Hey Second, I was right again you dumb shit
POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 10:32
VIEWED: 2421
PAGE 3 of 4
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Eight decades later, Congress and the states agreed to add a new restriction: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, says those seeking to hold federal and state offices who have previously taken an oath to support the Constitution may not have attemped to subvert or overthrow the Constitution.
Well that would bar half of the Democratic party from ever running again after what they've done over the last 7 years.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The media collective is going to whine like bitches about this for a week or two, then they're going to stop talking about it altogether and hope that everybody forgets about it by the election.
SPOILER ALERT: Their viewers, the Democrat cultists and the Pink Haired Potbelly Cancel Pig Troll Brigade on Twitter are going to forget all about it by the election. In fact, some of them a month from now would tell you that it never even happened if you asked them about it.
But the rest of us?
We will never forget.
Whoopie Goldberg and the View gals along with Rachel Maddow and Morning Joe are going to bitch and moan about this one for a while, but some Lefty shills are already trying to make people forget any of this happened... just as I predicted they would.
SLATE: It’s Past Time to Quit Hoping the Courts Are Going to Stop Trump
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-s-past-time-to-quit-hoping-
the-courts-are-going-to-stop-trump/ar-BB1jlx9b
SPOILER ALERT: They're still doing plenty of whining. 15 paragraphs full of it before they get to the last paragraph to tell YOU to move on, as if it's not all of them that need to move on.

--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This topic has helped the Radical Libtard Propaganda Network (aka MSM) distance itself from NEWS outlets.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Thread formerly titled "Hey Ted, I was right again you dumb shit"
CBS News: Supreme Court says Trump can appear on 2024 ballot, overturning Colorado ruling
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-trump-ballot-eligibility-co
lorado/Quote:9-0, you stupid little bitch. So you whiny little unAmerican cunts can't even complain it was the Conservative stacked court that made this decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said states cannot bar former President Donald Trump from the ballot using a rarely invoked provision of the 14th Amendment, overturning a decision from Colorado's top court and handing the GOP presidential front-runner a victory in an unprecedented case that threatened to derail his bid to return to the White House.
...
Justices Amy Coney Barrett wrote separately to note that all nine justices agree on the outcome of the case, saying "that is the message Americans should take home." The three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, issued an opinion concurring with the judgment, but said the court went too far in dictating "novel rules" for federal enforcement of Section 3.
Maybe now you'll finally stop listening to all the lies the Legacy Media fills your head with everyday.
The 14th Amendment scam was never going to save you.
This could be used as a bell weather subject to ascertain whether a source is A. News, or B. Radical Libtard Propaganda Network. Some other topics might be also suitable for this purpose, but this one seems to hit the nail on the head.
Reasonable folk already knew how these Unconstitutional Rules and Rulings would turn out, albeit not that the 3 Libtards would resort to upholding the Constitution, but Libtard heads are still exploding.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Justices feared assassination if they disqualified Trump. Why risk your life for nothing? Trump will lose in 2024 but he'll be back in 2028, which is perfectly fine with me, a Democrat. When he loses in 2028, the GOP will self-destruct.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Reasonable folk already knew how this would turn out, albeit not that the 3 Libtards would resort to upholding the Constitution, but Libtard heads are still exploding.
The Court Made Its Colorado Decision Out of Fear
This case wasn’t decided on its merits, and the result is an utterly flimsy legal argument.
By George T. Conway III | March 5, 2024, 1:16 PM ET
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/03/supreme-court-colora
do-opinion-trump-disqualify/677646/
You can’t always get what you want. What Mick Jagger said about life applies with equal, perhaps even greater, force to litigation. Like life, litigation has its ups and downs. It reflects human fears and frailties—because judges, lawyers, and litigants are human. Law is never perfect, and never will be.
And so it is with the United States Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. Anderson, which unanimously reversed the Supreme Court of Colorado’s decision barring Donald Trump from the state’s presidential-primary ballot.
Trump’s brazen effort to end constitutional democracy in America should have been the textbook example of the sort of behavior that would lead to someone being barred from holding public office under the Fourteenth Amendment. But it was not to be, and never was to be.
I talked with a lot of people about the Colorado case over the past three months, and I didn’t come across a single person who appeared willing to wager that the Supreme Court would uphold the Colorado decision; even the most fervent advocates for Trump’s disqualification, the ones who believed (as I was ultimately convinced) that the Colorado decision was unimpeachably correct, did not imagine that the Court was likely to agree. My guess is that none of these people thought they had any votes after the argument three weeks ago.
This private pessimism didn’t arise from legal reasoning. It came from an understanding that it was too much to expect this Court, at this time, in this political context, to apply the Constitution the way the Court normally should: by dispassionately looking at the constitutional text, and the historical context, and letting the chips fall where they may. It may be noble-minded for someone like me, sitting in the cheap seats, to incant my favorite Latin legal maxim, Fiat justitia ruat caelum—“Let justice be done though the heavens may fall.” But I don’t hold a lifetime appointment to decide how justice is to be done. And however much I’d like to think that judges really believe—as Justice Samuel Alito claimed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization—that they “cannot allow [their] decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to [their] work,” the fact is that judges are human. Their decisions are affected at times by their perception of what the public reaction may be.
Fewer better examples of that will ever arise than the Court’s decision yesterday. I confess that, going in, I gave the Court a lot more credit than the Court eventually showed itself to be due. I wrote that “the people who think the Court is going to reverse no matter what … may well be right.” I was understating things there, but I was convinced that the justices, in reversing, would come up with a stronger opinion than they ultimately did.
They didn’t, because, frankly, there wasn’t anything stronger. And the Supreme Court’s unsigned per curiam opinion—I can’t blame any of the justices for not wanting to put their name on it—makes that painfully, embarrassingly clear. To be sure, the Court deserves some credit. For instance, and with good reason, it didn’t even mention the Trump lawyers’ prin
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol
I think Second's brain is finally imploding.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I talked with a lot of people about the Colorado case over the past three months, and I didn’t come across a single person who appeared willing to wager that the Supreme Court would uphold the Colorado decision; even the most fervent advocates for Trump’s disqualification, the ones who believed (as I was ultimately convinced) that the Colorado decision was unimpeachably correct, did not imagine that the Court was likely to agree. My guess is that none of these people thought they had any votes after the argument three weeks ago.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
lol
I think Second's brain is finally imploding.
This private pessimism didn’t arise from legal reasoning. It came from an understanding that it was too much to expect this Court, at this time, in this political context, to apply the Constitution the way the Court normally should: by dispassionately looking at the constitutional text, and the historical context, and letting the chips fall where they may. It may be noble-minded for someone like me, sitting in the cheap seats, to incant my favorite Latin legal maxim, Fiat justitia ruat caelum—“Let justice be done though the heavens may fall.” But I don’t hold a lifetime appointment to decide how justice is to be done. And however much I’d like to think that judges really believe—as Justice Samuel Alito claimed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization—that they “cannot allow [their] decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to [their] work,” the fact is that judges are human. Their decisions are affected at times by their perception of what the public reaction may be. (Justices feared assassination if they disqualified Trump. Why risk your life for nothing?)
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Cry, cry, cry, bitch.
What have I ALWAYS told you?
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
Don't go and kill yourself or do anything stupid. 
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:If Trump wins, I can start cheating on my taxes and pay as little as Trump pays in taxes. The Federal debt will then increase faster than the GDP because of other significant taxpayers taking cues from Trump's tax returns, which he will, once again, be keeping a secret from the public, as he did last time.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Cry, cry, cry, bitch.
What have I ALWAYS told you?
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
Don't go and kill yourself or do anything stupid.
From the following graph, notice that the Federal Debt leaped upward under Trump while he was attempting to buy his victory in the 2020 election by increasing spending while not collecting taxes.
Federal Debt: Total Public Debt in Red
Gross Domestic Product in Blue
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1hTTC

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:If Trump wins, I can start cheating on my taxes and pay as little as Trump pays in taxes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Cry, cry, cry, bitch.
What have I ALWAYS told you?
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
Don't go and kill yourself or do anything stupid.
Good to know that the only thing keeping you from cheating is the law.
But we already know that because you're a pirate, a thief and a plagiarist.

--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The only thing holding anybody in line is themselves. We hold ourselves to goals or, as in the case of you and EVERY OTHER TRUMPTARD I HAVE KNOWN, nobody is looking after their best interests or seeing that they achieve any goals at all. It is probably impossible for a Trumptard to understand, which is why they need Trump, so that somebody, certainly not themselves, is looking after them.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:If Trump wins, I can start cheating on my taxes and pay as little as Trump pays in taxes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Cry, cry, cry, bitch.
What have I ALWAYS told you?
Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
Don't go and kill yourself or do anything stupid.
Good to know that the only thing keeping you from cheating is the law.
But we already know that because you're a pirate, a thief and a plagiarist.
For a real-life example, Trump doesn't pay taxes, and nobody can make him. The closest approximation to making Trump do something is by confiscating his property against his loud protests and selling it for back taxes. That has not happened, yet, because of his lawyers. The same thing happened with Trump's mentor, Roy Cohn. Roy didn't pay taxes even to the day he died. Only then did the IRS get paid. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Cohn#Reputation
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
