Soros, hacked

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, August 26, 2016 17:26
VIEWED: 15466
PAGE 1 of 1

SIGNYM

Monday, August 15, 2016 7:57 PM

It must be the Russians again.

Quote:
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.

http://soros.dcleaks.com/

REAVERFAN

Monday, August 15, 2016 11:40 PM

Here's some more reichwing misdirection trying to make Soros some kind of Koch-style manipulator.

Sorry, it doesn't add up. When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.

THGRRI

Monday, August 15, 2016 11:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
It must be the Russians again.

Again SIG is protecting the Russians. Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia. Yet SIG defends the Russians insinuating our FBI is lying

FBI Confirms Investigation Into Massive Hack of DNC

http://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-confirms-investigation-massive-hack-dnc/s
tory?id=40855489
____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:13 AM

Quote:
The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers

so the FBI is investigating the hack to find out who did it

Quote:
which [some]sources

Who? Not the FBI

Quote:
and [some] experts

Who? I have read "some" experts say it was, and other experts (such as James Clapper) who tell people to stop hyperventilating. It is extremely difficult, according to MY expert, to determine who hacked what, as it is also extremely easy to spoof a source (i.e. put in information that points to another source, not the real one).

Quote:
say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.

Uh huh.

Dood, you're a one-man McCarthy Commission, aren't you?

Stop hyperventilating.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

1KIKI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:23 AM

Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia.

Acutally - no.

So once again THUGGR proves himself an illiterate idiot! The article says the FBI merely confirms it's investigating the hack.
The people who say it's the Russians are NOT the FBI.

The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers, which sources and experts (NOTE: NOT the FBI) say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.

Not only did the hack apparently allow the cyber operatives to steal opposition research on Republican nominee Donald Trump, but also, many suspect, it led to the theft of internal messages that show efforts by DNC officials to undermine Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders during the primary season. Those damaging emails have since been released by WikiLeaks, agitating Sanders supporters at the start of the Democratic convention in Philadelphia and prompting DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to tender her resignation, effective at the end of the week.

"The FBI is investigating a cyber intrusion involving the DNC and are working to determine the nature and scope of the matter," the FBI said in a statement today. "A compromise of this nature is something we take very seriously, and the FBI will continue to investigate and hold accountable those who pose a threat in cyberspace."

For weeks, the FBI had been unwilling to confirm it was looking into the hack — or even that such a hack had taken place, as The Washington Post first reported in June.

Nevertheless, a cybersecurity firm (NOTE: NOT the FBI) working with the DNC spoke extensively at the time about how the DNC was hacked by "two separate Russian intelligence agencies."

Dmitri Alperovitch, a co-founder of firm CrowdStrike (NOTE: NOT the FBI) , told ABC News in June he knew "definitively" that the GRU, Russia's military intelligence agency, was behind the cyber attack and that he was "less confident in but [had] reason to believe" Russia's Federal Security Service also took part. A Russian Embassy spokesman denied the allegations.

The hackers were "looking for opposition research on Trump and his campaign" and "they did take opposition research on Trump," Alperovitch said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) at the time.

"This also shows you espionage has now moved off the just physical realm of recruiting spies and getting information. It's now through cyber means. This is a traditional target of Russian intelligence for 100 years but now doing it for cyber," he said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) , referring to U.S. candidates and campaigns. "I would say this is not surprising at all. This is what intelligence agencies" want to get.

He said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) that the DNC is "absolutely" safer now and that CrowdStrike did a full remediation and "kicked out both adversaries." He added that CrowdStrike installed software because the firm "expect[s] for them to come back."

"Russian intelligence's interest in the U.S. political system will not cease. It will only intensify, and there will be ongoing attempts to hack into the network going forward," Alperovitch said (NOTE: NOT the FBI) .

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as c

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:58 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by G:
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
It must be the Russians again.

Quote:
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.

http://soros.dcleaks.com/

Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.

Russian no doubt G. I suggest people should be very careful when following any of SIG's and 1KIKI's links.

That said SIG, my post shows that you and 1kiki as always, come down on the side of Russia. After all, my claim is that the two of you are Russian trolls. By using your own posts I show your unflappable defense of Russia which proves my point.

Get it

____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:36 AM

Quote:
Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.

Fortunately, I have excellent security on my net. So I will boldly go in your stead. (BTW, you have more to fear from google.)

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Brilliant - a site about hacking that wants you to download something to your computer.
Fortunately, I have excellent security on my net. So I will boldly go in your stead. (BTW, you have more to fear from google.)

Of course SIG I am sure the G.R.U., Russia’s military intelligence service has great security.

You're such an ass
____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:24 AM

Quote:
When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:
When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.

So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:36 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:
When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.

So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

I would answer this post like this SIG.

Why Russia buys Putin’s lies

MOSCOW — The outside world knows Russian-backed militants shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, using missiles supplied by Moscow, even if few leaders are yet willing to say outright that Vladimir Putin has blood on his hands (again).

But the Russian public is happy to buy Putin’s lies.

“It’s obvious the Ukrainians did this, the separatists don’t have the weaponry or the ability to shoot down aircraft at that altitude,” a partner at a major law firm told me.

Never mind that the “separatists” had shot down at least two Ukrainian planes in the week before, or that the Ukrainians had no reason to shoot at any plane because the militants have no airpower.

Then there’s an economist at the Ministry of Finance: “The Ukrainians are fascists, of course they’re responsible.”

One university professor was a bit more honest: “You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

In the outside world, people know the “rebels” have done all they could to impede any impartial investigation even seizing the bodies of the 298 innocent victims, and that the missile launchers were quickly pulled back into Russia after the atrocity.

But this is a schizophrenic society. People distrust their own government, but they distrust and hate foreigners even more. Many understand that Russia is probably responsible, but they’ll never admit it; it’s not a society given to self-criticism or honesty.

http://nypost.com/2014/07/21/why-russia-buys-putins-lies/

Perhaps your and 1kiki's thread development and lying posts is a sick attempt to justify your following Putin. Maybe what you are doing by constantly digging up dirt on the WEST is a kind of therapy for you. So you can say to yourselves, see we ( Russia ) ain't so bad.

____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 6:10 AM

Quote:
When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.-REAVERFAN

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:
When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.

So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs/

I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.-REAVERFAN

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:
When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.

So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs/

I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

OH, I'm crushed. Didn't you like my comment to this post when you posted this above? I'm absolutely besides myself.

____________________________________________

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by G:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

Don't we know it!

Yep, we witness it here every damn day.

____________________________________________

1KIKI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 8:37 AM

Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians ..."

You are???!!!

I thought you were Estonian. Though Russia, Estonian. It's all the same. Right?

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
“You don’t understand. We’re Russians ..."

You are???!!!

I thought you were Estonian. Though Russia, Estonian. It's all the same. Right?

“You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

No, but we know you sure are don't we. You know that's G quoting a Russian professor. It sure does catch the essence of you and SIG. Don't it comrade..
____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:02 PM

Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:19 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!

No ass, it's because you keep defending every thing Russia does. And it doesn't matter how bad it is. If you were American as you claim, there's no way you would do that. It's like the Russian professor says and I quote “You don’t understand. We’re Russians, we will never admit guilt to outsiders, especially to Americans. Even if we know we’re guilty.”

Yet you and 1kiki constantly bash America while defending Russia. No American would ever do that. It's a dead give away. Simply to most but apparently way over your head comrade.

As I have said many times. You two ain't that bright. You think you are but all you do is cut and paste. Most times your comments don't support what you have pasted. This is why your arguments get picked apart and destroyed by the other posters here. Again simple, you are dishonest and easy to expose as such.

____________________________________________

THGRRI

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

Because you are Russian or a Russian sympathizer you will never get Americans. What you are claiming as American traits doesn't hold up in the land of the free. You know, the place Russians risked life and limb to defect to.

No SIG this represents a people who signs over their freedoms to a supreme leader. Russia SIG, this type of thinking represents Russia

____________________________________________

REAVERFAN

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:50 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
When he spends almost a billion to sway the elections, there'll be some comparison. Until then, there isn't.

Here is an exact and direct comparison between the Koch Bros and Soros spending in the USA. While the Koch Bros do outspend Soros (within the USA) the difference in not "orders of magnitude", both spend mid-double-digit millions of dollars.

Quote:
When it comes to the combination of institutional lobbying, 527 group donations and PAC expenditures, Koch Industries far out-spends Soros’ hedge fund and think tank, $57.4 million to $12.8 million. Most of this money is attributable to lobbying expenditures.

Soros and the Koch brothers have all donated to federal political campaigns and committees. While Soros has far out-spent the Koch brothers in donating to 527 groups, especially when considering his incredible $23.7 million in donations to the groups between 2003 and 2004, the Koch brothers have donated more money to federal candidates and committees.

The Koch brothers give almost exclusively to Republicans just as Soros donates predominately to Democrats and Democratic organizations. Overall, Soros has spent $34.24 million and the Kochs have spent $4.06 million.

So, Koch Bros spent $57.4+$4.0 = $61.4.
Soros spent $12.8+$34.2 = $47.0
About the same

Soros, OTOH, spends a lot of money to influence elections outside of the USA, and on Dem foreign policy, something that the Koch Bros don't do. (They spend on USA energy policy)

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/09/opensecrets-battle-koch-brothe
rs/

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

Wrong. The Kochs spend way more money than that. You're ignoring the dozens of groups they're behind that DON'T use their name.

They literally buy governments. Look at Kansas or Indiana. Look at ALEC.

Very dishonest of you.

AURAPTOR

Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:13 AM

Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, August 19, 2016 5:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yup, they're Russians! It must be true, because they keep denying it!

I think maybe G and Thuggery should prove to us that Kiki and Siggy are Russians.

They can do so this way:
With hands and feet bound and concrete shoes, they shall jump into a raging river. If they float to the top and stay afloat, they are proven correct and Kiki and Siggy are proven to be Russian. If, however, G and Thuggery do not surface for 2 hours, then their claims are proven false and we will all know that Kiki and Siggy are not Russians.

SIGNYM

Saturday, August 20, 2016 7:30 PM

Quote:
Wrong. The Kochs spend way more money than that. You're ignoring the dozens of groups they're behind that DON'T use their name.

Uh huh

So, speaking of George Soros' PAID TROLLS ....

Quote:
In one document entitled: “Open Society Initiative For Europe (OSIFE). Mapping the Ukrainian debate in Greece” ... Soros offers a consultant a remuneration of $6,500 (gross) for “at least 15 full working days in carrying out this task” plus all expenses paid.

The aim of this task:

The consultant is expected to chart the main players in the Greek debate on Ukraine, outline the key arguments and their evolution in the past 18 months. Specifically, the report will take stock of any existing polling evidence provide a ‘who is who?’ with information about at least
– 6 newspapers,
– 10 audiovisual outlets (TV and radio),
– 6 internet sites,
– About 50 opinion leaders and trends in social networks[1].

Categorize the main strains of discussion and eventually identify different sides / camps of the discussion.

Provide a brief account of how Russia has tried to influence the Greek debate on Ukraine through domestic actors and outlets

Include a section with recommendations on
– What are the spaces OSF should engage and would most likely to have impact?
– What are the voices (of reason or doubt) that should be amplified?

Open Society Initiative For Europe (OSIFE) selected Iannis Carras for the Greek media mapping grant. The justification why he was chosen…

All contracts were for the same amount. We needed to find highly specialized researchers to map the debate on Ukraine in Europe, therefore we identified a shortlist of candidates in consultation with colleagues in the Think Tank Fund, OSEPI and in consultation with members of the OSIFE board and chose the most qualified who could produce the report in the time allowed. In the case of Greece we agreed that Iannis Carras, an economic and social historian of Balkan and Russian relations with expert knowledge of Greece’s NGOs and social movements, was the best suited to the task.

What is even more interesting is not the grant from OSIFE, but a letter from grant winner Carras to a person named Mathew (another Greek speaker???), outlining his plan in detail for pushing Soros’ Ukraine agenda in Greece.

I guess Carras was George Soros' paid troll.

Quote:
Of significance is how Carras tells Mathew about Greek society’s overall suspicion of The Open Society after the roll in played in seeding unrest in Yugoslavia. Carras even tells Mathew to not mention The Open Society in Greece.

“Do you want your name to appear alongside mine on the paper? Do make comments on all of the below.

In general, and at your discretion, do not say you are doing this for Open Society because it is likely to close down doors. There’s a lot of suspicion about Open Society in Greece, mainly because of its positions vis-à-vis the former Yugoslavia. As I am simultaneously writing an article for Aspen Review Eastern Europe that can be used as the organisation for which research like this is taking place.”

Working for an organization that needs to remain hidden because of the wide distrust it evokes in the target population.

Quote:
Carras then goes on to outline his approach in manipulating Greek society, covering topics such as:

1. Media.
2. Political parties and think tanks
3. Opinion polls.
4. Business relations.
5. Religious and cultural ties.
6. Migration and diaspora.
7. Greece and Ukraine in the context of Greece’s economic crisis.
8. Greece, Ukraine and the Cyprus issue.
9. Names and brief description of significant actors: a ‘who is who?’ with information on at least 50 opinion leaders

Carras notes how Russia has much goodwill in Greece, exercising “signifiant soft power”. Carras notes that Greece is, at this moment, a weak player in the Ukraine debate and the Greek Foreign Minister Ko

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

SIGNYM

Sunday, August 21, 2016 5:27 PM

GEORGE SOROS AND HIS FAMILY ARE MAJORS DONOR TO HILLARY CLINTON. HE SPENDS A LOT OF MONEY TO INFLUENCE POLITICS ABROAD.

Leaked Memo Proves Soros Ruled Ukraine In 2014: Minutes From "Breakfast With US Ambassador Pyatt"

Quote:
We noted in a previous post how important Ukraine was to George Soros, with documents from DC Leaks that show Soros, and his Open Society NGO, scouring the Greek media and political landscape to push the benefits of his Ukraine coup upon a Russian leaning Greek society.

Now more documents, in the massive 2,500 leaked tranche, show the immense power and control Soros had over Ukraine immediately following the illegal Maidan government overthrow.

Soros and his NGO executives held detailed and extensive meetings with just about every actor involved in the Maidan coup: from US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, to Ukraine’s Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Justice, Health, and Education.

The only person missing was Victoria Nuland, though we are sure those meeting minutes are waiting to see the light of day.

Plans to subvert and undermine Russian influence and cultural ties to Ukraine are a central focus of every conversation. US hard power, and EU soft power, is central towards bringing Ukraine into the neo-liberal model that Soros champions, while bringing Russia to its economic knees.

Soros' NGO, International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) plays a key role in the formation of the “New Ukraine”…the term Soros frequently uses when referring to his Ukraine project.

In a document titled, "Breakfast with US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt", George Soros, (aka GS), discusses Ukraine’s future with: ...

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

SIGNYM

Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:39 PM

These are the top two results from a websearch Soros+ NGO+spending.

Without attempting to pursue whether the individual organizations are beneficial to Americans' interests or not, these lists are intended to show that George Soros spends considerable money on politics both inside and outside of the USA. I truncated the descriptions significantly, but it you want to know more you can go to the original website.

Quote:
Organizations that, in recent years, have received direct funding and assistance from George Soros and his Open Society Foundations (OSF) include the following. (Comprehensive profiles of each are available in the "Groups" section of DiscoverTheNetworks.org):

Advancement Project: This organization works to organize "communities of color"

Air America Radio: Now defunct, this was a self-identified "liberal" radio network.

Al-Haq: This NGO produces highly politicized reports, papers, books, and legal analyses regarding alleged Israeli human-rights abuses committed against Palestinians.

All of Us or None: This organization seeks to change voting laws

Alliance for Justice: Best known for its activism vis a vis the appointment of federal judges, this group consistently depicts Republican judicial nominees as "extremists."

America Coming Together: Soros played a major role in creating this group, whose purpose was to coordinate and organize pro-Democrat voter-mobilization programs.

America Votes: Soros also played a major role in creating this group, whose get-out-the-vote campaigns targeted likely Democratic voters.

America's Voice: This open-borders group seeks to promote “comprehensive” immigration reform that includes a robust agenda in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens.

American Bar Association Commission on Immigration Policy: This organization "opposes laws that require employers and persons providing education, health care, or other social services to verify citizenship or immigration status."

American Bridge 21st Century: This Super PAC conducts opposition research designed to help Democratic political candidates defeat their Republican foes.

American Civil Liberties Union: This group opposes virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by the U.S. government.

American Constitution Society for Law and Policy: This Washington, DC-based think tank seeks to move American jurisprudence to the left by recruiting, indoctrinating, and mobilizing young law students

American Family Voices: This group creates and coordinates media campaigns charging Republicans with wrongdoing.

American Federation of Teachers: ...

American Friends Service Committee: This group views the United States as the principal cause of human suffering around the world.

American Immigration Council: This non-profit organization is a prominent member of the open-borders lobby.

American Immigration Law Foundation: This group supports amnesty for illegal aliens, on whose behalf it litigates against the U.S. government.

American Independent News Network: This organization promotes "impact journalism" that advocates progressive change.

American Institute for Social Justice: AISJ's goal is to produce skilled community organizers who can “transform poor communities” by agitating for increased government spending on city services, drug interdiction, crime prevention, housing, public-sector jobs, access to healthcare, and public schools.

American Library Association: This group has been an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's War on Terror -- most particularly, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, which it calls "a present danger to the constitutional rights and privacy rights of library users."

The American Prospect, Inc.: This corporation trains and mentors young leftwing journalists, and organizes strategy meetings for leftist leaders.

Amnesty International: This organization directs a grossly disproportionate share of its criticism for human rights violations at

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

REAVERFAN

Sunday, August 21, 2016 9:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.

I'm still waiting for you to make any assertion that's even remotely true.

SIGNYM

Sunday, August 21, 2016 9:31 PM

Quote:
Soros probably outspends the Kochs 100 to 1. It's not even close. He's beyond courrpt.- RAPPY

I'm still waiting for you to make any assertion that's even remotely true. = REAVER

And YOUR assertion that the Koch Bros spent "a billion" dollars on politics, and that Soros is far, far behind them is also not even remotely true.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/koch-brothers-george-soros-fear/

The Kock Bros spend on lobbying, on organizations like ALEC. Soros spends on PACs and activist groups and media outlets. The Koch Bros spend nationally. Soros spends nationally, but he also spends internationally.

Erase from your worldview the concept that the Koch Bros are some sort of mysterious giant force of USA politics, and that George Soros is just a strange little old man who made his money by breaking the bank of England and precipitating the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and speculating against the Malaysian ringit.

The reality is that they both wield tremendous influence, the Koch Bros in the Republican Party and Soros in the Democratic party, and -in addition, because of his foreign background- Soros also has strong influence on Democratic foreign policy and on immigration issues.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Monday, August 22, 2016 1:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
The FBI has acknowledged that it is investigating a massive breach of the Democratic National Committee's computers
so the FBI is investigating the hack to find out who did it

Quote:
which [some]sources
Who? Not the FBI

Quote:
and [some] experts
Who? I have read "some" experts say it was, and other experts (such as James Clapper) who tell people to stop hyperventilating. It is extremely difficult, according to MY expert, to determine who hacked what, as it is also extremely easy to spoof a source (i.e. put in information that points to another source, not the real one).

Quote:
say was likely the work of government hackers in Russia.
Uh huh.

Dood, you're a one-man McCarthy Commission, aren't you?

Stop hyperventilating.

They have said it has been traced back to a Russian government address because the addresses match another older hack they successfully tracked back.

____________________________________________

SIGNYM

Monday, August 22, 2016 2:02 AM

Quote:
They have said it has been traced back to a Russian government address because the addresses match another older hack they successfully tracked back.

Ah, the infamous "they".

"They" who? An official statement by the FBI? Someone who is claiming to speak for the FBI? Someone else?

Links, please.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

SIGNYM

Monday, August 22, 2016 7:14 PM

Oh wow, look. The Troll has gone home.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

THGRRI

Tuesday, August 23, 2016 2:39 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh wow, look. The Troll has gone home.

Actually it trolls and we are still waiting. When's the happy day comrade?

____________________________________________

1KIKI

Tuesday, August 23, 2016 6:52 AM

Ah, the infamous "they".

"They" who? An official statement by the FBI? Someone who is claiming to speak for the FBI? Someone else? NOT the FBI, or anyone speaking for them. The only thing the FBI confirmed was that they were looking into it.

In fact James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence said this:

Responding to the DNC-Russian furor in a more blasé and introspective manner than might be expected, Clapper stepped in as a calm voice of reason stating that he was "somewhat taken aback by the hyperventilation on this” and that the US was in “reactionary mode” regarding cyber-attacks. Clapper further indicated he was ‘not ready’ to identify Russia as the hacker “I don’t think we are quite ready yet to make a call on attribution.”

Meanwhile, THUGGR, after being proven wrong over this Our FBI confirms the hacks of the DNC come from Russia (he completely fabricated that), has been reduced to insinuating that it's an official finding. It's not. That presumption came from Crowdstrike. But I couldn't find any other responsible source that echoed that assertion. Crowdstrike looks to be all alone out there with this.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

SIGNYM

Friday, August 26, 2016 5:26 PM

Another USA group paid by Soros' "Open Society Foundation": Ultra Violet

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.