Some Covid-19 thoughts
POSTED BY: captaincrunch
UPDATED: Monday, September 29, 2025 18:59
VIEWED: 301579
PAGE 5 of 384
Quote:I LIKE that idea! Young people are immortal anyway. Why not let them live like it?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I think I have an answer for the two shit-sandwiches (economy v contagion) that Trump is forced to take a bite of...
Since young people are at much LOWER risk of death (not negligible, still 2X higher than "the flu") why not let THEM out of the cage? People over 50, people with pre-existing conditions should STILL self-isolate, and they should STILL get benefits for #stayingthefuckhome but the younger people can be let loose to take their chances.
Yanno, kind of a reverse isolation: isolate the well, instead of the sick? This might be the "next step" after the swell of sick people flooding the hospitals has peaked and declined.
We won't achieve "herd immunity" that way, since the under-50 only represents 65% of the population (with an Rnaught of somewhere between 2.5 and 7, you need roughly 80-85% infection rate) but at least people like SIX won't be yowling about his freedoms being infringed.
There would need to be all kinds of thought given to health care workers, teachers, etc who would have to regard EVERYONE as potentially infectious, but maybe after the swell has peaked and gone down there might be enough supplies and enough tests at least for teachers etc.
Of course, junior and juniorette would have to isolate themselves from at-risk family members. Maybe that would propel them out of mom's and dad's basements.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#STAYTHEFUCKHOME
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
The unemployment claimz hav spiked way the hell up. They were alredy swamped, so I'm not wasting my time to ask for money wen I probably woudnt get any and still dont need it. Minimize paperwork!
Speaking uv that, I gotta start bending my brain to the task uv doing taxez.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com .
That's a mistake. Especially if you're going to have a hard time finding a job right now.
You absolutely would get it. You were laid off. You have a 100% chance of getting it.
I remember not too long ago you were trying to sell a piece of art you made and said that you might be able to save yourself from foreclosure if you were able to sell it.
I'm not sure if you were just joking about things before, it's really none of my business, and I'm not trying to be a dick here... But you sounded like you were pretty close to the end of your rope before you got that job.
Not only does being laid-off suck balls, but for you it happened at a terrible time because the only jobs that would be available to you right now are "essential" jobs that would put you into constant contact with people who may or may not be infected (if you're worried about that sort of thing). Many of those jobs will not even be making close per-week to what you'd be getting on unemployment now if you filed for it.
If you are too lazy to file for unemployment right now, you're literally throwing away $600/mo. in Federal payouts on top of whatever the fairly generous percentage of your old pay was for the usual 26 weeks and an additional 13 week extension. For at least the first 4 months, I'm going to venture a guess that you would be getting paid more to stay at home than you made working your last job.
Do what you want to do, but for a smart guy you're acting extremely dumb here. The Federal benefits alone that you're choosing to flush down the toilet are $9,600 before taxes. That doesn't even include the 39 weeks of Illinois UI benefits.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I think I have an answer for the two shit-sandwiches (economy v contagion) that Trump is forced to take a bite of...
Since young people are at much LOWER risk of death (not negligible, still 2X higher than "the flu") why not let THEM out of the cage? People over 50, people with pre-existing conditions should STILL self-isolate, and they should STILL get benefits for #stayingthefuckhome but the younger people can be let loose to take their chances.
Yanno, kind of a reverse isolation: isolate the well, instead of the sick? This might be the "next step" after the swell of sick people flooding the hospitals has peaked and declined.
We won't achieve "herd immunity" that way, since the under-50 only represents 65% of the population (with an Rnaught of somewhere between 2.5 and 7, you need roughly 80-85% infection rate) but at least people like SIX won't be yowling about his freedoms being infringed.
There would need to be all kinds of thought given to health care workers, teachers, etc who would have to regard EVERYONE as potentially infectious, but maybe after the swell has peaked and gone down there might be enough supplies and enough tests at least for teachers etc.
Of course, junior and juniorette would have to isolate themselves from at-risk family members. Maybe that would propel them out of mom's and dad's basements.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#STAYTHEFUCKHOME
I'm on board with this.
I'd also say it would make for a great story if it wasn't already the plot of the first season of The 100. (Great Show by the way... maybe I should catch up on that now since I'm a few seasons behind).
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If you’re looking for a longer read: Leading economists have co-authored a free e-book on blunting the Covid-19 economic crisis:
https://voxeu.org/content/mitigating-covid-economic-crisis-act-fast-an
d-do-whatever-it-takes
Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever It Takes
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump is getting exactly what he wants as the crisis drags on. He’s on TV twice per day. He’s got a captive audience. He can say whatever he wants and the news networks will cover it.
And with the shutdown of almost all TV and film production in the face of the coronavirus threat, as well as live sports, it’s not difficult to imagine Trump on TV all the time.
Before the 2016 election, his ultimate goal was to start his own TV news network — one that would be a competitor to Fox News and give him a bigger bullhorn than ever before. He did it! Now he owns ad hoc Trump TV and he did it without investing any money!
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Here's a thought. Especially for anybody who is seriously grabbing their mail with neoprene gloves and letting it chill on the countertop in the sunlight for 3 days before even daring to touch it.
You better have the bottle of bleach ready by the sink and get ready to scrub any items you buy at the grocery store.
Maybe the next guy or gal who pulls this shit isn't going to do you the favor of filming it and putting it up on Twitter, and subsequently getting arrested and charged with "making a terrorist threat of the second degree" and ultimately convicted with a 5 year prison sentence.
You might also want to pinch that loaf when out in public and retreat to the safety of your own shitter while you're at it if you didn't already do that before COVID Fever swept the nation.
#You'reInMyWorldNowKiki
Sweet dreams.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
ETA: Edited on 08/31/2021 to re-upload the videos that the YouTube Nazis took down.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Jeezus, these people are stupid.
SIX, you jumping metaphorically in bed with them doesn't say much for your intelligence, or your state of mind. This is as bad as THUGR. What happened? Did you check your brains at the door?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#STAYTHEFUCKHOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, now for some INTELLIGENT skepticism about the virus.
Quote:My comment: Services to "other" patients aren't being reduced because hospitals are empty, but because hospitals are FULL. It's a little hard to ignore the death rate in some nations, but Bhakdi seems to manage!
Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.
What he says:
We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.
Quote:No, it's not missing. The virus has been sequenced, we didn't have the "same thing" last year. Apparently he hasn't been keeping up with developments!
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology ...
Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.
We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”
That’s missing.
Quote:BUT in Hubei they instituted draconian quarantine and social distancing policies, built 16 pop-up hospitals to treat the sick. The death rate was lowered because of policy, not despite it.
Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University ...
I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.
[…]
I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.
[…]
In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.
Quote:FINALLY! Something I can agree with
Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences...
Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Jeezus, these people are stupid.
SIX, you jumping metaphorically in bed with them doesn't say much for your intelligence, or your state of mind. This is as bad as THUGR. What happened? Did you check your brains at the door?
Yes. They are extremely stupid. And in Wondrous fashion, late-term Millennials and Generation Zed are proving to the world that you don't need a Y chromosome or testosterone to have a monopoly on dumb. Feminism has come full circle.
I'm not behaving any different with Kiki than I have with any other idiot on these boards who decides that it is a good idea to antagonize and/or insult me in every post. Kiki started piling on me long before COVID was a worry in the states because I don't believe that AIDS is real. You can go ahead and look back at post history if you are confused about the timelinie.
I'm not panicking here. My behavior hasn't changed. I'm not going to be washing items I buy or even giving them a second thought when I pick them up at the grocery store.
But I know goddamned well that she will now.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, now for some INTELLIGENT skepticism about the virus.Quote:My comment: Services to "other" patients aren't being reduced because hospitals are empty, but because hospitals are FULL. It's a little hard to ignore the death rate in some nations, but Bhakdi seems to manage!
Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.
What he says:
We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.Quote:No, it's not missing. The virus has been sequenced, we didn't have the "same thing" last year. Apparently he hasn't been keeping up with developments!
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology ...
Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.
We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”
That’s missing.Quote:BUT in Hubei they instituted draconian quarantine and social distancing policies, built 16 pop-up hospitals to treat the sick. The death rate was lowered because of policy, not despite it.
Dr Joel Kettner s professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University ...
I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.
[…]
I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.
[…]
In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.Quote:
Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences...
Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.[/quNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME