Impeach?
POSTED BY: captaincrunch
UPDATED: Saturday, March 8, 2025 02:55
VIEWED: 9877
PAGE 10 of 12
Imagine that! That judge must have been high all four times he gave them the green light to "spy" on that "very fine" person.
Ahhhhhh, the Deep State is at it again.
Rah! Rah! Deep State, Deep State...fuck them in the ass! (Wait, that doesn't
rhyme). Okay, I think I got it.
Fuck those slimey Russkies in the ass. (No, still not good).
Deep State goes balls Deep in Trump's ass (Wait....Putin's already there).
Kim's gonna get mad! They're in Love! Trump said so.
Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha...........Priceless!!!
sgg
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Harris: "Seems you would remember something like that and be able to tell us."
(putting on the pressure as the crickets chirp away)
I'd imagine it looked quite a bit like Hot Rod being grilled over his initial signing of a FISA warrant he didn't bother reading.Quote:
Rep. Gohmert: When you approve a FISA application, in your mind, does that mean you should read it and understand what’s part of it?
Rosenstein: “You should certainly understand what’s part of it, sir.”
Rep. Gohmert: “But, you’re parsing words. So, that doesn’t mean you need to read it, in your opinion – is that correct?”
Rosenstein: “It depends on the circumstances.”
Rep. Gohmert: “Well, telling you, being a former felony state judge, if I had somebody like you come before me and now it was revealed later that the guy that signed and approved an application for a warrant had not even read the application that would allow spying on somebody, I would look at everything he signed from then on with a jaundiced eye. And, I’m telling you, I was a little concerned.”
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Kamala didn't even let Barr answer her questions. It's called "badgering the witness".
Oh and btw ... she expected that Barr would personally review ALL of the underlying evidence???
What, then, would be the point of Mueller even writing a report? Why not just give all of the evidence to Barr, and let HIM write the report? My god, what a stupid woman.
She DOES bring up an interestig point tho, about Rosenstein possibly having a conflict of interest in the Mueller investigation. The problem was, that conflict of interest would have existed when Rosenstein was made acting atty general for this case... and objections should have been made then, two and a half years ago, and he should have recused himself two and a half years ago if there was a problem. It's disingenuous to bring that objection up NOW. The only reason why the Dems didn't was because they thought he was on "their" side, so they were a-OK with any possible conflict if it got them the result that they wanted.
But thanks for posting the video, I wondered what all the fuss was about. Now I see it was about nothing. Just like all of the rest of the hyperventilation about nothing. It's all spin and bullshit and you're getting willingly hoodwinked... again.
Carry on.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This story is less than a month old: "Trump's Sister Retires as Federal Judge, Ending Ethical Misconduct Inquiry"
Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:You are finally getting the point: If Nancy Pelosi pushes the House to impeach Barr, then the Senate will convene a quick, one-hour-long trial in the Kangaroo Court to declare that Barr did not lie even if Pelosi knows Barr did because she read the two page letter Mueller wrote to Barr telling Barr to not twist the facts in the Mueller report like pretzels.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
The Senate may only act in this way after The House has Impeached an Official. The Senate has no authority to initiate any Impeachment proceedings, or to act by themselves to Lynch anybody they choose.
www.cnbc.com/2019/05/02/nancy-pelosi-accuses-william-barr-of-committin
g-a-crime.html
I too, have little faith in the Dems. But if I were one of the current group, I would hope I would have enough confidence in myself and my beliefs that I would be excited by the prospect of having the public stage - even for 1 hour with the GOP - to show the undecideds how much better we are than the gop filth. Of course, the only way that isn’t a good idea is if one acknowledges that most of the undecideds are pretty flakey as well and might not even care. What’s the Latin phrase for, “we get exactly the democracy we deserve?”
We only know about Trump's sister cheating on her taxes because she is a federal judge and she had to give her tax returns to "auditors". Auditors is in air quotes because those guys were worthless, only looking at the documents the sister (and her brother's accountants) made available. But once real auditors looked at the tax returns and documents that had not been whitewashed by Trump, Trump's sister decided to make her life easier by resigning. President Trump won't be taking the easy way out, but the Democrats could do an actual audit on his tax returns, because the President and his sister were both in the same deals that involved tax cheating.
http://time.com/5568926/trump-sister-retires-judge/
www.abajournal.com/news/article/trumps-sister-a-federal-appeals-judge-
resigns-amid-ethics-inquiry
I realize that most people who voted for Trump don't care if Trump's sister cheated on her taxes. That's why they get exactly the democracy they deserve. But in theory Congress should care about tax cheating by the entire Trump family, both the sister on the federal bench and the brother in the White House.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the fact that stoning homosexuals or dragging them behind a car in 2019 is heavily frowned upon in America has more to do with the rise of people reporting as LGBT than whatever Obama put in the water to make the frogs gay.
I'd be curious to see the gallop poll results of the same surveys in predominately Muslim countries.
It's also curious that Misery believes the only way that one could have a life is to be with a partner. One of the opposite sex for that matter.
That seems to be a message without any empowerment behind it. And a quite homophobic one to boot. Dunnit?
Grasping at straws. LOL.
You get an extra side order of pathetic today
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nilbog.
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:Quote:Grasping at straws. LOL.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the fact that stoning homosexuals or dragging them behind a car in 2019 is heavily frowned upon in America has more to do with the rise of people reporting as LGBT than whatever Obama put in the water to make the frogs gay.
I'd be curious to see the gallop poll results of the same surveys in predominately Muslim countries.
It's also curious that Misery believes the only way that one could have a life is to be with a partner. One of the opposite sex for that matter.
That seems to be a message without any empowerment behind it. And a quite homophobic one to boot. Dunnit?
You get an extra side order of pathetic today
Misery.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Quoting for the video link.
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
The Republican-controlled Senate did not allow their committee counsel to question Attorney General William Barr, but they can’t stop the next best thing: having former prosecutor Kamala Harris question him.
Kamala: “Has the president asked you to open an investigation of anyone?”
Barr: [awkward silence]
Kamala: “Yes or no?”
He can’t figure out how to answer.
https://twitter.com/TimOBrien/status/1123655699467329541
We all know the answer. Barr just can’t figure out a way to deny it in a way that doesn’t constitute perjury.
I walked into a convenience store just as Senator Harris was about to grill Barr. I asked the lady behind the counter if she could turn the volume up, she did, and about 5 or 6 nearby gathered around to watch.
Oh Boy! I could see that Kamala had her game face on. Shit's about to get real up in here!!!
I could see, as she dropped the "line" into the water, her first words barely out of her mouth and Barr sweating profusely, he started for the "bait."
Harris: "Did the WH ever...etc."
Barr: "Uuuuh, I wouldn't, I wouldn't..."
Harris: (Cold steely eyes) "Yes or no."
Barr: (staring up into the ceiling looking for answers) "Could you repeat the question" (obviously stalling for time).
In my mind I could hear the "Final Jeopardy" theme music playing.
Harris repeats the question about the WH/president suggesting/asking him to investigate anyone.
Barr: Uuuuh, president or anybody else (again, obviously stalling for time to think of an answer that won't have him commit perjury. It's obvious he was
asked. You could tell in his demeanor, still looking up into the ceiling for
an answer.
Harris: "Seems you would remember something like that and be able to tell us."
(putting on the pressure as the crickets chirp away)
Barr: "Yes, but I'm grappling with the word suggest, er, I mean..."
The look on her and Booker's face is PRICELESS.
Barr: "There have been discussions of matters out there (waving his hands as if the answer is out there in the air), they have not asked me to open an investigation."
Double secret probation....lol
Harris: "Suggested?"
Barr: "I don't know"
Harris: "Hinted?"
Barr: "I don't know"
Harris: "Inferred?"
Barr: "I don't know"
Absolutely Priceless!!!
SGG
Hadn't thought there was anything germane in that post, but SIGs did a review which was interesting.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Kamala didn't even let Barr answer her questions. It's called "badgering the witness".
Oh and btw ... she expected that Barr would personally review ALL of the underlying evidence???
What, then, would be the point of Mueller even writing a report? Why not just give all of the evidence to Barr, and let HIM write the report? My god, what a stupid woman.
She DOES bring up an interestig point tho, about Rosenstein possibly having a conflict of interest in the Mueller investigation. The problem was, that conflict of interest would have existed when Rosenstein was made acting atty general for this case... and objections should have been made then, two and a half years ago, and he should have recused himself two and a half years ago if there was a problem. It's disingenuous to bring that objection up NOW. The only reason why the Dems didn't was because they thought he was on "their" side, so they were a-OK with any possible conflict if it got them the result that they wanted.
But thanks for posting the video, I wondered what all the fuss was about. Now I see it was about nothing. Just like all of the rest of the hyperventilation about nothing. It's all spin and bullshit anNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Nilbog.
Misery.
AT least I get laid by the goblin here in Misery.
Tried out a new technique this weekend that someone told me about. Thought for a minute I might have to call him an ambulance.
So, how was your weekend again? Do.....ANYTHING???
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That "new technique" .... It wouldn't involve penis in actual vagina, man on top, would it?
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Nilbog.
Misery.
AT least I get laid by the goblin here in Misery.
Tried out a new technique this weekend that someone told me about. Thought for a minute I might have to call him an ambulance.
So, how was your weekend again? Do.....ANYTHING???
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nah. She just found the key to his chastity cage and he nearly had a heart attack after his first orgasm in 10 years.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
“Democrat Texas Congressman Al Green says impeachment is the only thing that can prevent President Trump from re-election in 2020.” @OANN In other words, Dems can’t win the election fairly. You can’t impeach a president for creating the best economy in our country’s history.....
Also, there are “No High Crimes & Misdemeanors,” No Collusion, No Conspiracy, No Obstruction. ALL THE CRIMES ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE, and that’s what the Dems should be looking at, but they won’t. Nevertheless, the tables are turning!
3:46 AM - 6 May 2019
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1125351000704000000
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME