Real World Event Discussions

Is Trump Nuts?

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 23:49
VIEWED: 120217
PAGE 47 of 100

THGRRI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:14 AM

Your criticisms of Trump do follow a pattern or line sockpuppet. Right back to Russia. It's Russia, Syria and Iran's agenda in the middle east you push here. So there's no surprise when you criticize Trump over Yemen and Syria. I predicted that about you months ago. Remember, the whole Russian troll thing? I'll predict here and now, you always criticize Trump when he gets in the way of Putin's agenda. In the middle east, or anywhere else for that matter. I'll be sure to remind you whenever you do it, like now, deal? What happens to you as you type? You seem to lose you grip on reality. Clinton running DASH, what's up with that? You know what, don't bother. I don't read nuts.

As for calling me nick. It show's how much it stung you when I exposed you as sockpuppet. I ruined your fun and exposed you as a fraud. Or, are you giving us all a hint as to your next identity? Is it going to be nick?

By the way, It should be attacked Trump a few times, not view times. It's hard correcting all your grammar and spelling mistakes. Try to lessen them will you.

Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Nick,

I've already attacked Trump a view times, over Yemen, over the bombing in Syria. So have others. We're not us guys. There's no alignment of our motives, actions or views. We're just not in the hate group. It's like any other hate group. Everyone not in it might look like a conspiracy, but really we're "everyone else." 6, River, Sig, JSF, they aren't at all of the same perspective.

As for Clinton, she's not gone, and her impact on the US won't be gone for a long time. Obama supporters talked about Bush for the whole 8 years Obama was in office. It's not going to go away. It seems very much that HRC is still commanding ISIS. That said, there's been a slow shift of attacks away from her and onto John McCain.

1KIKI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:20 AM

lol

Care to try addressing the facts, again?

Or do you shoot nothing but blanks?

Originally posted by G:
"I coined the slogan "We Suck!"© many years ago."
G is an avowed Putin-loving, pro-Russian, anti-American troll.

THGRRI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:24 AM

No, I was looking forward to you being nick next dreamtrove/sockpuppet. Not reverting back to 1kiki. Such a disappointment.

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
lol

1KIKI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:55 AM

Originally posted by 1kiki:
lol

6STRINGJOKER

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:18 AM

boooooring

DREAMTROVE

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:21 AM

Nick,

1) I'm so not 1kiki.

2) Sockpuppet was fun, but never posted anything political. Actually, as I said, I prefered being sockpuppet to being dreamtrove. Notice I didn't at all balk at being called out. It's happened several times, and I posted the username and password ages ago to the board.

3) You created THGRRI to dodge the reaction that you were going to create, which means on some level you knew you intended to troll. You don't think of it that way, you think Sig and 1kiki are trolls and you're the good guy. Yet you prepared yourself to troll. Your subconscious knew it.

4) Why dodge the sockpuppet thing? The underlying user is more popular than the sockpuppet. If you're not him, would anyone take you seriously?

5) You want to know my core political position? Here it is:

I don't support Russia, I oppose the globalists. I oppose the commies, (formerly soviet) the nazis, international socialists, and their one worlder neocon elites. Why? I blame them for WWI, WWII, the Cold War and this mess in the Middle East. I think if they were gone, we could go back to the productive commerce that we had without them.

Additionally, I don't like a lot of globalist organizations like the IMF, World Bank and WTO. I blame them for the messes in Haiti, Brazil and much of Africa.

I agree with Putin when he's in line with that. Do I disagree with him? Sure, I think a lot of his domestic policy is whacked.

Trump? He's anti-globalist. That's good. He's no Ron Paul or Bernie Sanders. He could, as Sig says, bow to the neocons deep state, and that means become a globalist. A lot of Trump's ideas are also whacked.

Don't deflect your weakpoints onto others (spelling, sources, facts, trolling) It fools no one and makes you look terrible.

I don't get the Clinton DASH reference. Whats the story. (Yeah, actually willing to listen to what you have to say)

THGRRI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:14 AM

You just described yourself as a walking talking speculative hypocrite. Someone who spews out information based on conjecture and emotion rather than knowledge. And it is you who projects your weaknesses onto others. I intend to keep pointing that out for the foreseeable future.

How moronic is it that you imply I should absorb someone else's identity to gain stature here, and in doing so, not realize it reveals a lot about the way you think, not me. And I quote you " Why dodge the sockpuppet thing?"

Meanwhile, through your delusion you assign me credibility because you believe me to be Nick. That shits just to funny. But wait wait, it gets better. Like when you imply you are capable of entering my subconscious when you explain this. "Yet you prepared yourself to troll. Your subconscious knew it." Don't look now dreatrove/sockpuppet/1kiki, but your narcissism is showing again. And boy it's a whooper! G was right, you are entertaining.

Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Nick,

1) I'm so not 1kiki.

2) Sockpuppet was fun, but never posted anything political. Actually, as I said, I prefered being sockpuppet to being dreamtrove. Notice I didn't at all balk at being called out. It's happened several times, and I posted the username and password ages ago to the board.

3) You created THGRRI to dodge the reaction that you were going to create, which means on some level you knew you intended to troll. You don't think of it that way, you think Sig and 1kiki are trolls and you're the good guy. Yet you prepared yourself to troll. Your subconscious knew it.

4) Why dodge the sockpuppet thing? The underlying user is more popular than the sockpuppet. If you're not him, would anyone take you seriously?

5) You want to know my core political position? Here it is:

I don't support Russia, I oppose the globalists. I oppose the commies, (formerly soviet) the nazis, international socialists, and their one worlder neocon elites. Why? I blame them for WWI, WWII, the Cold War and this mess in the Middle East. I think if they were gone, we could go back to the productive commerce that we had without them.

Additionally, I don't like a lot of globalist organizations like the IMF, World Bank and WTO. I blame them for the messes in Haiti, Brazil and much of Africa.

I agree with Putin when he's in line with that. Do I disagree with him? Sure, I think a lot of his domestic policy is whacked.

Trump? He's anti-globalist. That's good. He's no Ron Paul or Bernie Sanders. He could, as Sig says, bow to the neocons deep state, and that means become a globalist. A lot of Trump's ideas are also whacked.

Don't deflect your weakpoints onto others (spelling, sources, facts, trolling) It fools no one and makes you look terrible.

I don't get the Clinton DASH reference. Whats the story. (Yeah, actually willing to listen to what you have to say)

SECOND

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:31 AM

We have the template for Trump's impeachment from, of all places, Alabama:
The affair and cover-up that just landed Alabama's governor in jail
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/4/10/15243350/alabama-governor-ro
bert-bentley-scandal

The scandal has dragged on forever

The basic contours of the scandal have been known for some time. Bentley had an inappropriate affair with a staff member, lied about it, used state law enforcement personnel to cover up the affair, and even fired the state’s chief law enforcement officer for his reluctance to go along with it. The political fundamentals have also been clear — Bentley clashed with Alabama Republicans on policy matters, offended and embarrassed a culturally conservative state, and had no real defenders in state politics.

Impeachment proceedings nonetheless moved very slowly, because though the Alabama Constitution does make provision for impeachment, it doesn’t spell out the details of the process. No previous governor has ever been impeached.

Bentley didn’t cooperate with the legislature’s investigation, and has consistently maintained that, whatever you think of all this, he did nothing that was actually illegal. The state’s attorney general, meanwhile, tried to slow down the process last fall shortly before Donald Trump’s election victory. Jeff Sessions’s elevation to the Cabinet opened up a Senate vacancy that Bentley swiftly filled with the attorney general in question.

But long before Bentley resigned on Monday, his situation was clearly impossible. His party’s leaders in both houses of legislature have called on him to step down, and the impeachment process is essentially a political one rather than a legal one. Nobody regards Bentley as an indispensable man in Alabama politics, and he had no realistic chance of beating removal proceedings in the legislature.

In the end, he plead guilty in exchange for not being prosecuted for any felonies — a deal that included, as one provision, an agreement to never again seek public office.

Quote:
Originally posted by DREAMTROVE:
Second,

And Clinton was about Monica Lewinsky. Keep telling yourself that.

It's a matter of determining the president is a traitor first. Then you get momentum for impeachment. But first you need a term of bad. Otherwise, you're just upending democracy.

WACO, Rwanda, Yugoslavia, all horrid CLinton decisions that led to impeachment. Those were the original impeachment items. Then they were replaced by Monica, which was a technicality from Linda Tripp who wasn't trying to impeach the president, she was trying to get Hillary arrested for the murder of Vince Foster.

Thing is, the deep state doesn't want to openly oppose the war, because they want to keep fighting it when someone new comes in. They don't want the public talking about it, or the public will say why fight the war at all? rather than how we should fight it.

So, it was Cambodia, and not getting out of Vietnam and to some extent the 18 voting age. They were unhappy. Watergate itself was probably a set-up.

Nick, whatever, you're a sockpuppet.

DREAMTROVE

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:36 AM

Nick,

You've become a tiresome troll.

Quote:
it is you who projects your weaknesses onto others.

lol

Quote:
I intend to ~~keep~~ troll

Fixed that for ya.

Quote:
How moronic is it that you imply I should absorb someone else's identity

Why on earth do you pretend to be not Nick then?

Quote:
I quote you " Why dodge the sockpuppet thing?"

I didn't, now, did I?

Quote:
Meanwhile, through you delusion you assign me credibility because you believe me to be Nick.

Lol, Nick.

Quote:
"Yet you prepared yourself to troll. Your subconscious knew it."

Yeah, you did.

Quote:
Don't look now dreatrove/sockpuppet/1kiki

Lol. You're a dick. I'm not 1kiki. If you said Sig was 1kiki I couldn't disprove it.

I think if I were 1kiki, I would have already known who you were, isn't that logical? No way would the me that is hypothetically 1kiki have had the patience (no offense 1kiki) to hold out knowing who you were through all of that trolling. One of many points on which I'm not 1kiki. you actually don't have any logical basis to deduce that I am 1kiki, other than some of my political points of view are not that different than 1kiki. And most of the population. That's pretty weak.

Quote:
G was right, you are entertaining.

Lol. G is often right.

1KIKI

Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:36 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
You just described

... blah blah blah

lol