Congressman Matt Gaetz Issues Statement Demanding Intelligence Committee Release Classified Memo on DOJ and FBI to Public After Viewing Documen
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 22:55
VIEWED: 34760
PAGE 4 of 4
The escort claiming to have tapes proving Russian interference in the US election, explained
Vashukevich’s claims have been getting a surprising amount of attention from mainstream media sources — and for some understandable reasons.
For one, that wasn’t just any oligarch she traveled with. It was Russian aluminum magnate and former Paul Manafort employer Oleg Deripaska. That’s the oligarch whom Manafort wanted to privately brief and with whom he seems to have surreptitiously communicated, through an intermediary, while he chaired Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
For another, it wasn’t just any top Russian government official who accompanied them on Deripaska’s yacht — it was Sergei Prikhodko, Russia’s deputy prime minister, a longtime Putin ally who has a foreign policy portfolio and is a very high-ranking official indeed.
Finally, the idea that Vashukevich might have secretly taped their conversations isn’t just hypothetical. At least once, she clearly did it, recording the two men as Deripaska discussed US-Russia relations. She later posted the video on her public Instagram account, where it sat for many months, essentially unnoticed, until anti-corruption political activist and Putin critic Alexei Navalny discovered it and explained its import in a YouTube video, accusing the deputy prime minister of accepting bribes from the oligarch.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/6/17083720/trump-russia
-news-nastya-rybka
We'll see won't we?
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes, we will see.
The informant, BTW, is willing to trade the information for a "get out of jail free" card because she's stuck in a Thai jail for sex trafficking. Supposedly, the CIA is interviewing her now to see if she has anything of interest to reveal.
What I want to know is ... why is nobody interviewing Julian Assange?
Also - Deripaska is no ally of Putin, and Pikhodko has no position in the Putin government. Prikhodko's position as Deputy PM (under Medvedev) ended in 2013. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deputy_Prime_Minister_of_Russia
You got your facts wrong, again.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It gets interesting about 5 minutes in. Then again about the U.S. elections around the 18 minute mark. Sorry, sig and kiki won't need to read the subtitles but the rest of us will.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Was this the same yacht party that McCain attended?
The subtitles don't show up in English, so I can't figure out what's being said and I doubt anyone else can either.
Quote:
Oligarch Tied to Manafort Has Past Links to Senior US Politicians
Some of Deripaska’s past has apparently come back to haunt him. He was reportedly barred for years from entering the United States because of alleged ties with organized crime, and while that ban was lifted in 2005, it was reimposed in 2006.
Deripaska enlisted help to try to overcome these hurdles. For example, he reportedly paid $560,000 in the early 2000s to Alston & Bird, the law firm of Bob Dole, the former U.S. Senate majority leader and 1996 Republican presidential nominee, which was able to get Deripaska’s U.S. visa reinstated, at least for a time.
In addition, the Washington Post reported in January 2008 that Rick Davis, who was then the manager of Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign, helped arrange a drinks-and-dinner meeting in January 2006 between Deripaska and a small group of U.S. senators, including McCain, near Davos, Switzerland, where the World Economic Forum was taking place.
According to the newspaper, seven months later, in August 2006, Davis, McCain and Deripaska attended a dinner in Montenegro, whose governing party had a contract with the lobbying firm that Davis ran together with Paul Manafort.
“Afterward, a group from the dinner took boats out to a nearby yacht moored in the Adriatic Sea, where champagne and pastries were served, partly in honor of McCain's 70th birthday,” the Washington Post reported.
https://www.voanews.com/a/oligarch-oleg-deripaska-tied-to-paul-manafor
t-has-past-links-to-senior-us-politicians/3777379.html
Hey BTW- just keep adding to your list of offenses, THUGR! That will go GREAT before a judge!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Was this the same yacht party that McCain attended?
The subtitles don't show up in English, so I can't figure out what's being said and I doubt anyone else can either.Quote:
Oligarch Tied to Manafort Has Past Links to Senior US Politicians
First, the subtitles are in English as everyone who watches it will see. You must be panicked to even suggest something like that which is so easily proven false. Perhaps your preferred language when watching Russian videos is Russian? That may be why you don't have English subtitles.
When they are speaking English at the 18 minutes mark the subtitles change to Russian. Get my point comrade?
Second, the video is over 25 minutes long. You responded to it in 5 minutes. Check the time stamps on the posts. Guess you never watched it.
tick tock comrade...
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:First, I have to open the video in Youtube in a separate tab and then click on "cc" to get the subtitles in English. I don't know about anybody else, but my computer doesn't play the English subtitles automatically from your link. It would be interesting if others weigh in with their experience, altho I doubt that anybody like JOIDIOT or GSTRING or TWITCHY would be honest enuf to agree with me, even if they had the same experience.
Was this the same yacht party that McCain attended?
The subtitles don't show up in English, so I can't figure out what's being said and I doubt anyone else can either. - SIGNY
First, the subtitles are in English as everyone who watches it will see. - THUGR
Quote:And there you go again, presuming lies and motivations which don't exist. Like I said, others will be able to click on the same link. If they get the same result that I do, then they'll know who the idiot is.
You must be panicked to even suggest something like that which is so easily proven false. Perhaps your preferred language when watching Russian videos is Russian? That may be why you don't have English subtitles.
Quote:Since it was all in Russian early on, I didn't even get that far, so what is YOUR point, libeler/toll?
When they are speaking English at the 18 minutes mark the subtitles change to Russian. Get my point comrade?
Quote:Yes, BECAUSE IT WAS IN RUSSIAN. WHY WOULD I WATCH A VIDEO IN RUSSIAN??
Second, the video is over 25 minutes long. You responded to it in 5 minutes. Check the time stamps on the posts. Guess you never watched it.
Sheesh!!!
Quote:Tick tock indeed, libeler/troll.
tick tock comrade...
BTW, I knew about the McCain-Manafort-Deripaska contacts because of a video from some end-times Xtian who was convinced that someone in the the Rothschild family will be the anti-Christ. Despite the fact that this guy had an idee fixe (kind of like you do), unlike THUGR he was EXTREMELY detailed. And somewhere in that long, excruciating history of the Rothschilds, he hit upon the links between the Rothschilds, Deripaska, McCain, and Manafort. If I can find that video again, I'll post it; there was a lot of interesting details about that part of politics.
In the meantime, I've wasted enough time with idiots.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Hers seem to always involve an exchange of money, his I don't recall any claims of money exchanged. Weird, if we consider the Primary objective attributed to Trump is money.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hillary's campaign people had "conversations" with Russians too. And THOSE Russians actually provided "dirt" on Trump, which was used to not only obtain a fraudulent FISA warrant but also to besmirch the President with false allegations. Is anyone investigating HER? I know I got to this point with GSTRING before, in some thread, and he asked me if I saw the difference between the Trump campaign and the Hillary campaign, and I said "no" except that her campaign's "contacts" with Russians were more important because they resulted in an actual exchange of information.
I don't know where that conversation is, but maybe GSTRING can explain what the essential difference is between one and the other.
Also, for reference at top of the page:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:A Russian Companion in a Thai prison...that's a joke writing itself.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:A self-described Russian 'seductress' is claiming she has dirt on Trump
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Apparently, just like GSTRING, you claim not only to know the content of (private) conversations, you ALSO claim to know someone's motivations???
-No, he lied because he should not have been doing what he was doing. And he knew it. He knew he was not supposed to work with the Russians to get trump elected. So he lied about meeting with them. -THGUR
Yeah, right.
[/snicker]
This reminds me that you CLAIM to know that I'm a "Russian troll", and you are so absolutleyfucking100%wrong about THAT that it throws all of your other claims into doubt. Seriously, dude, you need a mental tuneup. And I look forward to the day when I can take you to court, and then post about it here.
A Russian escort is asking the US government to grant her asylum in exchange for audio recordings that she says reveal new information about Russian meddling in the US election.
The escort says she recorded more than 16 hours of conversations between a Russian oligarch, a top Russian government official, and others about US-Russian relations and the election.
"If America gives me protection, I will tell everything I know," she said on Monday.
"I'm ready to give you all the missing puzzle pieces, support them with videos and audios, regarding the connections of our respected lawmakers with Trump, Manafort and the rest. I know a lot. I'm waiting for your offers and I'm waiting for you in a Thai prison," Vashukevich said in a video she posted on Instagram on her way to the Pattaya jail.
http://www.businessinsider.com/anastasia-vashukevich-russian-escort-ja
iled-in-thailand-claims-dirt-on-trump-2018-3
T
She might say anything to get out of that hole.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Well, first of all, this is where YOU BELIEVE something. You have turned an opinion into a belief. So I'll take your BELIEF about as seriously a I take the BELIEF in god, or the BELIEF in a flat earth, which is ... not at all.
Secondly ... No, I'll stop at the first point. A BELIEVER is someone who maintains an idea without evidence, or even in the face of countervailing evidence. Until you get past "believing", there's just no reasoning with you because you're immune to facts and logic.
Actually, Mueller has turned facts and logic into action. Not surprised you're not seeing that - it's a higher form of intelligence that you are clearly unfamiliar with. Do you suppose all of those indictments are based on opinions or facts? Not sure why someone as "smart" as you can't see the obvious.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW- you asked me, snidely, how I knew about such as arcane term as idee fixe. That's because I'm smarter than you, better educated than you, and because I don't get all my info from Twitter and FB.
Smarter? Naw, you are definitely waaaay more pretentious and even more wayer conceited - I can't hold a candle to you in those departments.
Sorry, we've covered this before, granny - I don't get all my info from T or FB. Wrong again.
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me? Just something you "believe?"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The nature of YOUR "belief", GSTRING is
Well, first of all, this is where YOU BELIEVE something. You have turned an opinion into a belief. So I'll take your BELIEF about as seriously a I take the BELIEF in god, or the BELIEF in a flat earth, which is ... not at all.
Secondly ... No, I'll stop at the first point. A BELIEVER is someone who maintains an idea without evidence, or even in the face of countervailing evidence. Until you get past "believing", there's just no reasoning with you because you're immune to facts and logic. - SIGNY
Actually, Mueller has turned facts and logic into action. Not surprised you're not seeing that - it's a higher form of intelligence that you are clearly unfamiliar with. Do you suppose all of those indictments are based on opinions or facts? Not sure why someone as "smart" as you can't see the obvious.- GSTRING
Quote:That is what we have not seen evidence of, so far. You have stated more than once that since Trump is a liar and he said he didn't collude with Russia, ipso facto (another phrase you'll have to look up) he must have colluded with Russia. Now, if that isn't a belief, I don't know what is, because there sure isn't any evidence that YOU know about in that direction!
that Trump's campaign was a willing, active partner in this crime/act of Treason (I believe).
Quote:Because you didn't know what an "idee fixe" was, and thought it was some sort of arcane phrase.
BTW- you asked me, snidely, how I knew about such as arcane term as idee fixe. That's because I'm smarter than you, better educated than you, and because I don't get all my info from Twitter and FB. - SIGNY
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me?- GSTRING
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
When you're the last one on the list it's because you are the target, the defendant.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:HAHAHA!
Originally posted by THGRRI:
When you're the last one on the list it's because you are the target, the defendant. - THUGR
Yeah, whatever.
It's a fucking national hysteria.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Because you didn't know what an "idee fixe" was, and thought it was some sort of arcane phrase.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me?- GSTRING
Eh? That is your standard for what you think makes you "better educated" is one phrase? That's pretty stupid don't you think? Maybe you should look up "educated?"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, when a retard wonders why everybody thinks he is a moron, or a more wayer idiot...
Originally posted by captaincrunch:Quote:Smarter? Naw, you are definitely waaaay more pretentious and even more wayer conceited -
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
BTW- you asked me, snidely, how I knew about such as arcane term as idee fixe. That's because I'm smarter than you, better educated than you, and because I don't get all my info from Twitter and FB.
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me?
That is just hilarious.
Everybody who bothers to trudge through the drivel you post knows how dumb and uneducated you are. One hallmark of the poorly educated is they think they are well educated. Only those who know there is more to learn are truly educated.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Maybe if she had splained that she was more wayer educated, you could have comprehended, having suitably targeted your level of vast education.
Originally posted by captaincrunch:Quote:Eh? That is your standard for what you think makes you "better educated" is one phrase? That's pretty stupid don't you think? Maybe you should look up "educated?"
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Because you didn't know what an "idee fixe" was, and thought it was some sort of arcane phrase.
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me?- GSTRING
Or have you confused indoctrination and institutionalization as education?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Further clear evidence, she has learned how to communicate effectively, including functional use of syntax and composition - which, yet again (you've been here for how long and still are incapable of comprehending how to communicate via posts on Bulletin Boards or Forums?), the following uncorrected quote demonstrated:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:Quote:Because you didn't know what an "idee fixe" was, and thought it was some sort of arcane phrase.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
How could you possibly know you are "better educated" than me?- GSTRING
Eh? That is your standard for what you think makes you "better educated" is one phrase? That's pretty stupid don't you think? Maybe you should look up "educated?"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
When you're the last one on the list it's because you are the target, the defendant.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I can't believe the crap nbc is airing. This jerk thinks Roger Stone is guilty because he thinks Assange is a hero?? Hell, not only is Assange a hero, so is Snowden. And that's because Assange and Snowden did what our current crop of sycophantic msm whores SHOULD be doing, but are too corrupt to do ... lifting the rock to see what's scurrying underneath, holding our government officials' feet to the fire, ripping off the mask of secrecy.
jeez, what a stomach-turning performance. It's prolly good to check in with the msm once in a while to see what shit they're spewing, but I had no idea they've sunk so low.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
And that's because Assange and Snowden did what our current crop of sycophantic msm whores SHOULD be doing, but are too corrupt to do ... lifting the rock to see what's scurrying underneath, holding our government officials' feet to the fire, ripping off the mask of secrecy.
Yes! Let's uncover our president and his collusion with a foreign adversary! There are so many threads to pull with that lying PoS it's hard to know which one to pull.
Yanno, hon, you sure do step in it a awful lot for someone who claims to be "smart."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:HAHAHA!
Originally posted by THGRRI:
When you're the last one on the list it's because you are the target, the defendant. - THUGR
Yeah, whatever.
It's a fucking national hysteria.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
There's no national hysteria. Most people don't really give a shit either way.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The poll found that 55 percent of Americans think Trump has attempted to interfere with the investigation, while 38 percent think he has not interfered.
Fifty-eight percent also said Trump is not taking the Russia investigation seriously enough even though 61 percent believe Russian efforts to influence the election are a serious matter that need to be investigated.
http://www.rttnews.com/2867114/majority-disapprove-of-trump-s-handling
-of-russia-investigation.aspx
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:THAT'S YOU AND YOUR BELIEF, AGAIN. YOU ASSUME THAT IT HAS OCCURRED. Since this is part of your belief structure, not based on any evidence that YOU know of, there's no point in even discussing this with you.
And that's because Assange and Snowden did what our current crop of sycophantic msm whores SHOULD be doing, but are too corrupt to do ... lifting the rock to see what's scurrying underneath, holding our government officials' feet to the fire, ripping off the mask of secrecy. - SIGNY
Yes! Let's uncover our president and his collusion with a foreign adversary!- GSTRING
Quote:MORE "BELIEF". You ASSUME that an investigation is warranted because of your BELIEFS.
There are so many threads to pull with that lying PoS it's hard to know which one to pull.- GSTRING
First of all... I never said "Don't investigate Trump". HOWEVER, I think we should be a lot more even-handed in our investigations, don't you???
So, how about Hillary? Maybe the FBI should do a REAL investigation on her, instead of deliberately botching the original investigation,
Allowing the destruction of evidence (like, with a hammer),
Tossing out immunity like confetti to people who weren't even being investigated (making it impossible to charge them with anything and leverage their cooperation),
Not requiring Hillary to testify UNDER OATH
Not investigating Hillary with obstruction of justice, even after she Bleachbitted emails AFTER being supoenaed (Man, if I did that at work I'd be in deep, deep dog doo-doo)
Having Loretta Lynch yack will Bill Clinton on the tarmac for 20 minutes ...
I mean, REALLY??? If there's is a way to fuck up an investigation and destroy/ taint the evidence so throughly that it can't be revived, the FBI took EVERY possible opportunity.
And then Brennan, that big fat liar. Maybe HE should be investigated! And, how about Comey? Obama? Lynch? Holder? I'll bet there's some nice big skeletons .... illegal searches, foreign influence, rank partisanship ... in THEIR closets. By all means! Let's start turning over ALL the rocks, instead of doing an endless safari up a single person;s anus.
Yanno, hon, you sure do an awful lot of lying, for someone who claims to be for the truth You're CONSTANTLY lying about what I said. You just did it here, and you did it again there http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=62254
It's one thing to be stupid, it's another to be dishonest. If you can't be smart, at least be honest.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:THAT'S YOU AND YOUR BELIEF, AGAIN. YOU ASSUME THAT IT HAS OCCURRED. Since this is part of your belief structure, not based on any evidence that YOU know of, there's no point in even discussing this with you.
And that's because Assange and Snowden did what our current crop of sycophantic msm whores SHOULD be doing, but are too corrupt to do ... lifting the rock to see what's scurrying underneath, holding our government officials' feet to the fire, ripping off the mask of secrecy. - SIGNY
Yes! Let's uncover our president and his collusion with a foreign adversary!- GSTRINGQuote:MORE "BELIEF". You ASSUME that an investigation is warranted because of your BELIEFS.
There are so many threads to pull with that lying PoS it's hard to know which one to pull.- GSTRING
First of all... I never said "Don't investigate Trump". HOWEVER, I think we should be a lot more even-handed in our investigations, don't you???
So, how about Hillary? Maybe the FBI should do a REAL investigation on her, instead of deliberately botching the original investigation,
Allowing the destruction of evidence (like, with a hammer),
Tossing out immunity like confetti to people who weren't even being investigated (making it impossible to charge them with anything and leverage their cooperation),
Not requiring Hillary to testify UNDER OATH
Not investigating Hillary with obstruction of justice, even after she Bleachbitted emails AFTER being supoenaed (Man, if I did that at work I'd be in deep, deep dog doo-doo)
Having Loretta Lynch yack will Bill Clinton on the tarmac for 20 minutes ...
I mean, REALLY??? If there's is a way to fuck up an investigation and destroy/ taint the evidence so throughly that it can't be revived, the FBI took EVERY possible opportunity.
And then Brennan, that big fat liar. Maybe HE should be investigated! And, how about Comey? Obama? Lynch? Holder? I'll bet there's some nice big skeletons .... illegal searches, foreign influence, rank partisanship ... in THEIR closets. By all means! Let's start turning over ALL the rocks, instead of doing an endless safari up a single person;s anus.
Yanno, hon, you sure do an awful lot of lying, for someone who claims to be for the truth You're CONSTANTLY lying about what I said. You just did it here, and you did it again there http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=62254
It's one thing to be stupid, it's another to be dishonest. If you can't be smart, at least be honest.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
So glad you bought that up - where was I dishonest? You and Kiki have this amazing ability to accuse someone of lying by lying. Kiki said I lie about everything, so I asked her to show me just one. And you know what she did? She disappeared. Are you going to disappear or change the subject?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, JUST TODAY you insinuated that I was against investigating the Trump campaign. Now, I doubt that you can find anywhere where I said it shouldn't be done. I think it's politically motivated, and I'm completely against an investigation that starts out with one topic and then veers all over the map until they find SOMEthing ... but an HONEST investigation ... i.e. one that doesn't start out with the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT (LIKE YOU DO) ... will uncover the truth.
So glad you bought that up - where was I dishonest?- GSTRING
ALSO, I think ALL of our public servants should get the same anus-scrubbing treatment. Hillary, Brennan, Comey, Lynch, Obama, and a raft of FBI, DOJ, CIA, and NSA employees could probably use some light being shown up their behinds.
Hillary, in particular, was treated to such a bungled investigation - which not only destroyed physical evidence but put witnesses out of reach - that it's hard to believe that it wasn't done specifically to keep her out of jail and in contention for the Presidency. So are we a nation of laws, or not?
And JUST TODAY, in this thread, you said I was "against democracy". http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62254 REALLY???
I could go back to almost any of your posts where you claim I said something, or think something, or have a particular motivation, or stand for something, or AM something, and they are virtually without exception sheer, unmitigated lies.
So yeah- fuck off, liar.
And now, back to our regularly scheduled topic ....
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Sessions: "I Have Appointed A Person Outside Of Washington" To Investigate FISA Abuse
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-08/sessions-i-have-appointed-pe
rson-outside-washington-investigate-fisa-abuse
But not a Special Counsel. At least, not yet.
*****
There is one other investigation going on, which has received far less attention than Mueller and even fewer leaks, and that is the AG's investigation into the texts between Strzok and Page, and any other indications that there may have been political bias in the FBI's and DOJ's handling of either the Trump investigation or the Hillary investigation.
It will be interesting to see what comes of it. A lot of people have already been reassigned, or quit, or retired, over these texts.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Once again we see sig trying to spin the truth. Everything she has been posting regarding Trump agrees with Trumps own outlook on the investigation. That it is bogus.
I.E. witch hunt, no collusion, no proof of any wrong doing whatsoever she says in post after post. With this position taken by her one would wonder why she would agree we need an investigation into Trump.
I'll tell you why. She posts the investigation is a sham 99% of the time. Ocassionaly she'll post she is for it, except, because it's been a years worth of no wrong doing found, it should end.
What sig cares about most is Americas' concept of Russia and what we will do. Trump is a secondary concern to her. She supports him because of the damage he is doing to this country both internally and globally.
Which of course supports Putins agenda.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Sessions: "I Have Appointed A Person Outside Of Washington" To Investigate FISA Abuse
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-08/sessions-i-have-appointed-pe
rson-outside-washington-investigate-fisa-abuse
But not a Special Counsel. At least, not yet.
*****
There is one other investigation going on, which has received far less attention than Mueller and even fewer leaks, and that is the AG's investigation into the texts between Strzok and Page, and any other indications that there may have been political bias in the FBI's and DOJ's handling of either the Trump investigation or the Hillary investigation.
It will be interesting to see what comes of it. A lot of people have already been reassigned, or quit, or retired, over these texts.
Give it up. You and yours have been beating this topic with a stick and it goes nowhere. If Sessions is doing this it is to appease Trump and a few traitorous republicans. It's only a ploy to change the subject. Nope, Trump, Russia Russia Russia.
Besides, you're quoting zerohedge again. A bullshit source. You just can't help yourself can you?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale
An informant whom House Republicans have said could reveal a link between a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium supplies and donations to the Clinton Foundation provided no evidence of that during a four-hour interview with congressional staff last month, Democrats said on Thursday.
The informant, lobbyist William D. Campbell, "provided no evidence of a quid pro quo involving Secretary (Hillary) Clinton or the Clinton Foundation and no evidence that Secretary Clinton was involved in, or improperly influenced" the uranium sale, the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.
Mr. Campbell identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence," the summary says.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/informant-had-no-evidence-clin
ton-benefited-from-uranium-sale-democrats/ar-BBK1BdK?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp
Again sig, again rappy kiki jsf jack nothing. All your hooting and hollering on this and your hero's can't find shit. Nothing connecting Clinton to any wrong doing. Again they come across as liars making false claims against Hillary and the Clinton foundation for political reasons.
So again you all find yourselves as having been led around by the nose by self serving trolls in government. Do you feel any embarrassment at all? A little shame maybe?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Well, JUST TODAY you insinuated that I was against investigating the Trump campaign. Now, I doubt that you can find anywhere where I said it shouldn't be done. I think it's politically motivated, and I'm completely against an investigation that starts out with one topic and then veers all over the map until they find SOMEthing ... but an HONEST investigation ... i.e. one that doesn't start out with the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT (LIKE YOU DO) ... will uncover the truth.
So glad you bought that up - where was I dishonest?- GSTRING
Wait, what? You really want us to believe you are in favor of Mueller's investigation of Trump? I thought you were telling the truth with all that "they should investigate Hillary!" and "It's the Deep State!" Both of those can't be true, so... connect the dots.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
And JUST TODAY, in this thread, you said I was "against democracy". http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62254 REALLY???
Like clock work, another lie! I think the problem might be that you don't know what the definition of "lie" is?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And once again G sig posts a link that goes to the first post in a thread. A post that has nothing to do with what she claims. It's typical for her.
Again she bears false witness against you. Again we bear witness, to her being such a troll she doesn't even care enough to properly cover her tracks.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You must be simple. Right? Is THAT the problem? Who says that only one investigation can be conducted at a time? Dude, what's you're problem?
So glad you bought that up - where was I dishonest?- GSTRING
Well, JUST TODAY you insinuated that I was against investigating the Trump campaign. Now, I doubt that you can find anywhere where I said it shouldn't be done. I think it's politically motivated, and I'm completely against an investigation that starts out with one topic and then veers all over the map until they find SOMEthing ... but an HONEST investigation ... i.e. one that doesn't start out with the PRESUMPTION OF GUILT (LIKE YOU DO) ... will uncover the truth.- SIGNY
Wait, what? You really want us to believe you are in favor of Mueller's investigation of Trump? I thought you were telling the truth with all that "they should investigate Hillary!" and "It's the Deep State!" Both of those can't be true, so... connect the dots.- GSTTRING
Quote:WOW, GSTRING, you just couldn't acknowledge your own post? Yes, I did slightly misquote you, you said I had "a problem with democracy". Instead, you try to give the impression that you said no such thing.
And JUST TODAY, in this thread, you said I was "against democracy". http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=62254 REALLY??? SIGNY
Like clock work, another lie! I think the problem might be that you don't know what the definition of "lie" is?- GSTRING
I could point to just about any of your posts, where YOU post that I said something, or think something, or stand for something, or AM something, and it will be a complete unmitigated lie. And you just did it again.
******
And just like clockwork, THUGR comes in to make a complete ass of himself.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Who says that only one investigation can be conducted at a time? Dude, what's you're problem?
My problem is you lie or just avoid answering a simple question directly.
"You really want us to believe you are in favor of Mueller's investigation of Trump?" How hard is that to answer?
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yes, I did slightly misquote you, you said I had "a problem with democracy". Instead, you try to give the impression that you said no such thing.
Ha! Is that what they calling lying in Cali? "Misquote?"
You completely changed the meaning when you lied, er, misquoted me. Language is important.
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Instead, you try to give the impression that you said no such thing.
That's because I said no such thing.
Lessee, 1 + 2 = yep - you got everything wrong again.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SIG 
G, 1+2=yep
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Well, here's a good post that I either missed among the BS, or it was edited after I glanced.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Sessions: "I Have Appointed A Person Outside Of Washington" To Investigate FISA Abuse
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-08/sessions-i-have-appointed-pe
rson-outside-washington-investigate-fisa-abuse
But not a Special Counsel. At least, not yet.
*****
There is one other investigation going on, which has received far less attention than Mueller and even fewer leaks, and that is the AG's investigation into the texts between Strzok and Page, and any other indications that there may have been political bias in the FBI's and DOJ's handling of either the Trump investigation or the Hillary investigation.
It will be interesting to see what comes of it. A lot of people have already been reassigned, or quit, or retired, over these texts.
Hadn't heard this news on MSM.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
House Intelligence Committee releases report showing there was No Collusion or Cooperation with Russia.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/house-committee-relea
ses-verdict-russia-probe-no-collusion
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=873
[img] https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_russia_investigatio
n_one_page_summary.pdf[/img]
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
At one point, Republicans even discussed putting up a physical wall in one of the committee's secured rooms to divide Democratic and Republican staff members. The plan was abandoned, according to sources with knowledge of the idea, a decision that had more to do with logistical concerns than any cooling of partisan animosity.
I remember that episode of Full House. The one where DJ and Stephanie put a line of tape up in the middle of their room that neither could cross.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Other relevant linkies:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Still nobody cares about this ballyhooed revelation?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Perhaps this is a huge nothing burger, based on the lack of interest following it's release.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
MSM News said today the Shifty Schiff Spindoctor Memo was released.
Anybody seen a copy?
OK, this seems to be the memo:
https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/redacted_minori
ty_memo_2.24.18.pdf
Funny thing: when trying to find a copy, there were no Real News links in the search results, only Fake News outlets.
And here s the SpinDoctor treatment:
https://democrats-intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?Docu
mentID=358
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=868
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=862
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The republicans didn't interview several who were involved. Example, Papadopoulos just to name one...
Just more crow for them to eat later.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Ex-FBI Asst. Director Says Upcoming Inspector General Report Is "Pure TNT"
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker said today that a highly anticipated report from the DOJ's Inspector General Michael Horowitz will contain "some pure TNT." Horowitz has been investigating the conduct of the FBI's top brass surrounding the 2016 election for over a year. He also uncovered over 50,000 text messages between two anti-Trump / pro-Clinton FBI employees directly involved in the exoneration of Clinton and the counterintelligence operation launched against the Trump campaign.
Swecker: “The behavior if it’s manifested in the action with your thumb on the scale of a particular investigation, one way or the other, that’s borderline criminal behavior — manipulating an investigation. I think this IG report is going to be particularly impactful, more so than any of these useless congressional investigations. I think you’re going to see some pure TNT come out in this IG report.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-16/ex-fbi-asst-director-says-up
coming-inspector-general-report-pure-tnt
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anybody else watching 60 minutes next Sunday? I wonder how they'll spin it on rt and zerohedge? What do you think sig? Hey, can you see me laughing? No really, can you see me laughing?
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Wonder when this comes out?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Ex-FBI Asst. Director Says Upcoming Inspector General Report Is "Pure TNT"
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker said today that a highly anticipated report from the DOJ's Inspector General Michael Horowitz will contain "some pure TNT." Horowitz has been investigating the conduct of the FBI's top brass surrounding the 2016 election for over a year. He also uncovered over 50,000 text messages between two anti-Trump / pro-Clinton FBI employees directly involved in the exoneration of Clinton and the counterintelligence operation launched against the Trump campaign.
Swecker: “The behavior if it’s manifested in the action with your thumb on the scale of a particular investigation, one way or the other, that’s borderline criminal behavior — manipulating an investigation. I think this IG report is going to be particularly impactful, more so than any of these useless congressional investigations. I think you’re going to see some pure TNT come out in this IG report.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-16/ex-fbi-asst-director-says-up
coming-inspector-general-report-pure-tnt
Think it will send Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Mueller, Lynch to jail?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Wonder when this comes out?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Ex-FBI Asst. Director Says Upcoming Inspector General Report Is "Pure TNT"
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker said today that a highly anticipated report from the DOJ's Inspector General Michael Horowitz will contain "some pure TNT." Horowitz has been investigating the conduct of the FBI's top brass surrounding the 2016 election for over a year. He also uncovered over 50,000 text messages between two anti-Trump / pro-Clinton FBI employees directly involved in the exoneration of Clinton and the counterintelligence operation launched against the Trump campaign.
Swecker: “The behavior if it’s manifested in the action with your thumb on the scale of a particular investigation, one way or the other, that’s borderline criminal behavior — manipulating an investigation. I think this IG report is going to be particularly impactful, more so than any of these useless congressional investigations. I think you’re going to see some pure TNT come out in this IG report.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-16/ex-fbi-asst-director-says-up
coming-inspector-general-report-pure-tnt
Think it will send Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Mueller, Lynch to jail?
Heh-heh - you guys are easily hood winked aren't ya? I thought Gaetz said that the Nunes Memo would do that? What happened to that promise?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Sessions fires former FBI No. 2 McCabe
WASHINGTON - Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired the FBI's former No. 2 official Andrew McCabe, prompting McCabe to say he is being targeted because he is a crucial witness into whether President Donald Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mccabe/former-fbi-no-2-mc
cabe-fired-claims-he-is-being-targeted-idUSKCN1GT02J
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That is not fair for you to remember what Getting/CC said you forgot.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Sessions fires former FBI No. 2 McCabe
WASHINGTON - Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired the FBI's former No. 2 official Andrew McCabe, prompting McCabe to say he is being targeted because he is a crucial witness into whether President Donald Trump tried to obstruct the Russia investigation.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-mccabe/former-fbi-no-2-mc
cabe-fired-claims-he-is-being-targeted-idUSKCN1GT02J
To be fair, you should tie more than half your brain behind your back when battling wits with a Libtard.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
In a lengthy statement, McCabe said he believes he is being politically targeted because he corroborated former FBI Director James Comey’s claims that Trump tried to pressure him into killing the Russia probe.
This statement now makes him a witness in any obstruction case Mueller may be contemplating. Actually, I think he already was. Lets not forget all Trumps tweets and public statements about him going back. This seems like a slam dunk.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yet another pitiful attempt to rewrite history, rearrange chronology. The Mueller Fishing Expedition did not even begin until after McCabe, Page, Strzok, et al endeavored to fabricate documents to facilitate the Witch Hunt.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In a lengthy statement, McCabe said he believes he is being politically targeted because he corroborated former FBI Director James Comey’s claims that Trump tried to pressure him into killing the Russia probe.
This statement now makes him a witness in any obstruction case Mueller may be contemplating. Actually, I think he already was. Lets not forget all Trumps tweets and public statements about him going back. This seems like a slam dunk.
T
Your poor brain must gasping and grasping amidst quicksand.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
A conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event or situation that invokes an unwarranted conspiracy, generally one involving an illegal or harmful act.
According to many psychologists, a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is often a believer in other conspiracy theories. Psychologists believe that the search for meaningfulness features largely in conspiracism and the development of conspiracy theories.
According to University of Chicago political science professors Eric Oliver and Thomas Wood, in any given year roughly half of Americans believe in at least one conspiracy theory. Their 2014 study found that 19% of Americans believed the U.S. government planned the 9/11 attacks to start a war in the Middle East, 24% believed former president Barack Obama was not born in the United States, and 25% believed Wall Street bankers conspired to cause the financial crisis that began in 2008. Those are high numbers considering there is zero evidence to support any of those theories.
What I think is that you're nuts. As for me rewriting history, you need to know McCabe documented in real time what Trump was up to, and Mueller has it.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So you are saying that your belief in Flat Earth, Green Martians, Lone Gunman Oswald, Easter Bunny, Hilliary's Innocence, Obama abiding The Constitution, Tooth Fairy, and Global Warming give you excuse to believe McCabe, Page, Strzok, et al did nothing Criminal, unethical, immoral, or wrong?
Originally posted by THGRRI:
A conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event or situation that invokes an unwarranted conspiracy, generally one involving an illegal or harmful act.
According to many psychologists, a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is often a believer in other conspiracy theories. Psychologists believe that the search for meaningfulness features largely in conspiracism and the development of conspiracy theories.
According to University of Chicago political science professors Eric Oliver and Thomas Wood, in any given year roughly half of Americans believe in at least one conspiracy theory. Their 2014 study found that 19% of Americans believed the U.S. government planned the 9/11 attacks to start a war in the Middle East, 24% believed former president Barack Obama was not born in the United States, and 25% believed Wall Street bankers conspired to cause the financial crisis that began in 2008. Those are high numbers considering there is zero evidence to support any of those theories.
What I think is that you're nuts. As for me rewriting history, you need to know McCabe documented in real time what Trump was up to, and Mueller has it.
T
That is quite an umbrella to be used by Snowflakes.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nope, I'm saying you need to get help.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Yet another pitiful attempt to rewrite history, rearrange chronology. The Mueller Fishing Expedition did not even begin until after McCabe, Page, Strzok, et al endeavored to fabricate documents to facilitate the Witch Hunt.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In a lengthy statement, McCabe said he believes he is being politically targeted because he corroborated former FBI Director James Comey’s claims that Trump tried to pressure him into killing the Russia probe.
This statement now makes him a witness in any obstruction case Mueller may be contemplating. Actually, I think he already was. Lets not forget all Trumps tweets and public statements about him going back. This seems like a slam dunk.
T
Your poor brain must gasping and grasping amidst quicksand.
Andrew McCabe was just offered a job by a congressman so he can get his full retirement. And it just might work.
That's one way of protesting Andrew McCabe's firing as deputy FBI director, roughly a day before he was set to retire: At least one Democratic congressman has offered McCabe a temporary job so he can get full retirement benefits — and McCabe appears to be considering.
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) announced Saturday afternoon that he has offered McCabe a job to work on election security in his office, “so that he can reach the needed length of service” to retire.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/andrew-mccabe-was-just-offered
-a-job-by-a-congressman-so-he-can-get-his-full-retirement-and-it-just-might-work/ar-BBKlTAR?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Oops
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Yet another pitiful attempt to rewrite history, rearrange chronology. The Mueller Fishing Expedition did not even begin until after McCabe, Page, Strzok, et al endeavored to fabricate documents to facilitate the Witch Hunt.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In a lengthy statement, McCabe said he believes he is being politically targeted because he corroborated former FBI Director James Comey’s claims that Trump tried to pressure him into killing the Russia probe.
This statement now makes him a witness in any obstruction case Mueller may be contemplating. Actually, I think he already was. Lets not forget all Trumps tweets and public statements about him going back. This seems like a slam dunk.
T
Your poor brain must gasping and grasping amidst quicksand.
Andrew McCabe was just offered a job by a congressman so he can get his full retirement. And it just might work.
That's one way of protesting Andrew McCabe's firing as deputy FBI director, roughly a day before he was set to retire: At least one Democratic congressman has offered McCabe a temporary job so he can get full retirement benefits — and McCabe appears to be considering.
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) announced Saturday afternoon that he has offered McCabe a job to work on election security in his office, “so that he can reach the needed length of service” to retire.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/andrew-mccabe-was-just-offered
-a-job-by-a-congressman-so-he-can-get-his-full-retirement-and-it-just-might-work/ar-BBKlTAR?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Oops
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
For reference at top of the page:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
House Intelligence Committee releases report showing there was No Collusion or Cooperation with Russia.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/house-committee-relea
ses-verdict-russia-probe-no-collusion
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=873
[img] https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_russia_investigatio
n_one_page_summary.pdf[/img]
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Pocan Reps the Libtard Central 2nd District of Madison, Tammy Baldwin's last Office.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:Andrew McCabe was just offered a job by a congressman so he can get his full retirement. And it just might work.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Yet another pitiful attempt to rewrite history, rearrange chronology. The Mueller Fishing Expedition did not even begin until after McCabe, Page, Strzok, et al endeavored to fabricate documents to facilitate the Witch Hunt.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In a lengthy statement, McCabe said he believes he is being politically targeted because he corroborated former FBI Director James Comey’s claims that Trump tried to pressure him into killing the Russia probe.
This statement now makes him a witness in any obstruction case Mueller may be contemplating. Actually, I think he already was. Lets not forget all Trumps tweets and public statements about him going back. This seems like a slam dunk.
T
Your poor brain must gasping and grasping amidst quicksand.
That's one way of protesting Andrew McCabe's firing as deputy FBI director, roughly a day before he was set to retire: At least one Democratic congressman has offered McCabe a temporary job so he can get full retirement benefits — and McCabe appears to be considering.
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) announced Saturday afternoon that he has offered McCabe a job to work on election security in his office, “so that he can reach the needed length of service” to retire.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/andrew-mccabe-was-just-offered
-a-job-by-a-congressman-so-he-can-get-his-full-retirement-and-it-just-might-work/ar-BBKlTAR?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
Oops
T
How heartwarming to see Libtards handing out graft to fellow loyal Libtards.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's it, thats the memo
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The investigation by the Inspector General Horowitz of those texts between Strzok and Page (and others) ... the one that Democrats seem determined to ignore ... is still going on.
Quote:MORE AT http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/documents-suggest-possible-
Documents suggest possible coordination between CIA, FBI, Obama WH and Dem officials early in Trump-Russia probe: investigators
... Newly uncovered text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page suggest a possible coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in the early stages of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to GOP congressional investigators on Wednesday.
The investigators say the information provided to Fox News “strongly” suggests coordination between former President Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan — which they say would “contradict” the Obama administration’s public stance about its hand in the process.
coordination-between-cia-fbi-obama-wh-and-dem-officials-early-in-trump-russia-probe-investigators.html
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-28/doj-inspector-general-expand
Inspector General Confirms Probe Of FBI's Criminal FISA Warrant Abuse To Spy On Trump
The DOJ's Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced Wednesday that he is expanding his internal investigation into alleged FBI abuses surrounding Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications - and will be examining their relationship with former MI6 spy Christopher Steele. The announcement follows several requests from lawmakers and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
s-fbi-misconduct-probe-investigating-allegations
One day later ...
Quote:
Sessions Names Prosecutor [but not a Special Counsel- SIGNY] To Investigate FBI Misconduct Claims
Attorney General Jeff Sessions revealed Thursday that John Huber - Utah's top federal prosecutor, will be paired with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate a multitude of accusations of FBI misconduct surrounding the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The announcement comes one day after Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed that he will be investigating allegations of FBI FISA abuse.
Sessions' decision stops short of formally appointing a special counsel to investigate - noting in a lengthy letter written to Chairmen Grassley, Goodlatte and Gowdy, Sessions that regulations recognize "the Attorney General may conclude that the circumstances do not justify such a departure "from the normal process of the department," and that he may instead determine that other "appropriate steps" can be taken..."
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-29/sessions-names-prosecutor-in
vestigate-fbi-misconduct-claims
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Interesting if true. It DOES seem to be exceptionally well-detailed, but the sources are all anonymous.
Quote:
Comey & Mueller Ignored McCabe’s Ties to Russian Crime Figures & His Reported Tampering in Russian FBI Cases, Files
For years James Comey and Robert Mueller, as FBI directors, knew Andrew McCabe maintained problematic contacts with Russian officials including organized crime figures yet did little to investigate the now-FBI deputy director’s relationships even after other agents caught McCabe tampering in Russian-linked cases, FBI sources said.
And while both Comey and Mueller have used the unlimited resources of the United States government to try and tie President Donald Trump to Russia, the former FBI chiefs largely ignored McCabe’s associations with Russian mobsters and a Putin-linked billionaire under federal investigation by their own Bureau.
The same Russian billionaire at the center of Mueller’s recent indictment of Paul Manafort.
Incredibly, Comey put McCabe in charge of running the FBI’s Russian investigation of President Trump to find supposed election collusion by Trump and his inner circle – including family members and Gen. Mike Flynn. McCabe’s probe of Trump and its evidence, which was spearheaded by now disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok, was turned over to Mueller when he was appointed Special Counsel after Comey’s firing by Trump.
Likewise, FBI sources confirmed Mueller was aware of McCabe’s problematic Russian contacts yet still took the now-disgraced Strzok on as a lead investigator to his Special Counsel team as well as the physical and witness evidence that McCabe had amassed on the Trump probe during his investigation under Comey.
Even officials at CIA were concerned about McCabe’s Russian contacts, sources confirm.
So how could a FBI agent – let alone the deputy director of the Bureau – be permitted to lead or conduct an investigation of the president of the United States for Russian collusion when the FBI agent in question has problematic associations with shady Russians himself?
McCabe climbed quickly through the FBI’s ranks forging a reputation as a supervisor who always got the job done while his bosses often looked the other way. That seems to be a recurring theme when investigating the day-today operations of the FBI in recent years.
But both Mueller and Comey seemed to either miss or ignore — or condone — major signs of problematic Russian associations and case red flags linked to McCabe, including:
FBI Agents accused McCabe of interfering with Russian-linked investigations, including the Boston Marathon terror bombing and the Robert Levinson kidnapping cases, even making a formal complaint with FBI Security Division about the incidents.
McCabe for years worked Russian organized crime in New York for the FBI, previous to his Washington D.C. rise. He led the FBI’s Eurasian Organized Crime Task Force, a joint operation with the NYPD.
While in New York, McCabe worked in tandem with Bruce Ohr, the recently demoted DOJ official linked to the Trump fake dossier who often coordinated with McCabe’s Russian organized crime task force. Ohr worked Organized Crime too for DOJ. Ohr’s wife Nellie worked for Fusion GPS and previously worked for the CIA.
McCabe maintained an alliance with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska a tycoon and close associate of Vladimir Putin. And McCabe apparently met with him in Europe without proper clearance from FBI, while Deripaska was a possible target on a FBI organized crime probe. McCabe also privately acknowledged to FBI agents that Deripaska was a friend.
Yes, this is the same Deripaska who was trumpeted as part of Mueller’s recent Paul Manafort indictment. If Manafort’s connections to Deripaska’s billions helped indict him, why didn’t McCabe’s associations with the oligarch warrant similar investigation by the very man, Mueller, who slammed Manafort?
During McCabe’s liaisons with Deripaska, Strzok was running the FBI’s Post-Adjudication Risk Management plan, or PARM, a program initiated to catchNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:It would be funny if it turned out McCabe had deeper, more durable, more meaningful ties to Russia than Trump did.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Interesting if true. It DOES seem to be exceptionally well-detailed, but the sources are all anonymous.
A lot of these stories make the FBI and the CIA seem like they're chock-full of twisted, convoluted political plots that either ignore, or are antithetical to, the supposed security mission of said agencies.
No wonder they classify so much stuff. God forbid we should see what they REALLY are doing that we're paying for with our taxes.
As for the CIA being concerned about preventing another Hansen, I find it too ironic that, while on the one hand they're robing themselves in the mantle of patriotic rectitude, on the other hand they're cartel-scale dealing drugs to self-fund secret wars around the globe.
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I understand that Huber from Utah was selected because he is non-partisan insulated, an unbiased Civil Servant appointed by Obama.
And I've heard that Sessions is avoiding a Special Counsel at this time because an appointment of one St this time would restart the clock for an ongoing SC on related subject, ie. Mueller. I don't recall if I heard all the details about that.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This managed to escape my notice until now:
The Woods Procedures are the method which, since 2001, were to be used to protect American Citizens from the Invasions of Privacy and Abuses of Power from the likes of Hilliary, Comey, Clapper, Lynch, McCabe, et al.
Sorry, no linky now, but DuckDuckGo gave plenty of results.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Heard an interview today with Sen RNd Paul. He explained that when Brennan accepted Intel on American Citizens, he was clearly violating law and should be in prison for it - not to mention when he solicited from foreign sources Intel on American Citizens, both of which CIA is prohibited from doing.
Brennan's role as ringmaster of all this seems to be beneath the surface of common knowledge.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Something I think might be getting overlooked, and should be focused upon for historical context.
It has depth of irony.
The FISA Court was created decades ago. I don't think anybody is unaware of that at this point.
The PATRIOT Act incorporated this established FISC within it's Protocols and Practices. Also well understood by most at this point. A critical factor in the inclusion and function of the FISC within the PATRIOT Act structure and umbrella is the Integrity, Faithfulness, Fidelity, Honesty, and Character of the Officers of The Court for FISC - meaning the lawyers, Agents, AGs, USAs presenting Evidence and Applications as well as the Judges. The fragile Rights of American Citizens were understood to be in jeopardy if lesser or substandard Officials were to corrupt the processes.
So some people were upset about the PATRIOT Act, largely based upon tenets of Rights of Citizens.
And then many of the people who elected Obama were those opposed to honest people of Integrity involved in FISC processes, and thus ushered in the despicable degenerate Obamabots to thoroughly corrupt the system beyond anything done before.
Can anybody say Self-fulfilling Prophecy?
Some people claim that those who are the cause of a problem should not be exposed as the cause, and should claim victimhood to escape the blame they so richly deserve.
I'm not buying the victimhood scam for those who caused the problem this way.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SOMEBODY SAT DOWN AND GAVE THE ANTI-TRUMP INTEL OP THE THOUGHT IT SO RICHLY DESERVES
Quote:
Sharyl Attkisson: 8 Signs Pointing To A Counter-Intel Op Deployed Against Trump
Authored by Sharyl Attkisson, op-ed via The Hill http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/388978-growing-signs-of-a-count
erintelligence-operation-deployed-against-trumps
It may be true that President Trump illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for two years. (We still await special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings.)
But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.
Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons.
1. Code name
The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”
2. Wiretap fever
Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.
The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016. Page’s office is connected to Trump Tower and he reports having spent “many hours in Trump Tower.”
CNN reported that Manafort was wiretapped before and after the election “including during a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Trump.” Manafort reportedly has a residence in Trump Tower.
Electronic surveillance was used to listen in on three Trump transition officials in Trump Tower — Flynn, Bannon and Kushner — as they met in an official capacity with the United Arab Emirates’ crown prince.
The FBI also reportedly wiretapped Flynn’s phone conversation with Kislyak on Dec. 31, 2016, as part of “routine surveillance” of Kislyak.
NBC recently reported that Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, was wiretapped. NBC later corrected the story, saying Cohen was the subject of a “pen register” used to monitor phone numbers and, possibly, internet communications.
3. National security letters
Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval.
Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI. Reviews by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General found widespread misuse under Mueller — who was then FBI director — and said officials failed to report instances of abuses as required.
4. Unmasking
“Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Power, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yates, former deputy attorney general.
Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared.
However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.
Prior to that revelation, Clapper claimed ignorance. When asked if he knew of unmasking requests by any ambassador, including Power, he testified: “I don't know. Maybe it's ringing a vague bell but I'm not — I could not answer with any confidencNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SOMEBODY SAT DOWN AND GAVE THE ANTI-TRUMP INTEL OP THE THOUGHT IT SO RICHLY DESERVESQuote:
Sharyl Attkisson: 8 Signs Pointing To A Counter-Intel Op Deployed Against Trump
Authored by Sharyl Attkisson, op-ed via The Hill http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/388978-growing-signs-of-a-count
erintelligence-operation-deployed-against-trumps
H
It may be true that President Trump illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for two years. (We still await special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings.)
But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.
Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons.
1. Code name
The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”
2. Wiretap fever
Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.
The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016. Page’s office is connected to Trump Tower and he reports having spent “many hours in Trump Tower.”
CNN reported that Manafort was wiretapped before and after the election “including during a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Trump.” Manafort reportedly has a residence in Trump Tower.
Electronic surveillance was used to listen in on three Trump transition officials in Trump Tower — Flynn, Bannon and Kushner — as they met in an official capacity with the United Arab Emirates’ crown prince.
The FBI also reportedly wiretapped Flynn’s phone conversation with Kislyak on Dec. 31, 2016, as part of “routine surveillance” of Kislyak.
NBC recently reported that Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, was wiretapped. NBC later corrected the story, saying Cohen was the subject of a “pen register” used to monitor phone numbers and, possibly, internet communications.
3. National security letters
Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval.
Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI. Reviews by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General found widespread misuse under Mueller — who was then FBI director — and said officials failed to report instances of abuses as required.
4. Unmasking
“Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Power, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yates, former deputy attorney general.
Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared.
However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.
Prior to that revelation, Clapper claimed ignorance. When asked if he knew of unmasking requests by any ambassador, including Power, he testified: “I don't know. Maybe it's ringing a vague bell but I'm noNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SOMEBODY SAT DOWN AND GAVE THE ANTI-TRUMP INTEL OP THE THOUGHT IT SO RICHLY DESERVESQuote:
Sharyl Attkisson: 8 Signs Pointing To A Counter-Intel Op Deployed Against Trump
Authored by Sharyl Attkisson, op-ed via The Hill http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/388978-growing-signs-of-a-count
erintelligence-operation-deployed-against-trumps
It may be true that President Trump illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for two years. (We still await special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings.)
But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.
Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons.
1. Code name
The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”
2. Wiretap fever
Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.
The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016. Page’s office is connected to Trump Tower and he reports having spent “many hours in Trump Tower.”
CNN reported that Manafort was wiretapped before and after the election “including during a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Trump.” Manafort reportedly has a residence in Trump Tower.
Electronic surveillance was used to listen in on three Trump transition officials in Trump Tower — Flynn, Bannon and Kushner — as they met in an official capacity with the United Arab Emirates’ crown prince.
The FBI also reportedly wiretapped Flynn’s phone conversation with Kislyak on Dec. 31, 2016, as part of “routine surveillance” of Kislyak.
NBC recently reported that Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, was wiretapped. NBC later corrected the story, saying Cohen was the subject of a “pen register” used to monitor phone numbers and, possibly, internet communications.
3. National security letters
Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval.
Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI. Reviews by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General found widespread misuse under Mueller — who was then FBI director — and said officials failed to report instances of abuses as required.
4. Unmasking
“Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Power, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yates, former deputy attorney general.
Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared.
However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.
Prior to that revelation, Clapper claimed ignorance. When asked if he knew of unmasking requests by any ambassador, including Power, he testified: “I don't know. Maybe it's ringing a vague bell but I'm notNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
From the WSJ, via ZeroHedge.
Quote:Embarrassing, to be sure, but hardly such a critical security issue that it should be redacted like a top secret item! And if the FBI is redacting embarrassing trivial shit like this, WHAT ELSE are they redacting?
Democrats and their media allies are again shouting “constitutional crisis,” this time claiming President Trump has waded too far into the Russia investigation. The howls are a diversion from the actual crisis: the Justice Department’s unprecedented contempt for duly elected representatives, and the lasting harm it is doing to law enforcement and to the department’s relationship with Congress.
The conceit of those claiming Mr. Trump has crossed some line in ordering the Justice Department to comply with oversight is that “investigators” are beyond question. We are meant to take them at their word that they did everything appropriately. Never mind that the revelations of warrants and spies and dirty dossiers and biased text messages already show otherwise.
We are told that Mr. Trump cannot be allowed to have any say over the Justice Department’s actions, since this might make him privy to sensitive details about an investigation into himself. We are also told that Congress - a separate branch of government, a primary duty of which is oversight - cannot be allowed to access Justice Department material. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes can’t be trusted to view classified information - something every intelligence chairman has done - since he might blow a source or method, or tip off the president.
That’s a political judgment, but it holds no authority. The Constitution set up Congress to act as a check on the executive branch—and it’s got more than enough cause to do some checking here. Yet the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation have spent a year disrespecting Congress—flouting subpoenas, ignoring requests, hiding witnesses, blacking out information, and leaking accusations.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley has not been allowed to question a single current or former Justice or FBI official involved in this affair. Not one. He’s also more than a year into his demand for the transcript of former national security adviser Mike Flynn’s infamous call with the Russian ambassador, as well as reports from the FBI agents who interviewed Mr. Flynn. And still nothing.
Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, is being stonewalled on at least three inquiries. The House Judiciary and Oversight committee chairmen required a full-blown summit in April with Justice Department officials to get movement on their own subpoena. The FBI continues to block a fuller release of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia report.
Not that the documents that Justice sends over are of much use. Mr. Grassley this week excoriated the department for its routine practice of redacting key information, and for similarly refusing to provide a “privilege log” that details the legal basis for withholding information.
His team recently discovered that one of the items Justice had scrubbed from the Peter Strzok-Lisa Page texts was the duo’s concern that former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe had a $70,000 conference table. (Was it lacquered with unicorn tears?)
Quote:
A separate text refers to an investigation that the White House is “running,” but conveniently blacks out which one. The FBI won’t answer Mr. Johnson’s questions about who is doing the redacting.
This intransigence is creating an unprecedented toxicity between law enforcement and Congress, undermining what has long been a cooperative and vital relationship. It is also pushing lawmakers ever closer to holding Justice Department officials in contempt or impeaching them. Congress hasn’t impeached a member of the executive branch (presidents excepted) since the 19th century. Let’s agree such a step would amount to a real crisis. And the pressureNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Do you think they are obstructing and delaying to drag past the Statute of Limitations for Hilliary's and Obama's crimes? It worked for Hilliary before, hiding the Rose Law Firm Billing Records in her White House closet until the day after the Subpoena expired. Yes, she was hiding behind the power, authority, and protection of her HUSBAND to save her skin.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
T
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:Quote:
House Intelligence Committee releases report showing there was No Collusion or Cooperation with Russia.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/house-committee-relea
ses-verdict-russia-probe-no-collusion
https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=873
[img] https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_russia_investigatio
n_one_page_summary.pdf[/img]
Recently NYTimes apparently published a story which revealed a Libtard secret which had not been disclosed before.
They were bragging about their heroes committing nonstop crimes against American Citizens. They revealed that Sally Yates was the Signatory on the first successful Application for FISA Warrant, of the 4 consecutive Warrants (3 were renewals). The first Applications were not successful because they did not include the Fake Evidence of Hilliary's Steele Dossier, so FISC rejected how preposterous the Applications were.
Because they were fawning over her incompetence, as their hero, it is unclear if they revealed this Yates info accidentally or intentionally.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Word has gotten out that Rod Rosenstein's Obstruction has included, in January 2018, direct threats by him against all Congressional Oversight Committee members that he will start SC Witch Hunts against every single one of them, their families, and friends if they continue to do their jobs.
I have not heard the source of this specific new revelation.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
#releasethememo
What would be a valid reason for why this isn't released already ? Why orchestrate a #releasethememo movement and then just .... not ?
If the damn thing exists, and says anything remotely close to what it's alleged to say... release the mother fucker now.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Hey rappy, here you go dumb ass. You're why Putin and the Russians say, thank god for useful American idiots.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Word has gotten out that Rod Rosenstein's Obstruction has included, in January 2018, direct threats by him against all Congressional Oversight Committee members that he will start SC Witch Hunts against every single one of them, their families, and friends if they continue to do their jobs.
I have not heard the source of this specific new revelation.
*breath* "You're the puppet!"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are many many posts in this thread that need to be addressed by Trumps supporters. Or should I say traitors.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
There are many many posts in this thread that need to be addressed by Trumps supporters. Or should I say traitors.
How far past, "grab 'em by the..." would Obama have gotten? Or Hillary, "grab 'em by the balls! When you're SoS they let you do anything!"
These people are seriously messed up, T.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fact Check: Why President Donald Trump Is Wrong About The Carter Page FISA Docs
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Now that the highly redacted memos and emails have been released a few weeks ago, funny how the Trolls here have cut back on their denials of truth and propaganda of Fake News narratives.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't see much of posts differentiating between the separate components of the Libtard Fishing Expedition Witch Hunt.
Subpart A: laundering information from Hilliary's Steele Dossier through the FISA Court.
Subpart B: actively spying upon US Law-Abiding Citizens, and pushing their Fake narrative into the picture through the alibtard spies.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Take this with a pinch of salt ...'world socialist web'
House hearing exposes complicity of FBI and Pentagon officials in January 6 coup attempt
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/06/16/coup-j16.html
Greenwald: FBI Involvement In Capitol Riot Not A "Crazy Conspiracy Theory," This Is What They Do
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/06/18/greenwald_fbi_invol
vement_in_capitol_riot_not_a_crazy_conspiracy_theory_this_is_what_they_do.html
FBI is investigating York County judge candidate Steve Stambaugh, 3 former employees say
https://www.ydr.com/story/news/watchdog/2021/07/06/fbi-investigating-y
ork-county-judge-candidate-steve-stambaugh/7784747002/
Inspector General report: Department of Justice needs 'consistent approach' to body cameras
https://www.yahoo.com/now/inspector-general-report-department-justice-
201720478.html
FBI Says 'scale' Of Kaseya Ransomware Attack Won't Allow To Work With Every Victim
https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/us-news/fbi-says-scale-of-kas
eya-ransomware-attack-wont-allow-to-work-with-every-victim.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Matt Gaetz's ex-girlfriend testifies to grand jury in sex trafficking probe
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/matt-gaetz-s-ex-gi
rlfriend-testifies-grand-jury-sex-trafficking-n1287352
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME