The Evidens
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Monday, February 14, 2022 07:11
VIEWED: 159178
PAGE 90 of 121
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I think you should read these indictments - the genuine originals - rather than continue to steep your brain in US media swill. https://www.justice.gov/sco
You'll find that in regards to the non-Russian nationals like Manafort, zero charges have anything to do with Trump or the election.
That's Mueller & Co. not tipping their hand. They put pressure on Manafort, etc by applying pressure around the edges for things that are already known to the public or easily found out (tax evasion, etc) - low level stuff. When you bring charges higher up you do better if you have someone like Manafort who confirms them. Make no mistake: Mueller is a pro.
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
And when it comes to the Russian nationals, some of them put a YUGE kink in the process by showing up in court and demanding to see the evidence against them. Which the Mueller team is fighting. I have to say, it makes Mueller look very suspicious.
They didn't show up in court, their lawyers did, and they made a nuisance of themselves. They asked for all details dating back like 40 years (?). Their demands were easily dismissed.
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Does he have evidence, or not?
Wait, what?!? Aren't you one of the ones who keep parroting "there is no evidence!" Opps!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"That's Mueller & Co. not tipping their hand."
In other words - no evidence re RUSSIA!! COLLUSION!!! in the indictments.
"They didn't show up in court, their lawyers did, and they made a nuisance of themselves. They asked for all details dating back like 40 years (?). Their demands were easily dismissed."
There is nothing true about your claim.
Originally, Mueller asked for a delay when the accused asked to see the evidence. Mueller's request was denied.
The defendant also asked to see the Grand Jury instructions, which was dismissed.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/concord-ruling-special-counsel
-russian-company/index.html
When it comes to the defendant's request to see the evidence, which is a constitutional right, that request was NOT dismissed. Instead, the judge ordered to two parties to settle the dispute. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-15/-putin-s-chef-judge
-scolds-lawyers-over-evidence-access-fight
"Wait, what?!? Aren't you one of the ones who keep parroting "there is no evidence!" Opps!"
OPPS? Like operations? Opportunities? There is still no publicly available evidence. If the defendant's request is honored at least in part as is Constitutionally required, we may finally get to see something. But I think Mueller doesn't have any, and he'll produce another stall tactic/ excuse.
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"And now you're going to protect these forum ghosts, who you say actually already confessed their fear of WMD in public, by not naming them even though you say they self identified. You're so full of sh*t it's embarrassing."
I can think of one who sprang to mind immediately.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So much bullshit from the reichwing trolls, so little credibility.
So few readers.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
# 15,237
So many Russianz attending invitation-only inauguration partyz.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"That's Mueller & Co. not tipping their hand."
In other words - no evidence re RUSSIA!! COLLUSION!!! in the indictments.
Funny how dumb and dishonest kiki and others are. For instance and for the umpteenth time, nobody gives a shit about collusion. There is no crime in itself with colluding. It's just a term Trump likes to keep using because the actual crime would be if his campaign conspired with the Russians. He uses the term collusion to deflect away from that. Just as kiki and others do here.
Its a conspiracy Mueller is looking for. A conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because that would be a crime. Guess what....
Richard W. Gates III is an American former political consultant and lobbyist who has pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the United States and making false statements. And this guy was at the top of Trumps campaign. The very top.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yup. Gowdy's investigation took 2 1/2 years. $7.8 million. Nothing.
Ken Starr's took 4 years, $40 million. A blowjob.
Mueller's put a year in. $17 million. 17 indictments, 5 guilty pleas, people getting jail time.
Looks like we're getting more for our money this time.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
JO - you posted this almost a month ago. Any news yet? And, if your prediction of a big move by Mueller doesn't show up 'soon', like you've been expecting, will you recalibrate the basic premise that led you to a wrong prediction?
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
For the last few months it haz seemed like a big move by Mueler iz immenent. I'v been thinking 'its gotta be next week' every Friday. Now I'm hearing Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayez and otherz saying it.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
