The Anti-Trump Libtards Running The Trump-Russia-Collusion Farce

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Saturday, October 24, 2020 01:46
VIEWED: 15617
PAGE 1 of 2

1 2 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:09 PM

This is the reboot of this thread.

There are so many scattered threads with Libtards here constantly denying the Special Counsel Investigators are biased.

So I'll post these facts where they can be referenced here.

First, they claim Mueller is a registered Republican. There is no confirmation of this claim.
Mueller stated in 2001 that he was a registered Republican at that time. In New York one must be Registered with a Party in order to vote. With a choice of being forced to vote for Criminal Democrats, or be able to vote for potentially honest candidates, any reasonable person must register as Republican. But a Republican in New York is often a RINO, essentially a Democrat in the Real World.
Mueller was enthusiastically supported by Chucky Schumer, and Appointed by Obama in 2011.
Upon Appointment as Special Counsel, Mueller resigned from WilmerHale.

Of the 19 known Special Counsel Investigators, none voted for Trump, none ever donated to Trump, and only one donated to any Republican (couple thousand, compared to over $38,000 donated to Democraps by this one donor). At least 13 are Registered Democraps, and 11 are Donors to only Democraps.
Highly unbiased, right?

Peter Strzok, (D), conspired with McCabe and Page to trump up Trump charges and produce fraudulent evidence in FISA Warrant Application, and cover up piles of crimes by Hilliary and Obama.

Lisa C. Page (D), conspired with McCabe and Strzok to trump up Trump charges and produce fraudulent evidence in FISA Warrant Application, and cover up piles of crimes by Hilliary and Obama.

Jeannie Rhee (D), from WilmerHale, Donated to Hilliary and Obama, other Democraps. Represented Hilliary in a lawsuit regarding use of a private email server. Also represented Clinton Crime Family Foundation.

James Quarles (D), from WilmerHale, donated to Hilliary and Obama.

Michael Dreeben (D), donated to Hilliary and Obama.

Elizabeth Prelogar (D), donated to Hilliary and Obama. Former Law Clerk to SCOTUS Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan.

Lawrence Rush Atkinson (D), donated to Hilliary.

Andrew Weissmann (D), donated to Obama and other Democraps.

Andrew Goldstein (D), donated to Obama.

Brandon Van Grack (D), donated to Obama. DoJ since 2010 (Obama Regime).

Aaron Zelinksky (D), has written excessively partisan articles for Liberal outlet HuffPost.

Adam Jed (D), donated to Democraps. Defended Abortion requirement in Obamacare, and argued to strike down the Definition of Marriage. Former Clerk for SCJ John Paul Stevens.

Greg Andres (D), donated to Democraps.

Ryan Dickey (D). Prosecuted Marcel Lehel, who hacked Sid Blumenthal's email and thus exposed Hilliary's illegal Private Email Address for Government work.

Kyle Freeny (D). Donated to Hilliary and Obama, worked in Obama's White House in 2011, vetting Appointees.

Aaron Zebley (no Party), from WilmerHale, donated to Democraps. Represented Hilliary Toadie Justin Cooper (phone smasher) regarding setup of Hilliary's private email server.

Zainab Ahmad (no Party). Recruited to DoJ by AG Loretta Lynch (Obama Regime).

Scott Andrew Cherney Meisler (no Party). DoJ CrimDiv since 2009 (Obama Regime)

Brian M. Richardson (no Party). Clerked for SCJ Stephen Breyer.

Brock W. Domin, FBI Special Agent.

Peter Carr, veteran DOJ spokesperson.

Maybe Bruce Orr.

Added December 2019:
Kevin Clinesmith - also ousted Feb 2018, around the same time as Strzok & Page.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:09 PM

More info will be posted here.

Mueller was appointed by Public Order on 17 May 2017.

Rhee represented Hilliary in a lawsuit regarding unsecured private email server, obstructing access to Hilliary's "private" emails which didnt exist. Also represented Clinton Crime Family Foundation for racketeering. And Obama Toadie Ben Rhodes for his crimes.

Zebley represented Hilliary Toadie Justin (Hilliary's cell phone smasher) Cooper regarding setup of Hilliary's unsecured private email server. Sounds like he only served in DoJ or FBI during 1990s (Clinton Regime) and later under Obama Regime, but not during Bush43 - haven't ironed out the details. FBI SA for 7 years (starting with Squad I-49 by 1998, likely after Jan 96 and then until after 2001), then AUSA in VA, then Mueller Chief of Staff at FBI (starting when Mueller extended in 2011 under Obama Regime), then DOJ NatSecDiv, then in Mar 2014 to WilmerHale.

Apparently Freeny provided highly biased, or fraudulent, or contemptuous representation for Obama pretending to enforce Federal Law, and lying to the Judge that Obama had not weakened Immigration Enforcement, invoking ire of Judge Andrew Hanen in 2016. When 26 States sued Obama.

Andres worked for DoJ only from 2010 to 2012 (Obama Regime).

Weissman attended Hilliary's Election Night Party, and praised Sally Yates for her refusal to perform her duties for Trump.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:10 PM

Wow. Weissmann is quite the Royal Snake. How is this crook not even disbarred yet?
OH! That's right, Obama Regime Department of Injustice only PROMOTES the most despicable lawyers, the most corrupt Prosecutors, the most Malicious Persecutors, the most heinously unjust Officers of The Court.

I am unsure I can even explain this adequately.

Remember the Arthur Anderson corrupted Prosecution by intensely corrupt prosecutors? The Make Believe crimes dreamt up by the Prosecutors? The 9-0 SCOTUS ruling vacating the Fake Convictions?

Remember the Wrongful Convictions of the 4 Merrill Lynch execs?

Remember the Malicious Prosecution of Senator Ted Stevens by corrupt Prosecutors?

Remember the Cartagena Sex scandal cover-up, where only USSS and Military personnel were fired, but all White House and Obamabot participants escaped unscathed?

Remember when a District Court Judge had to explain to an Enron defendant that he was pleading guilty to a crime that didn't exist?

Matthew Friedrich was the corrupt Prosecutor on Ted Stevens.

Lisa Monaco and Kathryn Ruemmler were the corrupt Prosecutors able to wrongfully convict the Merrill Lynch 4 of Fake Crimes.

Friedrich, his mentor and boss Leslie Caldwell, and boss Weissmann together were the corrupt Prosecutors which annihilated Arthur Anderson and their 85,000 employees with Fake Convictions.

The mentoring, training, tutelage, seeds of these corrupt practices for unjust Prosecutions were developed among Task Force Leader Weissmann, Monaco, Ruemmler, Caldwell, Friedrich in the FBI's Enron Task Force, under Director Mueller. The Arthur Anderson trumped up case was corrupted as part of The Enron Task Force. Perhaps Mueller learned this from his Malicious Persecution of Richard Jewell.

Matthew Friedrich was promoted Acting Assistant AG in the Obama Regime.

Leslie Caldwell was promoted to Assistant AG in the Obama Regime until Jan 2017.

Kathy Ruemmler (D) was promoted to Principal Associate Deputy AG in Jan 2009, and White House Counsel from 2011-14, and was integrally involved in The IRS email scandal cover-up, the Benghazi cover-up, the Solyndra cover-up, the Cartagena Sex scandal cover-up, and the Recess Appointment circumvention of Law. She was reportedly the real world model for Olivia Pope. She had previously served as Associate Counsel to Slick Willie 2000-01.

Lisa Monaco (D) was promoted to WH National Security Advisor from 2013-Jan 2017 after Asst AG from 2011-13. All in Obama Regime. She previously suckled as Counsel to AG Janet Reno 1998-2001, then after Enron as Special Counselor to Dir Mueller, Deputy Chief of Staff, CoS until 2009 (replaced by Zebley).

Merrill Lynch Convictions were Vacated by 5th US Court of Appeals in 2006.
Arthur Anderson Convictions were reversed 9-0 by SCOTUS in 2005.

The most heinous practices of corruption were fostered, nurtured, developed, rewarded by Mueller and Obama.
Horrifying that each of these are not rotting in prison.

Here is a link:
Www.seeking-justice.com/another-enron-task-force-prosecutor-poised-to-
head-doj-criminal-division/

Www.Observer.com/2014/06/all-the-presidents-muses-obama-and-procesutor
ial-misconduct/

WWW.Washingtontimes.com/news/2017/Oct/22/Christopher-wray-robert-muell
ers-top-prosecutor-kn/

Perhaps the best link:
Www.observer.com/2015/01/in-andrew-weissmann-the-doj-makes-stunningly-
bad-choice-for-crucial-role/

Www.businessinsider.com/the-complete-and-utter-humiliation-of-the-enro
n-task-force-2009-10//

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:10 PM

More linkies.

A funny denial of the facts:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jun/26/donald-
trump/trump-wrongly-calls-muellers-special-counsel-clint/

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:10 PM

Some helpful linkies:

https://heavy.com/news/2017/06/robert-mueller-team-of-lawyers-investig
ators-russia-probe/

Check the drop down info under Team List:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%8
0%93present)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-several
-team-members-gave-up-million-dollar-jobs-to-work-on-special-counsel-investigation/2017/08/08/e11169da-7b78-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html?utm_term=.848a7727a337

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/list-of-shady-corrupt-and-poss
ible-criminal-activities-and-scandals-surrounding-special-counsel-mueller/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/24/mueller-probe-meet-lawyers-
who-gave-to-hillary-now-investigating-team-trump.html

https://www.justice.gov/sco

http://abcnews.go.com/US/robert-muellers-russia-investigation-team-los
es-2nd-fbi/story?id=50166109

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/15/muellers-russia-prosecutors-
have-lots-biases-and-conflicts-interest-heres-partial-list.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/lawyers-robert-mueller-hired-for-the-tr
ump-russia-investigation-2017-6

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 15, 2018 1:11 PM

These are pertinent posts copied from the original thread.

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
JSF ... THUGR has an obsession and he will shit up every thread possible with his endless screeching and hyperventilation about RUSSIA!!! Just ignore him.

Thank you for digging up those facts about the "investigation team"; that kind of info is hard to come by.

No kidding. And it will promptly be ignored or forgotten by those with the FACTS Vaccination.

But the title should provide reference for where to find the info now. And new revelations can be added here, in a central thread.

And I do welcome legitimate additions and corrections to this information about this Farce clearly identified in the title.

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
That was a pretty good summary of stuff I've already read, and a lot of stuff I've never seen before.

THANKS! JSF.

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, March 17, 2018 8:08 AM

Updated, with a fresh start.

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 8:47 AM

Hey JSF, are you going to watch 60 minutes next Sunday. It looks like it's going to be a good one. Since this is a thread about Trump I guess we can discuss what's going on with him and the porn star right?

T

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 8:52 AM

Oops...another win for the libtards...tick tock
T

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 8:59 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

More info will be posted here.

OK...

T

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 9:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Updated, with a fresh start.

And it's a good one. Good for you buddy...

T

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 9:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

2

Wow, this is everywhere I look. What do you think. I guess we'll learn more next Sunday.

T

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 9:11 AM

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, March 17, 2018 2:33 PM

Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

So what you're saying is it would be more fair if they were all pro-Trump Republicans.

THGRRI

Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, March 18, 2018 12:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, I know I have not finished compiling the data.

I'm beginning to consider if this is a never-ending rats nest.

So far no evidence that Mueller or Rosenstein have allowed any fair, balanced, unbiased nonpartisan professionals to get near the Witch Hunt.
Perhaps more accurately, nobody is considered unless they are first proven to be highly biased against Trump and/or GOP.
So what you're saying is it would be more fair if they were all pro-Trump Republicans.

That would probably be more fair.
But a balanced mix would suggest fairness.
The presence of at least one who was not a rabid partisan hack attack dog might imply the pretense of fairness.

THGRRI

Sunday, March 18, 2018 3:03 AM

In wake of McCabe firing, Trump lawyer calls for end to Mueller's probe

March 17 (UPI) -- A lawyer for President Donald Trump on Saturday said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should end Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties with Russia.

John Dowd made the statement after Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, one of the first officials at the bureau to scrutinize possible links between the Trump team and Russian election meddling.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/03/17/In-wake-of-McCabe-firing-Tr
ump-lawyer-calls-for-end-to-Muellers-probe/6791521309116/

Exciting isn't it?

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, March 18, 2018 4:06 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In wake of McCabe firing, Trump lawyer calls for end to Mueller's probe

March 17 (UPI) -- A lawyer for President Donald Trump on Saturday said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should end Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties with Russia.

John Dowd made the statement after Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, one of the first officials at the bureau to scrutinize possible links between the Trump team and Russian election meddling.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/03/17/In-wake-of-McCabe-firing-Tr
ump-lawyer-calls-for-end-to-Muellers-probe/6791521309116/

Exciting isn't it?

T

You got that thrill crawling up your leg?
Didn't MSM report that Rosenstein or Wray fired McCabe?

For some reason you neglected to mention that Rosenstein clearly stated that expansion of the probe beyond Trump-Russia-Collusion must be approved by him. Certainly the reverse should be true.

THGRRI

Sunday, March 18, 2018 7:16 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
In wake of McCabe firing, Trump lawyer calls for end to Mueller's probe

March 17 (UPI) -- A lawyer for President Donald Trump on Saturday said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein should end Robert Mueller's investigation into whether Trump's campaign had ties with Russia.

John Dowd made the statement after Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, one of the first officials at the bureau to scrutinize possible links between the Trump team and Russian election meddling.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/03/17/In-wake-of-McCabe-firing-Tr
ump-lawyer-calls-for-end-to-Muellers-probe/6791521309116/

Exciting isn't it?

T
You got that thrill crawling up your leg?
Didn't MSM report that Rosenstein or Wray fired McCabe?

For some reason you neglected to mention that Rosenstein clearly stated that expansion of the probe beyond Trump-Russia-Collusion must be approved by him. Certainly the reverse should be true.

Clearly you don't have a command of the facts. And as just happened in a different thread, second showed how you make shit up.

T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, March 18, 2018 10:08 AM

Added the initial rough version of the Weissmann Enron Task Force Snakepit.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, March 19, 2018 11:59 AM

I have been adding info to the first 3 posts.

Does any of this seem even slightly like unbiased selection of Investigators?

Any slight indication of a single fair, balanced, unbiased participant?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:36 AM

Well, this linky looks like it helps uncover the SOP of Mueller's Rogue FBI Team, falsifying evidence and sworn documents,etc ::

HTTPs://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/10/puzzle-pieces-former-a
sst-sec-of-state-robert-charles-discusses-the-fisa-review-court-may-explain-judge-ruben-contreras-recusal/comment-page-1/

Plus, it sounds like Mueller absorbed the Investigators from the Guccifer 2.0 team. No details on their names yet.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, April 3, 2018 12:03 PM

I heard about an article which explained how CIA Director Brennan was the ringmaster of this whole circus.

I cannot access the story right now, but I think it was by Michael Doran. The story may have been from 13 March 2018. "The Real Collusion Story" sounds like the story, but I cannot confirm.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:11 AM

Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

SECOND

Tuesday, April 10, 2018 5:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Rosenstein has effectively annointed himself defacto AG, outside of his Constitutional Authority.

So nothing Mueller has Investigated, outside of nonexistent Trump-Russia Collusion, or brought charges for (none of which is related to Trump-Russia Collusion) has any merit or Authority.

Sessions had recused himself specifically from the Trump-Russia Collusion Investigation because he had been an advisor and surrogate for the 2016 Trump Campaign. He did not recuse himself from any tax or IRS matter, or any business dealings from before the campaign, or any misstatements uttered by subordinates, or anything that the SC has filed charges about, or convened Grand Juries about.

Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

JewelStaiteFan, raiding the office of a lawyer suspected of bank fraud is how prosecutors do their job. A famous Federal prosecutor explains:

Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, a friend of Trump, called the Cohen raids “a little heavy-handed.”

“Is this surprising? Yes,” said Giuliani, also a former U.S. attorney. “Is it extraordinary? No. This is the way prosecutors get information — sometimes to convict and prosecute, sometimes to exculpate.”

Criticizing Mueller for veering into “highly personal issues,” such as the alleged Daniels encounter, Giuliani added, “The only thing that’s happening, perhaps, is that Mueller is trying to compel the president to testify.”

See JewelStaiteFan, Cohen has long been a fixer for Trump, as well as his family and business. He’s done the dirty work that Trump hasn’t wanted to do himself, and he’s been doing it for a decade. It is never unconstitutional to raid a suspected crooked lawyer’s office. Cohen does not have Presidential immunity or a pardon, yet. Maybe Trump should have pardoned Cohen on his first day in office?

https://goo.gl/242Eg9

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SECOND

Tuesday, April 10, 2018 8:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?

It’s not easy to search a practicing lawyer’s office. As The Washington Post reported, “To serve a search warrant on a practicing attorney, federal prosecutors are required to obtain approval from top Justice Department officials. That means the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Geoffrey S. Berman, ... as well as Justice Department officials in Washington, probably signed off.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Berman to the job in January. Berman has a reputation among his friends and co-workers as a sharp, hard-working lawyer. And he’s certainly not part of any Democratic cabal out to get Trump: He donated $5,400 to Trump’s presidential campaign.

Berman also met personally with Trump when he was up for the job, according to CNN.

Trump fired the previous U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Preet Bharara, just three months into his presidency. Bharara rejected Trump’s overtures to establish a direct line of communication, and he told the White House he did not find the contact appropriate. Less than a day later, Trump fired him. Is now the time for Trump to fire the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Geoffrey S. Berman?

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/us-attorney-behind-the-michael-cohen-r
aid-is-a-trump-appointee/ar-AAvHnoS?ocid=spartandhp

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, April 11, 2018 1:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?
It’s not easy to search a practicing lawyer’s office....blah blah blah.

Why avert the question? You haven't discovered a suitable spin yet?

Yet more diversions to other topics are not substitutes for an answer.

Did Sessions recuse himself? Or did Sessions authorize this?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, April 13, 2018 5:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Did Sessions recuse himself from legal matters of Mike Cohen, unrelated to Trump-Russia Collusion? Or have Mueller and Rosenstein become unmoored from their Authority, granting themselves Unconstitutional Powers?
It’s not easy to search a practicing lawyer’s office....blah blah blah.
Why avert the question? You haven't discovered a suitable spin yet?

Yet more diversions to other topics are not substitutes for an answer.

Did Sessions recuse himself? Or did Sessions authorize this?

Did Rosenstein usurp the Attorney General by expanding the Witch Hunt beyond his authority, trampling the AG's authority?

I heard a former FEC Chairman clearly state that pretending to consider any Cohen payment as a "contribution in kind" was preposterous.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, April 20, 2018 9:28 AM

Of the many valid points absent from the Libtard discussion, I have not recalled oft mention of the Jan 2000 Clinton DoJ Constitutional Brief regarding pursuit of indictment against a sitting President.

The Clinton Libtards detailed why this should not be happening. This is the most recent and current legal position of the US Government.

Are Rosenstein, Mueller, and the other Libtards hell bent on destroying or circumventing the Constitution?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, April 21, 2018 3:53 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Of the many valid points absent from the Libtard discussion, I have not recalled oft mention of the Jan 2000 Clinton DoJ Constitutional Brief regarding pursuit of indictment against a sitting President.

The Clinton Libtards detailed why this should not be happening. This is the most recent and current legal position of the US Government.

Are Rosenstein, Mueller, and the other Libtards hell bent on destroying or circumventing the Constitution?

I had hoped to locate a copy of the report or memorandum, but so far it has proven elusive.

I only found this so far:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/insider/2016/11/09/can-a-president-trump-
be-prosecuted-based-upon-allegations-of-past-misconduct/#79d7a940491b

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, April 22, 2018 2:43 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Of the many valid points absent from the Libtard discussion, I have not recalled oft mention of the Jan 2000 Clinton DoJ Constitutional Brief regarding pursuit of indictment against a sitting President.

The Clinton Libtards detailed why this should not be happening. This is the most recent and current legal position of the US Government.

Are Rosenstein, Mueller, and the other Libtards hell bent on destroying or circumventing the Constitution?
I had hoped to locate a copy of the report or memorandum, but so far it has proven elusive.

I only found this so far:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/insider/2016/11/09/can-a-president-trump-
be-prosecuted-based-upon-allegations-of-past-misconduct/#79d7a940491b

Here we go. A linky:
https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenab
ility-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution

And the document:
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op
-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

I was mistaken, it was not Jan 2000, but Oct 2000.

1KIKI

Sunday, April 22, 2018 4:39 AM

For those who need a teaser to click on the link, here is the opening paragraph:

Quote:
In 1973, the Department concluded that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions. We have been asked to summarize and review the analysis provided in support of that conclusion, and to consider whether any subsequent developments in the law lead us today to reconsider and modify or disavow that determination.1 We believe that the conclusion reached by the Department in 1973 still represents the best interpretation of the Constitution.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op
-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, April 22, 2018 10:23 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
For those who need a teaser to click on the link, here is the opening paragraph:
Quote:
In 1973, the Department concluded that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions. We have been asked to summarize and review the analysis provided in support of that conclusion, and to consider whether any subsequent developments in the law lead us today to reconsider and modify or disavow that determination.1 We believe that the conclusion reached by the Department in 1973 still represents the best interpretation of the Constitution.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op
-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

And for those partisan readers, October 2000 was during President Clinton's Regime.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, April 22, 2018 10:37 AM

I also don't really hear Libtards adequately rationalizing why Strzok and Comey crafted Hilliary's exoneration 2 months before bothering to ask the first question of any interview or start any pretense of Investigation.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, April 26, 2018 5:37 AM

This is a somewhat hilarious denial of the facts by Libtard Politifact, but it supports some facts about this team.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jun/26/donald-
trump/trump-wrongly-calls-muellers-special-counsel-clint/

JJ

Thursday, April 26, 2018 5:44 AM

JJ

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, April 27, 2018 4:52 AM

Apparently James Comey announced in the Manderson Pooper interview that he was not a Republican.
There goes another Libtard claim/denial out the window.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, May 1, 2018 1:26 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I heard about an article which explained how CIA Director Brennan was the ringmaster of this whole circus.

I cannot access the story right now, but I think it was by Michael Doran. The story may have been from 13 March 2018. "The Real Collusion Story" sounds like the story, but I cannot confirm.

More details have been clarified.
One monkey, Clapper, directed FBI Director Comey to broach the Fake Dossier to Trump, and then to leak the subject to media. Clapper also contacted media to let them be on the lookout for the upcoming leak.

Yesterday on some Libtard Fake Story show, maybe Meet The Depressed, Comey was "interviewed" with a softball tossing exchange.
Comey stated that it was his "assignment" to inform Trump about the existence of the Fake Dossier which Trump did not know about, but it was not part of his "assignment" to inform Trump about other pertinent details surrounding this Fake Dossier which Trump also did not know about. Apparently these details included Comey's knowing the Fake Dossier was paid for by Hilliary and other Libtard Criminals.
The purpose of broaching the subject with Trump was to make it "newsworthy" for Fake News scriptwriters.

How detrimental to Comey's Criminal Defense will this admission of his be? How deep did he step in it?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, May 2, 2018 1:34 AM

Finally, the House has drafted Articles of Impeachment.
Against Rod Rosenstein.

What took them so long?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, May 2, 2018 5:41 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Finally, the House has drafted Articles of Impeachment.
Against Rod Rosenstein.

What took them so long?

I didn't even realize it was the Freedom Caucus fighting for our Freedoms yet again this time.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/01/house-freedom-caucus-drafts
-impeachment-articles-against-rosenstein-as-last-resort.html

Shiny.
Eight separate Articles of Impeachable offenses.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, May 2, 2018 7:04 AM

And the list of Perjury Trap questions Mueller wants to Trap Trump with has been released.
None of them have any relation to any crimes, let alone any Collusion.

Since everybody already agrees Rod Rosenstein was the person who made the recommendation to Trump to fire Comey, why is Mueller not asking Rosenstein the reasons, instead of asking Trump for Rosenstein's reasons?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, May 4, 2018 12:12 PM

Apparently there is a book covering a lot of this, titled The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Friday, May 4, 2018 6:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently there is a book covering a lot of this, titled The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.

What's it about?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, May 5, 2018 4:06 AM

Apparently today Federal Judge T.S. Ellis declared the Mueller team are plainly liars.

Maybe we should refer to them as The Muelliar Team.

Sounds like the Judge might throw out all of the Manafort non-case.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, May 5, 2018 5:35 AM

Peripheral to this topic, but MSM reported Trump's approval rating as 51%, and now even Shifty Schiff is pleading for Libtards and other Democraps to SHUT UP about Impeachment, Indictment, and Investigation.

SECOND

Saturday, May 5, 2018 6:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Peripheral to this topic, but MSM reported Trump's approval rating as 51%, and now even Shifty Schiff is pleading for Libtards and other Democraps to SHUT UP about Impeachment, Indictment, and Investigation.

A good surgeon won’t give false hope to a patient with two inoperable tumors. Trump is brain cancer. Pence is liver cancer. If one doesn’t kill, the other will. The Democrats recommend hospice care and large doses of morphine for this White House.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

6IXSTRINGJACK

Saturday, May 5, 2018 9:07 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Peripheral to this topic, but MSM reported Trump's approval rating as 51%, and now even Shifty Schiff is pleading for Libtards and other Democraps to SHUT UP about Impeachment, Indictment, and Investigation.
A good surgeon won’t give false hope to a patient with two inoperable tumors. Trump is brain cancer. Pence is liver cancer. If one doesn’t kill, the other will. The Democrats recommend hospice care and large doses of morphine for this White House.

I believed I warned about Pence in the second post on the Trump Impeachment Clock thread about a year and a half ago.

I'm glad we're all finally getting on board with that warning.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SECOND

Saturday, May 5, 2018 7:12 PM

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/05/04/more-serious-than-watergate/

I understand the line Rep. Adam Schiff is trying to walk in his New York Times editorial. Schiff is the ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee and he is well aware of how much incriminating evidence has already been gathered on the president, his associates, and his campaign.

Schiff wisely counsels caution and patience for reasons that span everything from an interest in national unity to simple pragmatism to partisan electoral strategy. The impeachment of a president is a weighty prospect and when necessary it requires the greatest possible consensus. If it is seen as politically motivated or an attempt to nullify an election, it not only can be harmful to the country but it might even prevent the president’s party from doing what the facts morally obligate them to do.

For these reasons, the Democrats would be wise to treat any possible impeachment as hypothetical rather than as a campaign promise.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, May 5, 2018 10:38 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently today Federal Judge T.S. Ellis declared the Mueller team are plainly liars.

Maybe we should refer to them as The Muelliar Team.

Sounds like the Judge might throw out all of the Manafort non-case.

I forgot to o mention that Dreeben was representing.

Regarding the full team, I keep hearing about Bruce Orr being there, but can't find confirmation.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, May 6, 2018 3:35 AM

And Lisa Page resigned yesterday.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, May 7, 2018 10:44 PM

Apparently over the weekend unredacted copies of documents which were demanded by House Select Committee on Intelligence were supplied.
These reveal that the redactions "for National Security reasons" were actually soley to cover up the crimes of FBI and DoJ, mostly applied to their crimes regarding targeting of Mike Flynn. Including the Fake Crimes they fabricated against Flynn. The whole Comey operation to drive Flynn to financial ruin, using the Big Thumb of Government to Squash Innocent Citizens.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Wow. Weissmann is quite the Royal Snake. How is this crook not even disbarred yet?
OH! That's right, Obama Regime Department of Injustice only PROMOTES the most despicable lawyers, the most corrupt Prosecutors, the most Malicious Persecutors, the most heinously unjust Officers of The Court.

I am unsure I can even explain this adequately.

Remember the Arthur Anderson corrupted Prosecution by intensely corrupt prosecutors? The Make Believe crimes dreamt up by the Prosecutors? The 9-0 SCOTUS ruling vacating the Fake Convictions?

Remember the Wrongful Convictions of the 4 Merrill Lynch execs?

Remember the Malicious Prosecution of Senator Ted Stevens by corrupt Prosecutors?

Remember the Cartagena Sex scandal cover-up, where only USSS and Military personnel were fired, but all White House and Obamabot participants escaped unscathed?

Remember when a District Court Judge had to explain to an Enron defendant that he was pleading guilty to a crime that didn't exist?

Matthew Friedrich was the corrupt Prosecutor on Ted Stevens.

Lisa Monaco and Kathryn Ruemmler were the corrupt Prosecutors able to wrongfully convict the Merrill Lynch 4 of Fake Crimes.

Friedrich, his mentor and boss Leslie Caldwell, and boss Weissmann together were the corrupt Prosecutors which annihilated Arthur Anderson and their 85,000 employees with Fake Convictions.

The mentoring, training, tutelage, seeds of these corrupt practices for unjust Prosecutions were developed among Task Force Leader Weissmann, Monaco, Ruemmler, Caldwell, Friedrich in the FBI's Enron Task Force, under Director Mueller. The Arthur Anderson trumped up case was corrupted as part of The Enron Task Force. Perhaps Mueller learned this from his Malicious Persecution of Richard Jewell.

Matthew Friedrich was promoted Acting Assistant AG in the Obama Regime.

Leslie Caldwell was promoted to Assistant AG in the Obama Regime until Jan 2017.

Kathy Ruemmler (D) was promoted to Principal Associate Deputy AG in Jan 2009, and White House Counsel from 2011-14, and was integrally involved in The IRS email scandal cover-up, the Benghazi cover-up, the Solyndra cover-up, the Cartagena Sex scandal cover-up, and the Recess Appointment circumvention of Law. She was reportedly the real world model for Olivia Pope. She had previously served as Associate Counsel to Slick Willie 2000-01.

Lisa Monaco (D) was promoted to WH National Security Advisor from 2013-Jan 2017 after Asst AG from 2011-13. All in Obama Regime. She previously suckled as Counsel to AG Janet Reno 1998-2001, then after Enron as Special Counselor to Dir Mueller, Deputy Chief of Staff, CoS until 2009 (replaced by Zebley).

Merrill Lynch Convictions were Vacated by 5th US Court of Appeals in 2006.
Arthur Anderson Convictions were reversed 9-0 by SCOTUS in 2005.

The most heinous practices of corruption were fostered, nurtured, developed, rewarded by Mueller and Obama.
Horrifying that each of these are not rotting in prison.

Here is a link:
Www.seeking-justice.com/another-enron-task-force-prosecutor-poised-to-
head-doj-criminal-division/

Www.Observer.com/2014/06/all-the-presidents-muses-obama-and-procesutor
ial-misconduct/

WWW.Washingtontimes.com/news/2017/Oct/22/Christopher-wray-robert-muell
ers-top-prosecutor-kn/

Perhaps the best link:
Www.observer.com/2015/01/in-andrew-weissmann-the-doj-makes-stunningly-
bad-choice-for-crucial-role/

Www.businessinsider.com/the-complete-and-utter-humiliation-of-the-enro
n-task-force-2009-10//

I was hearing about more non-conflicts.
Mueller decided to interview Eric Prince. Regarding info damaging to Hilliary, which was revealed by an unnamed source present at the interview, along with their lawyer, who had obtained full immunity for the source from anything Mueller could charge.
Guess who the lawyer was who obtained immunity from Mueller? Ruemmler.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:34 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Apparently today Federal Judge T.S. Ellis declared the Mueller team are plainly liars.

Maybe we should refer to them as The Muelliar Team.

Sounds like the Judge might throw out all of the Manafort non-case.

So far, the 3 Federal Judges who are not cowtowing to Mueller are Emmet Sullivan (Mike Flynn), T.S. Ellis (Manafort), and Dabney Friedrich (Concord Management).

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:14 AM

Apparently today Rudy Guliani informed CNN that a sitting President cannot be indicted. So now even Libtards can be exposed to Real News.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, May 17, 2018 1:12 PM

Happy Anniversary.
On 17 May 2017 Rosenstein appointed Mueller Special Counsel for the Fake ~~Witch Hunt Fishing Expedition~~ Malicious Persecution.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, May 21, 2018 9:18 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Happy Anniversary.
On 17 May 2017 Rosenstein appointed Mueller Special Counsel for the Fake ~~Witch Hunt Fishing Expedition~~ Malicious Persecution.

Ha! NBC News just reported that the SC had its One Year Anniversary yesterday. That would be 19 May.

Facts are just sooo confusing to Libtards.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, May 23, 2018 5:32 AM

Why the Appointment of Mueller is Unconstitutional:

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/federalist-society-co-founder-says-mu
ellers-investigation-is-unconstitutional/

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, May 24, 2018 4:13 AM

Sounds like several of these team members have Dual Appointments. Not sure if these Dual Appointments were made simultaneously or either before or after the Mueller Appointment.
I have not heard which specific names are included.

SECOND

Thursday, May 24, 2018 5:31 PM

A majority of Americans — 59 percent — don’t realize Robert Mueller’s investigation has uncovered crimes.

17 indictments and five guilty pleas so far.

Trump, even if otherwise innocent, is guilty of hiring crooks and trying to prevent an investigation into their activity.

Trump’s counterstrategy of muddying the waters around the investigation has been fairly successful.

www.vox.com/2018/5/23/17384096/mueller-investigation-poll

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
A majority of Americans — 59 percent — don’t realize Robert Mueller’s investigation has uncovered crimes.

17 indictments and five guilty pleas so far.

Trump, even if otherwise innocent, is guilty of hiring crooks and trying to prevent an investigation into their activity.

Trump’s counterstrategy of muddying the waters around the investigation has been fairly successful.

www.vox.com/2018/5/23/17384096/mueller-investigation-poll

The vast majority of Libtards - 100% - do not realize Mueller has not uncovered one single Crime related to Trump! Russia! Collusion! - none! Even Collusion isn't a crime.
Process crimes, perjury traps, Fake Crimes, crimes that don't exist, littering, Jaywalking, 10 year old retrospective offences, they found those aplenty (while ignoring their massive list of their own blatant crimes).

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, May 25, 2018 5:14 AM

Copied from the Nunes Memo thread:

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SOMEBODY SAT DOWN AND GAVE THE ANTI-TRUMP INTEL OP THE THOUGHT IT SO RICHLY DESERVES

Quote:
Sharyl Attkisson: 8 Signs Pointing To A Counter-Intel Op Deployed Against Trump
Authored by Sharyl Attkisson, op-ed via The Hill http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/388978-growing-signs-of-a-count
erintelligence-operation-deployed-against-trumps

It may be true that President Trump illegally conspired with Russia and was so good at covering it up he’s managed to outwit our best intel and media minds who've searched for irrefutable evidence for two years. (We still await special counsel Robert Mueller’s findings.)

But there’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.

Here are eight signs pointing to a counterintelligence operation deployed against Trump for political reasons.
1. Code name

The operation reportedly had at least one code name that was leaked to The New York Times: “Crossfire Hurricane.”
2. Wiretap fever

Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia’s ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.

The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016. Page’s office is connected to Trump Tower and he reports having spent “many hours in Trump Tower.”

CNN reported that Manafort was wiretapped before and after the election “including during a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Trump.” Manafort reportedly has a residence in Trump Tower.

Electronic surveillance was used to listen in on three Trump transition officials in Trump Tower — Flynn, Bannon and Kushner — as they met in an official capacity with the United Arab Emirates’ crown prince.

The FBI also reportedly wiretapped Flynn’s phone conversation with Kislyak on Dec. 31, 2016, as part of “routine surveillance” of Kislyak.

NBC recently reported that Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, was wiretapped. NBC later corrected the story, saying Cohen was the subject of a “pen register” used to monitor phone numbers and, possibly, internet communications.
3. National security letters

Another controversial tool reportedly used by the FBI to obtain phone records and other documents in the investigation were national security letters, which bypass judicial approval.

Improper use of such letters has been an ongoing theme at the FBI. Reviews by the Department of Justice’s Inspector General found widespread misuse under Mueller — who was then FBI director — and said officials failed to report instances of abuses as required.
4. Unmasking

“Unmasking” — identifying protected names of Americans captured by government surveillance — was frequently deployed by at least four top Obama officials who have subsequently spoken out against President Trump: James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence; Samantha Power, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Susan Rice, former national security adviser; Sally Yates, former deputy attorney general.

Names of Americans caught communicating with monitored foreign targets must be “masked,” or hidden within government agencies, so the names cannot be misused or shared.

However, it’s been revealed that Power made near-daily unmasking requests in 2016.

Prior to that revelation, Clapper claimed ignorance. When asked if he knew of unmasking requests by any ambassador, including Power, he testified: “I don't know. Maybe it'

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, May 25, 2018 11:27 PM

Yet another example of unchecked DoJ greed and misconduct:

Cardiac Arrest by Howard Root.

Not much different from Mueller's Witch Hunt.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, June 15, 2018 9:15 PM

I keep forgetting to mention that, at some point, it was revealed that Strzok has a personal friendship with the FISA Court Judge Contreras who was approving the Fraudulent Warrants.

REAVERFAN

Friday, June 15, 2018 10:08 PM

Judge orders ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to jail while awaiting money laundering and fraud trials

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/15/judge-orders-p
aul-manafort-jail-wake-new-obstruction-charges/701199002/

Nothing to see here, folks. It's just liberals making shit up! LOL!

JJ

Friday, June 15, 2018 10:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Judge orders ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to jail while awaiting money laundering and fraud trials

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/15/judge-orders-p
aul-manafort-jail-wake-new-obstruction-charges/701199002/

Nothing to see here, folks. It's just liberals making shit up! LOL!

Yep excelent, tick tock.

T

REAVERFAN

Saturday, June 16, 2018 1:33 AM

Factbox: Under investigation or indicted – the Trump aides facing scrutiny

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/06/15/factbox-under-investigation-or
-indicted-the-trump-aides-facing-scrutiny-2.html

Yup, Mueller's a secret liberal, just making it all up... LOL!

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, June 18, 2018 11:22 AM

On Sunday it was revealed that Strzok has agreed to appear before Congressional Committees. I didn't see any mention about whether he would say anything other than pleading the 5th.

On another front, over the past few weeks it has been slowly rolled out that details of the creation of Mueller's SC have been faulty, attempting to convey Authority reserved for Congressional Advise, Consent, and Confirmation. Because of the Unconstitutional basis of the Letter fraudulently Authorizing the SC, the entire Special Counsel Appointment is invalid and Unconstitutional.
The slow rollout of this fact seems to have successfully kept the issue under the Radar of the MSM.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, June 18, 2018 9:24 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Yet another example of unchecked DoJ greed and misconduct:

Cardiac Arrest by Howard Root.

Not much different from Mueller's Witch Hunt.

Just in case you missed it.

SECOND

Monday, June 18, 2018 10:00 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

On another front, over the past few weeks it has been slowly rolled out that details of the creation of Mueller's SC have been faulty, attempting to convey Authority reserved for Congressional Advise, Consent, and Confirmation. Because of the Unconstitutional basis of the Letter fraudulently Authorizing the SC, the entire Special Counsel Appointment is invalid and Unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court did not rule that unconstitutional, so JewelStaiteFan you are just making it up. Or in plain english, you are lying. Maybe the longer word "Lying-Republican" should be the understood word whenever the shorter word "Republican" is used. But this is also true:

Between 1787 and 1788, a public debate raged between the so-called Federalists and Antifederalists about whether to ratify the Constitution.

Here’s a typical passage about the President from Antifederalist No. 67:

His power of nomination, garrisoned by troops at his direction, unrestrained power of granting pardons for treason, which may be used to screen from punishment those whom he had secretly instigated to commit the crime, and thereby prevent discovery of his own guilt; his duration in office for four years — these and various other principles evidently prove the truth of the position — that if the president is possessed of ambition, he has power and time sufficient to ruin his country.

Here’s another passage from Antifederalist No. 69:

We may have, for the first president, and perhaps, one in a century or two afterwards (if the government should withstand the attacks of others) a great and good man, governed by superior motives; but these are not events to be calculated upon in the present state of human nature.

So the concern, even back then, was that the extraordinary powers invested in the presidency left the country vulnerable to a demagogue or crook, someone capable of exploiting the office without any regard for the health of the republic.

Congress is supposed to be our failsafe, but that system is no longer operating as the Federalists envisioned, as partisanship has overwhelmed our politics.

www.vox.com/2018/6/18/17433612/trump-mueller-congress-constitution-rul
e-of-law

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, June 19, 2018 2:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
On another front, over the past few weeks it has been slowly rolled out that details of the creation of Mueller's SC have been faulty, attempting to convey Authority reserved for Congressional Advise, Consent, and Confirmation. Because of the Unconstitutional basis of the Letter fraudulently Authorizing the SC, the entire Special Counsel Appointment is invalid and Unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court did not rule that unconstitutional,

Are you saying the Supreme Court has ruled that the clear language of The Constitution is Unconstitutional? Or that the Supreme Court has ruled that circumvention of The Constitution is suddenly Constitutional?
When did these rulings get published?
Or are you just saying you are lying?

REAVERFAN

Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:26 PM

It's abundantly obvious who's lying, and it isn't Second.

1KIKI

Wednesday, June 20, 2018 1:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Factbox: Under investigation or indicted – the Trump aides facing scrutiny

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/06/15/factbox-under-investigation-or
-indicted-the-trump-aides-facing-scrutiny-2.html

Yup, Mueller's a secret liberal, just making it all up... LOL!

I think you should read the indictments - the genuine originals - rather than continue to steep your brain in US media swill. https://www.justice.gov/sco

You'll find that in regards to the non-Russian nationals like Manafort, zero charges have anything to do with Trump or the election.

SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, June 20, 2018 2:27 PM

MSM said that Strzok was escorted out of the FBI Building.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, June 23, 2018 2:01 AM

Mark Meadow reported that FBI falsified it's own evidence regarding Mike Flynn, corrupting exculpatory Interview 302 Reports into falsely incriminating sentences.

REAVERFAN

Monday, June 25, 2018 6:31 AM

The Russia Conspiracy Is Unraveling Across the Pond
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/06/18/the-russia-conspiracy-is-unra
veling-across-the-pond/

Robert Mueller isn’t the only one investigating the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. In the United Kingdom, there are parliamentary inquiries underway that are looking closely at the Russians’ role in the Brexit vote, and it has become clear that the same players who worked for the Leave Campaign in Britain were also involved in helping Trump win the presidency. One thing investigators there have discovered is that the Russians had a keen interest in the arrest of Mr. Cottrell.

Oh, dear.

REAVERFAN

Tuesday, June 26, 2018 11:22 PM

Only a Russian troll would deny this internationally-recognized FACT.

Putin's Asymmetric Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for US National Security - A Minority Staff Report Prepared for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations - US Senate, 115th Congress, 2nd Session, January 10, 2018

The Nordic states continue to raise their populations’ awareness of and resiliency to Kremlin disinformation campaigns. In advance of a military exercise in Sweden, which also included the other Nordic states, the Baltics, and the United States, the defense ministries of Sweden and Denmark released a joint statement announcing their intention to team up to deter Russian government cyberattacks and disinformation operations. And Sweden, which will hold elections in 2018, has begun ramping up its defenses against disinformation operations through its Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB). The agency has picked up on fake news stories that push narratives claiming that Sweden is a war zone and the rape capital of Europe, and that it has banned Christmas lights and the eating of bacon on trains. Echoing the U.S. experts hired by Finland, the head of MSB’s global analysis and monitoring section, Mikael Tofvesson, has emphasized that the MSB’s strategy is not to fight fire with fire, noting that:

‘‘It’s like mudwrestling a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will think it’s quite nice. This plays into their hands, whereas for us getting dirty is just a pain. Instead, we have to try to stay clean and focus on the part of our society that has to work: democracy and freedom of expression, to make sure that giving the citizens correct information becomes our best form of resistance.’’ (page 111)

ref: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/FinalRR.pdf

There's an investigation going on in Spain, too. Remember when the news said Mueller's team was working with them?

Russian politician Alexander Torshin said his ties to the NRA provided him access to Donald Trump and the opportunity to serve as a foreign election observer in the United States during the 2012 election.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/01/590076949/depth-of-russian-politicians-
cultivation-of-nra-ties-revealed

The difference in the case of Torshin is that for the first time, a Russian mafia boss – at least one identified as such by the Spanish anti-corruption prosecutor – is within the circle of support of the new president of the United States.

As well as being a powerful banker, a leader of President Putin’s political party (United Russia) and his trusted ally, and a senator between 2001 and 2015 (in addition to being chairman of the upper house of the Russian parliament between May 19 and September 21, 2011), he is, according to the investigation carried out by the Spanish security forces, also a boss of a notorious criminal organization known as Taganskaya.

https://elpais.com/elpais/2017/03/31/inenglish/1490984556_409827.html

This is a good read, explains it in detail, references, links

The Aftermath

https://themoscowproject.org/collusion-chapter/chapter-5/

Disinformation wars are on-going. You can watch it here, the fun part is seeing a topic show up and wondering wtf it's supposed to be, you google everywhere, can't find a thing except for crazy twitter posts, and then? Our best leader tweets about it. lolz.

http://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/

REAVERFAN

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 5:16 AM

"Top Themes
Updated on June 25, 6:55 PM
Chatter on the Hamilton 68 dashboard focused heavily on domestic issues this week. Although topics such as Syria and Russia continued to appear in the top topics and hashtags for much of the week, a larger portion of posts and shared content focused on immigration and the Department of Justice Inspector General’s report. Accounts tracked by the dashboard tweeted about multiple angles and narratives regarding these events, though almost all of the chatter was heavily supportive of President Trump and heavily critical of the Obama administration’s policies toward immigration. Despite the dominant domestic focus, chatter on the dashboard also included several international subjects, including accusations of U.S. bombing in Syria, defense of Russia’s hosting of the World Cup, and allegations of Ukrainian government responsibility for civilian deaths in Donbass. These subjects are regular Kremlin talking points. However, the failure of these issues to successfully remain on the dashboard indicates that pro-Kremlin accounts struggled to mobilize susceptible users into propagating their content in light of a busy U.S. news week."

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 7:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
"Top Themes
Updated on June 25, 6:55 PM
Chatter on the Hamilton 68 dashboard focused heavily on domestic issues this week. Although topics such as Syria and Russia continued to appear in the top topics and hashtags for much of the week, a larger portion of posts and shared content focused on immigration and the Department of Justice Inspector General’s report. Accounts tracked by the dashboard tweeted about multiple angles and narratives regarding these events, though almost all of the chatter was heavily supportive of President Trump and heavily critical of the Obama administration’s policies toward immigration. Despite the dominant domestic focus, chatter on the dashboard also included several international subjects, including accusations of U.S. bombing in Syria, defense of Russia’s hosting of the World Cup, and allegations of Ukrainian government responsibility for civilian deaths in Donbass. These subjects are regular Kremlin talking points. However, the failure of these issues to successfully remain on the dashboard indicates that pro-Kremlin accounts struggled to mobilize susceptible users into propagating their content in light of a busy U.S. news week."

Top Domains (Top websites tweeted by a monitored set of accounts related to Russian influence campaigns).

Any of these sound familiar?

foxnews.com
zerohedge.com
rt.com
fxn.ws
breitbart.com
aml.ink
tass.com
petitions.whitehouse
sputniknews.com
sptnkne.ws

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 9:19 PM

Agent #5 has been identified as Sally Ann Moyer, registered Democrat.
Still unidentified is Agent #1, who has now become her husband. He/she interviewed President Hilliary.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, June 28, 2018 4:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Agent #5 has been identified as Sally Ann Moyer, registered Democrat.
Still unidentified is Agent #1, who has now become her husband. He/she interviewed President Hilliary.

More fake news. Nothingburger, as usual.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, June 28, 2018 4:51 AM

Here in the real world:
Manafort had $10 million loan from Russian oligarch: court filing
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-
had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF?utm_source=reddit.com

He had a loan from Deripaska, in name, and had the audacity to claim that there were no ties to Russia.

Treason. Sure wouldn't want to be him, right now.

REAVERFAN

Friday, June 29, 2018 1:04 AM

Rod Rosenstein shuts down Jim Jordan over Fox News report
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/06/28/rod-j-rosens
tein-shuts-down-jim-jordan-over-fox-news-report/?noredirect=on&utm_source=reddit.com&utm_term=.78e211b9dab9

Fake news debunked, again.

REAVERFAN

Friday, June 29, 2018 1:26 AM

It's freakin' hilarious!

https://thinkprogress.org/jim-jordan-rod-rosenstein-mueller-trump-clin
ton-838303eab9e1/

REAVERFAN

Saturday, June 30, 2018 4:14 PM

Why are Republicans hiding Peter Strzok’s testimony?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-are-republicans-hiding-pet
er-strzoks-testimony/2018/06/29/8ac02ade-7bbe-11e8-93cc-6d3beccdd7a3_story.html?utm_term=.b1b845ecb28d

"Strzok certainly doesn’t act like someone with anything to hide. He offered to testify publicly and without a subpoena. He didn’t take the Fifth or demand immunity. Unlike the president in his dealings with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, Strzok did not haggle for months over the terms or scope of an interview. Nevertheless, Congress first threatened to subpoena him unnecessarily and then chose to keep his testimony under wraps.

Strzok is on the hot seat primarily based on a few dozen text messages out of more than 40,000 that he and Page exchanged on FBI devices. In the most widely reported exchange, Page texted that Trump’s “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” and Strzok responded, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

There’s no question Strzok and Page used poor judgment in exchanging the messages, and they admitted as much to the IG. But they both claim their personal political views did not affect their professional decisions. Strzok told the IG that within the FBI there is a “bright and inviolable line between what you think personally . . . and the conduct of your official business,” and that he never crossed that line.

But what about Strzok’s “We’ll stop it” text message? Most have assumed that “we” means the FBI. But it’s at least as likely that Strzok, in a personal message to his girlfriend, was referring to we the voters, or we the American people. That would have been an unremarkable sentiment shared by about half the people in the country, who could not believe that Trump would ever be elected. It’s quite a leap to go from that text message to a claim that Strzok tried to use his official powers to tip the election.

And there’s no evidence that he did. The inspector general concluded the text messages suggested possible bias and “cast a cloud” over the FBI. But the IG also found no evidence that “these political views directly affected the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed.” The problems found by the IG were problems of appearance, not substance.

But maybe, despite his exhaustive investigation, the IG got it wrong. Maybe Strzok really was part of a “deep state” conspiracy to take down Trump — even though everything the FBI did during the email investigation actually ended up hurting his opponent. Maybe that same conspiracy now infects Mueller’s probe. If that’s the fear, what’s the argument for keeping Strzok’s testimony secret?"

I'll hazard a guess: Because it's yet another reichwing nutjob conspiracy nothingburger meant to distract from the actual crimes being investigated? Could it be that making his testimony public proves them wrong, yet again?

REAVERFAN

Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:11 PM

Trump: Russia didn’t interfere in the election. GOP-led Senate panel: Yeah, it did.
https://www.vox.com/2018/7/3/17532536/trump-russia-senate-election-put
in

"The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report comes as Trump is preparing to meet Putin on July 16 in Helsinki. Trump says he will raise the topic of election meddling with the Russian leader."

Then they'll have a good laugh.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, July 7, 2018 2:22 AM

Reports are that a pile more are being added to the team.

Anybody want to guess the party affiliation of them?

REAVERFAN

Saturday, July 7, 2018 10:41 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports are that a pile more are being added to the team.

Anybody want to guess the party affiliation of them?

LOL!

You certainly do echo the talking points. If you lived in America, you could be the next Hannity.

"Maxine Waters caused that Nazi to shoot journalists!"

He'd leave out the fact that the guy was a Nazi, though.

Remember the car crash he flashed to? That guy was a "sovereign citizen."

A type of Nazi, at least here.

Are you familiar with the US? Have you ever been here?

REAVERFAN

Saturday, July 7, 2018 5:34 PM

I read several articles about Mueller expanding the investigation. It appears the sheer volume of wrongdoing requires it.

No mention of party affiliation. Because that's irrelevant.

1KIKI

Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:20 AM

Since there are so many places I could post this exonerating tidbit, I'll post it in a few places:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/06/politics/paul-manafort-trial-public/ind
ex.html

Prosecutors says any alleged collusion with the Russian government won’t come up at the trial.

SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, July 8, 2018 1:15 AM

Quote:

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reports are that a pile more are being added to the team.

Anybody want to guess the party affiliation of them?
LOL!

You certainly do echo the talking points. If you lived in America, you could be the next Hannity.

"Maxine Waters caused that Nazi to shoot journalists!"

He'd leave out the fact that the guy was a Nazi, though.

Remember the car crash he flashed to? That guy was a "sovereign citizen."

A type of Nazi, at least here.

Are you familiar with the US? Have you ever been here?

Are you illiterate?
Are you incapable of comprehending the subject matter?
Are you a sockpuppet? Is the hand of second up your a$$?

REAVERFAN

Thursday, July 12, 2018 7:12 AM

Can We Just Admit that Trump Is Captured by the Russians?
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/07/11/can-we-just-admit-that-trump-
is-captured-by-the-russians/

It’s getting sad watching people thrash around for explanations for the president’s behavior that don’t involve him being essentially captured by Vladimir Putin. The latest comes from the Washington Post‘s editorial board. They begin by advancing the argument that Donald Trump is simply too stupid to understand how NATO is funded which is supposed to explain why he continuously says moronic things about Europe not paying the United States their dues. Perhaps as a private citizen and candidate, Trump suffered under the misimpression that NATO countries owe America money, but he was disabused of that notion at some point since he’s become president. If no one else has informed him (and they surely have), the foreign leaders within NATO have let him know in one-on-one conversations. Even Trump’s own words confirm he understands, as he asked European countries to commit to spending four percent of their GDP on defense. That’s a ridiculous request but it shows that he knows what the real bone of contention is, and it isn’t that NATO countries aren’t paying us directly.

Trump attempts to cover for his own NATO-destroying rhetoric by accusing Germany of being too friendly with and dependent on Russia, but that’s ludicrous. Germany has been steadfast in defending Ukraine while the president has rhetorically ceded Crimea to Russia and called for them to be reinstated to the G7.

It’s almost humorous to watch the Post’s editorial board dance around the elephant in the room.

"Ms. [Angela] Merkel and other European leaders probably are aware that Mr. Trump’s deep skepticism toward NATO is shared by virtually no one in his own administration or Republicans in Congress; the Senate passed a resolution in support of the alliance by 97 to 2 on Tuesday. The president is also at odds with the American public. According to a 2017 survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 69 percent — including 54 percent of core Trump supporters — say NATO is “essential” to U.S. security.

Perhaps that’s why, despite his outbursts, Mr. Trump did not stand in the way of NATO’s adoption at the summit of new plans to defend against Russia and terrorism. But his hostile rhetoric does its own damage — and it will be compounded if it is followed by an unseemly show of comity with Mr. Putin at their meeting next week."

Why would a president adopt these anti-NATO positions when they do not reflect the consensus of opinion within his own State Department, Defense Department, intelligence services, or his top advisors and congressional members of his own party?

Why would a president who stands accused of conspiring with Russia to win election want to nakedly adopt policies that suit Russia more than his own country and that are opposed by our allies? Why would he want to have a summit with the Russian leader? Why would he want to have a private meeting with no witnesses present with that Russian leader? An innocent man would avoid making himself look so clearly guilty and a guilty one would be more deceptive. Only a captured man would act like this.

And it’s getting silly how far people will go to avoid facing up to that simple fact.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, July 12, 2018 7:18 AM

It's seriously extraordinary that

A) Blumpy's made it so exceedingly obvious, and,

B) So many people, including people who aren't Republicans, are still unwilling to accept the full reality of this fundamental fact.

I mean, a sitting US President refuses to enforce Russian sanctions, frequently meets with Russians, has a team almost entirely up to their necks in specifically Russian connections, trashes NATO, fulfills all of Russia's geopolitical goals, meets with Putin, in private, with literally no other Americans in the room to provide witness for what he's saying.

All in less than a year. That's mind-blowing.

That's legitimately one of the craziest things to ever happen in politics, period. It's unheard of for a leader of a nation as wealthy, powerful and large as the US to have a leader so hopelessly, obviously compromised by the leader of a much weaker nation and everyone just sort of shrugs.

I mean, I truly don't know how to comprehend the level of denial. I'm just waiting for the aftershock when most of the population finally catches on. Watching it slowly dawn on all the majority of America that the President is a really stupid, gullible Russian asset, and has been since at least 1986.

And last year, when it came to light that Jared Kushner, who STILL has no clearance, had asked Russian Ambassador Kislyak if he could come over to the consulate to secretly backchannel & chill sometimes, former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden chimed in:

“What manner of ignorance, chaos, hubris, suspicion, contempt, would you have to have to think that doing this with the Russian ambassador was a good or appropriate idea?” Hayden said.

“This is off the map,” Hayden said. “I know of no other experience like this in our history, certainly within my life experience.”

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/report-russian-amb-kushner-wanted-secr
et-communications-backchannel/story?id=47672306

1KIKI

Thursday, July 12, 2018 9:55 AM

Quote:
Can We Just Admit that Trump Is Captured by the Russians?
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/07/11/can-we-just-admit-that-trump-
is-captured-by-the-russians/

expected, propagandist, fear mongering - being 'trumped' up to make people accept even more US troops in NATO than the current record numbers, more US military spending in Europe, and moving NATO even closer to the Russian border

I predict - and please put this in the predictions thread - that all this kabuki angst will silently evaporate. And people like RF will be too stupid to notice.

Trump is a blowhard when it comes to getting along with Russia. In reality, despite all the noise and gafla, there has been a major increase in US NATO-directed spending and troops.

https://www.defensenews.com/smr/nato-priorities/2018/06/25/poking-the-
bear-us-air-force-builds-in-russias-backyard/
The Trump administration wants to spend $828 million in 2019 to build up military infrastructure in Europe as part of an ongoing initiative to deter Russian aggression and reinforce allies. Almost half of that construction funding would go toward U.S. Air Force projects.
The request would more than double military construction funding under the European Deterrence Initiative, or EDI, from the 2018 request — when not so long ago, the U.S. military was shrinking its Cold War-era footprint in Europe.

http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/news/latest-news/59184-the-foreign-ministry-s
-parliamentary-secretary-welcomes-latvia-u-s-strategic-partnership-and-u-s-involvement-in-the-strengthening-of-latvia-s-security 19.02.2018. 17:20
On 19 February 2018, the Parliamentary Secretary of the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Zanda Kalnina-Lukaševica, met with Elise Stefanik and Anthony Brown, members of the Committee on Armed Services at the U.S. House of Representatives.
During the meeting, the Parliamentary Secretary expressed satisfaction at Latvia’s intensive political dialogue with the U.S. Administration and the Congress, which had resulted in further U.S. support for the security and defence of Latvia: a constant rotational forward presence of the U.S. has been established in the country, U.S. troops take place in military exercises in the Baltic States and Poland on a regular basis, and the U.S. Congress has increased funding for the European Deterrence Initiative. Because of this, society in Latvia can feel more secure. Members of the Congress Stefanik and Brown pledged unwavering U.S. support for Latvia’s security and Article 5 of NATO Charter.

https://www.stripes.com/news/big-guns-better-chow-for-us-soldiers-on-r
ussia-deterrence-mission-1.488756 September 21, 2017
Big guns, better chow for US soldiers on Russia deterrence mission
Martinez and his platoon are among 500 173rd Airborne Brigade soldiers that swooped into the Baltics (Lithuania) this month on a mission to deter Russian aggression.
They have joined war games with local troops and new NATO battle groups deployed to the broader region — a buildup that collectively represents the alliance’s largest reinforcement of its eastern flank since the end of the Cold War.

https://www.socom.mil/Pages/posture-statement-hasc.aspx MAY 2, 2017
Reassurance Initiative funding to deter Russia and reassure Allies, including by working with NATO to build more effective defense institutions in partner nations. In support of this, we have had persistent SOF presence for over 2 years in nearly every European country on Russia's western border (Baltics, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, Georgia) – assuring our allies and partners while building host nation and NATO capabilities to compete short of conflict in a hybrid environment.

https://apnews.com/cb5d55ba66694c2ca0f4094e26926345 Jan. 12, 2017
... the new deployment — which includes some 3,500 U.S. troops — marks the first-ever continuous deployment to the region (Poland) by a NATO ally (US).
In a separate but related mission, NATO will also deploy four battalions to its eastern flank later this year, one each to Poland and the three Baltic states. T

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:41 PM

Ummmmm.
I don't know what any of that has to do with the Special Counsel Witch-hunt Fishing Expedition.

Apparently Lisa Page decided she has not committed enough crimes, so she ignored a Congressional Subpoena to Appear on Wednesday.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:13 PM

You're just angry that your lies aren't working. Trump is up to his flabby neck in Russian slime, and there's no denying it.

You lose, again. Everything you post gets exposed as Russian/Reichwing disinformation bullshit. You're batting .1000, comrade! LOL!

1KIKI

Monday, July 16, 2018 1:15 AM

Thursday, July 12, 2018 10:13 AM
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=62294&mid=1
056928#1056928

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
You're just angry that your lies aren't working. Trump is up to his flabby neck in Russian slime, and there's no denying it.

You lose, again. Everything you post gets exposed as Russian/Reichwing disinformation bullshit. You're batting .1000, comrade! LOL!

1KIKI

Monday, July 16, 2018 1:30 AM

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, July 13, 2018
Grand Jury Indicts 12 Russian Intelligence Officers for Hacking Offenses Related to the 2016 Election

There is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity or knew they were communicating with Russian intelligence officers. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the vote count or changed the outcome of the 2016 election.

Everyone charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court. At trial, prosecutors must introduce credible evidence that is sufficient to prove each defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, to the unanimous satisfaction of a jury of twelve citizens.

indictment here
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4599146-Netyksho-Et-Al-Indictm
ent-Copy.html

SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, July 16, 2018 11:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, July 13, 2018
Grand Jury Indicts 12 Russian Intelligence Officers for Hacking Offenses Related to the 2016 Election

There is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity or knew they were communicating with Russian intelligence officers. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the vote count or changed the outcome of the 2016 election.

Everyone charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court. At trial, prosecutors must introduce credible evidence that is sufficient to prove each defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, to the unanimous satisfaction of a jury of twelve citizens.

indictment here
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4599146-Netyksho-Et-Al-Indictm
ent-Copy.html

SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).

Gosh, their Fishing Expedition can't even catch a minnow!
Are they going to extradite for these Fake Crimes?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Tuesday, July 17, 2018 12:00 AM

So, we must wait until tomorrow for the Impeachment of Rosenstein to begin?

1 2 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE