CNN Has Fewer Viewers Than The Food Network

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 19:52
VIEWED: 13369
PAGE 1 of 1

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 10:50 PM

And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 10:56 PM

Bunch of idiots without a real life watching either of them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 11:04 PM

Old white shut-ins watch Faux to reinforce their confirmation bias.

The rest of us have shit to do.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 11:36 PM

lol...

burning trash cans and wet dreams about punching "Nazis" while dressing up like Kick Ass.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Thursday, June 28, 2018 1:30 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.

I'm assuming it's this article here: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/cnn-gets-served-failing-network-lose
s-to-food-network-in-latest-ratings/

Quote:
According to the numbers compiled by Nielsen Media Research, CNN’s prime-time programming attracted an average viewership of 758,000 from June 18-24 for the 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. (Eastern) time period.

Among cable news networks, that number is good for third — which doesn’t sound too bad until you remember there are only three cable news networks.

And the difference between the three wasn’t even close. Fox News Channel was tops among all cable channels with an average of just over 2 million prime-time viewers for the week. MSNBC was in second with 1.49 million.

More like 1/3rd than 1/4.

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

How does this tell us "a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country"?

I'd argue that it only tells us that the average citizen doesn't give a shit. Which is something I've been saying here for well over a year.

I think the only information that can be inferred here other than the fact that an overwhelming majority of the people don't give a shit, is that of those that do, a majority would rather get their "news" from right wing shills than left wing shills.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, June 28, 2018 7:06 AM

CNN just barely edges out the number of transgender people in America in average prime time viewership.

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/marginalized-transgender-community

Quote:
In August 2015, the estimated number of transgender individuals in the United States was above 700,000, but almost 75 percent of them claimed to hide their gender or transition to avoid discrimination.

I hope that puts things into a little perspective for everyone here.

The guestimated percentage of transgendered people (assuming only 300 million people in the country) is around 0.23%.

The percentage of average people who watch CNN in prime time is around 0.25%

The percentage of average people who watch FOX news in prime time is around 0.66%

Hell... y'all should probably apply for minority status. I think you have a case.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JJ

Thursday, June 28, 2018 7:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Old white shut-ins watch Faux to reinforce their confirmation bias.

The rest of us have shit to do.

Fox viewers watch and get their news from Fox. CNN and MSNBC viewers not only watch both networks but also get their news from CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg news, Business Insider and so on and so on. All according to Trump and his minions are fake news. Get the point?

And REAVERFAN, I'm an old white guy. Many of us are now and always have been behind all the good changes that have occurred in this country over the years. Don't be one of those people who always categorize whits as all being the same.

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:02 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Do you have an Internet connection? It's been a tradition and general courtesy around here (what's left of that) to provide links for the source of such profound statements.

I'm assuming it's this article here: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/cnn-gets-served-failing-network-lose
s-to-food-network-in-latest-ratings/
Quote:
According to the numbers compiled by Nielsen Media Research, CNN’s prime-time programming attracted an average viewership of 758,000 from June 18-24 for the 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. (Eastern) time period.

Among cable news networks, that number is good for third — which doesn’t sound too bad until you remember there are only three cable news networks.

And the difference between the three wasn’t even close. Fox News Channel was tops among all cable channels with an average of just over 2 million prime-time viewers for the week. MSNBC was in second with 1.49 million.

More like 1/3rd than 1/4.
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
If your statement is factual (and I have no reason to believe it isn't) that just tells you a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country.

How does this tell us "a lot about the average "I just don't give a sh*t" citizen/non-voter in this country"?

I'd argue that it only tells us that the average citizen doesn't give a shit. Which is something I've been saying here for well over a year.

I think the only information that can be inferred here other than the fact that an overwhelming majority of the people don't give a shit, is that of those that do, a majority would rather get their "news" from right wing shills than left wing shills.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Thanks for posting the linky.
I had thought FNC still had about 3.7 million - but that may have been one show. And I thought CNN dropped below 1 million for the new week data. Good that you found the actual numbers, I hate generalizing with numbers.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 12:41 AM

I just realized something. With Prime Time viewership at 758,000 this means one out of every 433 Americans is stupid enough to be watching the CNN feed of Fake News.

So essentially, if you find yourself watching CNN, then you can rest assured that you are more stupid than the next 432 people you bump into, on average with a statistically balanced sampling.
And that you would need to find a random grouping of 867 Americans to be reasonably confident that you are smarter than at least one of those people.

Of course, most of those 758,000 are probably concentrated in New York.

JJ

Monday, July 2, 2018 1:11 AM

Fox viewers watch and get their news from Fox. CNN and MSNBC viewers not only watch both networks but also get their news from CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg news, Business Insider and so on and so on. All according to Trump and his minions are fake news. Get the point?

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 3:32 AM

Quote:

Fox viewers watch and get their news from Fox. CNN and MSNBC viewers not only watch both networks but also get their news from CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg news, Business Insider and so on and so on. All according to Trump and his minions are fake news. Get the point?

Color me not surprised that this is one of those most stupid out of every 433 people. Assuming this one is American.

This Troll might also imagine that each of the MSM feeders is presenting a different Fake News Story than the others.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 5:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I just realized something. With Prime Time viewership at 758,000 this means one out of every 433 Americans is stupid enough to be watching the CNN feed of Fake News.

So essentially, if you find yourself watching CNN, then you can rest assured that you are more stupid than the next 432 people you bump into, on average with a statistically balanced sampling.
And that you would need to find a random grouping of 867 Americans to be reasonably confident that you are smarter than at least one of those people.

Of course, most of those 758,000 are probably concentrated in New York.

That is a pretty funny post, and probably not too far from the truth.

Being an avid Fox News viewer yourself though...

People who live in glass echo chambers should be careful with the stones they throw.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 6:08 AM

I'm not sure how many years it's been since I've seen FNC.
I did watch it's first broadcast, 2 days before it was scheduled to launch.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 6:52 AM

No shit?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 7:57 AM

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

BENGHAZI! BIRTH CERTIFICATE! PIZZAGATE!

It's all fake news from... you guessed it... Russia.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 7:58 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 7:59 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....

Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:08 AM

Quote:
"Ideological news sources, like Fox and MSNBC, are really just talking to one audience," Political scientist and poll analyst Dan Cassino said in a press release. "This is solid evidence that if you're not in that audience, you're not going to get anything out of watching them."

See my echo chamber statement above.

Quote:
They found that someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer 1.04 domestic questions correctly compared to 1.22 for those who watched no news at all. Those watching only "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" answered 1.42 questions correctly and people who only listened to NPR or only watched Sunday morning political talk shows answered 1.51 questions correctly.

What did I say the other day, and many other times in the past about The Daily Show and The Onion being a better source of news than the MSM?

Yeah. I'm right again.

Thanks for the link.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:08 AM

Do you know what "context" means? It does have 2 syllables, so maybe not.

The first thing to realize is that every news medium has its own audience demographics. It's no secret to advertisers that the average Fox News viewer has less formal education and income than the average New York Times reader.

The Times is urban and urbane; Fox is small-town/suburban and populist. Fox competes directly against hundreds of other cable channels and has established a specialized niche in its media ecology. Fox trades in stories about the venality of big government, liberal overreach and little-guy heroes of the heartland. A large share of Fox stories deftly push emotional buttons (lest the viewer push the buttons on his or her remote…)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/07/21/a-rigorous-scientific-lo
ok-into-the-fox-news-effect/#332d56ee12ab

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:11 AM

Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

I don't need to. You already did it for me.

All of those quotes were from your first source.

I'm sure you missed them because they went past your ultra-left filters.

Maybe read your own source a few more times and I bet you'll finally see them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)

And yet, their viewers are still more informed than you.

Point missed, once again. Whoosh! lol

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:14 AM

And maybe you'd care to stop editing your post after somebody has replied. That's 3 times you've done it now.

Bad internet comment etiquette.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

REAVERFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Source 2. You've yet to provide any. Perhaps you just can't.

I don't need to. You already did it for me.

All of those quotes were from your first source.

I'm sure you missed them because they went past your ultra-left filters.

Maybe read your own source a few more times and I bet you'll finally see them.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Are you man enough to admit you lost again, or will you just puss out, as usual?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 8:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Cassino concluded that "the most popular of the national media sources—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—seem to be the least informative."

lol

Do Right, Be Right. :)
And yet, their viewers are still more informed than you.

Point missed, once again. Whoosh! lol

Bitch, I just owned you.

Just walk off the court, son....

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 2:34 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
No shit?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Which part?
Decent programming like FNC costs money for the viewer, it is always a premium Channel on Cable. Which is another reason I don't bother with pay TV. CNN has always been free, and now they can't give it away.
The relatives I visit have gobs of Channels, but if FNC is in their package, they won't ever watch it.

I probably found some FCN in hotels around winter of 15/16. But by the time my on-site work wrapped for the day, it would have been non-Prime Time.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 2:41 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....
Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NPR? Holy crap, how worthless that survey must be.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 7:10 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-
informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

This FACT has been repeatedly verified. Faux viewers believe lots of things that just aren't true.

Same thing could be said about CNN and MSNBC.

You'd all really be better off watching reruns of Mama's Family or something.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Do something unprecedented. Give us a source.

I gave you one, and there are plenty more.

How about your own source, idiot.

Very first sentence of your link....
Quote:
Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people's current events knowledge while NPR and Sunday morning political talk shows are the most informative sources of news, according to Fairleigh Dickinson University's newest PublicMind survey.

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
NPR? Holy crap, how worthless that survey must be.

I think the point of the article is, as I stated above, that you'd be just as equipped to answer the questions in that survey from watching reruns of Mama's family as you would any of the news outlets on either side.

It's a sad thing, really, that out of 5 questions about domestic and 5 questions about international things, even avid viewers of the news can't come close to answering 2 of them on average in either category.

RF posted that article because of the negative title it had about Fox News viewers without actually reading anything inside of it.

There's nothing to celebrate about your news of choice if you have a .008% improvement in your overall ability to answer questions that you would have answered if you didn't watch it at all. This is why RF had lost the argument from the beginning.

I actually love the title of that article, because it gets people to read things they don't want to know about themselves (or it least it gets them to link it for smarter people to decipher it and point those sad truths out to them).

Do Right, Be Right. :)

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 7:31 PM

This should all probably be taken with a grain of salt though.

If you read the very last paragraph, it states the following:

Quote:
It is a follow-up to a 2011 survey of 612 New Jerseyans that found, among other things, that those who watched Fox News were 18 points less likely to know that Egyptians overthrew their government than those who watch no news at all.

I don't think that anybody, pretty much anywhere, would be comfortable with how up until that point the term "people" is constantly thrown around as if to suggest these results reflect "all people in the U.S.", when you're talking about two surveys that were given to only "New Jerseyans" right in the middle of the height of popularity of the show "Jersey Shore".

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 2, 2018 11:49 PM

GIGO.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, July 2, 2018 11:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.

Pretty much sums up the RWED.

This place is one of my last guilty pleasures outside of cigarettes and coffee.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 5, 2018 6:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.

This was as applicable to that survey.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, July 5, 2018 6:39 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.
This was as applicable to that survey.

Yeah.

I re-appropriated it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, November 9, 2018 5:47 AM

I heard that CNN is the favorite Show of the North Korean Generals.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:43 AM

Have people forgotten that nobody watches CNN?
Yep, if you watch, you are a nobody.

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:48 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have people forgotten that nobody watches CNN?
Yep, if you watch, you are a nobody.

I still can't decide if you are Kiki's puppet or Sighole's. AU?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:54 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
GIGO.
This was as applicable to that survey.

Yeah.

I re-appropriated it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

In reference to those surveys: if you define "current events" as whatever npr yakked about, FOX viewers will be less informed about those supposed "current events" - duh.
Like when MSM reports that the most important issue today for politicians to discuss is the trans-gender Rights of Career Criminals in prison, and the Taxpayer's Responsibility to pay all expenses. Any reasonable person would not know that is a Current Event.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:43 AM

I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.

REAVERFAN

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
lol...

burning trash cans and wet dreams about punching "Nazis" while dressing up like Kick Ass.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

You dream of a neoNazi 4th reich and a homeland for white people.

I'll be there to knock your ass out when you try it.

REAVERFAN

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/

Now do you know why we don't care for it? It's fascist propaganda, which is pretty much all your sources, all day long.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 6:33 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I've seen folk here claim that, to find an opposing point of view, they look to another excrement output of the same MSM.

I wonder how many who are looking for an alternative to MSM check out CNSnews.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/

Now do you know why we don't care for it? It's fascist propaganda, which is pretty much all your sources, all day long.

Good site:

CNN - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

MSNBC - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

VOX - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vox/

Mother Jones - LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/

I do find it quite funny that while all of them are rated as "publishing misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes" and "some sources in this category may be untrustworthy", somehow Vox and Mother Jones get a "Factual Reporting" rating of "high" while CNN and MSNBC get "mixed".

lol

Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

Perhaps you should branch out and consume news from sources that aren't only telling you what you want to hear.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 12:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?

The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.

That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 2:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

You're welcome! You're like a lot of "people" that think because there are 2 parties they are the same just with different lies. Hardly.

1KIKI

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 2:10 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by GEEBERS:
You're like a lot of "people" that think because there are 2 parties they are the same just with different lies.

A liar AND a mind-reader as well! You're a man of many talents!

tic tac

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 2:42 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?
The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

butbutbutbut the Left clearly said that The Left was right!!
That must mean it is true! The Left would never ever lie, they said they don't.
In unrelated news, if The Left posted it on the interwebs, then we all know it must be true. Everything on the interwebs is always true. google it.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 2:42 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Maybe this site should tell you guys something?
The "left" press and in general, is more honest than the right - check. Thanks for that - we already knew.
That's the definition of a subjective statement. Thanks for the shining example.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

butbutbutbut the Left clearly said that The Left was right!!
That must mean it is true! The Left would never ever lie, they said they don't.
In unrelated news, if The Left posted it on the interwebs, then we all know it must be true. Everything on the interwebs is always true. google it.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, April 25, 2019 10:05 PM

Apparently last night CNN garnered more than 1,000,000 viewers briefly. 1,440,000.

And FNC only peaked over 2,918,000.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, April 26, 2019 3:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently last night CNN garnered more than 1,000,000 viewers briefly. 1,440,000.

And FNC only peaked over 2,918,000.

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/heres-how-cnns-prime-time-town-halls-s
tacked-up-against-the-competition-last-night/400457/

CNN had 690,000 average, with 180,000 ages 25-54.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/cnn-ratings-network-cable/2019/04/22
/id/912736/

Food Network has 523,000 ages 25-49.
https://www.thedailymeal.com/anybody-watching-food-network

WISHIMAY

Friday, April 26, 2019 10:34 AM

I don't know anyone under 65 that still WATCHES news on any channel.

Most people I know scroll through news feeds on their 'vices, so I'm not sure what this thread even matters?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, April 26, 2019 7:48 PM

The only news that Wishy gets is from article titles.

Maybe the first paragraph gets read if she's on her meds.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

WISHIMAY

Saturday, April 27, 2019 12:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The only news that Wishy gets is from article titles.

Maybe the first paragraph gets read if she's on her meds.

I honestly can't think of anything you could post that could be more hypocritical.
Especially since everyone here knows you don't read ANYTHING, title or otherwise...

SECOND

Saturday, April 27, 2019 2:12 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

Fact-checking Trump's claim 'I never told Don McGahn to fire Mueller'

Today, CNN revealed that Trump flat out lied. Then Trump attempted to cover up.

So, that's why JewelStaiteFan compares Fox to CNN: because Fox is saying the opposite of CNN and since Fox has more viewers, Fox can't lie, no more than Trump can lie. But that, too, is a lie.

www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/politics/fact-check-trump-claim-i-never-told-do
n-mcgahn-to-fire-mueller/index.html

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SECOND

Saturday, April 27, 2019 2:22 AM

CNN covers the 45 most outrageous lines from Donald Trump's rambling interview with Sean Hannity of Fox

www.cnn.com/2019/04/26/politics/donald-trump-sean-hannity-fox-news/ind
ex.html

1. "These are people that should be getting Pulitzers, not the ones that got the Pulitzers that got everything wrong."

Trump is referring to two reporters for Fox and another opinion columnist for the Hill newspaper who have reported on stories that he sees as favorable to him. Therefore they deserve Pulitzer prizes. Oh, and also the people who did win Pulitzers? They got everything wrong!

23. "This was a coup. This wasn't stealing information from an office in the Watergate apartments. This was an attempted coup."

I'd say this was deeply irresponsible for the President of the United States to repeatedly insist there was a coup against him with absolutely no actual evidence but, well, you already knew that.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Saturday, April 27, 2019 2:30 AM

I might have to start watching Fox News:

Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano: "When the president asked Corey Lewandowski ... to get Mueller fired, that's obstruction of justice. When the president asked his then-White House counsel to get Mueller fired & then lie about it, that's obstruction of justice."

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a27284937/judge-andrew-napolitan
o-donald-trump-obstruction-of-justice/

Fox News' Andrew Napolitano Says Trump Repeatedly Committed Obstruction of Justice

Fox News has steadily evolved into a quintessentially American form of State TV: it's a private enterprise that constantly backs the current regime not because it's a direct arm of the government, but because there's a fortune to be made doing it. That's the impetus behind a lot of partisan media: human beings naturally want their pre-existing views about the world reinforced, and are willing to pay for the service. But Fox has clearly gone to another place entirely, particularly in its primetime lineup, which now includes Sean Hannity, the president's Shadow Chief of Staff, whom he ranted to on-air for 45 minutes last night about a supposed "coup" against him.

Not everyone at Fox News HQ is succumbing to the sugar rush of chugging all that Kool-Aid, however. While Hannity might be nodding along as our Very Normal President admits he said the Obama administration wiretapped him because he had "a hunch" (also known as he made it up), Andrew Napolitano has taken a different line. The Judge is something of a Trump ally, but has gone after him before, including on the obviously corrupt and possibly illegal hiring of Matthew Whitaker to be the acting attorney general. Now Napolitano is out with an unequivocal condemnation of the Trumpian behavior detailed in The Mueller Report—and of William Barr, Whitaker's replacement in the attorney general role.

WISHIMAY

Saturday, April 27, 2019 3:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I might have to start watching Fox News:

Did you see them argue?

TRAPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

6IXSTRINGJACK

Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:19 AM

Man... Esquire's Jack Holmes is quickly becoming the 12 year old darling journalist of the Left these days, huh?

Now we know where all of the old CNN viewers are going for their news.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Saturday, April 27, 2019 7:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I might have to start watching Fox News:

Did you see them argue?

TRAPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

Heh - Sorry, should have used my jokey voice!

Seriously, if Napolitano's total crucifixion of Dump was a trap... we need more traps!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, April 27, 2019 10:38 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I might have to start watching Fox News:

Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano: "When the president asked Corey Lewandowski ... to get Mueller fired, that's obstruction of justice. When the president asked his then-White House counsel to get Mueller fired & then lie about it, that's obstruction of justice."

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a27284937/judge-andrew-napolitan
o-donald-trump-obstruction-of-justice/

Fox News' Andrew Napolitano Says Trump Repeatedly Committed Obstruction of Justice

Fox News has steadily evolved into a quintessentially American form of State TV: it's a private enterprise that constantly backs the current regime not because it's a direct arm of the government, but because there's a fortune to be made doing it. That's the impetus behind a lot of partisan media: human beings naturally want their pre-existing views about the world reinforced, and are willing to pay for the service. But Fox has clearly gone to another place entirely, particularly in its primetime lineup, which now includes Sean Hannity, the president's Shadow Chief of Staff, whom he ranted to on-air for 45 minutes last night about a supposed "coup" against him.

Not everyone at Fox News HQ is succumbing to the sugar rush of chugging all that Kool-Aid, however. While Hannity might be nodding along as our Very Normal President admits he said the Obama administration wiretapped him because he had "a hunch" (also known as he made it up),

When Obama is wiretapping Trump, as we all now know, and Trump says that Obama is wiretapping him, that means "he made it up"

Every once in a while, if anybody ever wonders if maybe pizmo/CC/G-string is sane, we are gifted these glaring reminders that he is very far off the Reservation.

WISHIMAY

Sunday, April 28, 2019 5:47 AM

If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

JAYNEZTOWN

Sunday, April 28, 2019 7:51 PM

LMAO screw CNN bunch of clowns if you ask me, and their dumb channels are everywhere, most hotels and airports on this Earth you can see this dumb station!

If we lost some of these news media channels I would not care, most of them just parrot the same crap.

The world is already connected so I have acess to enough so called 'news' and I am around media enough!

Mostly I don't watch news, or I try not to watch I have not really consumed it for maybe 10+ years, once in a while I do watch feeds online and flick through stations CNN, Fox, BBC, Russiatoday, some channel maybe in HongKong or Spain, Brazil or NHK Japan or Canada or NZ but its mostly curiosity and I can only really take a few mins before I'm disgusted and turn it all off. I follow certain online feeds, maybe something on liveleak or twitter or some online blog feed. News is everywhere trying to program you tell you what to think, at the bus stations, the stores, I will pass some canteen shop can get a free paper to read anytime. If I want to with one click I can see what a newspaper like the Guardian or LeMonde or Newyork Times or what someone in Thailand or S.Korea prints. I never really watched Fox, it seemed like a Globalist fake Conservative brand, the Rupert Murdoch family, not really American but America was open for business and its tv, radio and brands were sold out to foreign influencers. You can buy a political representative in America for something as cheap as 300 bucks $ $ that's why things get messed up when people who are supposed to represent you prostitute themselves out so cheaply.

In recent years CNN never struck me as an American tv news channel it just global tv channel, seemed like a globalist foreign controled brand, or infected with werid DeepState politics. You had Jewish Nepotism, a bunch of Jews or Zionists or Dual citizen Israelis getting other Leftwing Jews jobs on their Socialist buzz feed style news network, next the Britbongs all over CNN, some guy or girl from some posh British school saying how America needs to ban speech, give up its guns, finally are the weird communist types and are the war mongering Arabs, the Iranians and hags like Christiane Maria Heideh Amanpour CBE is a British-Iranian journalist, she goes on her weird rants calling terrorists 'activists' and almost gets sexually excited whenever she hears of a new war and some new place America is going to bomb.

The one positive I can say about Fox at least they did not cave into the jihad terroristic koranimals and at least Fox printed the Hebdo toons after the Europe bombings, islamic terror attack and Paris shootings. A small number of media outlets The Daily Beast, a German newspaper, Gawker website, a French magazine and The Washington Free Beacon printed the pictures but most media outlets, 90% of them caved and became a bunch of fucking cowards to these rodent jihadi scum, reminded me of reading the history of Salman Rushdie, Hirsi Ali and others who many leftwings wanted to throw under the bus, a mob of cowards and islamist apologists wanted to sacrifice them to islamic jihadis and appease the mass murdering jihad criminals. I see this as Western weakness, never before have a seen much of the Western world become so weird and degenerate and obsessed with globalism but also become so cowardly. I refuse to support any of these media cowards.

Ideal life for everyone is to live a life, maybe more time with your kids or to travel or to read or to enjoy the world? I would love to just work maybe 3-4 days a week and have most of the week to live the life, typically I don't always agree with French but that's one thing I respected about them, these people want to work to live a life not just live to wrok and pay bills. Why would I dislike CNN or Fox or class them all as the same. Why don't I trust media, I haven't watched them since the invasion of Iraq, maybe just maybe guys like 'Piratenews' Alex Jones and the David Ickes and other crazy had an influence on me, I liked the chaos of the old interne

WHOZIT

Sunday, April 28, 2019 8:49 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And still about a quarter of Fox News Channel viewership.

The Food Network has always been very popular, go to YOUTUBE and see how many hits many those cooking videos get. A lot of people love to cook and learn new dishes, the Food Network is under rated, it's more popular than most people think.

JONGSSTRAW

Monday, April 29, 2019 3:12 AM

I watch a lot of Animal Planet and National Geographic. Steve Irwin was the greatest educator and entertainer television has ever had, and his kids are doing a great job continuing his legacy. Crikey!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, April 29, 2019 3:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
I watch a lot of Animal Planet and National Geographic. Steve Irwin was the greatest educator and entertainer television has ever had, and his kids are doing a great job continuing his legacy. Crikey!

I wonder if those have better ratings than CNN. Or it's twin, PMSNBC.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, April 29, 2019 3:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
LMAO screw CNN bunch of clowns if you ask me, and their dumb channels are everywhere, most hotels and airports on this Earth you can see this dumb station!

If we lost some of these news media channels I would not care, most of them just parrot the same crap.

The world is already connected so I have acess to enough so called 'news' and I am around media enough!

Mostly I don't watch news, or I try not to watch I have not really consumed it for maybe 10+ years, once in a while I do watch feeds online and flick through stations CNN, Fox, BBC, Russiatoday, some channel maybe in HongKong or Spain, Brazil or NHK Japan or Canada or NZ but its mostly curiosity and I can only really take a few mins before I'm disgusted and turn it all off. I follow certain online feeds, maybe something on liveleak or twitter or some online blog feed. News is everywhere trying to program you tell you what to think, at the bus stations, the stores, I will pass some canteen shop can get a free paper to read anytime. If I want to with one click I can see what a newspaper like the Guardian or LeMonde or Newyork Times or what someone in Thailand or S.Korea prints.

In recent years CNN never struck me as an American tv news channel it just global tv channel, seemed like a globalist foreign controled brand, or infected with werid DeepState politics. You had Jewish Nepotism, a bunch of Jews or Zionists or Dual citizen Israelis getting other Leftwing Jews jobs on their Socialist buzz feed style news network, next the Britbongs all over CNN, some guy or girl from some posh British school saying how America needs to ban speech, give up its guns, finally are the weird communist types and are the war mongering Arabs, the Iranians and hags like Christiane Maria Heideh Amanpour CBE is a British-Iranian journalist, she goes on her weird rants calling terrorists 'activists' and almost gets sexually excited whenever she hears of a new war and some new place America is going to bomb.

The one positive I can say about Fox at least they did not cave into the jihad terroristic koranimals and at least Fox printed the Hebdo toons after the Europe bombings, islamic terror attack and Paris shootings. A small number of media outlets The Daily Beast, a German newspaper, Gawker website, a French magazine and The Washington Free Beacon printed the pictures but most media outlets, 90% of them caved and became a bunch of fucking cowards to these rodent jihadi scum, reminded me of reading the history of Salman Rushdie, Hirsi Ali and others who many leftwings wanted to throw under the bus, a mob of cowards and islamist apologists wanted to sacrifice them to islamic jihadis and appease the mass murdering jihad criminals. I see this as Western weakness, never before have a seen much of the Western world become so weird and degenerate and obsessed with globalism but also become so cowardly. I refuse to support any of these media cowards.

Ideal life for everyone is to live a life, maybe more time with your kids or to travel or to read or to enjoy the world? I would love to just work maybe 3-4 days a week and have most of the week to live the life, typically I don't always agree with French but that's one thing I respected about them, these people want to work to live a life not just live to wrok and pay bills. Why would I dislike CNN or Fox or class them all as the same. Why don't I trust media, I haven't watched them since the invasion of Iraq, maybe just maybe guys like 'Piratenews' Alex Jones and the David Ickes and other crazy had an influence on me, I liked the chaos of the old internet and the freedom and debate which came with radio and old tv, I don't know maybe the truth could be found on the old school bulletin boards, the debates in old college chat sites before the SJW movement came to shut it all down like a UN world police.

These days all of the hundreds and hundreds of old media companies in the United States of America, its a monopoly now and have com

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, April 29, 2019 6:34 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, April 29, 2019 7:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Combining "logic" and a quote from BungBetty?
You need help, or more meds.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Monday, April 29, 2019 6:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Combining "logic" and a quote from BungBetty?
You need help, or more meds.

Why do I need meds?

Look up circular logic. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

WISHIMAY

Tuesday, April 30, 2019 9:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Why do I need meds?

Look up circular logic. I don't think it means what you think it means.

I got yer "circular" right here

Booger Brainz

Which one of you is Moe and which is Curly?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, April 30, 2019 6:27 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Combining "logic" and a quote from BungBetty?
You need help, or more meds.

Why do I need meds?

Look up circular logic. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

I looked it up on the interwebs. Best result is from uncyclopedia.wikia
In reference to Circular Reasoning, it still means the same thing that I think it means.

You need meds altered if you think any form or version of Logic is related to anything about BungBetty.

Or else, if you think it means something different than the rest of us think, please explain.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, April 30, 2019 6:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Combining "logic" and a quote from BungBetty?
You need help, or more meds.

Why do I need meds?

Look up circular logic. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
I looked it up on the interwebs. Best result is from uncyclopedia.wikia
In reference to Circular Reasoning, it still means the same thing that I think it means.

You need meds altered if you think any form or version of Logic is related to anything about BungBetty.

Or else, if you think it means something different than the rest of us think, please explain.

Is this split personality of yours retarded or something JSF?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JAYNEZTOWN

Friday, May 3, 2019 8:17 PM

You can learn something from the Food Network, nutirtion facts, cooking skills, sadly politics has become very divided and largerly a waste of time, who knows what Canadian said when, or what dude in Africa, India or Europe went crazy about 10 years ago .... its a set up, more or less become a stage show with 'actors' they are reading a script, most heated debates will be forgotten as they push a new agenda in 2020 or 2024 or whenever. Although watching CNN and others fail kinda makes me happy.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, May 3, 2019 11:36 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
If they HAD wiretaps there wouldn't have been an investigation, they would have just shut everything down then and there. Trump can't shut up for 30 seconds about anything he has over on anyone. He's a fucking blowhard.

The reason there was an Investigation to begin with is because Papadopoulos was running HIS mouth.

I hope there is wiretaps and they got him talking about Ivanka, the old PERV.

Circular logic.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Combining "logic" and a quote from BungBetty?
You need help, or more meds.

Why do I need meds?

Look up circular logic. I don't think it means what you think it means.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
I looked it up on the interwebs. Best result is from uncyclopedia.wikia
In reference to Circular Reasoning, it still means the same thing that I think it means.

You need meds altered if you think any form or version of Logic is related to anything about BungBetty.

Or else, if you think it means something different than the rest of us think, please explain.

Is this split personality of yours retarded or something JSF?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

???

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, December 23, 2019 2:42 AM

I heard how dismal and devastating CNN viewerships has gotten lately, I think it was regarding the period around Thanksgiving.

But so far the only linky I find is here:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/373814/cable-news-network-viewersh
ip-usa/

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, December 24, 2019 4:26 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard how dismal and devastating CNN viewerships has gotten lately, I think it was regarding the period around Thanksgiving.

But so far the only linky I find is here:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/373814/cable-news-network-viewersh
ip-usa/

Here we go:

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/12/06/bottom-falls-out-cnn-ra
tings-hit-3-year-low/

Far-left CNN, an anti-Trump, pro-violence, racist, fake news outlet that traffics in conspiracy theories, collapsed to a three-year low in the ratings during the week of November 25.

A three-year low.

Three years.

While Congress is impeaching the president.

Want Breaking News from Breitbart Direct to Your Inbox? Takes Just 2 Seconds...

LOL.

And don’t you dare fall for the fake spin and blame Thanksgiving. Fox News increased its primetime audience by six percent when compared to this same week last year. MSNBC lost about 35 percent of its audience but didn’t hit no three-year low, pal.

CNN not only hit a three-year low, the Least Trusted Name in News fell to 18th place during primetime. Fox came in third. MSNBC came in fourth.

Did I mention CNNLOL came in 18th?

CNN’s ratings are so bad, some offshoot channel called Hallmark Movies and Mysteries beat it. Has anyone even heard of that channel? I haven’t–and TV is my life.

CNN’s demo audience, those 25-54 year-olds crucial to setting advertiser rates, fell to a five-year low.

Look at these numbers…

Primetime Viewers

Fox News: 2.2 million

MSNBC: 1.3 million

CNNLOL: 643,000

Total Day Viewers

Fox News: 1.33 million

MSNBC: 781,000

CNNLOL: 539,000

Good grief, the U.S. Congress is impeaching the president based on a hoax, and CNN is barely pulling in a half-million viewers, can’t attract even one-fourth of one percent of the American population.

This goes beyond low ratings. People are rejecting CNN.

One thing I don’t do off the clock is talk politics. You want to talk politics, let me punch in; that will be $25 an hour. I used to love to talk politics, but now that talking politics is my job, I’d rather talk about anything else. Actually, I don’t want to talk about anything. Silence. A book, a cup of Keurig, and silence, if you please.

But I tell ya, even without asking, people freakin’ hate CNN. What I mean is that they volunteer that information. Just bring it up. I hear it all the time, even from people who don’t know what I do for a living. Even strangers in waiting rooms. Hey, y’all mind if I change the channel? As long as it’s not CNN. And for a moment, we all forget we’re in a purgatory of plastic chairs, two-year-old magazines, and bad coffee as we form a bond built on pointing and laughing at CNN.

And it is not the fact that CNN is left wing.

MSNBC is left wing. No one’s arguing that MSNBC is lighting the world on fire, but MSNBC isn’t embarrassing itself.

CNN is just bad TV. Terrible TV. Unbearable to watch. Smug anchors. Endless repetition. Hate. CNN is tedious TV… Just like all propaganda.

These ratings are also another clear-cut sign that impeachment is a total dud.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/hatefest-fail-cnn-ratings-plunge-to-3-y
ear-low

HATEFEST FAIL: CNN Ratings Plunge To 3-Year Low
By Joseph Curl
DailyWire.com
Anderson Cooper and Wolf Blitzer appear on stage during Turner Upfront 2016 show at The Theater at Madison Square Garden on May 18, 2016 in New York City.
Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Turner
Facebook
Twitter
Mail

Covering then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump drove CNN’s ratings to all-time highs.

Hating on Trump day after day has driven the liberal network’s ratings to a three-year low.

“CNN fell to No. 18 in prime time this past week,” AdWeek reported. “The network aired a lot of specials, re-runs, and gave some of its prime time hosts multiple days off. Nevertheless, a drop is a drop and CNN had its lowest-rated week in 5 years among adults 25-54, and its lowest-rated week in total prime time viewers in almost 3 year

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, December 24, 2019 4:59 AM

Wow... Hallmark Movies beat it?

People would rather watch a Christmas Rom-Com where GWB's daughter, Sabrina The Teenage Witch kidnaps A.C. Slater at gunpoint and makes him pretend that he's her boyfriend at the family Christmas party at a cabin in the woods.

Not looking good, CNN.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:43 AM

So far this year, Fake News MSM hysteria panic has pushed Fox News Channel to record-breaking ratings for Cable shows.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, August 11, 2020 3:48 AM

Fox News now top-rated Network, of all networks, for the last 2 months - including primetime.

Of course, now with primetime clogged with BLMball and Lame Game Shows, it can't be too hard.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, December 10, 2020 12:03 AM

Ever since babysitter Rupert Murdoch abandoned FNC, his Libtard kids have been working hard to destroy it, getting rid of useful personalities, trying to duplicate the failures of cnn.

FNC viewers started catching on with Election Night Fake News from them.

Since then, Fox News has lost 32% viewership, including 23% loss of Prime Time viewership.

Fox News has also instituted banning of guests who have appeared on Newsmax, OANN, other honest news networks.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, December 15, 2020 5:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Ever since babysitter Rupert Murdoch abandoned FNC, his Libtard kids have been working hard to destroy it, getting rid of useful personalities, trying to duplicate the failures of cnn.

FNC viewers started catching on with Election Night Fake News from them.

Since then, Fox News has lost 32% viewership, including 23% loss of Prime Time viewership.

Fox News has also instituted banning of guests who have appeared on Newsmax, OANN, other honest news networks.

I didn't even realize FNC had hired Donna Brazille. They weren't even trying to be subtle about setting their ratings goal to the CNN level, were they?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, March 26, 2021 8:08 PM

If all the cable "news" networks keep taking in the ratings, boner pill manufacturers might as well start advertising on this site. They might get more ad views.

Good.

--------------------------------------------------

" 'You're like the Nazis' is the new 'I don't like you'. That disqualifies her from marching around planet Who-Gives-a-Shit in a helmet? ~Bill Maher

PSA: Don't click on any links in Second's posts. He's trying to fish your private information out of you.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, May 16, 2021 1:39 AM

The stupidest man in America is leaving CNN.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/don-lemon-announces-departure-cnn-033941191.
html

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, May 28, 2021 5:21 AM

Copied from another thread:

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Womp Womp.

Can we finally stop pretending that these people even matter anymore?

I watch YouTubers who regularly get a million views per day on their videos and they film them in their own houses.

Even the rerun of LevinTV bested all others in all categories.
That episode was the one revealing how Liar-In-Chief Fauci created and developed the Fauci Flu (covid-19).
I understand that that episode will be repeated again this weekend, on either Saturday or Sunday.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, June 1, 2021 6:09 AM

Sounds like Fox News Channel with Libtard Lachlan Murdoch at the helm is waking up.
After the Libtard driven programming led to their drop in ratings in Jan - even less than Libtard competitors, somebody has decided to return to news reporting.

Libtard Juan Williams has announced he is leaving, either FNC or one of it's shows.
Ultra-Libtard Donna Brazile has moved from FNC to ABC.
Darthtard Chris Stirewalt was fired.

Ratings and viewership are reportedly better than ever.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7:23 AM

Holy shit. Donna Brazile was on Fox?

They're just chasing dollars and experimenting dude.

They owe no allegiance to anyone but themselves and God Money, just like all the other Cable "News" Networks.

--------------------------------------------------

Give me liberty or just come shoot me in my house. I'm so over this ridiculous reality.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, June 18, 2021 12:45 PM

I understand NewsMax is the 4th Largest News Channel or Network.

Funny how rating reports never include anything past the top 3.....

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, April 14, 2022 6:29 PM

CNN has the most embarrassing launch of a streaming service ever.

I don't think anybody was interested in parenting tips from Anderson Cooper.

--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, April 14, 2022 9:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
CNN has the most embarrassing launch of a streaming service ever.

I don't think anybody was interested in parenting tips from Anderson Cooper.

yes, what about "parents" who want to brainwash their kid into being gay?

You must be just Racist.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, April 21, 2022 10:23 PM

CNN+ is to shut down after less than a month of existence.

Only spent $300 million dollars on that fiasco.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, May 31, 2022 5:36 AM

Greta Van Sustren has moved to NewsMax.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, May 31, 2022 6:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
CNN+ is to shut down after less than a month of existence.

Only spent $300 million dollars on that fiasco.

Nobody wanted to see Anderson Cooper tell you how to raise your kids.

This was actually a show that was going to happen.

--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, January 5, 2023 7:51 PM

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/cable-news-ratings-monday
-january-2-fox-news-nearly-triples-cnn-in-total-viewers/ar-AA15YKLv

Honestly, they should all probably just close up shop.

Half of the content creators I watch get more views in a day than CNN does. More than a few by quite a bit more. And they're just filming in a spare bedroom with a computer and a camera/mic setup that couldn't be more than $6k. There only real overhead is the bandwidth, and that's really only necessary if they do live streams too.

Some of these channels even give FOX a run for their money.

How are these talking heads and their yearly salaries reaching into the tens of Millions per year even justified at this point?

--------------------------------------------------

Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, January 31, 2023 2:05 AM

Hosts 'Growing Frustrated' As CNN Sees Worst Ratings Week in Nine Years

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2023/01/30/cnn-notches-wors
t-ratings-week-in-9-years-n2618905

Quote:
It's not news, necessarily, that CNN is not keeping up with the post-Trump administration times we live in — despite a change in course directed by new boss Chris Licht following a merger between CNN's parent company and Discovery. But when tanking ratings continue to sink to levels not seen in nearly a decade, there's bound to be some talk of whether the network is salvageable at all.

Enter a new dispatch from TheWrap noting CNN "notched its lowest ratings in nine years across all its day parts for the week of Jan. 16 through Jan. 22, 2023," per ratings data from Nielsen: "just 444,000 viewers in primetime, 93,000 in the all-important age 25-54 news demographic and 417,000 in viewers and 80,000 in the demo for total day."

As TheWrap noted, last week was "the first time since May 2014" that saw CNN stay below 450,000 viewers. And it's not like there was a industry-wide dip in viewers last week. It turns out Fox News Channel, the leader in cable news for almost too many consecutive weeks to track at this point, had 1.4 million total viewers and 176,000 in the 25-54 demographic during the same timeframe. Their primetime shows brought in two million viewers and 256,000 in the 25-54 range.

Get Fucked, CNN. Die already.

Then we'll start working on killing off MSNBC and FOX.

--------------------------------------------------

Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, March 23, 2023 9:24 PM

CNN has smallest weekly primetime audience in advertiser-coveted demo in over 30 years
CNN’s primetime lineup has failed to resonate with viewers

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-has-smallest-weekly-primetime-audien
ce-advertiser-coveted-demo-over-30-years

During the hours of 8-11 p.m. ET, CNN managed only 84,000 average viewers among the demo compared to 219,000 for Fox News. The last time CNN’s primetime audience was so tiny among the critical category was prior to the week of Sept. 30, 1991 – which is as far back as Fox News can track.

CNN’s primetime lineup has failed to resonate with viewers, and a gaping hole at 9 p.m. ET continues to cause problems as the network has still not named a permanent replacement since Chris Cuomo was fired in 2021. Recently, CNN has been airing a series of specials and town halls that have struggled to find an audience.

--------------------------------------------------

Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.

JAYNEZTOWN

Friday, March 24, 2023 6:51 AM

have they ever apologized for lies such as Hunter Biden, Russia, Muller or 'Pissgate'

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, May 16, 2023 8:22 PM

Cable News Ratings Friday May 12: CNN Prime Time Viewership Drops Below Newsmax

Quote:
CNN prime time dropped on Friday to 335,000 average total viewers from 8 to 11 p.m, coming below right-wing channel Newsmax, which scored 357,000 average prime time viewers.

The ratings-beleaguered network landed in fourth place in prime time, also behind Fox News and MSNBC, which averaged 1.44 million and 1.08 million total average viewers in prime time — respectively.

In the key 25-54 age demographic, CNN did a bit better with 87,ooo average viewers. Fox led with 109,000 and MSNBC was in second with 98,000 average demo viewers. Newsmax, meanwhile, averaged 45,000 prime time demo viewers.

After 8 p.m. on Friday night, no CNN show rated above 300,000 viewers and Newsmax beat the network from 8 to p.m. Who’s Talking to Chris Wallace at 10 p.m. marked its lowest-rated hour since it launched on the network and dropped 25 percent since its Friday debut.

--------------------------------------------------

Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Tuesday, June 6, 2023 7:52 PM

Embattled CNN chief apologizes to staff after embarrassing profile, vows to ‘fight like hell’ to win back trust

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/05/media/cnn-chris-licht-reliable-sources/
index.html

Just hang it up. You're done, dude. They smell blood in the water that isn't their own and they need a sacrificial lamb.

At this point, I think it hardly matters. Zaslav should just cut the ballast from Warner Bros. and sell the CNN brand to any BuzzFeed that will pay for it. The CNN brand is almost worthless in 2023.

--------------------------------------------------

Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.