VICE

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Thursday, February 7, 2019 06:37
VIEWED: 7685
PAGE 2 of 8

Hollywood and the facts could not be more distant strangers.

I will never understand the fetish the Left has w/ Dick Cheney, but ignores the monsters of their own , from Bill & Hillary, Obama, AlGore, John Kerry... it's an endless parade of subversive pieces of crap who abuse power and fleece the hell out of their positions to financially enrich themselves.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

You still haven't told me why you came to that conclusion. But, I'm going to answer this in two parts; Part 1 will be a direct response to your post here.
And Part 2 will be a breakdown of my review to settle this little diatribe of yours. Seriously, we need to end this, and if you still feel afraid of growing
a brain...well, then I will leave it at that.

This is the final response to your misunderstanding of my post.

Part 1: My response to your comments here

Quote:

---

I never called you a drunk, and I certainly didn't ever poke fun at you about it. That would be HUGELY hypocritical on my part.

---

I can't believe I actually have to explain this, but here it goes. I never accused you of calling me a drunk (other names and insinuations yes, but never
that you called me a drunkard. Especially most recently). Carefully read my response and you will see that I said your "friends" called you a drunkard - as well as me - whenever there wasn't a meeting of the minds. So, I did NOT accuse you of that.

I somehow get the feeling that I'm being pranked by you and your "friends"
because, despite whatever Jewels says, I do write in English. Reread my
comments and you will see. Okay, I hope that clears things up. Next case!

Quote:

---

I don't go around calling you names randomly for disagreeing with me, as all of your "friends" here on this site do all the time...

---

In regards to name calling; I'm not going to get into a tit-for-tat about
that little topic; so forget that shit. And as far as my "friends" are
concerned, that's on them. Perhaps they feel justified because of past encounters in RWED with you. I've seen the comments/epithets/insults hurled
back and forth. I look at it as a "snowball fight" and I will leave it at that.

Quote:

---

Whether it's Nazi or Comrade, or idiot or dummy. I've called you out on it 3 or 4 times now when you've done it to me, and you usually backpedal and apologize for it.

---

I'm not going to rehash this, but it seems to me that people, and I'm talking about you, Kiki, Siggy, Rappy and Jewels disagree with me (and I'm only going to talk about interactions with me) you come out of your "face" and start the
name calling. When I first came to the RWED, I was warned. I was told that
to be wary because people could get rough and carried away. I told my contact
not to worry, I'm a big boy. I could take it. Little did I know. But here we are, adults talking about name calling.

I never imagined myself getting into it with other so-called adults. And I always get the feeling that it's done purposely, just to get a "rise" out of
whomever is on the receiving end. There's a pattern - argue, insult/ridicule,
offering of peace and harmony, a brief moment of sane conversation, followed
by an almost agreeable state, when the person doesn't agree wholeheartedly
they are insulted and ridiculed mercilessly. Followed by a very hostile
period of bullying and, what I call, soul-bashing. The respondent brutally
attacks and tries to make it seem that the other started it. Typical narcissistic move - Turning the tables and making it look like your opponent
made the move.

Quote:

---

I'm getting quite tired of having to do that though, so I haven't bothered the last several insults you've thrown my way.

---

You and me both. I'm tired of playing this little game. I must tell you I'm not going to stand there and take shit from anyone. I'm going
to fight back and hit twice as hard...you throw a rock, I'll throw a boulder.
You hit me with a car, I'll use a bulldozer. You get the picture. But, no more

Quote:

---

you wrote this as though you were emulating one of the late night smarmy douches...

---

There goes that "smarmy douches" crack again. Dude, you know what you're doing. You say you don't insult, yet there you are, doing it. That is your interpretation, I

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

I know, right!


sgg

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Hollywood and the facts could not be more distant strangers.

I will never understand the fetish the Left has w/ Dick Cheney, but ignores the monsters of their own , from Bill & Hillary, Obama, AlGore, John Kerry... it's an endless parade of subversive pieces of crap who abuse power and fleece the hell out of their positions to financially enrich themselves.

---

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Here goes Part 2:

Quote:

---

This movie totally belongs to Dick Cheney, it's all about the Vice president and the inner workings of politics in Washington....well, sort of.

---

I still can't believe I have to break this down to you, but here it is: The story is about Cheney. Pretty simple. Where he came from and how he got started. Now, I know that you feel he's a scumbag (he is), but when you get
to know a dude and his motivations, well it just helps with staying a step ahead of him. Anyway, I know he's a douche (see, that's the right person to
call a douche). We can learn a thing or two by studying such a man, despite the fact he's scum.

Now that's exactly how I feel about Trump. It's probably exactly how you feel about Clinton. Does that mean that you sympathize with him...No. It's like getting to know your enemy, his movements and motivations. It's just to keep
yourself sharp in order to survive.

Quote:

---

For those of you who are afraid of the facts, skip this movie. No seriously.

---

Purely having fun here. It's like someone putting a burning paper bag of shit on your front porch, ringing the bell and hiding in the bushes to watch your reaction; except I'm doing it with words. Plus it was a scene in the movie that gave me the idea.

Quote:

---

For movie buffs, brace yourself, this is no walk in the park. It does NOT color by numbers, nor does it stay inside the lines. It is funny, it is irreverent, it starts and stops, but it is never boring.

---

Pretty straight forward; I'm talking to movie fans and telling them that this movie is NOT your typical film with a story line that follows a predictable pattern - it has a beginning, middle and end - but it's how it gets there
that is not normal. It takes flights of fancy, little side trips that gives the film it's flavor. It's pieces of a story, almost like poetry (but visual)
like a moving collage, that, put together, tells a story. A very clever way of
storytelling. But, if you're not a movie fan (which you are not), then this will not interest you in the least. Got it!

Moving on!

Quote:

---

It is timely and current. I could see why, by the end of the movie, why it was nominated for best picture.

---

The pacing and the rhythm, again, was not a straight-line storytelling but, by the end of the film, I understood it. Timely and current, because the topic of the film is corruption and manipulation within the government and how one man
managed to literally run the whole show from behind the scenes. You might not think so, but there are many who feel that the country is being run into the ground without regard for the way things are normally and lawfully handled.

Quote:

---

Christian Bale and Amy Adams have a chemistry that is unmistakable.
Both have been nominated for Best Actor in the Golden Globes, but this film belonged to Bale without question. He WAS Cheney. He was superb and carried this movie on his back. My feeling is he'll be going up against Cooper and Mortensen in the Oscars.

---

This is more movie stuff that wouldn't interest you. But it has nothing to do with Cheney, just how the actors portrayed their roles.

Quote:

---

The film followed his life from a country bumpkin drunkard to the White House. Only in America. But the film had a lot going for it, a lot more than your average political biopic. It had humor, satire, some biographic detail, narration and Shakespeare (you'll see). Like I said - never boring.

---

This part has to do with storytelling technique. Nothing more (again, boring -
for you - movie technique)

Quote:

---

Is it "liberal?" - you betcha.

---

Now here's the part where you probably got all upset. I'm having a bit of fun
by saying that the movie was "liberal" - and yes, I did aim it specifically
at you guys (you know who I mean), because anything "liberal" is considered
poison by you guys.

Quote:

---

No, wait a minute; it does briefly cover his run for off

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME