The wiretap tweet IS true (update)
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 16:07
VIEWED: 18449
PAGE 12 of 18
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Care to try addressing the facts, again?
Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?
To funny 1kiki. Blanks is what you're firing every time you answer someones' post this way. It shows you to be stumped, stymied, at a lose for words, frustrated, snookered, confounded, flummoxed. I could go on but it would be wasted on a dimwit. Oh, that's a stupid or silly person.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Care to try addressing the facts, again?
Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?
Originally posted by G:
"I coined the slogan "We Suck!"© many years ago."
G is an avowed Putin-loving, pro-Russian, anti-American troll.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Care to try addressing the facts, again?
Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?
Like I said
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Care to try addressing the facts, again?
Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?
Originally posted by G:
"I coined the slogan "We Suck!"© many years ago."
G is an avowed Putin-loving, pro-Russian, anti-American troll.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Care to try addressing the facts, again?
Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?
Yep, seems to be shooting blanks so far. But not sure it has dawned upon him/her.
What part of the concept of wiretapping do you think he can't understand?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Landmark Legal Foundation just filed a request with the secret court.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/15593/breaking-mark-levins-landmark-lega
l-foundation-ben-shapiro#
http://www.lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=909975
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This post from 27 March may not be the most recent post in this thread from SGG, and I do not mean to imply whether or not the poster has gained enlightenment since this post. But I quote it as example of the tone of some of the posts in this thread.
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
...And if you clap real LOUD and believe with all your might, you can save Tinkerbell!
SGG
It appears some detractors in this thread are up-to-date on their FACTS Vaccine Booster shots, and seem incapable (or at the minimum, unwilling) of comprehending what the contributors of this thread are providing in terms of facts.
So perhaps we can iron out a few details in the framework, and then address which specific items the Libtards and other Democrats are in feverish denial about.
It looks like most of these illegal acts are covered under 50 U.S.C. Sec 1809 and 18 U.S.C. Sec 798, and provide both criminal sanctions as well as civil liability. Also 50 U.S. Code Sec 1813.
1. Obamabots target Trump and his campaign people for wiretapping, but dance and jump around the legalese terms of the law by claiming that they are "officially" targeting only foreign subjects who are most likely to be in phone conversations with the real targets, the Trump people. Only Libtards and other Democrats claim this is "normal" or "regular" or "common" practice, policy, or procedure. Practiced by every President all the way back to Benjamin Franklin's first term.
By avoiding the intent and spirit of the law while dancing around the letter of the law, they violated the spirit and intent of the law. At this point Libtards will start arguing what the definition of the word "is" is.
2. Obamabots intentionally violate US 50, Chapter 36, Subchapter I. B. IV. 1813. By refusing to mask the identities of "incidentally collected" American Citizen subjects of no National Security interest. This is illegal, for every surveillance and for every person whose privacy is violated.
3. Illegal dissemination of the information to other Obamabots. See my March 22 post (the 49th post) of this thread for part of this.
4. Conspiracy to leak Classified information to non-authorized persons (political hacks), for the purpose of leaking the Classified information to non-authorized persons without Classified Clearance. This would include BimbObamabot Evelyn Farkas bragging about the Obamabot Army Conspiring to disseminate the Classified information (which she was not even authorized to have possession of - no "Need-To-Know" for her, a political Campaign Director for Hilliary, and no position whatsoever in the National Security arena) for the specific purpose of leaking the Classified data to the media (see my post on March 29 in this thread - the 56th post).
5. The illegal leaking of the Classified information, illegally collected against Private American Citizens, to non-authorized persons. Authorized people for recieving Classified are required to have valid Security Clearance as well as Need-To-Know (meaning the Classified information is pertinent to their work in the National Security arena).
6. The leaking of Classified information to the media, for distribution to the masses, without authorization from competent authorities to release Classified information.
So, which of these specific and particular illegal acts are the Libtards and other Democrats trying to claim they are not guilty of? Or are you agreeing that Obama is guilty of all of them?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Landmark Legal Foundation just filed a request with the secret court.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/15593/breaking-mark-levins-landmark-lega
l-foundation-ben-shapiro#
http://www.lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=909975
It looks like this is the text:
http://www.marklevinshow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/301/2017/04/Memo
InSupportOfMotionforInvestigation_Filed.pdf
And this looks like an explanation/background umbrella:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/mark-levin-wants-fisa-court-to-inves
tigate-leaks-on-trump-associates/article/2620864
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Good.
BREAKING: Mark Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation Asks FISA Court To Order Investigation Into Anti-Trump Targeting, Leaks
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
THUGR, JONESING FOR WWIII
All those guns 1kiki, are pointed towards your beloved Russia. All those cyber capabilities, pointed right at Russia. Thanks Putin, and get ready to duck.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What happened?
All of the deniers are suddenly mum? Mute? Admitting they have been guilty all along? What?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME