Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria
POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Monday, September 8, 2025 15:48
VIEWED: 105502
PAGE 21 of 87
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Troll, much?
Nope, not at all. We leave that to you and SIG.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Troll, much?
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey 1kiki
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by G:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is why I'm not participating in this thread anymore:
1) It started out biased, like "Russian Invasion of Ukraine". If there was a thread about "WAR CRIMES IN SYRIA" - of which there are a-plenty - that would be more informative. But KPO - being the anti-Russian troll that he is - zeros right in on every presumed Russian infraction, and ignores proven ones like the ones ISIL is committing right now.
Dearie - see the thread title - no ISIL.
And major BS on your part - you're not "participating" (even though you are) because you made a grandiose horse-sh*t statement that you couldn't back up:
SIGNYM: "When I have more time, I'll detail every fact that you denied (because it came from a source that you didn't "like", especially me) that you later thought was "objective"."
And I responded because I knew you were full of it: "I can't freakin' wait! It's going to be great to see how you twist my words to make your point! Half the time you confuse what poster said what! Please tell me we expect your favorite habit of presuming the negative from a statement! So even if someone didn't say something you will say they were obviously thinking it?! Ha! It always makes you look like a desperate fool but it's worth the laugh."
And now you're feigning indignance to weasel out of it - what a pos.Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
3) The thread gets its lifespan by attention. I refuse to pay attention to it from now. All of the time that I might have spent arguing minor points, I spent more productively recovering from surgery and managing my health better, going to a newly-discovered CA-native nursery, starting and re-potting plants, helping build a new computer, trying out new recipes, cleaning up, and being present for my family. What's the point of engaging fully-biased people who even REFUSE to look at a website because it might dirty their ideological skirt hems? After this, I'll refill the hummingbird feeders.
Yes, what's the point of engaging people who disagree with you because it might dirty your ideological skirt hems?Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
5) I've found a much better discussion board- one that isn't filled by ideological trolls, like you three.
Right - no doubt you mean where everyone agrees with you.
Again - thank god, cya bye.
Here you go SIG, this is why we are asking you why you are still here. While you do mention leaving this thread you expand upon that and imply you are leaving altogether because you've found a "better discussion board."
By the way. Check out your paragraph labeled 3. First sentence at the end. It should be ( from now on ) not from now. Hey tell 1kiki that's three corrections just today. Let her know I was right when I said I could correct your writings time and time again.
So I ask you, why are you still here?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Troll, much?
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
New Amnesty International report - Russia and Assad have deliberately targeted hospitals:
Quote:
Russian and Syrian government forces appear to have deliberately and systematically targeted hospitals and other medical facilities over the last three months to pave the way for ground forces to advance on northern Aleppo, an examination of airstrikes by Amnesty International has found.
Even as Syria’s current fragile ceasefire deal was being hammered out, Syrian government forces and their allies intensified their attacks on medical facilities.
Amnesty has gathered compelling evidence of at least six deliberate attacks on hospitals, medical centres and clinics in the northern part of the Aleppo Countryside governorate in the past 12 weeks. The attacks, which killed at least three civilians including a medical worker, and injured 44 more, continue a pattern of targeting health facilities in various parts of Syria which amounts to war crimes.
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/syrian-and-russian-forces-ha
ve-deliberately-targeted-hospitals-near-aleppo
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"That must be all that accuracy we keep hearing about."
"... and Syrian government forces ..."
Yes, nothing like accuracy in reporting, where they don't mention if these were SRA air strikes or Russian air strikes, because it's all the same thing anyway.
It must all be Russia's fault.
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"During the last week of January, Syrian government forces supported by Russian airstrikes began a ground offensive in the northern part of the Aleppo Countryside governorate to break the siege imposed by armed groups on the towns of Nubul and Zahraa."
The quote above is the only reference specifically to Russian airstrikes. But there's nothing in that quote about airstrikes on hospitals or medical facilities that the article claims to be addressing.
It always alerts me when articles are weasel-worded to IMPLY something to the careless or biased reader such as yourself, without actually saying it. Maybe they got wise to the fact that astute people were noticing the lack of evidence for their claims. Maybe they had to switch to less obvious tactics to keep the anti-Russian agenda going.
In any case, you won't find a single - not one - claim of specifically Russian airstrikes targeting the places they claim were targeted. Which is a glaringly obvious omission for an article you seem to think is about those bad Russians targeting civilians.
And, in your haste to draw your pre-formed conclusions, you missed the most important message in the story - the siege was imposed by the terrorist groups that the Russians and Syrians are fighting against. "During the last week of January, Syrian government forces supported by Russian airstrikes began a ground offensive in the northern part of the Aleppo Countryside governorate to break the siege imposed by armed groups on the towns of Nubul and Zahraa."
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"That must be all that accuracy we keep hearing about."
"... and Syrian government forces ..."
Yes, nothing like accuracy in reporting, where they don't mention if these were SRA air strikes or Russian air strikes, because it's all the same thing anyway.
It must all be Russia's fault.
Anyone keeping score? Here is another example of 1kiki defending Russia at the expense of the truth. 1kiki a compulsive and impulsive liar, lies on a regular basis and is unable to control her lying despite foreseeing inevitable negative consequences. One of those consequences are the rest of us pointing out the truth which leaves her looking like an ignorant ass.
As we have seen. Each sentence she writes in her posts misrepresents the facts, which is answered with the truth by G and KPO and makes her look.........fill in the blank.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
"That must be all that accuracy we keep hearing about."
"... and Syrian government forces ..."
Yes, nothing like accuracy in reporting, where they don't mention if these were SRA air strikes or Russian air strikes, because it's all the same thing anyway.
It must all be Russia's fault.
Dimwit, who said it was "all Russia's fault"? Check the title of the thread - "Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria"
And as for Amnesty not saying whether Russia or Assad who was responsible, no, they clearly say it was BOTH:
"Russian and Syrian government forces appear to have deliberately and systematically targeted hospitals and other medical facilities over the last three months..."
“Syrian and Russian forces have been deliberately attacking health facilities in flagrant violation of international humanitarian law. But what is truly egregious is that wiping out hospitals appears to have become part of their military strategy..."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME