Real World Event Discussions

Deep state. MSM. Trump ...

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, March 14, 2025 17:04
VIEWED: 33741
PAGE 21 of 33

Monday, March 19, 2018 7:28 PM

Quote:

The Deep State is Borgoroth, Sauron, The Slayer, yes, even The Alliance.
That's funny, because even Joss Whedon said that The Alliance was based on the US government!

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, March 19, 2018 8:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

The Deep State is Borgoroth, Sauron, The Slayer, yes, even The Alliance.
That's funny, because even Joss Whedon said that The Alliance was based on the US government!



That's perfect! The Alliance were a faceless menace just off screen, only referenced when the plot needed nudging just like the < echo > DEEP STATE < / echo > Essential for manipulation, er, I mean story telling 101. And they don't have to be paid any royalties! Wonder what the actor's guild has to say about that?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, March 19, 2018 10:02 PM

Deep state my muscular buttox.

T








NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, March 19, 2018 11:03 PM

I know GEEBERS likes to poke fun at the idea that super rich people use their money to run the people who run the country. But I noticed that - AS USUAL - he has no information to bring to the table to back up his silliness. He likes to reference FICTION to do that !

Well, GEEBERS has ALWAYS had problems with the concept of evidence. And reality. And honesty.





So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, March 19, 2018 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I know GEEBERS likes to poke fun at the idea that super rich people use their money to run the people who run the country. But I noticed that - AS USUAL - he has no information to bring to the table to back up his silliness. He likes to reference FICTION !

Well, GEEBERS has ALWAYS had problems with the concept of evidence. And reality. And honesty.





Hey kiki your lawyer called. After looking at all the evidence she wants to represent me. So sad...


T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, March 19, 2018 11:46 PM

It seems that THUGR and GSTRING are curiously out of step ...


Quote:

Public Troubled by ‘Deep State’
Monday, March 19, 2018

Bi-partisan concern that government is tracking U.S. citizens

West Long Branch, NJ – A majority of the American public believe that the U.S. government engages in widespread monitoring of its own citizens and worry that the U.S. government could be invading their own privacy. The Monmouth University Poll also finds a large bipartisan majority who feel that national policy is being manipulated or directed by a “Deep State” of unelected government officials. Americans of color on the center and left and NRA members on the right are among those most worried about the reach of government prying into average citizens’ lives.

Just over half of the public is either very worried (23%) or somewhat worried (30%) about the U.S. government monitoring their activities and invading their privacy. There are no significant partisan differences – 57% of independents, 51% of Republicans, and 50% of Democrats are at least somewhat worried the federal government is monitoring their activities. Another 24% of the American public are not too worried and 22% are not at all worried.

Fully 8-in-10 believe that the U.S. government currently monitors or spies on the activities of American citizens, including a majority (53%) who say this activity is widespread and another 29% who say such monitoring happens but is not widespread. Just 14% say this monitoring does not happen at all. There are no substantial partisan differences in these results.

“This is a worrisome finding. The strength of our government relies on public faith in protecting our freedoms, which is not particularly robust. And it’s not a Democratic or Republican issue. These concerns span the political spectrum,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

MORE AT
https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_031
918
/

ORIGINALLY SOURCED FROM https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-19/74-americans-believe-deep-st
ate-running-country


(I do this for THUGR, who is too stupid or too lazy to click on embedded links...)

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

America is an oligarchy
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Well, GEEBERS has ALWAYS had problems with the concept of evidence. And reality. And honesty.




Speaking of honesty, reality, evidence and my problems... I am having this problem getting you to answer a very simple question: do you know what evidence Mueller has? Yes/No?
So why do you and JSF (and the rest of the Trump boot lickers association) say "still no evidence." Isn't that a dishonest, unreal statement given your lack of knowledge?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 3:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Speaking of honesty, reality, evidence and my problems... I am having this problem getting you to answer a very simple question: do you know what evidence Mueller has? Yes/No?

I'm just counting up how many times you misrepresent my post.




So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 3:27 AM

So tell me GEEBERS how do you know all of this?

Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I have no idea what Mueller knows and I don't presume to know what Mueller knows since November 9th of 2016.

Because not only do you pretend to know what Mueller knows, you pretend to know what other people think, and what they do, and what will happen in the future!

The endless fantasy brain that lives inside SIGNYM's skull. Making stuff up 24 hours a day ... that was the voices in your head feeding your hatred ... Suuuuure you did ... That slow drip drip is Mueller taking his time ... he slept with her, we all know it ... With his level of paranoia I wouldn't be surprised, OR he thinks his base is so stupid that they will believe that, OR both ... it feels so right that you have joined the Fox & Friends team ... I'll wait because I know it's going to just get better ... (Nobody from Team Trump?) Not yet - but - don't you see the reason for that? ... I love how Trump idiots can't even guess at the future of this ... (Mueller's) like a zen gardner ... Don Jr. - make sure you chant "no collusion" when they crack him like an egg ... how many Trump True Believers think there's no collusion because Mueller didn't release his findings within a week of being assigned. They don't seem to understand ...
"Could Donald J. Trump get a Top Secret background clearance?" Hell no. His financial records would be scanned with a fine tooth comb, so that for one would exclude him. ... There is a mountain of there there ... There are ways to find out what a legal body like Mueller's may be up to/is up to without it necessarily coming from someone inside. ...





So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 7:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
I know GEEBERS likes to poke fun at the idea that super rich people use their money to run the people who run the country. But I noticed that - AS USUAL - he has no information to bring to the table to back up his silliness. He likes to reference FICTION !

Well, GEEBERS has ALWAYS had problems with the concept of evidence. And reality. And honesty.





Hey kiki your lawyer called. After looking at all the evidence she wants to represent me. So sad...


T



Testing...


Crap. Putting an italics end tag in my signature doesn't fix T's broken posts.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME