Real World Event Discussions

A thread for Democrats Only

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 15:36
VIEWED: 755368
PAGE 244 of 725

Saturday, May 25, 2019 1:40 AM

Of the two of us, I'm not the one making a living exploiting others and then ruining half of their lives for their political leanings.

You jump off the bridge and MAGA first. Nobody would miss you.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 27, 2019 6:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Of the two of us, I'm not the one making a living exploiting others and then ruining half of their lives for their political leanings.

You jump off the bridge and MAGA first. Nobody would miss you.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

I find a strong correlation at work between an employee's inability to learn and the employee being a Republican. Work goes much smoother without the people who won't learn from their mistakes. It is best to fire them. I have a list of three Republicans that Obama should have fired as soon as possible. (Hank Paulson, Tim Geithner, and Ben Bernanke) These 3 numbskulls are still writing books to justify the mistakes they made. They learned nothing, same as my Republican employees learn nothing from their mistakes:

https://bostonreview.net/politics/reed-hundt-playing-fire

According to Jamie Dimon, cumulative economic growth over the last decade has been half of what it would have been in a normal recovery. As a result the economy is $4 trillion smaller than it should be. In his words, that growth “certainly would have driven wages higher and given us the wherewithal to broadly build a better country.”

It is widely recognized that the economic disappointments of the last decade made it extremely difficult for the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016 to run on her predecessor’s record, even though unemployment was at last reaching satisfactorily low levels and wages had begun to increase. Conversely, Donald Trump’s successful campaign is often seen as reflecting voter dissatisfaction with the government’s response to the financial crisis of 2008.

Given the ample volume of hindsight, it takes conviction verging on stubbornness to insist that the United States government under the Bush administration did all it could to prevent the crisis and that both the Bush and Obama administrations did all they reasonably could have done in response. Yet in their three separate memoirs, numerous public statements, and now in their jointly written book, Firefighting: The Financial Crisis and Its Lessons, the trio of President Bush’s Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Bush’s president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and, later, President Obama’s Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, and both presidents’ Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have made these claims.

In Firefighting, for instance, they look to the next crisis and correctly assert that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) should be able to “fully stand behind” the obligations “of large complicated banks on the brink of failure . . . while winding them down in an orderly fashion.” But in an FDIC resolution shareholders and creditors take some loss. The firefighters rejected that approach in 2008, and they continue now to argue that in a crisis it is wrong “to ensure that risk takers pay a price for their risk taking” such as by “imposing haircuts on creditors.” By arguing that risk takers should be held harmless in the next crisis, they are restating the position that tied President Obama to one of the most unpopular government actions in history—namely, the bail-out. No future president should, or would want, to take this advice.

Notwithstanding many actions by the trio in emergency conditions, their reaction to the recession was not what the country deserved. Indeed, it had at least three serious flaws that we should be revisiting and learning from for next time.

First, they bailed out Bear Stearns in March 2008, then let Lehman Brothers go bankrupt on September 15, 2008, and finally bailed out AIG on September 16, 2008. In the first of these moves, they had another firm buy the failing firm. In the middle decision, they magnified the losses for everyone by implementing no plan in advance. And in the last of these moves, the government took control and fired management.

This unpredictable signaling intensified the dreadful reaction to the Lehman bankruptcy. The government’s sinuous path of decision-making inspired a lack of confidence. That in turn contribut

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 27, 2019 9:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
I find a strong correlation at work between an employee's inability to learn and the employee being a Republican.



Yup. I'm sure anybody is going to take the word of somebody who eats, sleeps, shits and breathes Democrat. And is already scrambling for reasons to not look so horrible for firing people they don't agree with on something that has nothing to do with work.

Why bother man? Everybody knows you're either a piece of shit or the entire story of your riches is a flat out lie in the first place. You can't even go back and delete your history on that since it's been quoted so many times by other people.

Just own it man. You seem to revel in it most days. Be yourself.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, May 27, 2019 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:

Originally posted by second:
I find a strong correlation at work between an employee's inability to learn and the employee being a Republican.



Yup. I'm sure anybody is going to take the word of somebody who eats, sleeps, shits and breathes Democrat. And is already scrambling for reasons to not look so horrible for firing people they don't agree with on something that has nothing to do with work.

Why bother man? Everybody knows you're either a piece of shit or the entire story of your riches is a flat out lie in the first place. You can't even go back and delete your history on that since it's been quoted so many times by other people.

Just own it man. You seem to revel in it most days. Be yourself.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

So, 6ix, you have disappointed your bosses and they fired your fat dumb ass. Tough to be you. I told you about the TV show My 600-lb Life. Doctor Now orders his patients to eat less. He weighs them every few months to find out who is lying to him about keeping their diet. He sends them to a psychiatrist for their mental problems. If they won't slow down their eating, as Doctor Now has ordered, he will never schedule surgery to reduce the size of their stomachs. Bosses are very much like Doctor Now. If you won't follow your boss's orders, he will never pay you, 6ixStringJack. He might send you to a psychiatrist, or he might fire your dumb ass. Since bosses don't swear a Hippocratic Oath, bosses are not required to "Do No Harm" in America. They will "Harm" you if you piss them off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_600-lb_Life

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
So, 6ix, you have disappointed your bosses and they fired your fat dumb ass. Tough to be you. I told you about the TV show My 600-lb Life. Doctor Now orders his patients to eat less. He weighs them every few months to find out who is lying to him about keeping their diet. He sends them to a psychiatrist for their mental problems. If they won't slow down their eating, as Doctor Now has ordered, he will never schedule surgery to reduce the size of their stomachs. Bosses are very much like Doctor Now. If you won't follow your boss's orders, he will never pay you, 6ixStringJack. He might send you to a psychiatrist, or he might fire your dumb ass. Since bosses don't swear a Hippocratic Oath, bosses are not required to "Do No Harm" in America. They will "Harm" you if you piss them off.



Wow. You put more fake news in a single paragraph than Maddow usually puts in her nightly show.

What's a'matter, Princess? You on tilt because I've got you pegged?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 3:40 AM

Pete Buttigieg and Nancy Pelosi have both mastered the art of puncturing Trump — far better than his Republican primary debate rivals did.

“I don’t have a problem standing up to somebody who was working on Season 7 of ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ when I was packing my bags for Afghanistan,” Buttigieg told The Post’s Robert Costa, saying he took a dim view of Trump’s bone-spurs excuse to get out of serving in Vietnam.

Pelosi winds Trump up when she drips condescension worthy of a Jane Austen grande dame, saying she will pray for the president or pleading for someone to stage an intervention with the poor soul.

After Pelosi remarked that the president was engaged in a cover-up, Trump dynamited his own meeting with “Crazy Nancy,” as he called her. His I’m not crazy, you’re crazy rebuttal to Pelosi echoed his I’m not a puppet, you’re a puppet line to Hillary Clinton during the debate.

Trump tweeted a video of Pelosi that was manipulated to make her look as if she were slurring her words. “Well, I don’t know about the videos,” the president told reporters as he left on his trip to Japan.

“He does outrageous, nasty, destructive things, knowing full well he’s crossing a line, and then he pretends he didn’t,” said Trump biographer Tim O’Brien.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 5:10 AM

lol.

What these idiot journos don't get is that Trump is still very entertaining.

Look at those idiots on the Left act like morons in 2019.

Trump's bringing them all down to his level, and that's not a playing field that they're going to win on.


If they weren't so insecure and hated by the people they're supposed to represent, they'd ignore anything he had to say and he'd be left looking like the asshole.

But they can't, so they won't.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 5:56 AM

Trump biographer Tim O’Brien said, “He has spent five decades going to gossip columnists, radio shows, TV interviews and newspapers to stick a knife into almost anybody who crosses his path that he doesn’t like and he revels in it. There is something amazing in the Energizer Bunny aspect of his nastiness and his ignorance. He doesn’t care what people think about how mean or dumb he is. He just keeps going.”

O’Brien said Pelosi “hit on something that is core to his con. His whole life is about the cover-up. He has covered up his academic record, his health reports, his dalliances with women, his finances, his family history. Even while he was saying he was the most transparent president in history, his Treasury secretary was across town telling Congress, ‘I’m not giving you the president’s tax returns.’

“One of the biggest motivating factors in Trump’s life — other than food, greed, sex and revenge — is mythmaking. Deep down, he knows he’s a pathological liar and he’s not the person he says he is. But any time anyone pierces that veil, it sends him into a rage.”

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 6:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Trump biographer Tim O’Brien said, “He has spent five decades going to gossip columnists, radio shows, TV interviews and newspapers to stick a knife into almost anybody who crosses his path that he doesn’t like and he revels in it. There is something amazing in the Energizer Bunny aspect of his nastiness and his ignorance. He doesn’t care what people think about how mean or dumb he is. He just keeps going.”

O’Brien said Pelosi “hit on something that is core to his con. His whole life is about the cover-up. He has covered up his academic record, his health reports, his dalliances with women, his finances, his family history. Even while he was saying he was the most transparent president in history, his Treasury secretary was across town telling Congress, ‘I’m not giving you the president’s tax returns.’

“One of the biggest motivating factors in Trump’s life — other than food, greed, sex and revenge — is mythmaking. Deep down, he knows he’s a pathological liar and he’s not the person he says he is. But any time anyone pierces that veil, it sends him into a rage.”

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly




Sounds like he should be your hero, Second.

You've certainly modeled your life after him.

Or if it's all a lie you've been feeding us, it's the reality you wish others to believe of you.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, May 28, 2019 4:48 PM

So Far, Models Are Predicting a Trump Victory in 2020
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/models-predicting-trump-vi
ctory-2020.html


Three analysts who set up and look at predictive models say President Donald Trump is likely to win reelection in 2020. The secret? A combination of favorable economic data as well as the normal advantage that incumbents enjoy, according to Steven Rattner, a counselor to the Treasury secretary in the Obama administration.

In a column for the New York Times, Rattner notes that “one of the best” models to predict election outcomes makes clear that Trump is likely to receive a significant tailwind from the economy. Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, has come up with a model that takes into account GDP growth rates, inflation, and incumbency and has been quite accurate in previous cycles. In 2016, for example, the model accurately predicted a victory for Trump although it overestimated his share of the popular vote. According to that model, Trump’s vote share should be as high as 56.1 percent in the next election, although in reality the divisiveness of the candidate means the actual number won’t be as high.

Fair isn’t the only modeler to see Trump with a clear advantage in 2020. Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics analyzed 12 models and found that Trump comes out on top in all of them. Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics analyzed the Electoral College and came to the same conclusion.

“So the question for 2020 may well be whether Mr. Trump can overcome the majority of voters’ poor perception of him and use a good economy and incumbency to win re-election,” Rattner writes.

More at https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/445668-3-modelers-predict-trump-
reelection



TrumpNation: The Art of Being The Donald
by Timothy O'Brien
www.amazon.com/TrumpNation-Donald-Timothy-L-OBrien-ebook/dp/B0169GGSJU
https://pirateproxy.lat/torrent/16575664/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME