Why Do Libtards Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison?
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 05:56
VIEWED: 11688
PAGE 1 of 1
They have been whining that when their Criminal parents are held in Adult Detention or Prison, the children should be also incarcerated in order to keep innocent children together with their Criminal parents.
To me this seems like it would be unjust and unfair, but that makes it all par for the course for intolerant and unjust Libtards.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Plus, more families were separated under Obama than there have been under Trump. Where was the outcry then?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SO predictable. This is 100% Trump, and no one else. Well, Miller the Nazi is behind it, but his Satanic influence will be out the door soon.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Trump is holding children hostage to get Congressional Democrats to vote for funding Trump’s Texas/Mexico Wall. Since Mexico won't pay for Trump's Wall, and Trump won't pay, despite having $10 billion to build the whole wall in his personal checking account, maybe the Democrats will.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Why Do Libtards Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison?
www.msnbc.com/weekends-with-alex-witt/watch/az-dem-rep-trump-admin-hol
ding-kids-hostage-to-get-your-stupid-border-wall-1257817667548
God demands children be punished for their parents' sins, per Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who reached for a biblical verse to defend his department’s policy of separating migrant parents from their children at the Mexican border, saying that God supports the government. "It's not me. It's God," - Jeff Sessions.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/18/separation-children-pare
nts-families-us-border-trump
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/hhs-handed-child-migrants
-to-human-traffickers.html
New York Magazine
Article Date: January 29, 2016 10:25 am
Quote:
The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.
In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.
“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”
As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.
The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor. HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.
The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015. Exactly how many of those fell prey to traffickers is unknown, because the agency does not keep track.
Oops.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ADDENDUM: I figured I better do a little fact checking and see what political bias New York Magazine has just to cover my ass from more "Nazi" comments from the peanut gallery.
Just as I suspected...
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-magazine
Quote:
New York Magazine media bias rating is Left.
New York Magazine's bias is considered to be liberal. Despite the fact that New York Magazine’s readers reside in a location that many consider to be liberal, in the 1990s, the magazine chose Tucker Carlson, a conservative talk-show-host, as the company’s primary national correspondent. The AllSides Bias Rating™ of the New York Magazine is "far left." The majority of AllSides users who voted agree that the New York Magazine has a left-sided bias in its stories.
More On New York Magazine
The New York Magazine was founded in April of 1968 by Milton Glaser and Clay Felker and has an emphasis on New York City news. When the magazine was founded, its prime competitor was the New Yorker; at the time, New York Magazine was thought to be less polite, establishing itself as a “cradle of New Journalism." Over time, the magazine broadened its scope to become more national. Now, the New York Magazine covers the news, culture, entertainment, and lifestyle defined in New York City life. Each week, 1.8 million people read the magazine. The company has created other news websites as well, such as vulture.com, thecut.com, and scienceofus.com, each focusing on different areas of the news.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-magazine/
Quote:
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Notes: Established in 1968. New York is a bi-weekly magazine concerned with life, culture, politics, and style generally, and with a particular emphasis on New York City. NY Mag has a left wing bias in story selection and reporting, but is always sourced and factual. (5/13/2016)
Both considered to be Left to Far Left, as well as factual.
Nope... can't claim it's bogus because it came from zerohedge or RT.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:6ixStringJack, you conclusively proved that Republicans threatened to kill children back in 2013. Obama does not have the power to monitor the Republicans 24 hours per day so that their crimes could be prosecuted. The responsibility is with the local authorities, not Obama, to keep Republicans from committing felonies such as raping children or enslaving children. But you decided to blame Obama, rather than Republicans. Good thinking, 6ixStringJack. You are a credit to your race.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
ADDENDUM: Both considered to be Left to Far Left, as well as factual.
Nope... can't claim it's bogus because it came from zerohedge or RT.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:In Japanese, 6ix, your symbols for "Shiro hidari" mean "white left".
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Do Right, Be Right. :)
https://goo.gl/d4vQ95
In plain english, 6ix, you are "dumb" + "ass".
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Thanks for posting the linky.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/hhs-handed-child-migrants
-to-human-traffickers.html
New York Magazine
Article Date: January 29, 2016 10:25 amQuote:
The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.
In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.
“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”
As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.
The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor. HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.
The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015. Exactly how many of those fell prey to traffickers is unknown, because the agency does not keep track.
Oops.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
We can't blame 2013 on Trump? Or Bush? Maybe Clinton or Reagan?
Butbutbutbut the Senate inquiry was based upon an AP Story. Is AP a Fake News Source? The Inquiry of Obama's failures was from a Senate which was GOP? That can't be!
The incompetents, abusers, corrupted are Obamabots, the Fact reporting is from Left-Wing Extremist News sources, and the good guys are Rebublicans!!!! Somebody is going to blow a gasket!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:In Japanese, 6ix, your symbols for "Shiro hidari" mean "white left".
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Do Right, Be Right. :)
https://goo.gl/d4vQ95
In plain english, 6ix, you are "dumb" + "ass".
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
It's Chinese, dipshit.
It's not my name for you either. Google it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.
Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump keeps blaming Democrats for his own policy of family separation
As a backlash grows to the Trump administration’s policy of family separation at the border, President Donald Trump went on Twitter to blame Democrats — again.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17474816/trump-blame
s-congressional-democrats-family-separation-us-mexico-border
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:And the little fascists unthinkingly just buy it. Typical reichwing idiocy.
Originally posted by JJ:
Trump keeps blaming Democrats for his own policy of family separation
As a backlash grows to the Trump administration’s policy of family separation at the border, President Donald Trump went on Twitter to blame Democrats — again.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17474816/trump-blame
s-congressional-democrats-family-separation-us-mexico-border
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
zero tolerance
Trump needs to end family separation 'today,' says Anthony Scaramucci
10:33 a.m. ET
Even ex-White House staffers are lobbying President Trump to end the separation of children and parents at the border.
Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci is the latest Trump affiliate to demand the president end the divisive immigration policy "today," calling the policy "atrocious" and "offensive to the average American" on CNN on Monday morning.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/779683/trump-needs-end-family-separation
-today-says-anthony-scaramucci
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:And the little fascists unthinkingly just buy it. Typical reichwing idiocy.
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:
Originally posted by JJ:
Trump keeps blaming Democrats for his own policy of family separation
As a backlash grows to the Trump administration’s policy of family separation at the border, President Donald Trump went on Twitter to blame Democrats — again.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17474816/trump-blame
s-congressional-democrats-family-separation-us-mexico-border
Even when Trumps own people make the claim that it is up to him to end all this. The people who post in favor of Trump and are always defending him are trolls. They love the controversy regardless how damaging it is to the children and America's image.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
It's Chinese, dipshit.
It's not my name for you either. Google it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
In today’s news, which can’t be blamed on Congressional Democrats, but does fit with the story of Why Do Republicans Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison? a Republican Texas sheriff's deputy is accused of sexually abusing a 4-year-old, then threatening her mom with deportation. You never know what a sheriff’s deputy is capable of, but it was never Obama’s problem; it was always the local Sheriff’s problem to control his deputy.
www.cnn.com/2018/06/18/us/texas-deputy-child-sex-assault-charge-trnd/i
ndex.html
While Trump delivers concrete material benefits to wealthy business executives in the form of tax cuts and industry-friendly regulation, what he’s offering his working-class backers is that cracking down on foreigners will solve their problems and that his willingness to suffer the condemnation of cosmopolitans is a token of his dedication to their interests.
Trump’s white working-class base sees a world in which cultural elites have marginalized their concerns in favor of caring a lot about the problems of immigrants and minorities. White working-class voters see a zero-sum battle for attention and sympathy in which caring about immigrants’ problems means neglecting their own. Not everyone of such voters may approve of cruel treatment of Central American asylum seekers, but at the end of the day, the message that Trump is perhaps excessively cruel to foreigners emphasizes the notion that he is on their side.
The symbols in Chinese are spoken as Bái zuo https://goo.gl/1gdS2U
The exact same symbols, with the exact same meaning in Japanese, are Shiro hidari https://goo.gl/d4vQ95
But either way, 6ix is still "dumb"+"ass"
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/29/us/politics/us-placed-immigrant-chi
ldren-with-traffickers-report-says.html
U.S. Placed Immigrant Children With Traffickers, Report Says
This I believe was the outfall of Obama's DACA. There were plenty of stories running in the LATimes 2012-2014 about parents and children living on opposite sides of the border after Obama - the 'Deporter in Chief' - deported their parents.
LATimes
Obama to Dreamers' parents: No deferral for you
Michael McGough
Nov 21, 2014 | 4:00 AM
The most curious aspect of the proposal was what it didn’t contain: deferral of deportation for the parents of the so-called Dreamers, children brought to this country illegally by their parents.
Two years ago, Obama protected many Dreamers from deportation with his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, and the Dreamers hoped that he would extend the same consideration to their parents.
They were disappointed.
Apparently the White House considered deferring deportation of the Dreamers’ parents, too, but ran into a roadblock from the Office of Legal Counsel in the Justice Department. The head of that office, Karl R. Thompson, concluded that “the proposed deferred action program for parents of DACA recipients would not be a permissible exercise of enforcement discretion.”
CNN
Deportations: Missing parents, scared kids
By Cindy Y. Rodriguez and Adriana Hauser, CNN
Updated 11:41 AM ET, Sun October 27, 2013
After their father was deported, Cesia Soza, bottom left, and her brother Ronald Jr. have lived with the Sandigo family in Miami.
American Immigration Council
Falling Through the Cracks
December 12, 2012
One of the many consequences of an aggressive immigration enforcement system is the separation of children, often U.S. citizens, from their unauthorized immigrant parents. Take the case of Felipe Montes, a father who has spent the past two years fighting to reunite with his three young children, who were placed in foster care in North Carolina following Montes’ deportation to Mexico in late 2010. Such cases only scratch at the surface of a growing problem. Our immigration policies often fail to address the needs of millions of children whom they directly impact.
ImmigrationImpact
Thousands of U.S.-Citizen Children Separated From Parents, ICE Records Show
Written by Guillermo Cantor June 26, 2014
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Disingenuous Liberals are fomenting discord with the pretext of Asylum seekers being unusually detained. This is a lie. Valid Asylees can report to a Port of Entry and present their claim of Asylum. But these Criminals are illegally crossing the border, and then when captured spout the pretext of Asylum.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.
Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
It's Chinese, dipshit.
It's not my name for you either. Google it.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
In today’s news, which can’t be blamed on Congressional Democrats, but does fit with the story of Why Do Republicans Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison? a Republican Texas sheriff's deputy is accused of sexually abusing a 4-year-old, then threatening her mom with deportation. You never know what a sheriff’s deputy is capable of, but it was never Obama’s problem; it was always the local Sheriff’s problem to control his deputy.
www.cnn.com/2018/06/18/us/texas-deputy-child-sex-assault-charge-trnd/i
ndex.html
While Trump delivers concrete material benefits to wealthy business executives in the form of tax cuts and industry-friendly regulation, what he’s offering his working-class backers is that cracking down on foreigners will solve their problems and that his willingness to suffer the condemnation of cosmopolitans is a token of his dedication to their interests.
Trump’s white working-class base sees a world in which cultural elites have marginalized their concerns in favor of caring a lot about the problems of immigrants and minorities. White working-class voters see a zero-sum battle for attention and sympathy in which caring about immigrants’ problems means neglecting their own. Not everyone of such voters may approve of cruel treatment of Central American asylum seekers, but at the end of the day, the message that Trump is perhaps excessively cruel to foreigners emphasizes the notion that he is on their side.
The symbols in Chinese are spoken as Bái zuo https://goo.gl/1gdS2U
The exact same symbols, with the exact same meaning in Japanese, are Shiro hidari https://goo.gl/d4vQ95
But either way, 6ix is still "dumb"+"ass"
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
I see you didn't Google it.
Let's just say that the people of China get a lot of chuckles out of you and are extremely pleased with the work you're doing.
Keep it up.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.
Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.
Sorry to blow up your false narrative.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump is creating his American caliphate, and democracy has no defence
The terror of the Trump doctrine is not in its innovation but in its imitation. The last few months are a testament to the fact that history is not past, that the passage of time does not necessarily imply progress. The words Sessions quoted were used in the 1840s and 50s to justify slavery. When abolitionists argued that slavery was cruel, and that separating families was a violation of religious ethics, they were met with the argument of religious compliance with the law. John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, told the Washington Post: “Whenever Romans 13 was used in the 18th and 19th century – and Sessions seems to be doing the same thing, so in this sense there is some continuity – it’s a way of manipulating the scriptures to justify your own political agenda.”
The invocation of piety is also familiarly threadbare when the behaviour of this holy sovereign, allegedly with God’s will vested in him, is taken into account. Trump is a man mired in allegations of infidelity committed across the course of his three marriages. His church attendance was summed up in his statement that he had “never asked God for forgiveness”, and he referred to communion as “my little wine” and “my little cracker”. Yet he received 80% of the white evangelical vote. Of his unlikely Christian support base, Amy Sullivan, in the New York Times, says: “Decades of fearmongering about Democrats and religious liberals have worked. 80% of white evangelicals would vote against Jesus Christ himself if he ran as a Democrat.”
This is the most sinister and most powerful element of the dictator’s playbook: the pact with the base. Every policy, every utterance, becomes about what it signifies to its target audience rather than what it objectively means. During the presidential campaign, when Trump said that “you just don’t see the expression Merry Christmas any more”, he wasn’t expressing, or even reflecting, an earnest concern about the erosion of Christian values. He was feeding a paranoia and nativist angst about race and identity. There is no Trump doctrine, but there is a Trump code, transmitted from the pulpits of the White House to his voters.
Where others see panicked children and parents mad with distress when ripped away from their offspring, Trump supporters decipher the scene in terms of what Trump is projecting: your fears are real, your will is done, and I am its executor. Once this line of communication has been established, there is little that can disrupt it, no appeal to emotion or logic that is fruitful. It is a feedback loop that is not about values or religion or even conservatism. It is about prejudice against the other and anger at liberals, the perceived enablers of the other.
To those Americans shocked that ancient biblical texts preaching obedience to the law are being uttered by senior White House officials, those of us who have gone through the anguish of holy texts being used to justify crimes against humanity can extend much empathy but no comfort – and the certainty that there is more to come. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/18/trump-american-c
aliphate-democracy-arab-world
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Democrats did not control CA Legislature from 1999 to 2005?
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.
Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.
Sorry to blow up your false narrative.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Democrats did not control CA Legislature from 1999 to 2005?
No. You obviously don't know shit about California. Let me help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Davis#Budget_crisis
Then, of course, Schwarzenegger became governor in '03, presiding over gridlock and fascistic rural Republicans, who authored the 2005 revisions, as they did in 2000.
Sorry to blow up your false narrative, twice.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.
Sorry to blow up your false narrative.
Actually, the Dems WERE completely in charge of ordinary legislation in 2000. (Increasing taxes requires a supermajority vote.)
2000
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D50/ R29
CA governor D
And though there was a R governor in 2005, the D's were still solidly in control of the legislature.
2005
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D48/ R32
CA governor R
SO IT'S NOT TRUE REPUBLICANS 'DID IT ALL'.
I'd like to think you're mistaken, but the information you chose to highlight, and chose to leave out, in order to present a one-sided picture, makes you look more like a deliberate liar, REAVERFAN.
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And the Republicans came up with the legislation and got it passed.
You are a Russian troll, nothing more. Your credibility is no better than your God Trump's.
I realize that I just taught you more than you've ever known about California politics just now. Don't pretend to know things you clearly don't. You're not that smart.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"And the Republicans came up with the legislation and got it passed."
You mean the DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY passed the legislation in 2000 and the DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY passed the legislation in 2005, AND a DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR signed it in 2000?
I'd say the biggest reason why we have that legislation now is the democrats in office at the time. Because if THEY hadn't voted FOR it, it couldn't become law. It sure is funny how a majority vote works in a democracy, isn't it. Or didn't you understand that?
BAD DEMOCRATS!
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Trump is creating his American caliphate, and democracy has no defence
The terror of the Trump doctrine is not in its innovation but in its imitation. The last few months are a testament to the fact that history is not past, that the passage of time does not necessarily imply progress. The words Sessions quoted were used in the 1840s and 50s to justify slavery. When abolitionists argued that slavery was cruel, and that separating families was a violation of religious ethics, they were met with the argument of religious compliance with the law. John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, told the Washington Post: “Whenever Romans 13 was used in the 18th and 19th century – and Sessions seems to be doing the same thing, so in this sense there is some continuity – it’s a way of manipulating the scriptures to justify your own political agenda.”
The invocation of piety is also familiarly threadbare when the behaviour of this holy sovereign, allegedly with God’s will vested in him, is taken into account. Trump is a man mired in allegations of infidelity committed across the course of his three marriages. His church attendance was summed up in his statement that he had “never asked God for forgiveness”, and he referred to communion as “my little wine” and “my little cracker”. Yet he received 80% of the white evangelical vote. Of his unlikely Christian support base, Amy Sullivan, in the New York Times, says: “Decades of fearmongering about Democrats and religious liberals have worked. 80% of white evangelicals would vote against Jesus Christ himself if he ran as a Democrat.”
This is the most sinister and most powerful element of the dictator’s playbook: the pact with the base. Every policy, every utterance, becomes about what it signifies to its target audience rather than what it objectively means. During the presidential campaign, when Trump said that “you just don’t see the expression Merry Christmas any more”, he wasn’t expressing, or even reflecting, an earnest concern about the erosion of Christian values. He was feeding a paranoia and nativist angst about race and identity. There is no Trump doctrine, but there is a Trump code, transmitted from the pulpits of the White House to his voters.
Where others see panicked children and parents mad with distress when ripped away from their offspring, Trump supporters decipher the scene in terms of what Trump is projecting: your fears are real, your will is done, and I am its executor. Once this line of communication has been established, there is little that can disrupt it, no appeal to emotion or logic that is fruitful. It is a feedback loop that is not about values or religion or even conservatism. It is about prejudice against the other and anger at liberals, the perceived enablers of the other.
To those Americans shocked that ancient biblical texts preaching obedience to the law are being uttered by senior White House officials, those of us who have gone through the anguish of holy texts being used to justify crimes against humanity can extend much empathy but no comfort – and the certainty that there is more to come. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/18/trump-american-c
aliphate-democracy-arab-world
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'd argue that there's no comparison.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by REAVERFAN:Quote:I'd argue that there's no comparison.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Of course you would. Your low IQ doesn't allow you to consider all of the consequences of every action. Only the ones you hyper focus on.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.
Sorry to blow up your false narrative.
Actually, the Dems WERE completely in charge of ordinary legislation in 2000. (Increasing taxes requires a supermajority vote.)
2000
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D50/ R29
CA governor D
And though there was a R governor in 2005, the D's were still solidly in control of the legislature.
2005
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D48/ R32
CA governor R
SO IT'S NOT TRUE REPUBLICANS 'DID IT ALL'.
I'd like to think you're mistaken, but the information you chose to highlight, and chose to leave out, in order to present a one-sided picture, makes you look more like a deliberate liar, REAVERFAN.
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
I had not re-checked the info, but RF seemed to be lying. When I called his lies into question, he clearly doubled down and repeated and amplified his outrageous lies, and obviously told nothing but lies.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So, Ummm, did RF just get out of prison?
Originally posted by reaverfan:
And the Republicans came up with the legislation and got it passed.
You are a Russian troll, nothing more. Your credibility is no better than your God Trump's.
I realize that I just taught you more than you've ever known about California politics just now. Don't pretend to know things you clearly don't. You're not that smart.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I have been wondering about something. Of the number of Illegal Aliens trying to claim Asylum, what percentage are found to be valid claims? And what percent are denied entry due to the claim being frivolously false? What percent deported, what percent jailed?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Disingenuous Liberals are fomenting discord with the pretext of Asylum seekers being unusually detained. This is a lie. Valid Asylees can report to a Port of Entry and present their claim of Asylum. But these Criminals are illegally crossing the border, and then when captured spout the pretext of Asylum.
And how does this compare to normal numbers of Asylum Claims?
Does anybody know? Since MSM is dutifully hiding this info, I suspect the answers are not favorable to them.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Liberals have been whining that there are 10,000 of these kids separated from their families. But they are feverishly hiding the fact that 8,000 were already separated before arriving at the border, because the family had self-separated already, sending their kids alone to infiltrate America.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I have been wondering about something. Of the number of Illegal Aliens trying to claim Asylum, what percentage are found to be valid claims? And what percent are denied entry due to the claim being frivolously false? What percent deported, what percent jailed?
And how does this compare to normal numbers of Asylum Claims?
Does anybody know? Since MSM is dutifully hiding this info, I suspect the answers are not favorable to them.
Hey JSF, do you have an Internet connection? You could go to google.com and enter:
"Of the number of Illegal Aliens trying to claim Asylum, what percentage are found to be valid claims?"
in their search box tool thingy and then see what comes back. Maybe that would help?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.
When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.
When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.
Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.
Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:How many Illegal "help" did second say he keeps on his plantation?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.
Originally posted by second:Quote:Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.
When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.
Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.
Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Back to the topic:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Liberals have been whining that there are 10,000 of these kids separated from their families. But they are feverishly hiding the fact that 8,000 were already separated before arriving at the border, because the family had self-depricates already, sending their kids alone to infiltrate America.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:How many Illegal "help" did second say he keeps on his plantation?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.
When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.
When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.
Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.
Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I'd put the quotes around "plantation" instead of help in that sentence.
I don't know how many slaves he has on his Minecraft plantation.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There seems to be a divide between 2 groups of folk.
Liberals assumed Obama would never adhere to The Constitution nor any Law, and they encouraged his lawlessness, corruption, and reckless abandon.
Same for Hilliary. And Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Lerner, Holder, etc.
So why would anybody consider that this lawless group would also not support Illegal entry into America, and assume that is the best way?
Other folk think Laws still exist, and maybe Obama didn't completely break America. Maybe they just haven't been paying attention the past decade, but think the Constitution has not been discarded. For these folk, it is difficult to understand why some criminally inclined people just don't follow the Law, and enter the country legally.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fact, Obama won two terms, easily. Lets see how your boy does.
tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You already got crushed on tha lie. Why do you keep repeating it like a Russian bot?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Back to the topic:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Liberals have been whining that there are 10,000 of these kids separated from their families. But they are feverishly hiding the fact that 8,000 were already separated before arriving at the border, because the family had self-depricates already, sending their kids alone to infiltrate America.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:None of the "investigations" (witch hunts) the Republicans wasted over 100 million on turned up anything. Are you saying your Republican Gods weren't trying hard enough?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
There seems to be a divide between 2 groups of folk.
Liberals assumed Obama would never adhere to The Constitution nor any Law, and they encouraged his lawlessness, corruption, and reckless abandon.
Same for Hilliary. And Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Lerner, Holder, etc.
So why would anybody consider that this lawless group would also not support Illegal entry into America, and assume that is the best way?
Other folk think Laws still exist, and maybe Obama didn't completely break America. Maybe they just haven't been paying attention the past decade, but think the Constitution has not been discarded. For these folk, it is difficult to understand why some criminally inclined people just don't follow the Law, and enter the country legally.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:6ix, congratulations on never learning a thing. You will be living at bottom until you figure out that throwing around phrases like "supply and demand" does NOT explain how capitalism works for setting wages. Until you, personally, are the very last worker in America, you cannot set your own wage. The boss does. You could force a higher wage by threatening the boss: government forces him to pay more by raising the minimum wage or you force him by sitting idle until he meets your wage demands. But "supply and demand" explains nothing about wages. Your wage is NOT set by the quantity of Central America refugees.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.
And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.
When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.
When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.
Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.
Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
https://hbr.org/2017/10/why-wages-arent-growing-in-america
You hate foreigners; you hate your wages; it seems natural that foreigners must be who ruined your wages. That's incorrect. The correction is: Hate your boss for your low wages. Do something to him to make him give you a raise. As for me, I live a middle-class life. I don't screw my employees so that I can afford a private jet like Trump owns.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If Trump wants to end the separations, he can always go back to the policy he followed for the first 443 days of his administration, but he is not.
He says he’s signing an executive order to end family separations. There is a trick: the actual aim seems to be to pick a fight with the courts and allow separations to continue while blaming judges. Trump signed an executive order allowing children to be detained indefinitely with their parents. The problem is that that violates a 1997 consent decree saying that you can’t detain/imprison children for more than 20 days. Trump will be straight up violating that order in 20 days. So what will almost inevitably happen is that a court will step in, say you can’t do that and then Trump will announce that the judge is forcing him to keep separating families.
Trump has been trying to blame his policy on someone else ever since it started, but the non-Fox media has been pretty good about repeatedly calling this out as a lie. So now he’s going to try to make it into the truth—or something close to the truth, anyway.
Just remember: if he really wants to end the separations, he can always go back to the policy he followed for the first 443 days of his administration. It’s entirely up to him.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why do you feel the need to constantly twist peoples words to suit your own agenda Second?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I had forgotten to mention that they have a code word, it is "strict" - which means "enforcing the Law." Which is obviously the opposite of what Obama did.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
There seems to be a divide between 2 groups of folk.
Liberals assumed Obama would never adhere to The Constitution nor any Law, and they encouraged his lawlessness, corruption, and reckless abandon.
Same for Hilliary. And Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Lerner, Holder, etc.
So why would anybody consider that this lawless group would also not support Illegal entry into America, and assume that is the best way?
Other folk think Laws still exist, and maybe Obama didn't completely break America. Maybe they just haven't been paying attention the past decade, but think the Constitution has not been discarded. For these folk, it is difficult to understand why some criminally inclined people just don't follow the Law, and enter the country legally.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well, it seems Trump really stepped in it now.
He capitulated to MSM and signed a new order circumventing Congress and the Laws passed by Congress.
This way Liberals can now file suit against Trump for Constitutional overreach, and keep the same stories of the past week in the headlines for months or years.
Handy to have some Fake News to rely on while Obama Crimes and Corruption, Hilliary Crimes and Corruption, Comey, McCabe, etc Crimes can be overlooked and unreported.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Could you be more specific? Because I have found those who lean Republican in Texas are a bunch of whinny little cry-babies about their words being twisted. Here are some recent words from famous Republicans and it is all twisted lies:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why do you feel the need to constantly twist peoples words to suit your own agenda Second?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
“Congress and the courts created this problem, and Congress alone can fix it. Until then, we will enforce every law we have on the books to defend the sovereignty and security of the United States.” — Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen
“It's not a policy. Our policy at DHS is to do what we're sworn to do, which is to enforce the law.” — Nielsen
“The only [other] option is to not enforce the law at all.” — Nielsen
“I don't want children taken away from parents. And when you prosecute the parents for coming in illegally, which should happen, you have to take the children away. Now we don't have to prosecute them, but then we're not prosecuting them for coming in illegally.” — Trump
“You can’t do it through an executive order.” — Trump
And not only did the administration say it was bound by man's law to do what it was doing; it said it was also bound by God's law. "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said recently in defending the policy, "to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.”
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders offered a similar justification, which logic would suggest means Trump will have some explaining to do at the Pearly Gates.
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-trump-and-kirstjen-nielsen’s-
embarrassing-surrender-on-separating-families-at-the-border/ar-AAyV5TU?ocid=spartandhp
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I encourage the Justice Department to take each and every single one of these people to trial. When none of these people are convicted, that will be the news. But the GOP doesn't have the guts to take any of this to court. It's easier for the GOP to be a bunch of whinny little cry-babies on FOX.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, it seems Trump really stepped in it now.
He capitulated to MSM and signed a new order circumventing Congress and the Laws passed by Congress.
This way Liberals can now file suit against Trump for Constitutional overreach, and keep the same stories of the past week in the headlines for months or years.
Handy to have some Fake News to rely on while Obama Crimes and Corruption, Hilliary Crimes and Corruption, Comey, McCabe, etc Crimes can be overlooked and unreported.
All of Kirstjen Nielsen's advocating for caging children on the southern border made her hungry for some Mexican food.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Could you be more specific? Because I have found those who lean Republican in Texas are a bunch of whinny little cry-babies about their words being twisted. Here are some recent words from famous Republicans and it is all twisted lies:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why do you feel the need to constantly twist peoples words to suit your own agenda Second?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
“Congress and the courts created this problem, and Congress alone can fix it. Until then, we will enforce every law we have on the books to defend the sovereignty and security of the United States.” — Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen
“It's not a policy. Our policy at DHS is to do what we're sworn to do, which is to enforce the law.” — Nielsen
“The only [other] option is to not enforce the law at all.” — Nielsen
“I don't want children taken away from parents. And when you prosecute the parents for coming in illegally, which should happen, you have to take the children away. Now we don't have to prosecute them, but then we're not prosecuting them for coming in illegally.” — Trump
“You can’t do it through an executive order.” — Trump
And not only did the administration say it was bound by man's law to do what it was doing; it said it was also bound by God's law. "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said recently in defending the policy, "to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.”
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders offered a similar justification, which logic would suggest means Trump will have some explaining to do at the Pearly Gates.
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-trump-and-kirstjen-nielsen’s-
embarrassing-surrender-on-separating-families-at-the-border/ar-AAyV5TU?ocid=spartandhp
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
There is no point in being specific with you. You will just quote a single sentence, twist the words, throw out another insult, and then post an almost entirely unrelated 10 paragraph essay that nobody is going to read.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I will be very specific: you are not getting any raises unless you convince your boss. It is not the quantity of Central America refugees that determine where you work and how much you are paid. It is completely a negotiation between only you and your boss. The invisible hand and supply and demand have nothing to do with how much you are paid. If you are too fucking dumb to understand that Trump can't help you by jailing children, you are too fucking dumb to negotiate a raise. Did you understand, 6ix?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There is no point in being specific with you. You will just quote a single sentence, twist the words, throw out another insult, and then post an almost entirely unrelated 10 paragraph essay that nobody is going to read.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:I will be very specific: you are not getting any raises unless you convince your boss. It is not the quantity of Central America refugees that determine where you work and how much you are paid. It is completely a negotiation between only you and your boss. The invisible hand and supply and demand have nothing to do with how much you are paid. If you are too fucking dumb to understand that Trump can't help you by jailing children, you are too fucking dumb to negotiate a raise. Did you understand, 6ix?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There is no point in being specific with you. You will just quote a single sentence, twist the words, throw out another insult, and then post an almost entirely unrelated 10 paragraph essay that nobody is going to read.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
You are absolutely over-simplifying a very complex issue, and eliminating factors that don't agree with your agenda.
Wages for workers are held down, primarily, by three things that businesses in America do today.
1. Illegal workers driving down wages for the lowest paying jobs.
2. Outsourcing livable wage jobs to countries with skilled labor that can do it at a fraction of the labor cost because the cost of living is so small compared to here.
3. Completely displacing the need for workers in both low and middle paying jobs by automation.
If there were no illegal workers to do the lowest paying jobs for even less than the pathetic minimum wage in this country, the DEMAND for WORKERS for these jobs would increase, thus the pay would increase accordingly.
And if the pay for the simplest and shittiest jobs were to increase due to this, at least to the minimum wage, pay for the better jobs on the lower end would also increase.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And Senate Liberals are feverishly working to prevent any legislation getting passed.
Just to perpetuate the problems they created to begin with.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
For the past week we've all known the 9th Circuit's Flores decision has been hog-tying Trump's options. So now I wonder how long Liberals will wait to sue Trump for violations.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nonsense. Why do you lie so much? Who pays you to come here and tell such whoppers? Who do you think is dumb enough to believe you?
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And Senate Liberals are feverishly working to prevent any legislation getting passed.
Just to perpetuate the problems they created to begin with.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Nice piece of writing, 6ix. It removes from you the responsibility for how much you are paid by placing it beyond your reach. Very articulate, but let me be blunt: you have no fucking idea of what you are talking about and neither does Trump.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
You are absolutely over-simplifying a very complex issue, and eliminating factors that don't agree with your agenda.
Wages for workers are held down, primarily, by three things that businesses in America do today.
1. Illegal workers driving down wages for the lowest paying jobs.
2. Outsourcing livable wage jobs to countries with skilled labor that can do it at a fraction of the labor cost because the cost of living is so small compared to here.
3. Completely displacing the need for workers in both low and middle paying jobs by automation.
If there were no illegal workers to do the lowest paying jobs for even less than the pathetic minimum wage in this country, the DEMAND for WORKERS for these jobs would increase, thus the pay would increase accordingly.
And if the pay for the simplest and shittiest jobs were to increase due to this, at least to the minimum wage, pay for the better jobs on the lower end would also increase.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Faced with a problem Mitch McConnell can’t solve for him, Trump is flailing.
Trump has largely skated by as president, deferring to the policy consensus in Republican Party circles. He’s served as a rubber-stamp signatory of tax legislation he wasn’t involved in crafting and judicial nominations in which he had little say.
But sometimes things happen — like a surge of families with children arriving at the border to press asylum claims — that require leadership in the executive branch and don’t have obvious solutions.
Trump’s response to the crisis at the US-Mexico border — where toddlers are in internment camps and older kids are in tent cities at frightening expense while children sob, health deteriorates, and the long-term damage of toxic stress accumulates — reminds us that he does not know anything about public policy, diplomacy, constitutional law, or legislative strategy.
So you get instead what he’s delivered over the past two weeks — aggressive hostage-taking, lying, trolling, chaos, dissembling, and cruelty — none of which is going to advance Trump’s legislative goals or address the underlying issue of the northward flow of asylum seekers. Even the executive order he signed on Wednesday raises more questions than it will probably solve.
All presidents are tested now and again, and Trump is failing massively. It’s not quite the first time, and it certainly won’t be the last. Being president of the United States is a difficult job, and Donald Trump has no idea how to do it.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"All we have to do is replace Obama. ... We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don't need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. ... We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don't need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate. [...]
Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president of the United States. This is a change for Republicans: the House and Senate doing the work with the president signing bills. His job is to be captain of the team, to sign the legislation that has already been prepared." -Koch puppet Grover Norquist, 2012
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Nice piece of writing, 6ix. It removes from you the responsibility for how much you are paid by placing it beyond your reach. Very articulate, but let me be blunt: you have no fucking idea of what you are talking about and neither does Trump.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
You are absolutely over-simplifying a very complex issue, and eliminating factors that don't agree with your agenda.
Wages for workers are held down, primarily, by three things that businesses in America do today.
1. Illegal workers driving down wages for the lowest paying jobs.
2. Outsourcing livable wage jobs to countries with skilled labor that can do it at a fraction of the labor cost because the cost of living is so small compared to here.
3. Completely displacing the need for workers in both low and middle paying jobs by automation.
If there were no illegal workers to do the lowest paying jobs for even less than the pathetic minimum wage in this country, the DEMAND for WORKERS for these jobs would increase, thus the pay would increase accordingly.
And if the pay for the simplest and shittiest jobs were to increase due to this, at least to the minimum wage, pay for the better jobs on the lower end would also increase.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Faced with a problem Mitch McConnell can’t solve for him, Trump is flailing.
Trump has largely skated by as president, deferring to the policy consensus in Republican Party circles. He’s served as a rubber-stamp signatory of tax legislation he wasn’t involved in crafting and judicial nominations in which he had little say.
But sometimes things happen — like a surge of families with children arriving at the border to press asylum claims — that require leadership in the executive branch and don’t have obvious solutions.
Trump’s response to the crisis at the US-Mexico border — where toddlers are in internment camps and older kids are in tent cities at frightening expense while children sob, health deteriorates, and the long-term damage of toxic stress accumulates — reminds us that he does not know anything about public policy, diplomacy, constitutional law, or legislative strategy.
So you get instead what he’s delivered over the past two weeks — aggressive hostage-taking, lying, trolling, chaos, dissembling, and cruelty — none of which is going to advance Trump’s legislative goals or address the underlying issue of the northward flow of asylum seekers. Even the executive order he signed on Wednesday raises more questions than it will probably solve.
All presidents are tested now and again, and Trump is failing massively. It’s not quite the first time, and it certainly won’t be the last. Being president of the United States is a difficult job, and Donald Trump has no idea how to do it.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
lol
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Owned, yet again. Too dumb to do anything but an embarrassed laugh. ^
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Immigration crisis hit the USA in 2014. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_American_immigration_crisis
Many of the children coming across were unaccompanied minors. The government responded by setting up temporary facilities meant to provide shelter for the people seeking asylum.
As part of this process, the government sent $2.7 billion in aid to provide shelter, food, medical care, lawyers and judges in order to expedite the process as much as possible. However due to the volume of people this was taking too long.
So Obama requested an additional $4 billion to deal with the problem that originated from the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 which made sending some of these people back to their origin country difficult. Rather than assisting with the situation, congress decided to hold the refugees hostage by attempted to get the 2008 act repealed (an act I might add signed into law by the GOP's former President Bush) in exchange for the funds.
What the Obama administration didn't do is forcibly separate children from their parents. That administration had to deal with a large number of unaccompanied minors, and did the best they could while being held back and denied funds by the GOP controlled congress. Now, that isn't to say this was flawless or awesome. It had it's own slew of problem. Conditions weren't great, and the ACLU sued in order to get them approved (go ACLU, you never disappoint me).
The current "administration" under Trump is forcibly separating families and detaining children as a punitive measure to exhibit a "zero tolerance" policy.
That's the difference. Obama had to deal with a crisis and provided whatever he could because he was a humanitarian. The GOP held the refugees hostage, just like they're doing now, in order to strong arm democrats into signing for things like a border wall.
If the GOP cared at all, it would have already fixed this problem. They have majority control of all 3 branches of government, and they have full democratic support for reuniting these children with their families. Any proposal that is about reuniting the families will be fully supported by democrats.
With that being said. The additional $3.7 bln that Obama was asking for to help fix this humanitarian crisis was denied by Senate Republicans.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/09/us/obama-seeks-billions-for-childre
n-immigration-crisis.html
So there was a significant influx of children without parents that came over the border. The abuses should be addressed. But do not forget that the current abuses are sanctioned by the President.
So, once again, the trolls are lying, the Republicans are lying, and you've been proven liars.
/end thread
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
But there was so much more in the Obama administration - namely, deporting parents who were here back to Mexico while leaving their DACA children here. As many as 20,000 children were separated from their parents that way.
THANKS! OBAMA, FOR BEING A DICK!
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why should we spend a dime fixing their problem, let alone billions.
Unless you're coming here legally, stay in Mexico.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Why should a tax payer in Texas have his money spent fixing the problems of Indiana? What is 6ixStringJack in Indiana worth to me in Texas? Nothing at all. I think worthless 6ix owes me some money that he got for SNAP. I certainly remember 6ix defending SNAP as a worthwhile program. It was not worth anything to me to keep 6ix from starving. Give me my money back, 6ix. Do it now!
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why should we spend a dime fixing their problem, let alone billions.
Unless you're coming here legally, stay in Mexico.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
There is a highly technical debate among economists about whether low-education immigrants exert a depressing effect on the wages of low-education native-born workers such as 6ixStringJack (most researchers find that they don’t, but there is some disagreement). This debate, however, is playing no role in Trump policies.
What these policies reflect, instead, is a vision of “American carnage,” of big cities overrun by violent immigrants. And this vision bears no relationship to reality.
For one thing, despite a small uptick since 2014, violent crime in America is actually at historical lows, with the homicide rate back to where it was in the early 1960s. (German crime is also at a historical low, by the way.) Trump’s carnage is a figment of his imagination. More at
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/21/opinion/blood-libel-trump-immigrants.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This poll from Gallup doesn’t distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. Still, after a full year of racist fusillades from Trump aimed at immigrants of all types, the number of Republicans who view immigration as a good thing went up 6%.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/235793/record-high-americans-say-immigrat
ion-good-thing.aspx
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This all helps demonstrate the difference between Obama's goals and Trump's goals. Obama's goal was to import as many unrepentant Criminals (aka Democrat voters) as possible, while Trump's goal is to export and block from entry the Criminals clearly defined by Federal Law.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
But there was so much more in the Obama administration - namely, deporting parents who were here back to Mexico while leaving their DACA children here. As many as 20,000 children were separated from their parents that way.
THANKS! OBAMA, FOR BEING A DICK!
SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I am a bit taken back by the Janus positions of the Libtards lately.
Libtards have spent decades demanding that Government Nanny State be the Institutionalized Norm. CPS, confiscating kids away from loving parents, only Government Bureaucracy can decide what is best for children and babies, and which ones to kill or let live, Government Bureaucrats must be the sole arbiter of child disposition. It Takes a Village (aka Nanny State Government) To Raise a Child.
So now, all of a sudden, their beloved and entrenched Government Bureaucracy Child Care is not better than Criminal parents, Criminal Families, or the child traffickers they are with?
Law-Abiding Citizens cannot get relief from these Nazi Liberal Bureaucrats, but Criminal invaders must be treated better than American Citizens? Why must they be treated better?
Does any reasonable person see any logic in this?
Or is it solely knee-jerk Liberalism at work?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Why should a tax payer in Texas have his money spent fixing the problems of Indiana? What is 6ixStringJack in Indiana worth to me in Texas? Nothing at all. I think worthless 6ix owes me some money that he got for SNAP. I certainly remember 6ix defending SNAP as a worthwhile program. It was not worth anything to me to keep 6ix from starving. Give me my money back, 6ix. Do it now!
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Why should we spend a dime fixing their problem, let alone billions.
Unless you're coming here legally, stay in Mexico.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
There is a highly technical debate among economists about whether low-education immigrants exert a depressing effect on the wages of low-education native-born workers such as 6ixStringJack (most researchers find that they don’t, but there is some disagreement). This debate, however, is playing no role in Trump policies.
What these policies reflect, instead, is a vision of “American carnage,” of big cities overrun by violent immigrants. And this vision bears no relationship to reality.
For one thing, despite a small uptick since 2014, violent crime in America is actually at historical lows, with the homicide rate back to where it was in the early 1960s. (German crime is also at a historical low, by the way.) Trump’s carnage is a figment of his imagination. More at
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/21/opinion/blood-libel-trump-immigrants.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
There's a difference, idiot.
I pay income taxes, and I pay property taxes. Even when I wasn't working, I paid property taxes. Like every legal citizen that has a social security number, when I am working, part of my income is going towards social security that I'm not likely to get when I retire. I'm just getting MY money back when and where I can.
Jesus... Leftists today and their hypocrisy and false equivalencies.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Time magazine cover showing President Trump looking down on a crying 2-year-old Honduran girl.
Of course now we know that the “crying girl” story was totally fake news. That girl was never separated from her mother, and they had paid a smuggler six thousand dollars to get them across the border.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Time magazine cover showing President Trump looking down on a crying 2-year-old Honduran girl.
Of course now we know that the “crying girl” story was totally fake news. That girl was never separated from her mother, and they had paid a smuggler six thousand dollars to get them across the border.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
More fail from the reichwingers.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
More fail from the reichwingers.
Trolls reaverfan, they are nothing but trolls. I would say imagine them attacking the child and not Trump but I don't have to. They do so by calling her story fake news. What a shit head JSF is.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Now we know the answers.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
They have been whining that when their Criminal parents are held in Adult Detention or Prison, the children should be also incarcerated in order to keep innocent children together with their Criminal parents.
To me this seems like it would be unjust and unfair, but that makes it all par for the course for intolerant and unjust Libtards.
So the children can die.
Good job Libtards.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Now we know the answers.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
They have been whining that when their Criminal parents are held in Adult Detention or Prison, the children should be also incarcerated in order to keep innocent children together with their Criminal parents.
To me this seems like it would be unjust and unfair, but that makes it all par for the course for intolerant and unjust Libtards.
So the children can die.
Good job Libtards.
Yup.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
President Donald Trump's Actions Call Into Question Fitness For Office
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh. So I guess you can mark it in the books that January 4th, 2019 was the time that Democrats called into question Trump's fitness for office.
It's a new year. Just forget about the last two years where they did that every single day. That never happened.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
And now the Democratic politicians and pundits are all calling for MORE WAR and you guys just fucking eat it up because your hatred for "the other side" is so strong.
YOUR TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME HAS GOT YOU SO TWISTED THAT DEMOCRATS ARE BECOMING THE PARTY OF NEVER-ENDING WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW IT!!!!
Your "side" was spending weeks singing McCain's praises and regularly talks about how much they miss GWB these days.
George W. "Patriot Act, eternal Middle East conflict, Anti-Gay-Marriage Constitutional Amendment" Bush is what you guys are longing for in 2019?????
Wake the fuck up.
Find a message.
Kick those corporate neo-liberal pro-war hawks out.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened. It was historic, regardless of what your mind will accept and you will post.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened.
T
That wasn't a wave. Not even close.
Wow... The house flipped sides. Something that has happened EVERY SINGLE MID-TERM ELECTION save for ONE in the last 100 years.
Now it's your turn to Google what the predictions by the MSM were for both the house and the senate as well as governorships 4 months prior to the mid-terms compared to what actually happened.
You'll find it was not much different than Hillary's "stunning" loss.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:oops. Maybe you forgot 2002, 2014?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened.
That wasn't a wave. Not even close.
Wow... The house flipped sides. Something that has happened EVERY SINGLE MID-TERM ELECTION save for ONE in the last 100 years.
Now it's your turn to Google what the predictions by the MSM were for both the house and the senate as well as governorships 4 months prior to the mid-terms compared to what actually happened.
You'll find it was not much different than Hillary's "stunning" loss.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:oops. Maybe you forgot 2002, 2014?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened.
That wasn't a wave. Not even close.
Wow... The house flipped sides. Something that has happened EVERY SINGLE MID-TERM ELECTION save for ONE in the last 100 years.
Now it's your turn to Google what the predictions by the MSM were for both the house and the senate as well as governorships 4 months prior to the mid-terms compared to what actually happened.
You'll find it was not much different than Hillary's "stunning" loss.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
How is 2014 an example?
Republicans already had control of the house.
I should clarify that I meant it flipped to the other side that was not held currently by the President.
The Republicans managed to already do that in the first mid-term after Obama was President.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Funny thing,,,Miller is Jewish.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
SO predictable. This is 100% Trump, and no one else. Well, Miller the Nazi is behind it, but his Satanic influence will be out the door soon.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:yeah, that was confusing.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:oops. Maybe you forgot 2002, 2014?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened.
That wasn't a wave. Not even close.
Wow... The house flipped sides. Something that has happened EVERY SINGLE MID-TERM ELECTION save for ONE in the last 100 years.
Now it's your turn to Google what the predictions by the MSM were for both the house and the senate as well as governorships 4 months prior to the mid-terms compared to what actually happened.
You'll find it was not much different than Hillary's "stunning" loss.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
How is 2014 an example?
Republicans already had control of the house.
I should clarify that I meant it flipped to the other side that was not held currently by the President.
The Republicans managed to already do that in the first mid-term after Obama was President.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Every single Midterm does not mean Every single Midterm. M'kay.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:yeah, that was confusing.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:oops. Maybe you forgot 2002, 2014?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I've got an idea for Democrats.
How about you find a fucking platform that speaks to the people and run on it?
Two years of running on "We're not Trump" didn't work for Hillary and didn't result in the Blue Wave you were expecting either.
Wow, I guess you hadn't heard yet. It's called the mid-terms dummy. Google it and check out what happened.
That wasn't a wave. Not even close.
Wow... The house flipped sides. Something that has happened EVERY SINGLE MID-TERM ELECTION save for ONE in the last 100 years.
Now it's your turn to Google what the predictions by the MSM were for both the house and the senate as well as governorships 4 months prior to the mid-terms compared to what actually happened.
You'll find it was not much different than Hillary's "stunning" loss.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
How is 2014 an example?
Republicans already had control of the house.
I should clarify that I meant it flipped to the other side that was not held currently by the President.
The Republicans managed to already do that in the first mid-term after Obama was President.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Every single Midterm does not mean Every single Midterm. M'kay.
I like to use these instances to point out just how often those of us not buying into any of the Russia bullshit actually disagree with each other. It happens quite frequently.
One might notice that the rest of them are either in 100% agreement with each other at all times, they maintain their solidarity by never speaking up when somebody on their "side" says something they don't agree with, or they are one single person pretending to be about 6 different people.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Today Stretch Pelosi had a Bill for adding merely an additional 100 Administrative Judges to the Border Entry Points, and she refused to allow it to come up for Vote.
For those not following, a Ruling has decided that Children of Illegal Alien Criminals cannot be held for more than 20 days in a detention facility. So when the Illegal Alien parents have claimed to seek Asylum, then after 20 days, their children are taken from them - by order of the liberal judges. Sen Ted Cruz has issued a report regarding how many more Administrative Judges would be needed to process the backlog of Asylum cases and get the process time down to 20 days. The amount needed is more than 100 judges, but Stretch Pelosi won't even allow that many, enuring that more children will be separated from their parents.
This is in step with her other obstructionist work, such as her strides to REDUCE the number of beds in detention facilities, claiming the backlog is just a "made-up" crisis, and no children of detainees need to have beds.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME