trump-whistleblower-cbs-feder
al-protection-011468
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
You idiots have been oppressing the entire sexual spectrum as long as you have existed. I can't wait for the day your kind is dead - WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by CAPTAIN CRUNCH:
burp
Yep, you can't address a single point. You're as predictable as WISHY. The fact that the M$M has whip this nothing-burger into something that even the "whistleblower's" attorneys have to publicly reel in just shows how little there is to this whole thing.
*****
Speaking of CC being overstuffed ...
Quote:There was no "invasion". Russia did not take and hold Donbas territory against an unwilling population; they assisted rebel elements in a proxy war.
Wow, ok. And Trump is still guilty.- CC
You say that will all the certitude you repeated TRUMP!!RUSSIA!!COLLUSION!! over the span of 2+ years. Why should I credit your opinion about anything?- KIKI
Apart from being right about Russia invading Ukraine *cough*
Quote:Yep, they annexed Crimea, after a huge majority voted for it. "Invasion"? Planes, tanks, troops? NOPE!
Crimea *cough*
Quote:WHAT "involvement"? Hillary had more involvement than Trump did.
and about Trump's involvement with Russia pre-2016 you mean?
Quote:It's also not a problem. Was there any quid pro quo? Any pressure? Did Zelenskiy even know about the pending funds from the USA? Sheesh! Trump spoke to another President? Big deal.
Easy, you don't have to listen to me, Kiki. Listen to Trump saying it himself - from the White House released "transcript":
TRUMP: "The other thing, there's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
It's not opinion, it's fact.-CC
Quote:That's not what I said. The context was that the form of "help" from Russia was that it alllegedly stole the DNC/Podesta emails and sent them via internet to Russia. But not a single packet of that (alleged) international communication was ever intercepted by the NSA. Not one, out of hundreds of millions.
SIGGY use to say if there was collusion in 2016 surely we'd have phone conversations...
Aside from that, there was an active real-time counterintelligence surveillance of the Trump campaign. Now, "collusion" requires ONGOING communication. Think about it: Even if the terms of the deal were set many years ago (We'll help get you elected if you remove sanctions from Russia and provide a billion-dollar loan to Venezuela) there would STILL have to be communication as situations change. What happens for example if Trump thought the "help was inadequate? Or if neither of Russia's asks are achievable? Don't they have to get together and reset their arragements from time to time? Wouldn't that leave a trail of phone calls?
Quote:CC, if there was anything MORE in Trump's closet, don't you think this "whistleblower" would have found it out? Why are they stooping to making a big deal about this nothingburger if they had anything substantive to bring to the table?
aren't like this one that was not caught until a whistle blower had the nerve to call it out?
Quote:
Ukraine is an adversary? Biden and son didn't think so. The Podesta Brothers didn't think so. -KIKI
It is if their president gives in to Trump's flagrant over step. This is all about Trump Making Trump Great Again. If he caves (and I wouldn't blame him if he does, The US represents their survival), then he sets himself up for further []u]extortion/kompromat from Russia.
Krompromate FROM RUSSIA? Are you as delusional as JO is? JO's got an excuse ... he's been propagandized into total paranoia and is suffering from PTSD. What's YOUR excuse? Quote:
No doubt Trump gets together with Putin on a regular basis for some fun dictator chat[/quNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME