The UN investigation on Ghouta 2013 did NOT identify a perpetrator.

POSTED BY: 1kiki
UPDATED: Friday, April 14, 2017 17:45
VIEWED: 1731
PAGE 1 of 1

1KIKI

Friday, April 7, 2017 10:00 PM

The UN investigation on Ghouta 2013 did NOT identify a perpetrator.
http://undocs.org/en/A/67/997

However, UN investigations into multiple potential chemical attacks did reveal that the 'opposition' used chemical weapons.
http://undocs.org/A/68/663

DREAMTROVE

Friday, April 7, 2017 10:13 PM

They weren't allowed to. The US made that a condition of allowing the investigation, which is very fishy of us. However, a subsequent joint statement of the investigators said they were certain that it was Al Nusra. The Turks involved have since confessed to helping Al Nusra with the attack.

1KIKI

Friday, April 7, 2017 10:26 PM

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin

Originally posted by G:
"I coined the slogan "We Suck!"© many years ago."
G is an avowed Putin-loving, pro-Russian, anti-American troll.

KPO

Friday, April 14, 2017 5:45 PM

Did you miss this part of the report Kiki, or just forget to mention it?

Quote:
"The evidence available concerning the nature, quality and quantity of the agents used on 21 August indicated that the perpetrators likely had access to the chemical weapons stockpile of the Syrian military, as well as the expertise and equipment necessary to manipulate safely large amount of chemical agents"

p19 - http://www.refworld.org/docid/53182eed4.html

-------------------------------------------------------

"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Evidence the Syrian regime sponsors ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521