The Evidens
POSTED BY: JO753
UPDATED: Monday, February 14, 2022 07:11
VIEWED: 159178
PAGE 72 of 121
Quote:I suggest you read the first two pages of my link, which makes it quite clear that their information was (mostly) comprised of phone calls intercepted over the years while Hillary visited Russia. Which, and I apparently have to spell this out for you, is separate from the DNC files, the Podesta files, and Hillary's private State Department server.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
What evidence against Hillary. What evidence against Hillary. The Russians released everything they had through wiki leaks.
You know, you could save yourself from being so stupendously, embarrassingly wrong by doing just a small amount - less than 2 complete pages - of reading plain English.
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:I suggest you read the first two pages of my link, which makes it quite clear that their information was (mostly) comprised of phone calls intercepted over the years while Hillary visited Russia. Which, and I apparently have to spell this out for you, is separate from the DNC files, the Podesta files, and Hillary's private State Department server.
Originally posted by THGRRI:
What evidence against Hillary. What evidence against Hillary. The Russians released everything they had through wiki leaks.
You know, you could save yourself from being so stupendously, embarrassingly wrong by doing just a small amount - less than 2 complete pages - of reading plain English.
Who posted that document to the internet kiki? Did they doctor it? Is it completely made up? I also recommend everyone look at the first two pages. It offers nothing of what you claim, troll.
We both know it's not a truthful document. Did you cut and paste it, highlight what you wanted, changed what you wanted and then post it?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well, if you can believe that, you can believe anything.
AND YOU DO!!! No matter how stupid it is.
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Well, if you can believe that, you can believe anything.
AND YOU DO!!! No matter how stupid.
You're just to stupid and dishonest to have a good conversation with. If everyone clicks on your documents link, then clinks onto the document cloud link on the right, they are brought to the sauce where your document was created and edited. I suggest everyone give it a go.
You asshole. https://www.documentcloud.org/
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"brought to the sauce" HA HA HA ! That's funny!
"Now BuzzFeed News is publishing the full document so that Americans can make up their own minds about allegations about the president-elect that have circulated at the highest levels of the US government." https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-d
eep-ties-to-russia?utm_term=.rhOAyBnP9#.amDeL78dP
link in original goes to document cloud url
Maybe BuzzFeed planted a fake document! 'Ya think, THUGGER?
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki, start with a clearer reference, one that is easy to read: https://themoscowproject.org/dossier/
Originally posted by 1kiki:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-All
egations.html
page 1 par 4
"A dossier of compromising material on Hillary CLINTON has been collated by the Russian Intelligence Services over many years and mainly (emphasis is mine) comprises bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia ..."
page 2 par 2.
"... including democratic presidential candidate Hillary CLINTON ..."
page 2-3 par 5.
" ... rumors about a Russian dossier of 'kompromat' on Hillary CLINTON ..."
page 3 par 6
"... the CLINTON dossier was controlled exclusively ..."
Since roughly 50% of the first two pages are devoted to Hillary, both of you are wrong, once again, when it comes to the facts.
1kiki, it is transparently obvious that you're misleading us by cutting off the quote where you did.
"A dossier of compromising material on Hillary CLINTON has been collated by the Russian Intelligence Services over many years and mainly comprises bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia . . ." and intercepted phone calls rather than any embarrassing conduct. The dossier is controlled by Kremlin spokesman, PESKOV, directly on PUTIN’s orders. However it has not as yet been distributed abroad, including to TRUMP. Russian intentions for its deployment still unclear
Detail
Speaking to a trusted compatriot in June 2016 sources A and B, a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure and a former top level Russian intelligence officer still active inside the Kremlin respectively, the Russian authorities had been cultivating and supporting US Republican presidential candidate, Donald TRUMP for at least 5 years. Source B asserted that the TRUMP operation was both supported and directed by Russian President Vladimir PUTIN. Its aim was to sow discord and disunity both within the US itself, but more especially within the Transatlantic alliance which was viewed as inimical to Russia’s interests.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Your link is not a secure connection.
I just hand-typed short phrases that included the name CLINTON because I was too lazy to type the whole thing out by hand. Which is why I provided BOTH THE LINK AND SPECIFIC DOCUMENT REFERENCES so people could look for themselves.
And I proved you wrong. There were many, many references to the dirt on Clinton that Steele's sources said Russia had. So sorry you can't take being wrong, but if you did a little more reading and thought just a twees, you wouldn't be so very, very wrong, so very, very often.
So, aside from you being an ass, do you have a point of fact to make?
Well, for SURE you're an ass !!! 
And let me add - if you believe Steele's dossier about Trump, then it means that the Russians also had dirt on Clinton. Which is what I said at the top of the page, where you accused me of lying. So, isn't it you who's lying, SECOND-RATE?
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And btw, I already discussed this: "Speaking to a trusted compatriot in June 2016 sources A and B, ..." Search on the phrase 'crystal ball' and you'll find it.
And, once again - you are so wrong. So very, VERY wrong.
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
And btw, I already discussed this: "Speaking to a trusted compatriot in June 2016 sources A and B, ..." Search on the phrase 'crystal ball' and you'll find it.
And, once again - you are so wrong. So very, VERY wrong.
Lets get back to reality shall we...
Publics Worldwide Unfavorable Toward Putin, Russia but few see Russian power and influence as a major threat
http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/08/16/publics-worldwide-unfavorable-towa
rd-putin-russia/
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
97% of people 'believed' Iraq had WMDs. And how did that work out? As they say, a million flies eat shit.
That's the problem with assuming public opinion is reality. It isn't.
So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME