TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 89 of 170
There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.
hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.
hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.
And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.
But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
FYI: TRUMP'S FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE (FULL SPEECH)
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What!? I'm agreeing with you, you Silly Billy!
Bombs away I say. You win the bet! We'll be speaking Russian inside of 2 years......all because we wouldn't listen to you and Sig about Hillary. You were right all along.........oh, the HORROR!!!
SGG, the meek and shameful!
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
sgg
I have bets with people at work that we and Russia will be shooting at each other within a year. (Let's not count the fact that the US already bombed and strafed the Syrian army for over an hour despite calls to US command, so Russia bombed a 'secret' US outpost in Syria in retaliation.)*
*And what's with the US keeping all this a 'secret', anyway? The Russians know, and our fearless leaders know they know. It's not like putting that information out there is going to be a tactical advantage or disadvantage for anybody. Why are us poor schmucks, the people, the only ones left in the dark?
Meanwhile you can keep on ignoring hillary's results of abysmal failure in every military adventure she supported Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Syria. Hail saint hillary the perfect!
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki, if you really were correct then Obama also had "zero power" during the last 4 years. You might want to back off of that claim of "zero". It makes you sound like a drunken Republican celebrating how the GOP will ruin the Democrats despite Trump losing.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible.
As a practical matter, Paul Ryan decided what laws Obama got to sign for the last year. Before Ryan, it was John Boehner deciding.
Should Hillary die in office, the second person in line to replace her is Speaker of the House Paul Ryan. Should Hillary live, it will still be up to Ryan to make a choice about how to govern the USA. Will it just be the usual obstruction of Hillary, same as Ryan did to Obama? Or will he take the GOP back from the hostage-happy tea partiers and team up with Republican moderates and with Democrats to occasionally pass a few important bills that might revive the GOP's fortunes? We will soon know which kind of co-leaders of the USA Paul Ryan and Hillary will be.
The suspense is how many Republicans will Trump defeat.
www.gocomics.com/tomtoles/2016/10/21
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump vows to sue all his female accusers!
Trump's revenge message overshadows otherwise substantive speech.
Trump didn’t say what kind of lawsuits he planned to file against the women, but any libel litigation could be complicated by the fact that Trump, in the 2005 recording, bragged about the same kind of conduct the women now accuse him of perpetrating. Trump recently vowed to sue the New York Times for libel, but has not yet followed through on the threat.
www.boston.com/news/politics/2016/10/22/trump-vowing-to-sue-every-one-
of-his-female-accusers
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Sunday the choice offered to voters in the U.S. presidential election was between "bad and worse" and that harsh exchanges in the debates pointed to a lack of morality in America, Tehran's arch adversary.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
No, I don't. And thanks for lying about me - AGAIN.
Meanwhile, I'll keep posting until someone addresses my points - one of which isn't 'what' but HOW. HOW is hillary going to get all her promises through a republican Congress?
As for addressing what * I * posted, instead of the voices in your head, YOU have failed to do so at every opportunity.
"America claims it has more than 200 years of democracy, and they have had 50 presidential elections, but there is no morality in that country," Rouhani said in a speech, carried live by state television.
"You saw the presidential debates, how they talk..., how they accuse and mock (each other)," Rouhani told a crowd gathered at a stadium during his visit to the central city of Arak.
Rouhani said a head of state had asked him during his visit to the United Nations in September about who he preferred between Republican candidate Donald Trump and his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
"I said should I prefer bad over worse or worse over bad?," said Rouhani, a pragmatist politician and cleric who may run for reelection in Iran's presidential polls in May 2017.
He did not say to which candidate his descriptions referred.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-iran-idUSKCN12N0G0
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Tom Hanks, playing the Fox News anchor and debate moderator Chris Wallace, introduced Saturday Night Live‘s spoof of the third US presidential debate as “a lot like the third Lord of the Rings movie—you don’t really want to watch, but you’ve come this far.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
1kiki, if you really were correct then Obama also had "zero power" during the last 4 years. You might want to back off of that claim of "zero". It makes you sound like a drunken Republican celebrating how the GOP will ruin the Democrats despite Trump losing.
As a practical matter, Paul Ryan decided what laws Obama got to sign for the last year. Before Ryan, it was John Boehner deciding.
This points up the power that a President really DOES have, even with a recalcitrant Congress. So, what did Obama (or maybe it was Hillary) accomplish in his last six years? He (and Hillary) managed to ...
1) Engineer a coup in the Ukraine
2) Instigate sanctions on Russia, creating further stresses on EU economies
3) Destroy Libya
4) Break Sudan into two pieces, creating two failed states out of one
5) Drone Yemen into instability, and support Saudi Arabia's invasion
6) Instigate a proxy was against Assad, using radical Muslim extremists as tools
7) Negotiate trade deals TTIP and TTP
8) Participate in a climate change negotiation
9) Support a Honduran coup
10) Drag his feet in Keystone XL
11) Create a marine sanctuary off Hawaii
12) Piss off Philippine President Duterte
13) Complete the monstrous data storage center in Utah, which contains the emails, texts, phone calls and tweets of hundreds of millions of average Americans
14) Signed more (combined) Executive orders and "Presidential Memoranda" than any other President, including Truman, who up until Obama took the record.
http://moneymorning.com/2016/01/06/president-obama-is-the-most-controv
ersial-executive-action-user-in-u-s-history-heres-why/
15) Sent more troops back into Iraq
16) Failed to stem the wealth gap
I should really look into those Executive Orders and Presidential Memoranda. But the list of Obama's "accomplishments" actually demonstrates my previous point:
The President's power resides PRIMARILY in the realm of "foreign policy", including negotiated treaties, trade agreements, and partnerships, military intervention and covert action. Exactly the place I don't want Hillary to be.
And where Hillary might do some good - domestic policy- she doesn't have much authority. I made this point before: It would be an interesting test if Congress turns Democratic. I know, SECOND, that you objected to this point because of the possibility of minority Senate Republicans filibustering everything. But you contradicted yourself, because even you yourself said that the filibuster COULD be done away with by a simple majority vote. So if Senatorial Democrats were truly hard-nosed, they could get their way. This would be a test, not only of Hillary's commitment to the American people, but also a test of the Democratic Senators' commitment.
Now, with that kind of legislative and executive power - like 2008 to 2011- the Democrats could choose to accomplish a lot. And if they made a real difference in the lives of everyday Americans they would ensure their hold on power for the foreseeable future. But like in 2008-2011, my bet s that they'd scurry from responsibility, like cockroaches when the light is turned on, because nobody but nobody wants to bite the hand that feeds them contributions, neither Democrats nor Republicans.
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, some points from Trump's speech (and no, it's not just suing the women who accused him, as SECOND lied.)
Term limits for Congress
Prohibit the additional consolidation of media as being too anti-competitive
5-year prohibition on leaving office and going to work as a lobbyist, and a lifetime ban on leaving office and then representing a foreign nation
Simplifying and changing the tax law
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"1kiki, if you really were correct then Obama also had "zero power""
YOU EFFING LIAR!!!
MAYBE IF I MAKE IT BIG ENOUGH, BOLD, ENOUGH, ITALIC ENOUGH, RED ENOUGH, CAPITAL ENOUGH, UNDERLINED ENOUGH
YOU'LL FINALLY FUCKING STOP LYING ABOUT WHAT I'VE BEEN POSTING ALL ALONG
THERE ARE ONLY TWO - TWO - 2 - DOS - DUEX - DWA - EK - THINGS hillary WILL BE ABLE TO DO.
Trade deals, and provoke Russia.
Got it, now? Or are you so FUCKING dishonest you'll pretend to not understand it NOW?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME